unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
all are welcome to read, write and think
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« November 2009 »
SMTWTFS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 2021
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

Recently by Ansa

  • of shabebaraats and screwed up fairytales
  • from 2 days in paris.
  • sleepless.
  • fantasy land and reality checks.
  • on gaining weight and denial.
  • weirdness maximus
  • .
  • of uncontrollable things
  • none.
  • why is gold so imp?
  • the story of my lizard
  • Two successful days
  • an old story rediscovered
  • abhi ishq key imtihaa'n aur bhi hai'n
  • hai apnay qabeelay ka koi lashkar?
  • God's gender.

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • Ansa
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

God's gender.

Posted: Dec 9, 2008 Tue 06:59 am     Views: 297    Interacts: 4

So all patriarchal explanations of God's gender representation aside, I have decided God is definitely a man.
No woman, divine or not, can see a girl go through such pain and not do anything to relieve it. none.

He reminds me of ahm.


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content


Latest comments
Posted by WaltzingMatilda on Wednesday December 10, 2008 03:26 am
what exactly is the difference between a non-existant male and a non-existant female??
Posted by PKSZ_shadbad on Tuesday December 9, 2008 12:27 pm
Reminds me of Job's lament
God ITSELF speaks
Posted by khakiflash on Tuesday December 9, 2008 10:36 am
Makes me think that any God who permits such pain, indeed any pain from any cause for any sensate being, when He(?) is supposed to love us SO much, can only be THE ultimate sadist. Furthermore, as this Being apparently has such affection for us, He must cause himself to suffer immeasurably when consigning so many of us to everlasting fire - or aren't some now saying that 'Hell' just means eternal separation from God? (Scary!) He could so easily not indulge in this masochism by exercising a mere whim, but perhaps the temptation of self-satisfaction is too strong for Him to resist. Sounds to me that for the God man has created, S/M rules. I'd prefer to believe in either a more sensible one or none at all.
Posted by opium on Tuesday December 9, 2008 07:35 am
^-^




Ansa

  • Interacts: 7
  • iLogs: 280
  • Gallery: 1
  • Page views: 58693
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: Apr 21 2006
  • Last signin: Sep 29 2009
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • My MUSIC PAGE
  • Small Things That Make A Big Difference
  • It's your fault Grandpa..
  • The Cup of Coffee............... an interesting article tht i came across
  • Fake Muslim History and The Reality!

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • The Strange Case of the Indian Channels That Did Not Air the 26/11 Documentary
  • Why MQM Wants To Enter Punjab?
  • I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
  • Forgive n Forget
  • Three Poems by Allama Iqbal
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Threads - Part 2
  • Dear Chowk Readers
  • Alternate Goals
  • Asian Test Championship
  • Another Hope Killed

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2009 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited