unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« November 2009 »
SMTWTFS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 2425 26 27 28
29 30

Recently by drlokraj

  • baat 'un' dinoN ki
  • Na sehraa ko nakaara
  • in our times!
  • Kinni beeti, kiNjh bitaayi!
  • Pratibadhta (ahad)
  • Har ikk da gham sehNdey rahiye/ghazal
  • Warming up to Enlightenment
  • Aaj phir dard ki intehaa huyi hai
  • JauRey phullaaN di kahaani
  • na yaadaaN ghar diyaaN rahiyaaN
  • Future of Sikhism
  • Udasi's udaasi!
  • 'War and Peace' : translation of poem 'yudh tey shaanti' by Paash
  • Inkaar (refusal)
  • dard-e-bay-watni
  • A messiah for our time

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • drlokraj
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

A messiah for our time

Posted: Mar 23, 2009 Mon 11:39 pm     Views: 350    Interacts: 10


Khushwant Singh

Prejudice is like poison. Unless purged out of one’s mind in early stages, it can spread like cancer and make one incapable of differentiating between right and wrong. Of the many kinds of prejudice, the worst is to believe that one’s own religion is superior to all others, which may be tolerated but never taken seriously or accepted as equally valid as one’s own. The most misunderstood of the major religions today is Islam, which, after Christianity, is the second most widely practised religion in the world. It also gains more converts than any of the other religions. Prejudice against Islam was spread in Christendom from the time Muslims gained dominance in the Middle East, North Africa and Spain. Christian crusaders failed in their missions to crush Islam in its homeland but continued to vilify its founder, Mohammed. The emergence of militant Islamic groups like al-Qaida and taliban gave them reasons to do so. The attack on the World Trade Centre in New York and the Pentagon in Washington on September 11, 2001 provided fresh ammunition to vilifiers of Islam. Since then Islamophobia has been deliberately spread throughout the non-Muslim world. The two principle contentions of the anti-Islamists are that Islam was spread by the sword and that its founder-prophet was not the paragon of virtue that Muslims make him out to be. It can be proved by historical evidence that Islam was not forced upon the people; it was readily accepted by millions because it offered them new values, principally equality of mankind and rights to women that were unheard of in those times. In countries like Indonesia and Malayasia, Islam was not forced on the population by Muslim invaders but by Muslim missionaries.

Muslims are extremely sensitive to criticism of their Prophet. A popular adage in Persian is: ba khuda diwaana basho, ba Mohammed hoshiar! — “say what you like about God, but beware of what you say about Mohammed.� They regard him as the most perfect man who ever trod upon the earth, a successor of Adam, Moses, Noah, Abraham and Christ. He was the last of the prophets. If you honestly want to know how Muslims see him, you ought to take a good look at his life and teachings, which he claimed had been revealed to him by God. It would be as wrong to judge him by the doings of al-Qaida and taliban or by the fatwas periodically pronounced by Ayatollahs and half-baked mullahs. You do not judge Hinduism of the Vedas and Upanishads by the doings of Hindus who, in the name of Hindutva, destroy mosques, murder missionaries and nuns, vandalize libraries and works of art. You do not judge the teachings of the Sikh gurus by the utterances of Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale and by the murder of innocents by his hooligans. Likewise, judge Mohammed by what he taught and stood for and not by what his so-called followers do in his name.

Mohammed was born in Mecca in 570 AD. He lost both his parents while still a child and was brought up by his grandfather and uncle. He managed the business of a widow, whom he later married. She bore him six children. He took no other wife until she died. He was 40 years old when he started having revelations while in trance. They proclaimed Mohammed as the new messiah. Such revelation kept coming at random, sometimes dealing with problems at hand, at other times with matters spiritual. They were memorized or written down by his admirers and became the Quran, which means recitation. It should be kept in mind that Mohammed was not preaching ideas of his own but only reiterating most of what was already in the Judaic creed. Allah was the Arabic name for God before him. Similarly, Islam was ‘surrender’ and salman was ‘peace’. Mecca was the main market city of the Bedouin tribes. They gathered at the Kaaba, the huge courtyard with the black meteorite embedded in it during two pilgrimages — the bigger Haj and the lesser Umrah. Mohammed accepted Judaic traditions regarding food which is halaal (lawful) or haraam (forbidden, such as pig meat), names of the five daily prayers and circumcision of male children. Mohammed only asserted the oneness of God that did not accept of any equal such as the stone goddesses worshiped by different tribes. Mohammed never forced people to accept his faith and indeed quoted Allah’s message of freedom of faith. “There must be no coercion in matters of faith — la ikra f’il deen.� Further: “And if God had so willed, He would have made you all one single command; but He willed otherwise in order to test you by means of what He has vouchsafed unto you. Vie, then with one another in doing good works!�

As might have been expected, Mohammed’s mission roused fierce hostility. Many attempts were made to assassinate him but he had miraculously escaped. Ultimately, in 622 AD he was advised to flee from Mecca to Medina. This is know as the Hijra (emigration) and recognized as the beginning of the Muslim calendar. Meccans made a few attempts to capture Medina but were ousted. Muslim armies led by Mohammed triumphed and returned to Mecca as conquerors. By the time Mohammed died in Medina in 632 AD, the Arabian peninsula was united as a confederacy of different tribes under the banner of Islam.

Most of the ill-founded criticism against Mohammed is directed towards the number of women he married after the death of his first wife, Khadijah. This has to be seen in the perspective of Arabian society of the time. Tribes lived by warring against each other and looting caravans. There were heavy casualties of men, creating serious gender imbalance. Widows and orphans of men killed had to be provided with homes and sustenance. Otherwise they took to prostitution or begging. So they were given protection by being taken in marriages. Also, matrimonial alliances were a good way of creating bonds between different tribes. Mohammed did nothing not acceptable to his people. He went further: he was the first teacher to proclaim that the best union was a monogamous marriage and fixed the maximum limit to four, provided a man could keep all of his wives equally happy — which was most unlikely. The pertinent verse in the Quran reads: “And if you have reason to fear you might not act equitably towards orphans, then marry from among other women who are lawful to you, even two or three or four; but if you have reason to fear you might not be able to treat them with equal fairness, then only one.� Bear in mind that at that time polygamy was the norm in patriarchal societies all over the world.

To make a beginning in clearing your mind of anti-Muslim prejudices, I suggest you read Karen Armstrong’s Muhammad: A Prophet for Our Time. Armstrong is the leading writer on comparative religions today. She is not Muslim.


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content


Latest comments
Posted by buzzburza on Sunday May 3, 2009 02:47 am
This should be required reading for
all Yanks.
Posted by Eklavya on Tuesday March 24, 2009 08:52 am
A lot of us sincerely believe that this or that religion is better than the rest. Many of our religions themselves make that claim, explicitly and clearly, as they should.

Khushwant Singh has truly gone senile if he considers that to be the 'worst kind of prejudice.' Or he should be honest about his contempt for religion, and openly denounce being religious as following the worst kind of prejudice.

Posted by nb on Tuesday March 24, 2009 08:35 am
but khushwant is still a sardar...
Posted by Eklavya on Tuesday March 24, 2009 08:27 am
Tahir bhai, the problem here is not about the Truth. It is with Khushwant Singh's following statement, which is clearly untrue, and outright foolish:

"Of the many kinds of prejudice, the worst is to believe that one’s own religion is superior to all others, which may be tolerated but never taken seriously or accepted as equally valid as one’s own."

I frankly don't understand how a sane person can make that statement, and would be glad to be explained otherwise.
Posted by tahir on Tuesday March 24, 2009 07:23 am
This is Dr. Lok-Raaj (people power) you half Muslim-half-Indusians!

Why are you so disturbed hearing what Mr. Kushwant Singh says unless you know that he's found the truth he'd been looking for?

Doctor sahib, you're up against a liberated DAKTAR from down-the-underwear!
Posted by Eklavya on Tuesday March 24, 2009 06:29 am
This is an utterly foolish article. Shows Khushwant Singh is finally going senile, if he wasn't already.

But to be fair to drlokraj ji, he just said it 'appealed' to him, not whether he agreed with it or not. So, let's not conclude anything about him, please.
Posted by Catchy on Tuesday March 24, 2009 04:34 am


nb - All spirits have tendency to appreciate the TRUTH unless they are dead. If drlokraj likes such stuff, that shows his spirit still has chances to find the Ultimate Truth.
Posted by drlokraj on Tuesday March 24, 2009 03:35 am
nb, its not aimed at anyone. It appealed to me hence I posted.
Posted by akcheema on Tuesday March 24, 2009 02:29 am
I have read most of Karen Armstron's books, including the one you mentioned above ... her understanding of abrahamic religion is very un-orthodox as she claims the whole concept of God, Prophets and revelation is completely different to what and how we perceive it today ... different even for the prophets themselves

She states (many times) that the way Abraham, Jesus, Moses and Mohammed etc 'experienced' God and his revelation is far more allegorical to the more concrete concept of the above ... which evolved much later

She herself, was a catholic nun, ran away and turned atheist, then 'reverted' to a form of 'free-lance'monotheism ... a profesor of theology in London

I have a lot of respect for her views, even though I do question some of them (then I have always been blamed for questioning everything!).
Posted by nb on Tuesday March 24, 2009 02:12 am
please advise who this ilog is aimed at? thanks

drlokraj

  • Interacts: 390
  • iLogs: 105
  • Gallery: 72
  • Page views: 93028
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: Nov 1 2004
  • Last signin: Nov 20 2009
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • MURAWWAT O MOHABBAT KE MABAIN (afsana)
  • My MUSIC PAGE
  • Small Things That Make A Big Difference
  • It's your fault Grandpa..
  • Fake Muslim History and The Reality!

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • The Strange Case of the Indian Channels That Did Not Air the 26/11 Documentary
  • I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
  • The Jehadi Frankenstein
  • Uneven Democracy : The Cry from Chhattisgarh
  • NRO Is Just a Name
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Chopping Block
  • Reshma: Voice of Mother Earth
  • Nuclear powers can count too!
  • Gardens of Stone
  • Connected to: Harsh Kapoor

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2009 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited