I think Indian fans are guilty of looking at batting as executive management, bowling as clerical, and fielding as purely janitorial. I would even go Freudian and relate this obsession with batting to a mass manifestation of penis envy.
Thanks to horrendous bowling, India has once again lost a test series. And once again, only the batsmen are facing the brunt of criticism. It is true that the batsmen didn't do well in Australia and deserve due criticism proportional to the degree of their failure, but does that mean that as always, the bowlers should get away without even a slap on their wrists? It is one thing to expect more from your batting, but it is another thing to completely ignore the other two shamelessly deflated wheels of the car -- the bowling! How can you give away 600+ runs in the first innings and expect your batsmen to win the match? The fact is that Indian cricket will never achieve dominance until the fear of facing their batsmen exceeds the joy of facing their bowlers. Bowling, indeed, is a serious problem, and as fans, it is our responsibility to be no less critical of it than we are of batting.
Here's something to ponder about: Why is it that when a team scores massive amounts of runs against India, all the Indian fans solely credit the thrashing to great batting by the opposition? Why do they passingly express their disappointment at their bowlers here and there, before endlessly feasting on trashing any under-performing batsmen, calling for new ones, and proposing radically new batting orders? Even bowlers from the opposing teams feel ignored every time they cause an infamous Indian batting collapse. The Indian fans get so obsessed with criticizing their batsmen that they leave the poor bowlers from the opposition begging for some well-deserved praise.
Clearly, there is a deeper psyche here that's rooted in a strange obsession with batting. I think Indian fans are guilty of looking at batting as executive management, bowling as clerical, and fielding as purely janitorial. I would even go Freudian and relate this obsession with batting to a mass manifestation of penis envy. Who can deny the charm of a cricket bat as a phallic object, whipping the little slut, lovingly nicknamed “Cherry,” around the ground? Isn't it the phallic bat that batsmen, in the privacy of their locker rooms, oil with pride while fantasizing about banging some Cherries, proudly relishing the strokes formed on the willow as love-bites from past relationships? Even at the pitch, who looks more majestic? Those who run in to serve the boss; or the boss himself, standing majestically in the center of the field, proudly dictating the proceedings with his huge, flashing organ?
Now the question is, who cares about poor Cherry? Yes, that little slut who goes around in everyone's hands, only to be licked, rubbed, and fingered; taking all the abuse while losing its shine as it ages, knowing all the while that it will be tossed aside at any moment, only to be replaced by a fresh, glossy virgin. Well, the simple answer is, no one cares about poor Cherry. So why even expect an aspiring Indian cricketer to dream of becoming a bowler!
MEDIA TACTICS OF SOLDOUT TO POWER MONEY NIL SOCIAL REPONSIBILITY ====================================================== 21inPage-1 by americanultra2000, on Flickr :dry: :dry: :dry:
victims burnto death not even acknowlegement from a sociopsth psychopath totally absent function of frontal lobotomized brain UNAWARE what happened by his slumber genocide in deep sleep
@#2: You are on the ball with your comment. The "on any pitch" and "under any conditions" part of your comment is most critical.
@#1: I agree with you. You need to have bowling strength to win test matches on a consistent basis. However, your comment seems to have thrown spinners out of the equation. We cannot ignore how Bedi, Qadir, Warne, and Murali have won test matches for their teams on several occasions. Ajmal and Rehman were instrumental in the latest series win against England.
Pakistan's ability to produce quality pace bowlers despite their exposure to typical South Asian tracks continues to remain a mystery. But the other mystery is India's recent inability to produce even one attacking spinner. Traditionally, spin has been the core strength of Indian bowling. Lively or flat wickets aside, there is no clear reason why India is still struggling to find an attacking spinner. Even countries like Australia and England, who have traditionally relied on seamers, have stepped up and produced world-class spinners like Warne and Swann.
You need bowlers who can take 20 wickets on any pitch... And batsmen who can score 50+ in any conditions. That is the difference between Steve Waugh's Australia or West Indies of the 80s.... And rest of the world
Bowlers win Test matches. It is an old truism of the game as you must bowl out the opposition twice to win. Indians are used to their batsmen making a ton of runs on flat decks and they thus get inflated averages. India needs to produce green wickets for a generation if they are to produce world class fast bowlers.
The bitter truth is that India has not produced a single great fast bowler in its history despite producing a host of great batsmen.
Interestingly, Pakistan, with almost identical conditions of pitch and climate, has produced a whole line of great fast bowlers (but not as many batsmen); yet because bowlers win matches our overall test record is much better: Imran, Wasim and Waqar would be contenders for any all-time bowling XI and Shoaib is faster than anyone else and would be a shoe-in for most teams. Even second string Pakistani bowler's like Sami and Asif are better than anyone India has produced.
comments / interact
BLoOD OF INNOCENT MINORETIES HOLI BY VT SINGH RAPIST TUNNELS LIKES
ADVANIS PAST DONT DETER THE KILLERS
=========================================
:dry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kQtfX6BaQA :blink: :dry: :huh:
Advani yatra hit by 'cash-for-coverage' scandal
352hd2f by americanultra2000, on Flickr
rath yatra
:angry: :angry:
_55953983_gallery9 by americanultra2000, on Flickr
:angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:
gulmarg jafris house
========================
312032_10150324091333664_520078663_7950878_128992535_n by americanultra2000, on Flickr
MEDIA TACTICS OF SOLDOUT TO POWER MONEY NIL SOCIAL REPONSIBILITY
======================================================
21inPage-1 by americanultra2000, on Flickr
:dry: :dry: :dry:
6zot45_th by americanultra2000, on Flickr
victims burnto death not even acknowlegement from a sociopsth psychopath totally absent function of frontal lobotomized brain UNAWARE what happened by his slumber genocide in deep sleep
:angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:
312032_10150324091333664_520078663_7950878_128992535_n by americanultra2000, on Flickr
--
au :angry:
@#1: I agree with you. You need to have bowling strength to win test matches on a consistent basis. However, your comment seems to have thrown spinners out of the equation. We cannot ignore how Bedi, Qadir, Warne, and Murali have won test matches for their teams on several occasions. Ajmal and Rehman were instrumental in the latest series win against England.
Pakistan's ability to produce quality pace bowlers despite their exposure to typical South Asian tracks continues to remain a mystery. But the other mystery is India's recent inability to produce even one attacking spinner. Traditionally, spin has been the core strength of Indian bowling. Lively or flat wickets aside, there is no clear reason why India is still struggling to find an attacking spinner. Even countries like Australia and England, who have traditionally relied on seamers, have stepped up and produced world-class spinners like Warne and Swann.
The bitter truth is that India has not produced a single great fast bowler in its history despite producing a host of great batsmen.
Interestingly, Pakistan, with almost identical conditions of pitch and climate, has produced a whole line of great fast bowlers (but not as many batsmen); yet because bowlers win matches our overall test record is much better: Imran, Wasim and Waqar would be contenders for any all-time bowling XI and Shoaib is faster than anyone else and would be a shoe-in for most teams. Even second string Pakistani bowler's like Sami and Asif are better than anyone India has produced.
It is an interesting conundrum.
RSS feed for comments to this post