| « October 2008 » | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
Recently by khakiflash
- How about more personal stories on Chowk?
- How my nickname 'Khaki' came about.
- Musing about my profile info.
- Is hay-fever suffered the whole world over?
- Getting the last 2 inches off
- More humorous poetry, please.
- Racial attitudes in 1956 when filming 'Bhowani Junction'.
- Film 'The Darjeeling Limited'
- Still here
- Total anonymity on 'Chowk'.
- Food glorious food!
- Was fuer eine schoene Ueberasschung!
- Where are the runners?
- Ahmedinejad's comment re gays
- waiting for a muse
- enigma - or maybe not
As a passionate enthusiast of English Literature I always feel deprived and envious when others rave about past authors whom I just can't 'get into' in terms of tha language they employ. At the moment for me the most significant two are Joseph Conrad (my mind just keeps wandering!) and Kipling - though I'm just starting to appreciate his poetry now. Not so his stories.
But 20 years ago I would have cited Dickens and Austen as two whose 'wavelnegths' I just couldn't get tuned into. Now those are two of my favourites. Dickens, though he can be very mawkish on occasions, can also be profound as well as hilarious. With Austen I had made the mistake of trying to read her too rapidly. Then I found that her language is a style of prose to be savoured - rather like the lightest possible sponge-cake. Beautiful. I was wondering if other Chowkers have had similar changes of opinion.
add to my favorite ilogs
flag objectionable content
khakiflash
- Interacts: 9
- iLogs: 48
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 10500
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Dec 26 2006
- Last signin: Sep 10 2008
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


