| « October 2008 » | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
Recently by echoboom
- IF I WERE A TERRORIST
- Was Marriott Hotel Islamabad an attack on US Marines
- Sufism..Hussain Nasr
- Paradise Lost Smyrna 1922: The Destruction of Islam’s City of Tolerance by Giles Milton
- Mohsin Changaizi: The 20 year old Poet who has taken Urdu Poetry by Storm
- It’s the Turkish secularists who look backwards
- VAFADAARI mein shaikh O Brhaman kee..
- Wedding of Ahmedinejad`s son....
- Around the world, much is expected from Sen. Barack Obama as he begins race for White House
- Prince Charles, defender of Islam
- Some of the most haunting melodies--on video
- 1783..When America was defeated by Muslims
- Muslim Travelers and Mapmakers during the Middle Ages
- CNN: 1.5 Million converts to Islam since 9/11
- The Ben Ladens
- 50,0000 converting to islam each year..British Home Secretary
Bolivia's Politics has Jews Packing
Daniel Bush
LA PAZ, Bolivia (JTA) – More than any other single event in recent years, the future of Bolivian Jewry may be determined by the outcome of the country's upcoming national referendum on a new constitution.
The proposed constitution calling for increased state control of private-sector enterprise is being fiercely opposed by many middle- and upper-class Bolivians, including the country’s Jews. Four of Bolivia's wealthiest provinces have launched autonomous movements in response to the proposal.
The referendum is scheduled for May 4.
Bolivia's Jewish community has shrunk considerably in the past decade. Young Jews are seeking larger Jewish communities, and both old and young have left to find professional opportunities unrestricted by the policies of Evo Morales, the socialist who became Bolivia’s president in 2005.
Morales, Bolivia's first indigenous president, is staunchly anti-American and has endorsed Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's call for an anti-American "axis of good" comprised of Bolivia, Venezuela and Cuba.
Ricardo Udler, the president of the Israeli Circle of La Paz, the country's main Jewish organization, says Bolivian Jews are increasingly uncomfortable about the direction the country of 9 million is taking under Morales.
"Since Evo was elected there's been a radical change," Udler said.
Though there is no overt anti-Semitism in Bolivia, he said, Bolivia's approximately 350 Jews feel threatened by Morales' close ties with Chavez and his growing relationship with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
"Things could get worse for Jews in Bolivia," Udler warned.
Since Morales took office, the Jewish population of La Paz, Bolivia's capital and the home of its largest Jewish community, has fallen by some 10 percent. That has a significant impact on a community of approximately 180.
Bolivia's Jews find themselves in a predicament not unlike Jews in South America's socialist leader, Venezuela, which has lost approximately half its Jews since Chavez took power. As in Venezuela, Jews in Bolivia fear increased state control of their businesses and lives.
Morales' increasingly close relationship with Iran hasn't helped. Last September, Ahmadinejad on a visit to Bolivia pledged to invest $5 billion in the country over the next five years, including in the natural gas and oil industries. Those industries already receive support from Chavez.
The Morales administration also has announced the possibility of Iran opening an embassy in La Paz.
Due to these developments, said Bolivian Jewish businessman Joe Epelbaum, "a lot of Jews are planning to leave."
"This is a fast-shrinking community," he said.
The upturn in Jewish emigration from Bolivia represents a surprising reversal for a country that during World War II was among the few in South America that offered visas to Jews fleeing Europe. Jewish immigrants settled in La Paz as well as the cities of Cochabamba and Santa Cruz, establishing communities that thrived in the postwar years.
During the 1950s, La Paz had between 12,000 and 15,000 Jews, according to Udler.
Harald Schoengut, the president of the Israeli Association of Cochabamba, said his city's Jewish population reached 2,000 half a century ago. About 110 Jews now live there.
In La Paz, some two dozen Jews recently attended Shabbat services at the Israeli Circle of La Paz building on a Friday evening. At a dinner later that night attended by about the same number of people, the host noted with chagrin that one-tenth of La Paz's once-booming Jewish community could fit under a single roof.
Most of those leaving the country are third-generation Bolivian Jews seeking better educational and professional opportunities in the United States, Israel and Europe.
“We’re trying to avoid this by enticing the younger generations to study here in Cochabamba,” Schoengut told JTA. Despite this effort, most young Jewish high school and university graduates continue to leave the country. “The future is very uncertain.” he said.
Udler said a similar exodus is taking place among young Jews in La Paz.
"We have a big problem that our children go to study abroad and they don't come back," he said. "My sons, for example, won't come back to Bolivia," from Israel, where they have moved, "because there isn't a Jewish community here. In Bolivia they don't have a Jewish future."
Since Morales came to power, older Jews also have been leaving in greater numbers than ever, according to Epelbaum, who owns a large textile factory here with two brothers-in-law.
"Families with bigger, more profitable businesses that are harder to leave behind are staying," said Epelbaum, 57, who was born in Poland and immigrated to Bolivia with his parents when he was 7. "But there's no future as a Jew in Bolivia even if you have a business that's doing well."
Jews in the country’s textile industry have been hurt by Morales’ unpredictable labor and trade policies, Epelbaum said. Morales has limited exporters’ access to international markets and restricted foreign investment in Bolivia.
Epelbaum's textile store, on a busy commercial street in the center of La Paz, is crowded with rolls of colored fabrics. A photograph of Epelbaum's three daughters hangs on the wall behind the counter at the back of the store. All of them have left the country.
"I'm basically still here for economic reasons," he said. "Eventually, though, I don't see myself staying here."
The professionally and socially driven emigration of Bolivia's younger Jews coupled with the politically driven emigration of its more established members means the days of Bolivian Jewry are numbered, Udler said.
"In the next 10 to 20 years," he said, "there will be no more Jews in Bolivia."
add to my favorite ilogs
flag objectionable content
Reason? They both are not products of the Ba Ba Blacksheep system of Slave Markets.
============================================================
India n Leftists Fume Over US Iran Comments
By Patrick Goodenough
CNSNews.com International Editor
April 24, 2008
(CNSNews.com) - Left-wing lawmakers in India who oppose a planned nuclear energy cooperation agreement with the United States are up in arms over Washington's advice on how New Delhi should deal with Iran.
Earlier this week, a State Department spokesman appealed for the Indian government to press President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on the international community's unresolved nuclear dispute with Tehran when the Iranian leader visits next week.
Spokesman Tom Casey said the U.S. hoped India would urge Ahmadinejad to comply with Security Council requirements regarding the nuclear program, including the suspension of uranium enrichment.
Opponents of the Indo-U.S. nuclear deal, including leftist parties whose support in parliament is crucial for the survival of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's government, seized on the comment, saying it was further proof of U.S. interference in India's affairs.
The Bush administration's proposal to resume civilian nuclear cooperation -- frozen since India began experimenting with nuclear weapons in the 1970s -- is a key element in its strategy, outlined in 2005, to help energy-hungry India become "a major world power" in the 21st century.
The agreement was signed two years ago, but it remains bogged down because the Indian leftists have threatened to withdraw their support for the government if it goes ahead. The State Department warned earlier this month that time was running out if the current U.S. Congress was to have the opportunity to consider the landmark deal for ratification, although the department said it could also be taken up by the next administration and Congress.
Leftists led by the Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) have long suspected that in exchange for the deal, the U.S. expects India to toe the line on other issues, including support for the West in the dispute with Iran.
Although both the Indian and U.S. governments have denied that there is any linkage between the two issues, skeptical U.S. lawmakers have long argued that India should support the U.S. on Iran if it wishes the deal to go ahead.
When India twice sided against Iran in votes calling for the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), to refer Tehran to the Security Council, the left-wingers said this was proof that the government was bending to pressure from the U.S.
They were similarly unhappy when the U.S. spoke out against India's plans for a pipeline to bring natural gas from Iran to India, via Pakistan (India, which is anxious to find energy suppliers to fuel its growing economy, dismissed U.S. objections; negotiations on the multi-billion-dollar project continue, but have run into difficulties including a dispute over transit fees Pakistan wants to charge.)
Casey's remark ahead of Ahmadinejad's first visit to India drew an unusually strong response from India's external affairs ministry, which said India and Iran were ancient civilizations which did not need any outside guidance on how to conduct bilateral relations.
The ministry's stance did not satisfy the CPI-M, however, and its lawmakers demanded that the government summon the American ambassador to protest against the "gross interference" in India's relations with other countries.
Accusing the U.S. of "imperialist arrogance," communist lawmaker Brinda Karat said the incident "clearly proves that the U.S. considers India its junior partner."
External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee on Wednesday advised the U.S. to leave the issue of Iran's nuclear programs to the IAEA.
"We tell the U.S., do not take on yourself the responsibility [of determining] whether Iran was manufacturing weapons or not," he told reporters. "Leave it to the IAEA, the designated authority."
Iranian Ambassador to India Mahdi Nabizadeh said Wednesday that neither Tehran nor Delhi would allow Washington's "interference" to affect increasingly close bilateral ties, the official IRNA news agency reported.
Tehran hid its nuclear program for almost two decades before dissidents exposed it in 2002. While the U.S. and allies suspect it is being developed for military purposes, Iran says it wants the technology solely to generate energy supplies.
Despite three Security Council resolutions and sanctions, Iran continues to defy demands to suspend uranium enrichment, and on April 8 announced plans to expand the activities by tripling the number of centrifuges it has operating.
Centrifuges are pieces of equipment that spin at high speeds, enriching uranium to varying degrees, providing fuel for nuclear reactors or, in the case of very high levels of enrichment, a key ingredient for an atomic bomb.Make media inquiries or request an interview about this article.
Subscribe to the free CNSNews.com daily E-Brief.
TEHRAN (FNA)- Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said that no one in the White House nor any of the presidential candidates can save America from its economic "downfall".
Addressing a large crowd in Hamadan on Wednesday, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said the US is doomed to undergo an economic breakdown, press tv said.
While the Bush administration refuses to confirm speculations about the US economy, American economists have conceded that the country is in fact in recession.
"No politician can be found in the United States who is capable of saving the US economy from this move toward the valley of downfall," continued Ahmadinejad.
He then rejected the speculation by "superficial" observers that claim the recession was spawned by the privileged few who wait only to reap the benefits later.
"[The recession] will end the hegemony of world powers," Ahmadinejad concluded.
In March 2008 alone, US employers cut a whopping 80,000 jobs, the biggest decline in a
echoboom
- Interacts: 2461
- iLogs: 643
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 148794
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Jul 31 2003
- Last signin: Oct 8 2008
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


