unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« November 2008 »
SMTWTFS
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30

Recently by Soulat

  • Feedback to chowk staff...
  • Chowk Staff failure..
  • Chowk staff failure...

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • Soulat
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

Chowk staff failure...

Posted: Aug 30, 2005 Tue 09:23 am     Views: 61   

I am not new but I have been visiting the site regularly now.

I am afraid that this has to be the worst site on the net in terms of level of interactions and content. I come here to get some kicks and I think most other people do that too as the chawk staff has consistently failed to apply its own guidelines. Then we have some chowk favorites and they can do any thing without any censure.

Example 1.
It is clear from posts on FP and also on UP, that two persons: 1. Khamakha, and 2. Saminasha deliberately bait salim into some hysterical posts. Salim has a weakness and both of them use it.
How does the chowk staff reacts. Salim’s posts are deleted but they never delete Khamkha or saminasha’s posts even though their posts are as disgusting as salim’s responses. Some posts are removed for being irrelevant to the article but you never see saminasha and khamakha’s post deleted.

It is clear from their posts that they are associated with the chowk admin and often it seems that they provoke salim with consent from the chowk staff.

Example 2.
Temporal is also a chowk staff as he posts on behalf of chowk explaining chowk policies.
If he is with chowk then he should refrain from posting against salim and should work in improving chowk quality instead of going after someone he does not like.

Example 3.
There is a poster here who ran scripts on the site to prevent some posters from signing in. The chowk staff ignored that no other site would have done that.

This same poster constantly abuses Farzana versey on her articles but I see no censure of him.

Example 4.
Ms. Farzana Versey is constantly harassed with some really obnoxious and personal attacks but I have never seen Temproal, Saminasha, Khamakha and many other to come forward to support her.

The following post still stands on the thread….. Thank you.

#75 by Ranger on August 27, 2005 11:27pm PT
hehehehe...hindvi loves dalit c-ock...hehehehe....


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content



Soulat

  • Interacts: 67
  • iLogs: 3
  • Gallery: 0
  • Page views: 1372
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: Apr 12 2004
  • Last signin: Sep 1 2005
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • Small Things That Make A Big Difference
  • My MUSIC PAGE
  • The Cup of Coffee............... an interesting article tht i came across
  • WHEN AMERICA WAS DEFEATED BY MUSLIMS
  • The Mountain

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • The Correct Turn
  • G-8: RIP?
  • Urdu News Columnists and Anchors -- should we always believe them?
  • Politics of PPP and Asif Zardari
  • The Indian Obama!
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Raj and I
  • Placing Responsibility for the FCD Fiasco
  • Waiting for you, Mahatma
  • Pre-Eid Fireworks in Pakistan
  • A Conversation with Hanif Kureishi

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited