Unflinching Idealism ... since 1997 Follow Us on TwitterRead Chowk on Facebook

Forgot your password?
Forgot your username?
Create an account



 

Today@Chowk

Yesterday
Yazan created a new topic Rochdale sex abuse is nothing to do with race in the forums. 09:49 PM
Yazan created a new topic Rochdale sex abuse is nothing to do with Arny ace in the forums. 09:44 PM
Yazan created a new topic 6 Ways That Food Is Being Used As A Weapon Agains in the forums. 05:30 PM
Yazan created a new topic What’s with the South Asian inferiority complex? in the forums. 02:02 AM
Yazan created a new topic how many Likes in F.B. lingo for Clifton bridge. in the forums. 01:35 AM
 

The Role of Mystics, Artists and Scientists in Human Evolution

by Khalid Sohail March 04, 2007 23:45

Creative people have been in a minority but they have lead the majority on the path of human evolution.

When we study human history, we realize that human beings have been evolving over the centuries. In every generation there was a majority that blindly followed traditional beliefs and practices. Such traditions gave birth to religions whose leaders gained power in their communities. They ruled the masses by directing their personal and social lives. Some of those leaders became intoxicated with power and began misguiding their communities socially, economically and politically. As those religions and traditions became more institutionalized, the abuse of power increased. But in every generation there was also a minority of creative personalities, whether mystics, artists or scientists, that questioned those traditions and challenged those religious leaders.

Over the centuries there have been many mystics from different cultural traditions, be they sufis or sadhus, sants or saints, who followed their own hearts rather than the highway of tradition. Since they were perceived as threats to religious and political establishments who abused power, these mystics were called heretics and were penalized, persecuted, even executed, because they were sympathetic to common people. Kabir Das, Bullay Shah, Sheikh Saadi, Maulana Rumi, William Blake, and Walt Whitman all challenged the religious and social traditions of their time and paid a heavy price. Mansoor Hallaj, the famous mystic, was crucified for saying analhaq [I am truth] . Many priests, rabbis, maulanas and pundits, who are the privileged religious elites of their communities, are threatened by these mystics who accept rather than judge people. Common people always loved, respected and cherished mystics of their communities, who were not concerned with the concepts of sin and guilt and burning in hell, but instead, led simple lives and served their communities. Mystics established the value of human experience and personal truth over traditional beliefs and . Their philosophy can be summarized by the sayings of two mystics. Buddha, the ancient mystic said,

“ Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it

Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held

Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books

Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin

Believe nothing just because someone else believes it

Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true.”

The modern mystic of 20th century J Krishnamurti stated, “Truth is a pathless land”

As humanity evolved, many creative personalities who challenged the traditional beliefs became artists. They developed different forms of expression, creating poems, plays and paintings to challenge traditional morality. Endowed with rich and non-traditional ways of seeing the world, they suggested that were part of folklore and wisdom and that we need metaphorical rather than literal interpretations of holy books. Artists connected with the masses at an emotional level and inspired them to challenge traditional morality based on . Traditional religious leaders and institutions, who were challenged by mystics also felt threatened by artists whom they also penalized and persecuted.

Artists redefine our concept of good based on aesthetic rather than moral . Artists help us to appreciate the beauty of nature and humanity and to get in touch with our inner beauty. They helped us develop our Right Brains in order to appreciate words, colours and sounds and in doing so, touch the artist inside in all of us. They help us keep alive our inner child who loves to play and enjoy life. In our stressful lives full of , work and social responsibilities, artists help us enter an imaginary world where we enjoy their creative products. Whether they are the plays of Shakespeare and Ibsen, the paintings of Picasso and Van Gogh, the novels of Virginia Woolf and Franz Kafka or the poems of Mirza Ghalib and Pablo Neruda, they all inspire us and we find them entertaining as well as enlightening. The creation of and has been a major step in human evolution.

In the last few centuries, human beings have crossed another milestone in evolution through the disciplines of and Philosophy. Scientists question not only religious leaders but also mystics and artists. Scientists insist on logical and rational proof before they accept anything. Scientists believe that there are two kinds of truth, subjective truths and objective truths. For any truth to be accepted universally it has to be proved to others. They use microscopes and telescopes to prove their theories. Scientists and philosophers have explored different aspects of life—biology, psychology, economics, sociology. In the last couple of centuries, the discoveries of scientists and philosophers like Charles Darwin, Karl Marx and Albert Einstein have changed how we see ourselves, other human beings and the universe around us. It appears as though mystics and artists challenged religious traditions from inside while philosophers and scientists attacked them from outside. While mystics and artists helped human beings to develop their Right Brains, scientists and philosophers stimulated the growth and evolution of the Left Brain. In the twentieth century writings of scientists and philosophers like Bertrand Russell, Jean Paul Sartre, Sigmund Freud and Stephen Hawking took the rational understanding of human life and the universe to new heights and depths and emphasized that human beings can solve their personal and social problems without the help of , , and divine revelations.

As the disciplines of and philosophy have grown, not only have human minds developed but also human communities. In schools, colleges and universities is based on scientific , while at the state level, laws have been made on secular and humanistic principles.

Many scientists and philosophers have remained mentally prepared to follow the tradition of Socrates, who had to drink from the cup of poison for inspiring young people to question their religious and cultural traditions.

In the twentieth century many humanistic psychologists have studied the creative and mystic encounters from a secular and scientific point of view. Psychologists like William James and Julian Jaynes broadened the horizons of human psychology, attempting to prove that our is part of our humanity rather than part of divinity. Abraham Maslow proved that to have peak experiences (creative and mystic experiences) human beings need not believe in any or organized . Such experiences are more related to the stimulation of the Right Temporal Lobes; they are products of the human unconscious mind rather than of gods and angels. These psychologists developed a secular discipline of human psychology, following a humanistic tradition in which our understanding of the human mind and personality is based on our scientific and secular principles rather than holy .

As we review communities around the world in the 21st century we become aware that there are many that are still guided by religious traditions and where religious leaders have wide-ranging social, economic and political powers. These leaders still demand the practice of their brand of holy in everyone’s personal and political lives, and insist on theocratic states deriving laws from holy on which no two sects agree. On the other hand there are communities where has become a private concern, and social and legal matters are guided by secular, scientific and humanistic .

I am of the opinion that blind and were our past and , psychology and philosophy are our future as human beings. On the journey of human evolution we are gradually evolving from religious communities and theocratic states to secular communities and humanistic states where all will enjoy equal and privileges. On this journey mystics, artists, scientists and philosophers, with their personal, creative and rational truths have been paving the way for social change over the centuries and paying a heavy price for challenging age-old traditions. In spite of their differences, they all worked towards human liberation focusing on personal truth, creative and rational thinking. All these groups have reformed their communities, bringing about social change by challenging blind and inspiring people to achieve social consciousness and enlightenment. Mystics, artists, philosophers and scientists, they all suffered but their sufferings paved a way for future growth.

They blazed their own trails but their trails became the highways for future generations. Such creative people have been in a minority but that minority has been leading the majority on the journey of human evolution. Arnold Toynbee, a famous historian, once wrote, “ To give a fair chance to potential creativity is a matter of life and of any society. This is important because the outstanding creative ability of a small percentage of the is mankind’s ultimate capital asset.”



Please login to comment

comments / interact  

 
#100 Inquirer March 15, 2007 05:22
Re: # 95, Khalid:

You may have returned from your trip by now. Hope you had a satisfying experience. I missed your article initially and therefore, currently, I am also not aware about the discussion that proceeded.

Nevertheless, I commend your effort to review the various disciplines - religion, mysticism, philosophy, science and psychology - and indicate their potential interrelationsh ips. I agree with your statement: "I am of the opinion that blind faith and religion were our past and science, psychology and philosophy are our future as human beings." I would add further that religion indeed was an attempt to understand the science as the primitive humanity - tentatively growing out of animalistic life into an understanding existence via maintenance of the records of the thoughts of the individuals - could. It is unfortunate that the vested interests captured and exploited the religious movements all over the world for their dominance on the common people. Yet, the rational efforts of the Marxists also failed miserably because unless we grant essential freedom and incentives to the Individual. even the rationalist doctrines merely become the tools of the exploiting coteries.

Greater and more specific understanding of the interrelationsh ips of the disciplines mentioned above can lead to a more comprehensive and substantive understanding of human development. Viewing the totality of human intellectual and spiritual development will lead an individual to a more rational and equilibrated self. Yet, do many people want this independence? Many among us conveniently hold on to the crutches which give them even though pseudo, comfort and sometimes provide them their intellectual/spiritual/financial existence.

Notwithstanding this all, I look forward to reading more of what exist in the posts and interact in future.

 
 
#99 khuram March 14, 2007 04:15
Freethinker quoted:

"David Hume wrote about divinity and metaphysics as follows:

"If we take in our hand any volume; of divinity or school metaphysics, for instance; let us ask, Does it contain any abstract reasoning concerning quantity or number? No. Does it contain any experimental reasoning, concerning matter of fact and existence? No. Commit it then to flames: for it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion."

Blind faith is risky, to say the least."

Chowk interacts don`t have the facility of smilies. Anyways, I always use to smile whenever I happen to see this famous quotation by David Hume. This quotation itself doesn`t contain any such rational reasoning which can have anything to do with quantity or number. It also doesn`t contain any experimental reasoning, concerning matter of fact and existence.

Anyhow, there is nothing solid on which to agree with David Hume on this issue.

Shall discuss in details at some other time as these days I am busy with some other matters.

Regards!

 
 
#98 zeemax March 12, 2007 00:51
#97 by JIC

Very well thought out and clearly laid out post.

Actually Chaudary Saheb, some people will propound any mish-mash as long as it takes a swipe at religion.

Regards.

 
 
#97 JIC March 11, 2007 10:09
You contradict yourself when you oppose the religious ideologies on the basis of science and yet supporting phenomenon like mysticism and then lumping it with equally allusive entity, the human spirituality. It is any one

 
 
#96 zeemax March 09, 2007 10:08
#94 by subuhiansari,

Haha ...

My point is, you have been asked certain questions by some readers (eg. Khurram) but you skirt those questions. It almost seems that you don`t quite know how to address them.

You have answered your own question. Dr. Sohail can only fool the Readers Digest types, but not any other, let alone the sharp intellects like Khurram who simply demolished his argument quite effortlessly ....

P.S. Don`t wait around for him ... wait till the next article (wink).

 
 
#95 drsohail March 09, 2007 06:35
Re: # 92

dear friends....i am going out of town, rather out of country on holidays where i would not

have access to internet so i would not be able to pursue the dialogue. thanks for your

intellectually stimulating feedback...sincerely sohail

 
 
#94 subuhiansari March 08, 2007 23:57
I have a friend who describes people who use lot of complex words and concepts without explaining them as suffering from "verbal incontinence". My point is, you have been asked certain questions by some readers (eg. Khurram) but you skirt those questions. It almost seems that you don`t quite know how to address them. Their personal philosophy or belief system is not pertinent to the question asked and the anticipated answer.

My main criticism of your paper is that it is extremely simplistic to divide the human community into two opposing camps: traditionalists who are blind followers of a religion and secular humanists ( artists, mystics, philosophers, scientists etc. who seem to fall in this category) who are blazing new and higher paths. Many creative people were and are adherents of their respective faiths and religions including Socrates, William Blake, Darwin. Socrates was tried and condemned because he challenged the Establishment and encouraged the youth of that time to do the same. Same is true of Jesus. He also challenged the Estabilshment and not his Faith. Furthermore, religion is not always a dark force that demands blind adherence. Religion has also inspired sublime Thought( Tillich, Buber, Bonhoeffer et al); music and Art. You must also realise that although many mystics challenged the orthodoxy, they remained within the fold of their respective faiths and some became part of the orthodoxy. In Christianity some of them were even granted sainthood.

Also, it was this intense love of God that inspired beautiful mystical poetry and other writings. So, you cannot equate religion with all that is negative. Equally, many crimes have been committed in the name of Secularism. Any system of thought that becomes an ideology treats humans as an abstraction and thus becomes potentially dangerous. Nazi Germany stands out as a stark example.

You are from Science background. You shouldn`t be using the word "proof" so loosely. Psychologists and social scientists can conjecture and present highly probable hypothesis and theories but cannot really give "proofs".

I would really appreciate if you define spirituality for me. For me spirituality is a metaphysical term and not a scientific one. I just do not understand how spirituality figures in an atheisit`s scheme. Spirituality is supra-rational and supra-material. I had asked this question once before in another context but you never gave a satisfactory answer.

One more question: In the title of your paper, you use the term `human evolution`, Shouldn`t it be `The Role of...............in the Development of Human Consciousness` ?

 
 
#93 ZahraJ March 08, 2007 22:58
I am curious if any culture or society taught mysticism as a formal subject to its masses. Yes, now we do have books that serve as a collection of mystics from Islam, Judaism, and various other -isms. But I am not sure if there was a dedicated focus on this subject area. Can mysticism be considered an offshoot of philosophy?

 
 
#92 khurram March 08, 2007 21:13
drsohail,

Thanks for the kind words. Nice to know we share an appreciation for Tillich. `Courage to be` was the first book of his I read and it got me hooked on him. For me, he settles the issue of Psychology and Religion. Have you read his `Dynamics of Faith`? What do you think of his concept of faith? What about his views regarding God?

I am also a great admirer of Buber. Among muslim scholars, I am an admirer of Dr Fazlur Rahman (not the politicain!), Ismail Faruqi, Mohd. Asad and H. Nasr . These are the kind of people I believe will take us beyond secular humanism. I have had only brief exposure to Ghulam Ahmed Parvez`s writings. Did not feel excited by his theology. I only know of Azad`s political writings. For me the ultimate source of knowledge is through the experience of the divine mystery mediated by theologians, institutions and tradition.

Don`t worry about America and Christian fundamentalism! I don`t know how things look from up there but we are quite far from that.

I live in North Carolina. Toronto is definitely a place I would like to visit someday.I have heard it has a vibrant desi community and great food!

I can imagine you getting along well with Mr. Gill. You 2 hardly seem to disagree on anything. I, on the other hand, seem to disagree with almost everything you say.

 
 
#91 drsohail March 08, 2007 19:17
Re: # 90

dear khurram....your letter is very refreshing and revealing. did you read jimmy carter`s (

a liberal christian`s) recent book...Our Endangered values... in which he is critical of bush`s

ideology and policy of bringing religion and politics together

. Karen Armstrong in her recent books also shared that America has been

moving towards christian fundamnetalism.

Paul Tillich is a wonderful scholar. i have a lot of respect for that Christian scholar. have

you read his book THE COURAGE TO BE. it is one of my all time favourire books. it is the

only book that discusses when a person should see a psychiatrist and when he needs

a `spiritual` counselling.

among muslim scholars who is your favourite...what are your views about ghulam ahmed

pervaiz and abul kalam azad. i adore them as much as paul tillich.

in jewish tradition i adore martin buber ...father of the philosophy of....i and thou.

i am curious now that if you believe that human beings are not the source of truth...then

who is? please share with me what has been your source of truth? and how do you think

others can access it.

thank you for sharing your thoughts openly...looking forward to your response...

sincerely sohail

ps...after reading your last letter i feel we can be friends..if you lived in toronto i would

have come to visit you or invite you to my place. i have bben fortunate to make new

friends through chowk...met mohammad gill who visited toronto and malik jahanzeb who

lives in toronto. where do you live?

 

Article Categories



Article Interatcs

#100 Inquirer
#99 khuram
#98 zeemax
#97 JIC
#96 zeemax
#95 drsohail
#94 subuhiansari
#93 ZahraJ
#92 khurram
#91 drsohail
#90 khurram
#89 drsohail
#88 khurram
#87 drsohail
#86 khurram
#85 drsohail
#84 khurram
#83 ZahraJ
#82 masadi
#81 masadi
#80 drsohail
#79 ZahraJ
#78 chaltahai
#77 drsohail
#76 drsohail
#75 Kamath
#74 iron_mask
#73 iron_mask
#72 masadi
#71 Dash_Dot
#70 ZahraJ
#69 Tehsinabbasi
#68 drsohail
#67 khurram
#66 drsohail
#65 khurram
#64 drsohail
#63 khurram
#62 drsohail
#61 drsohail
#60 Dash_Dot
#59 drsohail
#58 Dash_Dot
#57 khurram
#56 Urstruly
#55 drsohail
#54 Dash_Dot
#53 Dash_Dot
#52 Dash_Dot
#51 Urstruly
#50 Dash_Dot
#49 freethinker
#48 drsohail
#47 Dash_Dot
#46 freethinker
#45 Urstruly
#44 Dash_Dot
#43 drsohail
#42 drsohail
#41 khurram
#40 drsohail
#39 drsohail
#38 iron_mask
#37 iron_mask
#36 iron_mask
#35 iron_mask
#34 KaalChakra
#33 KaalChakra
#32 tahmed32
#31 KaalChakra
#30 iron_mask
#29 iron_mask
#28 KaalChakra
#27 iron_mask
#26 KaalChakra
#25 iron_mask
#24 KaalChakra
#23 hamidm2
#22 nasah
#21 malikjahanzeb
#20 chaltahai
#19 drsohail
#18 tahmed32
#17 Shah2
#16 hush
#15 drsohail
#14 zeemax
#13 drsohail
#12 drsohail
#11 freethinker
#10 iron_mask
#9 masadi
#8 Nasruminallah
#7 parthaab
#6 parthaab
#5 Saroya
#4 Saroya
#3 uba
#2 Saroya
#1 Nasruminallah

Copyright © 1997 - 2010 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited.