Feedback to chowk staff...

Feedback to chowk staff after new commitment to strict complaince. let see....

Why the following posts are still on this thread. They are only mocking and abusing Farzana Versey. Please remove them. Thanks.

Mercy beau-coup?
Farzana Versey

#68 by arjun_m on August 28, 2005 6:16pm PT
#67 by antihypochrist on August 28, 2005 4:15pm PT


Things that seriously disturb FV ji and provoke her into writing "articles":


8. Rains in bombay means she can’t get to the sea lounge

9. Sea lounge raised the price of a cup of coffee..It’s now 90Rs...

#72 by rsridhar on August 28, 2005 7:38pm PT
re:#58 by Ajeya
The woman in question is a parasite. I said that and much more in the interact that was censured.
Sridhar

#67 by antihypochrist on August 28, 2005 4:15pm PT
Things that seriously disturb FV ji and provoke her into writing "articles":

1. Kashmiri Pandits receiving decent housing quarters in other parts of India.

2. Kashmiri Pandits voicing their angst and staying organized.

3. Media bringing into light the unfortunate incident involving Gudiya (thereby making a mockery of the Muslim qaum of India).

4. The TN government arresting the Shankaracharya and the following squeaks from "radical Hindus". Those squeaks were large enough to disturb FV ji in Mumbai.

5. The Indian people asking Pakistanis to release Sarabjit.

6. Her Hindu doodhwala, and his Hindu cow.

7. Vaginas and Mallika Sherawat’s breasts.



What this post has to do with the topic?

#64 by arjun_m on August 28, 2005 2:52pm PT
63 by mohar11 on August 28, 2005 2:46pm PT


I was talking about pre-911 situation



oh yes...before 9/11, pakis were all jihaaad, kashmir banega pakistan, jihadis zindabad etc etc...

post 9/11, they’re all visa moderates...moderates only because their visa depends on it....most won’t be caught dead admiting they support(ed) the jihadis....it’s like our parents telling us how bell-bottoms were the in thing when they were in college but they personally never wore them(sure...)...


Is this not a personal attack on ferzana?
#58 by Ajeya on August 28, 2005 11:30am PT

It is not surprising to me that this anti-national individual, with strong pro-Pakistan, pro-Hurriyat and pro-terrorist sympathies should denounce the Indian Government’s efforts to save this individual.
She uses a very thin veil to hide her traitorous character - she is merely trying to preserve India’s prestige!

This despicable woman represents that reprehensible part of the IM community that is anti-national and treachorous, and should be immediately prosecuted for anti-national activities by the Indian Government.


What this post has to do with th topic.
#54 by arjun_m on August 28, 2005 11:01am PT
#52 by mohar11 on August 28, 2005 9:54am PT


You guys sponsored a 20 year jihad


Pakis have given us a gift that keeps giving...Now the west is link fire-breathing, kashmir-banega-pakistan-declaring, jihad-supporting Pakis to Islamic terrorism
US, UK, Canuckistan etc are all catching on..

Indians just need to let pakis be pakis, keep reminding them what that really means and sit back with the popcorn and a good german beer....

Why is this not a personal attack on her?

#25 by TheoVanGogh on August 27, 2005 9:57am PT

The article is the expression of the mental dissonance caused by Farzana Versey’s government and leader being put under pressure by a few women in Punjab - it is her instinct to defend her country Pakistan. She cannot help it any more than a rooster can help crowing.

This is meant to ridicule the author

#12 by khamkhwa. on August 26, 2005 4:44pm PT
[highest authorities ]

...the 6th and 7th words of the first sentence stopped me from proceeding further...


Enjoy this too…

#314 by tddysam on August 31, 2005 12:45pm PT
Re: # 313

On the subject of multi-nicks, methinks Soulat is none other than Farzana Versey.