| « August 2008 » | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 | ||||||
Recently by Salim_Chauhan
- Response to Kaal Bhayya
- TS PI, are you the dentist brother?
- Political prediction
- Kaal Bhayya, are you trying to become my VP? ...and feedback on your valid concerns ..,
- To the brilliant women of Chowk!
- Can you believe the hysterical paranoia of Madame Flatulence?
- Who's on first?
- A few words of advice to my ex-friend Coomar
- In worship of THE GODDESS of prose
- Bye Bye Mushy!
- Georgia on my mind!
- Chowk is acting like Random House
- Message to Dear friend Cobray
- Atif, please confirm the rumor
- Parachi gone wild
- It's deja vu all over again
Question to anyone representing Qadiani religion.
Sattar Sahib,
I have one question that has really perplexed me about your great leader. If he was all that great, why was it important for him to be considered a "Prophet" or a "Messenger?" I mean there are many more important sounding titles in Islamic history - Aalim, Mufti, Ayatollah, Maulana, Ameer, etc..
Why was it necessary to choose the designation of Our Holy Prophet (PBUH)? Before the Hindus get all excited about Mohammed (PBUH) being a Prophet and a Messenger, let me say that "Messenger" means peon, carrier, postman, errand boy, and nothing very important. What made the term "Messenger" was not its meaning, but the love of Muslims for this wonderful man (PBUH).
add to my favorite ilogs
flag objectionable content
Salim_Chauhan
- Interacts: 5007
- iLogs: 2239
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 130690
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Aug 14 2005
- Last signin: Aug 29 2008
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list
