unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« March 2010 »
SMTWTFS
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 1819 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31

Recently by Ansa

  • goodbye
  • of shabebaraats and screwed up fairytales
  • from 2 days in paris.
  • sleepless.
  • fantasy land and reality checks.
  • weirdness maximus
  • none.
  • why is gold so imp?
  • the story of my lizard
  • Two successful days
  • an old story rediscovered
  • abhi ishq key imtihaa'n aur bhi hai'n
  • hai apnay qabeelay ka koi lashkar?
  • God's gender.
  • to die for money?
  • the beauty of ee cummings

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • Ansa
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

God's gender.

Posted: Dec 9, 2008 Tue 06:59 am     Views: 331    Interacts: 4

So all patriarchal explanations of God's gender representation aside, I have decided God is definitely a man.
No woman, divine or not, can see a girl go through such pain and not do anything to relieve it. none.

He reminds me of ahm.


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content


Latest comments
Posted by WaltzingMatilda on Wednesday December 10, 2008 03:26 am
what exactly is the difference between a non-existant male and a non-existant female??
Posted by PKSZ_shadbad on Tuesday December 9, 2008 12:27 pm
Reminds me of Job's lament
God ITSELF speaks
Posted by khakiflash on Tuesday December 9, 2008 10:36 am
Makes me think that any God who permits such pain, indeed any pain from any cause for any sensate being, when He(?) is supposed to love us SO much, can only be THE ultimate sadist. Furthermore, as this Being apparently has such affection for us, He must cause himself to suffer immeasurably when consigning so many of us to everlasting fire - or aren't some now saying that 'Hell' just means eternal separation from God? (Scary!) He could so easily not indulge in this masochism by exercising a mere whim, but perhaps the temptation of self-satisfaction is too strong for Him to resist. Sounds to me that for the God man has created, S/M rules. I'd prefer to believe in either a more sensible one or none at all.
Posted by opium on Tuesday December 9, 2008 07:35 am
^-^




Ansa

  • Interacts: 7
  • iLogs: 281
  • Gallery: 1
  • Page views: 62941
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: Apr 21 2006
  • Last signin: Dec 25 2009
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • Small Things That Make A Big Difference
  • My MUSIC PAGE
  • The Cup of Coffee............... an interesting article tht i came across
  • It's your fault Grandpa..
  • Fake Muslim History and The Reality!

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Understanding Islamic Revival In Its Proper Context
  • 21st Century Terrorism and Wars Against Terror
  • The Desert of Possibility: Part II
  • A Ward of the State
  • River Song
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Untitled
  • Kabul
  • I Protest!
  • Who will Bell the Bad, Fat Cats?
  • In Defence of Benevolent Dictators

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2010 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited