| « November 2009 » | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | |||||
Recently by philosopher
- A Glorious Verse Of The Glorious Quran
- An interview with Imam Zaid Shakir
- A Shavian and a Theologian
- Investigating Benazir's Assassination
- Arabia Without Spices``: An Alternate Hypothesis
- Benazir's shocking statement about osama bin laden
- hamdim2: hay wali pausheeda jo kafir khula
- Ayat-ul-kursi
- Ideology:Response to PM
- No Title
- Creation:A Response To PM
- Existence:response to masadi and khurram
- Existence:Response to Khurram
- Universe vs Multiverses:To masadi
- Evil:Response to Kaal
- No Title
Existence:Response to Khurram
Re: # 180
khurram
((((If Universe exists because God is observing it, then who observes God?)))
When we talk about material objects being dependent on our (or for that matter God’s) perception or observation, we are not asserting some sort of "existence" of those "objects". All we are saying is that it is merely the reflection of our senses or ’consciousness’. Even when we talk about the ’existence’ of God we don’t consider God a material being. God, in that sense, is ultimate consciousness (mind, observer) and He is the "cause" of that idea (of existence of material) in human minds. The problem arises because of the usage of the term "existence" without describing it.
NOTE: Anybody who is looking into it.... this is by no means an exhaustive answer to his question. Existence’ is an incredibly complex philosophical issue and it’s impossible to discuss it here.
add to my favorite ilogs
flag objectionable content
philosopher
- Interacts: 638
- iLogs: 62
- Gallery: 9
- Page views: 22340
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Feb 24 2006
- Last signin: Aug 1 2009
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list
