| « July 2008 » | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Recently by Shah2
- Impartial Columbia Univ course Islam in South Asia
- Hollywood Mogul & boston Brahmin
- Historical Facts
- Mere hi Ghar Ke Chirag Ne Khud Jala Diya Mera Ashiyana
- Pakistan no spokeperson of Islam/Muslim
- Paki trying to be flag brear of Islam of OTHERS
- Eye for eye makes both blind
- Shiv Sainik Cobra
- Taslima Nasreen
- New definition
- Dont disparage Einstein
- whatever
- Helenism shaped Juseaism as well a Christians
- Hate mongering writers historians authors scholars
- Ibn Sina toTusi
- Pricking Bubble .....
cobra Bhai
I apreciate the support concern and lament for minority hindu in islamic pakistan.It is of concern to me too.
But logistically it was not posible 60 yrs ago and not now.Dont forget there are or were more than 30% non muslims in East Pakistan .Not or rather only educated& rich of them had the oppertunity to migrate.I know you hate gandhi to have kiled him but some time you have to chose between uprooting and taking a chance .We all have made bad discisions that we regret.
indian nationalism is not based on historical past that too one proported by one camp or other.not specifically those names you mentioned but the Moghul rule as also 200yr rule by British are 'integral' part of India .First nationalism is not one point of view.I only read rudimentary history in School
but as some one said furure is morecertain than 'Past which KEEPS CHANGING.'
In F.P d.M. sab enumerted varius revision of History text book or version during different power to enforce there view.
coming to your fixing a standard for out sider insider is totally arbitary.I have no affinity for Ghazni or Moghul or Mid East any more than millions of HINDUS who are more friendly to Mid East Arab AND pakistan .If a Hindu becomes alied or friendly with arabs / Pakistan (as bollywood ) Its no crime BUT for minority to do .. mjority Hindutva have restriction of .No one likes to be under microspe unfairly conditions applied to them .A person whether indian or American can have more than one identity.A marathi is some time less Indian Than being MORE Marthi and a also Non Indian Hindu in Kenya may claim more to India than many inside India ..Why should certain indian cannot be doing the same thing as the majority.Millions of Indian live work and have aliance with Arabs Mid East and muslims.Its even lauded both here in Chowk and Bolywood when A hindu forms alliance with Pakistan or any other muslims outside India but Muslim of India must prove somehng to Hindu like you 'to be seclude from them like appartheid.Why the very same thing in rest of Indian(hindu) is Kosherbut if Indian muslim comes close to it it become un indian disloyal etc etc.
Not long ago likes of you could not see a muslim liking any pakistani cricketer or artiste.It immediately is no no in u r eyes but same Indians ( like u ) are hiring jeering cheering Inzimam Shoib god knows how many of Pakistani cricketer Artiste.
I have lost some of my post and a it is it has become too long .
I end with big question Dont Stop me from doing what u (or people like u are doing the same thing)
Lastly no matter what up rooting such large number in millins minoreties is like who will do it? just as side note how many ofIndians ( even when they r hindu) is India ready to take e.g. kenya ,Fiji ,sri lanka ,South Africa ...
add to my favorite ilogs
flag objectionable content
Shah2
- Interacts: 346
- iLogs: 77
- Gallery: 11
- Page views: 15542
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Dec 16 2006
- Last signin: Jul 21 2008
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


