| « September 2008 » | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | ||||
Recently by Salim_Chauhan
- If I had a choice between cliftonbridge and scout, I would select ..
- Helpful and timely advice to Bristol and Cliftonbridge
- Response to DM Sahib regarding diverse ancestry
- Response to Kaal Bhayya
- TS PI, are you the dentist brother?
- Political prediction
- Kaal Bhayya, are you trying to become my VP? ...and feedback on your valid concerns ..,
- To the brilliant women of Chowk!
- Can you believe the hysterical paranoia of Madame Flatulence?
- Who's on first?
- A few words of advice to my ex-friend Coomar
- In worship of THE GODDESS of prose
- Bye Bye Mushy!
- Georgia on my mind!
- Chowk is acting like Random House
- Message to Dear friend Cobray
#175 Posted by sattar2 on June 21, 2008 5:44:16 am
{"Kulharee ...
I personally think you play with words but don’t mean anything nasty about the Prophet (pbuh); you probably do it just to annoy the ummah. This is not a good idea … as it creates ill will ... which translates into more persecution of Ahmadi-Muslims. That’s my 2 cents; I hope you’ll rethink."}
#184 Posted by Kulharee on June 22, 2008 12:34:37 pm
{"Nazi ki aulad, until you get our names rights, until you put Nabee Allah in front of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadi (the leader of all Payghambers, and second only to Allah) until you address us with respect that we deserve, I refuse to entertain your silly stupid questions that you took out of a stupid 6th century Arbi camel's butthole (where your other beliefs also came out of)..."}
Sattar Sahib,
Despite your persistent and sensible advice to the contrary, Mr. Kulharee is adamant on continuing his insults against Our Holy Prophet (PBUH). In light of this obvious propensity to blasphemy, one must ask the following questions:
1. While Mr. Kulharee may not represent the entire community of the followers of the Qadiani religion, he is more than just a crackpot. He has written articles about the Qadiani religion and is the most ardent and vocal advocate for Qadiani rights on Chowk. Therefore, does he belong to a peculiar sect of Qadianis who condone the most vulgar and profane insults against Our Holy Prophet (PBUH)?
2. If Mr. Kulharee's tendency is to retaliate for abuse against Mirza Ghulam Ahmed with an immediate insult to Our Holy Prophet (PBUH), isn't it fair to say that in the "THEM VS US" context, at least for some Qadianis, Mirza Ghulam Ahmed belongs to Qadianis and The Holy Prophet (PBUH) belongs to Muslims?
3. If Mr. Kulharee so easily resorts to insulting the Holy Prophet (PBUH), isn't it fair to conclude that, at least in some Qadiani circles, it is permissible to resort to that type of vulgarity against the most sacred person in Islam?
4. Given these facts and defining Muslims as those who follow the religion of Prophet Mohammed (PBUH), isn't it obvious that even some Qadianis, of the type or sect represented by Mr. Kulharee, do not consider themselves to be Muslims or followers of the Holy Prophet (PBUH)?
It is bad enough to associate false "prophets" after Our Holy Prophet (PBUH), but to defile the sacred name of the founder of Islam is tantamount to provoking Muslims and taunting them to do something about it. May Allah have mercy on the Qadianis for their blasphemous, insidious, treacherous, and treasonous behavior.
add to my favorite ilogs
flag objectionable content
you should thank kulharee for the clarity he has so arrogantly injected into the ahmedi question.
;)
otherwise it's all goul goul talk yaar
Salim_Chauhan
- Interacts: 5007
- iLogs: 2242
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 132030
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Aug 14 2005
- Last signin: Sep 5 2008
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


