unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
« November 2009 »
SMTWTFS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 2425 26 27 28
29 30

Recently by ALFBAY

  • Genius poetry of Kabeera of Chowkwala fame
  • Ultimate Rebuke of a distinguished Chowki
  • Weaklings can't apologize
  • A Praying Soul Insulted by Guess Whom?
  • Warning from Chowk and My Response
  • For Taji - abouts fueds with further comments

iLog Categories

  • All
  • Personal
  • Fiction
  • Poetry
  • Travel
  • Work
  • Sports
  • Books
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Humor
  • Religion
  • Chowk
  • Other
  • ALFBAY
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts

Warning from Chowk and My Response

Posted: Oct 4, 2009 Sun 03:10 pm     Views: 269    Interacts: 9

From: complaintcentre
Date: Oct 2 12:53 pm
Subject: Warning
Your recent interacts and ilogs do not meet chowk\'s criteria of good taste. Your continued assault must stop or else your account will be suspended. Abusive interacts and ilogs will not be tolerated any more.

However, we are in the process of hearing suggestions that will restore chowk\'s image.

chowkstaff
------------------------------------------
Thanks for letting me know. I will refrain in future to respond in the coin to abusive, hate mongerers, bigots interactors as advised. But I must keep the right to respond in refined way and in good taste as suggested. Hope you will find that acceptable. I just posted a comment on Tahir's ilog "What a desperation, what a weakness" where he is attacking Chowk editors in most disatasteful way. Pl advise if my response meets your criteria. If I don't hear from you I will understand that I have remained within the guidelines.
Regards,
----------------


+ add to my favorite ilogs + flag objectionable content


Latest comments
Posted by csg on Monday October 5, 2009 12:47 am
that is alarming
Posted by Fouz on Monday October 5, 2009 12:13 am
Not only that but someone hacked into my PMs, read my personal messages and posted abusive comments on one of the blogs (outside Chowk) and appended my e-mail (which I had written in my profile)

I think its pretty much certain that Chowk now is not the place to be seen and heard.
Posted by csg on Sunday October 4, 2009 11:19 pm
complaintcentre is a id created by some chowkie to imitate chowk admin. The id has been used to post ilogs as well in the past. The chowk admin should take note of this.

Posted by ALFBAY on Sunday October 4, 2009 10:10 pm
WOW, damn it, see how dishonest, faker, imposter, theives, cowards are these guys who blame others for filthy attacks. What more filthy (and cowardly) act can be than impostering like this. Can't our simpletons like sumarai and fouz see all this or protest on this.
Good thing I posted the communication for all to see. I had the uncanny feeling that I should bring this to everyone's attention.
Thanks man for pointing this out.
Posted by BJ2 on Sunday October 4, 2009 07:14 pm
If they did not make a grammar error, then it is not authentic chowkstaff mail.
Posted by tahirtheLman on Sunday October 4, 2009 07:09 pm
Dear
Alfbay
This is not chowkstaff
I received a similar "warning"
This is an interactor with a signin name of complaintcentre
When chowkstaff writes you do not get the , reply option in the mail message.
Moreover if you click complaincentre's ID you will find out that he has actually written i logs which have been removed by actual chowkstaff.
This is someone trying to "impersonate" chowkstaff.
Posted by ALFBAY on Sunday October 4, 2009 04:46 pm
You must realize samurai that my responses were only in reaction to hate mongering. if you want to be fair you must also discourage in the first place the abusive attacks from the other side.
tali eik haath say naheen bajti
there is long record of abusive attacks - tahir must apologize like masadi from all who have been deeply hurt by his filthy attacks
any fair minded person will endorse this idea.
Posted by Samurai on Sunday October 4, 2009 03:53 pm
Good for you Alfbay, nothing wrong with criticising an iloger or an author, whose views and ideas about certain things are different from yours, as long as it is done within the norms of decency, choosing proper words and the right orfice. But for the last couple of weeks, you had earned the distinction of being the most foul mouth, using highly abusive and filthy language, applying it all through the wrong orfice. Believe me there is no fun in paying somebody in the same coin, I really felt bad later on, the otherday when I asked you to fly to the moon for a particular task. Now, since you have promised to be a good interactor within the Chowk Prescript or guidlines. I wish you all the best.

ALFBAY

  • Interacts: 1
  • iLogs: 14
  • Gallery: 6
  • Page views: 3105
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: Sep 13 2009
  • Last signin: Dec 31 1969
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Favorite iLogs

  • My MUSIC PAGE
  • Small Things That Make A Big Difference
  • It's your fault Grandpa..
  • The Cup of Coffee............... an interesting article tht i came across
  • What do Women Want?

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • The Strange Case of the Indian Channels That Did Not Air the 26/11 Documentary
  • I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
  • The Jehadi Frankenstein
  • Uneven Democracy : The Cry from Chhattisgarh
  • NRO Is Just a Name
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • What is Pakistan to me?
  • I Protest!
  • Denis Halliday on Iraq
  • The Battle at Delhi, 1999
  • Semi Final of the World Cup 1999

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2009 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited