unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« December 2008 »
SMTWTFS
1 23 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31

Recently by Salim_Chauhan

  • The beauty of Urdu poetry
  • Atif, in addition to percentages, art, Latin, and finance, you can add geography to the portfolio of Injun areas of expertise.
  • Why are so many Indians turning this terrible tragedy into a roaring comedy?
  • Future of Indo/Pak relations
  • Diluting sympathy - thank you Chowki Injuns
  • Imran the Terrorist is an Indian - possibly Kashmiri
  • This horrible tragedy in Mumbai
  • Let's get rid of the VHP supporter
  • The real Islamic bomb
  • DM Sahib - Massacres and Ethnic Cleansing are wrong regardless of religious identiy ...
  • Kaal Bhayya - Terrorism, partition, minorities, and Liaqaut/Nehru Pact
  • Dear Tahmed Sahib, we have had our differences, but ...
  • Dear Cobra, Ranjit, and others who see a Musla under every rock
  • Congratulations America and Congratulations President-elect Obama
  • Why most Pakistanis and Paki Americans favor Sen. Barack Obama for President
  • Ranjit will get run over by Obama Nation

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • Salim_Chauhan
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

MQM, PPP, ML(N), IJI, ANP - NO, just Pakistan Zindabad

Posted: Oct 4, 2008 Sat 05:48 pm     Views: 178    Interacts: 2

{"Mohajir ‘identity’ formed under the pressure of Sindhi nationalism, and the Punjabi and Pashtun ethnic movements, and most importantly under the economic pressures created by limited resources and ‘unequal’ distribution. ...Additionally, post ethnic quotas, the only way Mohajirs could demand economic rights legitimately as a group was to be considered a separate nationality on par with that of Sindhis, Punjabis, Pathans, and Balochs. And Mohajirs did just that. ...

The trajectory of Karachi and Pakistan could have been different had it not involved itself in Afghanistan. The Islamization unleashed by Haq to service the Muhajideen pipeline had a deep impact on the political and cultural fabric of Pakistan – an impact whose ripple effects are still being echoed in the demolished minarets of Lal Masjid, and Shia-Sunni relations in particular. Zia regime, which came at a time when concern about Iranian revolution was high, armed the Sunni extremists within Pakistan and helped perpetrate horrific violence against the Shias in mid 1980s."}

Chishti Sahib,
Very good points made by you in the above reference. Your article leaves the reader confused about the varying and shifting alliances of the MQM, its shady and murky splinter groups, and the role played by the misgovernments of Zia, BBI, NSI, BBII, NSII, and Mushy. This confusion is justified by the obvious fact that almost everything in Pakistan is confusing, every act is a conspiracy, and nobody seems sincere.

The main reason is that Pakistani governments are not sincere with Pakistani citizens. Information is not shared, disinformation is not credibly refuted, irrational and seemingly illogical and often self-contradicting policies are allowed to fester. Your article has done a good job in leaving the reader with a sense of apathy and a "plague on all their houses" conclusion.

But, we can't allow this to happen. We need to reevaulate ALL our policies, institutions, and alliances in terms of "What is Best for Pakistan?" While there are provinces, there are ethnicities, and there are religions, the worst thing we can do is to allow these perfectly common differences, present in almost all countries, to lead us down the path of self-destruction. We need, more than anything, unity among ALL Pakistanis now. We have removed a reviled dictator, elected a democratically-empowered government, and are coming together to deny victory to those who commit violence to accomplish what their votes could never attain.

I request all my Pakistani brethren and cistern - Punjabis, Sindhis, Pathans, Baluchis, Kashmiris, and Mohajirs to unite against those who want to hurt all of us. Our salvation is in unity and in Pakistan's survival and progress.

Pakistan Zindabad.


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content


Latest comments
Posted by barristerakc on Thursday November 6, 2008 10:02 pm
How can you go back - literally grown up idolizing your views bhai! How can I unite with Punjabis? You brand me Mitarwa and Hindustora who refuse to even acknowledge my mandate?

Something I am writing,
IDENTITY OF A MOHAJIR

Territorial identity gained popularity in the 1970's. It was an alternative to the
Ideal of Muslim nationalism that lay scattered after the partition of 1971. A Pakistani
had always had a doubt identity. As a Muslim he belonged to the "umma". As a Pakistani he belonged to the "millat" - a term that us a synonym for nation. Whereas the umma explained Pakistan's eastern border with India, the millat did so for the western borders with other Muslim countries. Bhutto now added a third community, the "qaum" to which a Pakistani was supposed to belong. He took qaum, or people, as an ethnic-territorial unit, identifying four qaum in Pakistan. He took qaum or people, as an ethnic-territorial unit, identifying four qaum in Pakistan, which coincided with the four provinces: the Punjab, Sindh, NWFP and Baluchistan.Being a Punjabi, Sindhi, Pakhtoons or Balochis was no longer considered to be in opposition to a Pakistani national identity. Analogous to the two nation’s theory, one could coin this ideology the threefold identity theory as it brings together the attachment to the three communities of "umma, millat and qaum" into one national identity.

A more commonly used term for the same phenomenon was "nationality theory" which according to Eqbal Ahmed in Pakistani context, arguing that the place of the provinces in Pakistan was similar to the nationalities in the Soviet Union. The Nationality Theory also enabled one to see Mohajirs as a flawed and in-between category, people with neither history nor a sense of territorial attachment, urban, on the move and unreliable.

Interestingly, I found an example of this idea of the uprooted Mohajir in Benazir’s Bhutto's autobiography donated to me by a dear friend to understand Benazir Bhutto.

When B.B is confronted with a marriage proposal from the family of Asif Zardari she ponders over his credentials, listing as one of his positive points that

"He is from Sindh, so he knows out customs and courtesies. He's not a rootless phenomenon like the urban professional people who can pack their bags and go anywhere. He's a rural, with commitments to his family and tribe" (Bhutto 1988:354).
without a sense of loyalty is, of course the Mohajir the urban migrant.

The new state ideology was put into practice in several ways, such as the introduction of Sindhi as the provincial language. A "quota system" regulating access to government jobs and educational institutions on the basis of ethnicity was implemented. In Sindh, this reservation on the basis of ethnicity was implemented. In Sindh, this reservation program distinguished between Sindhis and Mohajirs. More-over, Mohajirs like other groups who did not identify as Punjabis, Sindhis, Pakhtoons or Balochis were asked to assimilate. They were expected to learn Sindhi and prove their loyalty to Sindh -its language, culture and history. This of course deemed the way for Mohajirs to question the PPP's commitment to the Pakistani ideal of Muslim fraternity and to argue that Mohajirs had made sacrifices for Pakistan, not Sindh and that they had come to Pakistan to live in dignity as first-class citizens and never to bow for despot again, be it a Brahman or a Sindhi landlord. Yet the reaction, culminating in the emergence of the MQM, was much more complex than a plain rejection of the nationality theory. To a large extent the MQM made the new policy of ethnicity its own and adopted the Sindhi passion with which it was associated.
Posted by hurricane on Saturday October 4, 2008 06:39 pm
"I request all my Pakistani brethren and cistern - Punjabis, Sindhis, Pathans, Baluchis, Kashmiris, and Mohajirs to unite against those who want to hurt all of us. Our salvation is in unity and in Pakistan's survival and progress."

Very true...and it also lies in the umda Karachi biryani which cannot be had in LA :(

Salim_Chauhan

  • Interacts: 5291
  • iLogs: 2302
  • Gallery: 0
  • Page views: 151295
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: Aug 14 2005
  • Last signin: Dec 2 2008
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • Small Things That Make A Big Difference
  • My MUSIC PAGE
  • The Cup of Coffee............... an interesting article tht i came across
  • The Circus
  • WHEN AMERICA WAS DEFEATED BY MUSLIMS

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
  • An Indian Muslim
  • India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in Pakistan for Mumbai mayhem
  • Terror in Mumbai.....and also in 'Bannu or somewhere'
  • A Big, Decadent Pakistani Wedding
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • UN Sanctions Against Iraq: 10 Myths
  • A Conversation with Hanif Kureishi
  • Say No to Indian and Pakistani Bombs
  • Talha el Ghafoor
  • Alphabets

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited