unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« July 2008 »
SMTWTFS
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 2425 26
27 28 29 30 31

Recently by Faizan

  • The Dark Knight (Nolan, 2008)
  • Wall•E (2008, Stanton)
  • The Incredible Hulk (2008, Leterrier)
  • Salaam Cinema (1995, Makhmalbaf)
  • Kung Fu Panda (Osborne/Stevenson, 2008)
  • Indiana Jones & the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (2008, Spielberg)
  • Strange Days (1995, Bigelow)
  • Speed Racer (2008, Wachowski's)
  • Iron Man (2008, Favreau)
  • Wall Street (1987, Stone)
  • The Departed (2006, Scorcese)
  • Infernal Affairs (2002, Lau/Mak)
  • Repulsion (1965, Polanski)
  • Knife in the water (1962)
  • Sarkar (2005, Varma)
  • Cache (2005, Haneke)

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • Faizan
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

Cache (2005, Haneke)

Posted: Apr 18, 2008 Fri 08:43 am     Views: 216    Interacts: 0

Director Michael Haneke’s ground breaking "Cache" is a film that clearly understands convention and audience expectations and plays, nay, toys with it. It transcends the laws of cinema not by breaking it, but by creating entirely new ones. Consider a scene at the start of the film which seems at first to be a motionless shot of an apartment exterior, till we realize that the shot itself is neither the mise-en-scene nor the mise-en-shot that the director has directed for his audience to watch, but a recorded tape within the film of someone watching over the main characters. Normally, the distinction between the directors shot of the film intended for us to watch would be drastically different from any recording that the characters would watch within the film, but Haneke tricks us, multiple times during the course of the his film without letting the approach become tiring, by never distinguishing between the two types of shot. Think about the implications of this; we never know, even till the very end, which shots were the film itself and which were recordings within it.

The people being filmed are the upscale Laurent family whose patriarch Georges works as a television talk show host, is married to Anne (Juliette Binoche) who herself is a publisher and together they have an adolescent son Pierrot. The appearance of tapes showing them vignettes of their own life recorded as if under surveillance, spooks them at first and starts bearing heavy on their already fragile marriage. Accompanying these tapes are ghastly childlike drawings of a bleeding boy and then a headless chicken. About half way through the film, Georges thinks he might know who might be behind them, but lies about it to his wife, till a tape of what he lied about also makes its way to their house. The ramifications of this are significant and the eventual payoff is magnificently spectacular yet restrained. Restrained because there is no big revelation, no shocking surprise, yet spectacular in the way it ends either giving away everything or nothing at all.

Like the work of the best auteur’s, the presence of the director in every frame is evident and the consistency in mood is dazzling. His style is characteristic of people considered masters behind the camera and his choice of shots captures trivial details making even the most mundane seem extremely interesting to watch. The only way to describe the feel of the movie is as a psychological mystery encapsulating elements of surrealism and voyeurism.

I have made little mention of the performances of the cast or the script in specific and yet they are about as perfect and polished as anything you are likely to see this year. The script in particular manages to subtly explore the nature of guilt and the responsibility that people have over others. "Cache" can hardly be considered just a great film; it is a supreme achievement of every aspect of film making.

Rating: 5/5


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content



Faizan

  • Interacts: 5
  • iLogs: 22
  • Gallery: 0
  • Page views: 5168
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: Mar 3 2004
  • Last signin: Jul 17 2008
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • My MUSIC PAGE
  • The Cup of Coffee............... an interesting article tht i came across
  • An Occult Religion behind an Islamist fascade
  • The Circus
  • Perspective

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Dhokha and Being a Muslim in India
  • Why is Karachi Turning Into a Sell-Out?
  • Government Wins Manmohan Singh Loses
  • Time for Musharraf to Quit
  • Fields Of Joy
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Never Again
  • Dodging the Law of Extradition
  • The Limits on Women’s Lives
  • The Good, the Bad and the Anxiety
  • As Long As It Does Not Affect You

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited