unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« September 2008 »
SMTWTFS
1 2 3 45 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30

Recently by Tazeen

  • Isn't it ironic, dont you think?
  • Situation in Balochistan and Indian Agencies
  • A David Beckham musical !!!!
  • Why in English .....
  • "Deadline Republic of Pakistan"
  • Ratty revolution in Bihar
  • I had a dream !
  • What's next?
  • Buried alive, for they have sinned !
  • The Nanny Diaries - Beijing Chapter
  • Gillani sahib and his infinite wisdom
  • An open letter to Tehreek-e-Taliban, Pakistan
  • of drug addled years
  • After personal computer comes personal tank
  • Trivial Pursuit
  • Conquering another language !

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • Tazeen
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

Affirmative action in Pakistan's annual budget

Posted: Jun 12, 2008 Thu 10:23 pm     Views: 316    Interacts: 2

The annual budget was announced and everyone has an opinion or two about it. Here, I would to point out two announcements regarding affirmative action for women. First, there is a 10 per cent job quota for women in government departments. And secondly, taxable income levels for men and women are set at different levels. For men, minimum taxable annual income is Rs 180,000, whereas for women, it would be Rs 240,000. Women now can make Rs 60,000 more annually than their male colleagues and need not give income taxes.

I wonder how men will react to it, would there be queues in offices outside HR departments where men would want to change their names and gender (only on paper) so that they too can get this tax exemption.


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content


Latest comments
Posted by cliftonbridge on Friday June 13, 2008 08:34 am
10% is not exactly a great number for a 50% population ... but i think its great that the whole notion of not only state sanction but state promotion and state protection of working women has finally taken root.
Posted by Delirium on Friday June 13, 2008 02:55 am
Discriminatory !

Tazeen

  • Interacts: 29
  • iLogs: 125
  • Gallery: 0
  • Page views: 51932
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: Jan 12 2004
  • Last signin: Sep 3 2008
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • My MUSIC PAGE
  • The Cup of Coffee............... an interesting article tht i came across
  • The Circus
  • Some thoughts on Sufis and Sufism
  • An Occult Religion behind an Islamist fascade

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Save Me From Charismatic Leaders!
  • Free to Breed
  • Why Zardari Should Be President!
  • There is no ‘honour’ in killing
  • A New Kind of Charity this Ramadan
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Aunty Vilayatpasand Thinking Aloud
  • Between the Devil and the Deep Sea
  • On The Other Hand
  • The Woman
  • Science and Religion

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited