unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
all are welcome to read, write and think
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« November 2008 »
SMTWTFS
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 2021 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30

Recently by echoboom

  • Is English Law related to Muslim Law
  • Encore---of an Interact
  • Quaid-i-Azam's speech : CONDEMNING WESTERNISM
  • Dr. Abdul Qadir Khan--Now Jang columnist
  • Smears against Obama energized Muslim voters
  • THE SENATE of SATAN...Iblees kee majlis-i shoora explained
  • most comprehensive list of converts to islam
  • ELMER GANTRY..Top most movie about abuse of religion..a much better job than that by the pompous bufoon Bill Maher
  • The Quaid's great sympathies for the Al-Quaida (circa: 1930)
  • Was Marriott Hotel Islamabad an attack on US Marines
  • Sufism..Hussain Nasr
  • Paradise Lost Smyrna 1922: The Destruction of Islam’s City of Tolerance by Giles Milton
  • Mohsin Changaizi: The 20 year old Poet who has taken Urdu Poetry by Storm
  • Wedding of Ahmedinejad`s son....
  • Prince Charles, defender of Islam

  • Some of the most haunting melodies--on video

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • echoboom
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

WHY MUSLIMS , the world over, HATE the U.S

Posted: Mar 29, 2008 Sat 07:57 pm     Views: 166    Interacts: 1



New massive survey of Muslims belies Bush rhetoric "why do they hate us?"


by Abdus Sattar Ghazali Page 1 of 2 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com

Why do they hate us? President George Bush posed this question to the American public shortly after 9/11 terrorist attacks. And in a strong affirmation of the power of propaganda, he replied: “They hate our freedoms -- our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other.”

Tellingly, the presidential rhetoric stands refuted and exposed by the latest survey of 500,000 Muslims in more than 35 Islamic states. Only about 7 per cent of Muslims condone terrorist attacks, but none of these "politically radicalized" gave religious justification for their beliefs, instead voicing fears that the West and the United States are seeking to occupy and dominate the Islamic world.


Most of them actually espouse democratic beliefs but are skeptical of their own governments and the United States' professed intention to spread democracy in the Muslim world.

Those were some of the key messages from the authors of a new book, Who Speaks for Islam? What a Billion Muslims Really Think, which outlines the results from a Gallup poll. Based on the largest and most in-depth study of its kind, this book presents the first ever data-based analysis of the points of view of more than 90% of the global Muslim community.

The book is authored by John L. Esposito, a professor of international affairs and Islamic studies at Georgetown University, and Dalia Mogahed, Gallup's executive director of Muslim studies. It offers an evidence-based understanding of extremism, Islam, democracy and what approximately 1.3 billion Muslims really think about the West.

The survey of the world's Muslim community was commissioned by Gallup's chairman, Jim Clifton, shortly after US President George W Bush asked in a speech to congress ten days after 9/11: "Why do they hate us?"

Gallup posed questions on the minds of millions of people: Is Islam to blame for terrorism? Why is there so much anti-Americanism in the Muslim world? Who are the extremists? Where are the moderates?

Many of the poll's findings went against the "conventional wisdom" of US politicians, media commentators and the American public about Muslims' views of the West, the role of religion and the value of democracy, according to John L Esposito.

"What we have here is the ability to get beyond the battle of the experts" and let "the data lead the discourse," Esposito said while launching the book in Washington recently. What is needed is an overhaul of how the United States reaches out to people in the Muslim world, Esposito said, criticizing the current approach as "public diplomacy defined as public relations."

Gallup's polling found that most Americans - politicians and people - suggest improvements in education and more exchanges as a means of improving ties between the West and Islamic countries. What Americans fail to recognize, Esposito argued, is that Muslims lobbied just as hard for changes in US foreign policy - including a perceived "double standard" in promoting democracy around the world.

"One also has to face the fact that policy really does matter, It's the political grievances that are the real drivers" of radicalization,” said Esposito. In other words, it was not religious beliefs that have driven some Muslims to believe that the September 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington were justified.

Interestingly, among the overwhelming majority of Muslims, their views were driven less by a hatred of the West than a perception that the West hates them. Only 17 per cent said the West "respects" Islam.

When asked how the West could improve relations with the Muslim world, the most often offered response was: respect Islam, stop treating us like we’re inferior, stop degrading Muslims in your media.

The Gallup poll findings are not surprising. President Bush’s rhetoric - Why do they hate us? - was dehumanizing the enemy which is the first unwritten rule of war. To dehumanize, the enemy is portrayed as rude, crude and uncivilized. He is the other. He is not human. He is irrational.

Since a group stripped of its humanity is not seen as having human worth, they have no human rights. Such a demonized, out-group is not deserving of the protections that other human groups are entitled under international law and conventions. Such a development helps powerful governments and military alliances, and their media outlets, to justify the bombing and killing of civilians, and the ignoring of the human rights of the demonized group. (Burchfield cited by Erin S. LaPorte, The Criminal Race)

Once demonized and stripped of their humanity, it not only makes it easier for the battlefield solider to kill the “faceless, non-human enemy,” it is also easier to indiscriminately kill any member of “the enemy.” (Sam Keen cited by Erin S. LaPorte)


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content


Latest comments
Posted by echoboom on Saturday March 29, 2008 08:09 pm
and now a little laughter



A sleepy legend struggles to understand
By Thomas Wark/For the Sun-News
Article Launched: 03/27/2008 12:00:00 AM MDT



Excuse me, sir. The name's van Winkle, Rip van Winkle. I've had a little nap, you see, and I wonder if you'd bring me up to date on things. Is Ike still president?

Ike? Long gone, old-timer. Fellow named Bush is president now. Compassionate conservative.

Interesting mix. Been in long?

In his second term.

Really. As a conservative, I suppose that by now he has balanced the budget and paid off the national debt.

Not exactly. The debt's about $9 1/2 trillion right now.

You jest! Last time I looked it was about $250 billion!

Times change, old guy. Debt is good for the country. Besides, there's a war to pay for.

Yes, the Cold War, right?

No, sir. The War on Terror.

Congress declared war on "terror?"

Not exactly. You see, there was this guy Saddam Hussein, he had weapons of mass destruction in Eye-rack. And then this Osama bin Laden guy, he's what they call a Saudi, he got fellas to fly airplanes into the World Trade Center. So then, of course, we had to invade Eye-rack. So Congress didn't exactly declare no war, they just told President Bush, you go ahead and do whatever you want to fix them terrorists.

So then President Bush arrested this Osama bin Laden, the Saudi, who sent the airplanes to attack us,


-------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------

Advertisement

----------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------
and brought him to the bar of justice?
Not exactly. Osama's somewhere in Afghanistan. But we did bring Saddam to the bar of justice. He's been kilt.

So we let the Saudi guy who attacked us go free and we killed the Iraqi guy who didn't attack us?

Yep.

What became of his weapons of mass destruction?

There weren't any.

(Contemplative pause.)

Well, I was never very good on foreign policy. But you said this President Bush was compassionate. I suppose, then, nobody lives in poverty in America any more. And everyone, rich or poor, gets health care when they need it.

Not exactly. Some folks still can't afford to be sick.

Some? How many exactly?

'Bout 47 million, give or take a few. And they's about 37, 38 million livin' below the poverty line.

That's compassionate?

Sure "nuff. This president feels their pain.

It seems to me that someone might question whether it's good policy to go deep into debt to fight a war over weapons that don't exist while people live in sickness and poverty here at home.

That would be the liberals. They're soft on terrorism. They don't understand if we don't fight 'em there, we'd have to fight 'em here.

Fight whom?

Al Qaeda. They hate us because we got freedom.

So now we're forcing freedom down their throats with bombs?

Zackly. This war will not end till our foes are vanquished.

"Our foes." Al Qaeda?

The Islamofascists!

Islam! So it's a religious war, this "war on terror?"

Well, God did tell the president to free Eye-rack and bring democracy to the Middle East.

God speaks to this president?

Yessir. This bein' a Christian nation, and the president bein' a born-again Christian. . .

But, before I went to sleep it was a secular nation. Specified in the Constitution. Surely we still have a Bill of Rights!

Guess you haven't heard about the Patriot Act. FISA. The Protect America Act. The Military Com . . . . .

I must still be asleep. Wake me up when this nightmare is over.


Thomas Wark was an editor with the New York Times and Philadelphia Inquirer before retiring to Las Cruces with his wife Lois.



echoboom

  • Interacts: 2461
  • iLogs: 653
  • Gallery: 0
  • Page views: 154222
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: Jul 31 2003
  • Last signin: Nov 16 2008
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • My MUSIC PAGE
  • The Cup of Coffee............... an interesting article tht i came across
  • MURAWWAT O MOHABBAT KE MABAIN (afsana)
  • WHEN AMERICA WAS DEFEATED BY MUSLIMS
  • The Mountain

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • The Muslim Protagonist and the Past Three Years
  • G-8: RIP?
  • The Correct Turn
  • Delhi Belly
  • Urdu News Columnists and Anchors -- should we always believe them?
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Water Surface
  • Economic Development Conference at MIT
  • The Life Hereafter
  • The Boys who will be Men
  • Nuclear Viagra and Nationalist Virility

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited