| « November 2009 » | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | |||||
Recently by pakdoc
- The Final Solution: A documentary banned in India
- We don’t even match up with Pakistan as far as defence goes – IAF Chief
- moral- mishchief mongers end up alone!
- China giving meddling India a message
- Maoists Ripping India apart slowly
- In India, 5,000 kids die every 24 hrs: UNICEF
- The Extremists of Pakistan
- The Doctrine of Divide and Rule
- Democracy- An Elected Dictatorship
- Muslims- the forefathers of modern day sciences and technology 2
- Muslims- the forefathers of modern day sciences and technology 1
- Heaven in Hell
- A Pakistani owns and runs Edible Arrangements
- An Autumn Tale
- Be the change you want to see
- Islam and nationalism
Foreign Aid and India:
Financing the Leviathan State
by Shyam J. Kamath
Shyam J. Kamath is an associate professor of economics in the School of Business and Economics, California State University at Hayward.
Executive Summary
With a debate now raging over whether further foreign aid programs financed by U.S. taxpayers are justified in the post-Cold War era, a review of the development experience of the recipient of the largest amount of foreign aid is instructive. India has received more foreign aid than any other developing nation since the end of World War II--estimated at almost $55 billion since the beginning of its First Five-Year Plan in 1951.(1) It has long been an article of faith among development economists and policymakers that foreign aid is a necessary and central component of economic development, yet the record of Indian economic development since 1947 belies that view.
India has had one of the lowest rates of growth of all developing countries and remains one of the poorest countries in the world after almost 45 years of aid-financed, centrally planned development. Foreign aid has directly financed and sustained India's centralized planning and control framework and thereby financed the growth of one of the noncommunist world's largest and most inefficient public sectors. In 1988-89, 101 of the country's 222 largest public-sector companies recorded losses and contributed to a federal deficit five times as large, in relative terms, as the U.S. budget deficit.(2)
Today, after nearly 45 years of planned economic development, India's annual per capita income remains around $300. Almost 40 percent of Indians live below the official poverty line, and the absolute number of Indians in that category increased sharply between the late 1950s and the mid-1980s. In short, India is a paradigmatic case of the failure of government-sponsored aid; it stands as a dramatic testimonial to why such aid should go the way of the socialist development model it has bankrolled for decades.
add to my favorite ilogs
flag objectionable content
Because they are still crawling n borrowing...wait couple of years....it would be KAPUT...even CHINA declined cash funds, and let me not talk about saudis....a word to the wise is enough!
Samjhi darling ;)
accept the truth indi boys...your false propoganda of shining india doesn't sell :) welcome to reality....
thanks riaz haq sahib for spreading truth and countering farce..... long live pakistan!!!! :)
may truth conquer and deception befall :P
You incite ppl to become Soosai Bambar...
You have become Old and enjoying all the Kafirs can give in the west... Ur Internet Jihad encourages gullible kids like PakDoc to extremes...
This is a perfect Internet mirror to what happens in Madressas all arnd Pakistan..
Militarily intervene to overthrow the current regime
419 24.5%
Indict government officials for gross violation of human rights
358 20.9%
Launch diplomatic offensives to get governments to reverse decision
259 15.1%
Militarily intervene to provide humanitarian assistance
258 15.1%
Increase sanctions against the top leaders
181 10.6%
Undertake airdrops of aid despite government opposition
116 6.8%
Provide aid to these governments for them to distribute as they wish
63 3.7%
Censure the governments at the UN Security Council
57 3.3%
Number of Voters : 1711
First Vote : Monday, 23 June 2008 17:01
Last Vote : Monday, 02 November 2009 07:02
1. Somalia (0)
2. Zimbabwe (+1)
3. Sudan (-1)
4. Chad (0)
5. Democratic Republic of the Congo (+1)
6. Iraq (-1)
7. Afghanistan (0)
8. Central African Republic (+2)
9. Guinea (+2)
10. Pakistan (-1)
Hmmm
~~~~~~~~~~According to the State Bank of Pakistan, FDI has shrunk~~~~~~~~~~~
Hmmm
~~~~~~the industry will face a production loss of $1 billion a month due to gas supply cuts.~~~~~~~~
Hmmmm
~~~~~~war on terror has cost the country’s economy more than $35 billion in lost exports, revenues, opportunity, etc~~~~~~
Hmmmm
~~~~~~~~“The economic cost of terrorism and the war against militancy is considerably high and its impact is going to be felt long after it is over and done with~~~~~~~~~~
Interesting!
Ye sala Pakistan tau mar raha hai.....
May we have our money back, please? Specifically, the £1 billion we donate in aid to India, a country rich enough to enter the space race. What on earth are we doing, pouring UK taxpayers’ money into the maw of a nation that can afford to send rockets to the Moon?
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/5520516/Why_are_we_givin g_India_%C3%821_billion_in_aid_if_it_can_afford_Moon_missions/
But the British aid minister Douglas Alexander, the first cabinet minister to visit India's poorest state Bihar, said that despite "real strides in economic growth" there were still 828 million people living on less than $2 a day in India.
UK's Department of International Development says if the UN's millennium development goals - alleviating extreme poverty, reducing child mortality rates and fighting epidemics such as Aids - are left unmet in India, they will not be met worldwide. Some 43% of children go hungry and a woman dies in childbirth every five minutes.
British Minister Alexander contrasted the rapid growth in China with India's economic success - highlighting government figures that showed the number of poor people had dropped in the one-party communist state by 70% since 1990 but had risen in the world's biggest democracy by 5%.
I think this is 1992 paper from the pre-reform period.
So the info about India's growth is dated.
But the fact is India is still the largest recipient of foreign grants and loans from various donors and IFCs.
In spite of all of the recent news about aid to Pakistan dominating the media, the fact remains that resurgent India has received more foreign aid than any other developing nation since the end of World War II--estimated at almost $100 billion since the beginning of its First Five-Year Plan in 1951. And it continues to receive more foreign aid in spite of impressive economic growth for almost a decade. At the recent G20 meeting, India has asked the World Bank to raise the amount of money India can borrow from the bank for its infrastructure projects, according to Times of India. At present, India can borrow up to $15.5 billion as per the SBL (single borrower limit) fixed by the Bank.
http://www.riazhaq.com/2009/04/foreign-aid-continues-to-pour-in-india.h tml
pakdoc
- Interacts: 0
- iLogs: 47
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 6597
- Last visitor: adnanmanzoor
- Member since: Sep 29 2009
- Last signin: Dec 31 1969
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


