unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« November 2008 »
SMTWTFS
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30

Recently by Catchy

  • A secular society is a lost society and can’t be just? Solution: ISLAM
  • Cure they need badly
  • NATO forces bombs Pak army posts on Afghan border
  • No Title
  • No Title
  • No Title
  • Islam and Banking
  • "Bushy" image of Pakistan
  • Quran’s "40" Chapters and man responsible for "education" of Pakistanis?
  • Kashmiris sold out
  • KING of Pakistan
  • The "Future" of our "Education"
  • Women Protection Bill or Rapist Protection Bill
  • No Title
  • No Title
  • Sad Day in Pakistan’s history

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • Catchy
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

Women Protection Bill or Rapist Protection Bill

Posted: Dec 12, 2006 Tue 06:01 pm     Views: 59   




The SHARIA can’t be enforced in AIR and by HYPOCRITES and CROOKS.

The whole society needs to be morally and willingly ready for enforcing ALLAH’s injunctions. Otherwise, it will be a total failure and mockery like we made of Hadood Law in Pakistan.

The four witnesses thingy in Huddod Law was to protect a WOMAN to be falsely accused. The woman does not have to produce 4 women to prove a RAPE was made on her. The RAPIST could be punished (if does not confess) on Zina Bil Jbar Mojib Tazir (Section 10.3) based on medical or chemical evidence. No women in since 1979 has been punished for failing to produce 4 Witnesses. This is a mere Propaganda and my challenge to show a single case where a victim woman was penalised for accusing a Rapist and then punished for not producing 4 witnesses. This was POLICE who were arresting women (for their notorious crookedness to make falsify cases) who came to complain for RAPE (Section 10.3) under Consensual Adultery (Section 10.2). Now you will be shocked to know that under NEW WOMEN PROTECTION BILL some one accusing some couple on Consensus Adultery has to still produce 2 Witnesses but no Woman can file against a RAPIST under Hadd any more. It will be under Penal Code where a mere doubt that it was a consensual act will free the man even from Consensual Adultery (LEWDNESS) crime.

Only a FOOL will believe it is a BILL for Women’s protection but in fact it is a bill to protect Rapists and encourage Adultery in an "Islamic Society".

Congratulation Mufti YLH.


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content



Catchy

  • Interacts: 16
  • iLogs: 128
  • Gallery: 0
  • Page views: 15117
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: Jan 25 2005
  • Last signin: Nov 16 2008
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • Small Things That Make A Big Difference
  • My MUSIC PAGE
  • The Cup of Coffee............... an interesting article tht i came across
  • WHEN AMERICA WAS DEFEATED BY MUSLIMS
  • The Mountain

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • G-8: RIP?
  • The Correct Turn
  • Urdu News Columnists and Anchors -- should we always believe them?
  • Politics of PPP and Asif Zardari
  • The Indian Obama!
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • ATA: A Terrifying Act
  • A Heavy Price to Pay
  • Global Economy in a Swirling Freefall
  • Scaly
  • Life (and Death) etc.

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited