| « October 2008 » | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
Recently by GT
- Insurance.
- The Next President.
- The mauling of adivasis in Assam.
- Nandigram: What is the problem?
- Gujrat: Knowing is not enough, we need to remember.
- Quo Vadis?
- Transition to democracy -1.
- Not so fast.
- What now?
- Geelani's views?
- So finally ...
- Kaal.
- No Title
- No Title
- Further on in the debate:
- Reply to Masadi continued:
Further on in the debate:
Masadi:
You say
"When you say we will have to exclude some given point #3, then you are ignoring point #1, those that are excluded are "soldiers" of the status quo, they have no place in a social movement that is going against the antagonizer’s system."
Now, in my example given below, is person no. 1 a soldier of the status quo?
add to my favorite ilogs
flag objectionable content
GT
- Interacts: 1221
- iLogs: 11
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 5652
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Oct 22 2005
- Last signin: Oct 10 2008
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list
