Ras Siddiqui February 2, 2006
#10 Posted by Ras on February 12, 2006 6:57:04 pm
An interesting movie billed as a `Comedy`` but contains almost none.
It seems that ZahraJ has hit the nail on the head here.
What a coincidence indeed!
Ras
#9 Posted by ZahraJ on February 12, 2006 10:23:00 am
I think that was the point of having this silly movie. There is no concept of COMEDY in the Muslim World. And what a coincidence that the movie is in the theatres when the Cartoon Incident is well covered in the media.
#8 Posted by JagdeeshGodbole on February 10, 2006 7:58:10 am
This movie sucked. It was not funny at all.
#7 Posted by ZahraJ on February 3, 2006 9:51:04 pm
A simple waste of time!
I just saw the said movie early this week at the AMC - 42nd Street, NYC. Only 10 -12 seats were occupied in the smallest theatre at the AMC. The most interesting aspect was that 80% of the audience was young women who had stopped by after work. The movie was a big disappointment and quite poorly made. Albert Brooks ` acting was fine, but there was no comedy in his delivery or his jokes. The only comedy you would sense was in the one-liners, as Ras identied in his review.
The most irritating part was Albert`s Indian assistant`s repeated emphasis on ``FANTASTIC``. It was simply stupid. Both Indians and Pakistanis(or the ones emulating to be Pakistanis) were portrayed as if they had never experienced a life outside - very naive and silly ones.
As the movie finished, I went to the front desk and asked them for a refund.
``I am sorry ma`am we do not have a policy to give refunds.``
``Since there was no comedy in the movie, therefore I decided to play a prank on you.``
I wished I had watched Nanny Mcphee :(
I just saw the said movie early this week at the AMC - 42nd Street, NYC. Only 10 -12 seats were occupied in the smallest theatre at the AMC. The most interesting aspect was that 80% of the audience was young women who had stopped by after work. The movie was a big disappointment and quite poorly made. Albert Brooks ` acting was fine, but there was no comedy in his delivery or his jokes. The only comedy you would sense was in the one-liners, as Ras identied in his review.
The most irritating part was Albert`s Indian assistant`s repeated emphasis on ``FANTASTIC``. It was simply stupid. Both Indians and Pakistanis(or the ones emulating to be Pakistanis) were portrayed as if they had never experienced a life outside - very naive and silly ones.
As the movie finished, I went to the front desk and asked them for a refund.
``I am sorry ma`am we do not have a policy to give refunds.``
``Since there was no comedy in the movie, therefore I decided to play a prank on you.``
I wished I had watched Nanny Mcphee :(
#6 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on February 3, 2006 2:57:21 pm
#6, nasah {``and NOT to Pakistan -- if I may add...:)``]
Nasha,
That was my point. Thanks for adding it. This is hilarious - the funniest place in the Muslimm world is in India. LOL. Bollywood could transform Islam into a pleasant force. :)
Nasha,
That was my point. Thanks for adding it. This is hilarious - the funniest place in the Muslimm world is in India. LOL. Bollywood could transform Islam into a pleasant force. :)
#5 Posted by nasah on February 3, 2006 1:57:34 pm
``Isn`t it funny that to look for ``comedy in the Muslim world,`` one has to go all the way to India?``(Salim)
and NOT to Pakistan -- if I may add...:)
and NOT to Pakistan -- if I may add...:)
#5 Posted by nasah on February 3, 2006 1:57:35 pm
``Isn`t it funny that to look for ``comedy in the Muslim world,`` one has to go all the way to India?``(Salim)
and NOT to Pakistan -- if I may add...:)
and NOT to Pakistan -- if I may add...:)
#4 Posted by nasah on February 3, 2006 12:08:39 pm
Ras btw -- those hookah smoking Pakistani comedians were not high on tobacco....:)
#3 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on February 3, 2006 10:02:55 am
Ras,
Isn`t it funny that to look for ``comedy in the Muslim world,`` one has to go all the way to India? That in itself should answer most questions. :)
Isn`t it funny that to look for ``comedy in the Muslim world,`` one has to go all the way to India? That in itself should answer most questions. :)
#2 Posted by Saminasha on February 3, 2006 8:45:26 am
It seems the irony is so subtle in this movie, that mainstream American critics have missed it. Brooks means this movie to be a mirror.
#1 Posted by nasah on February 3, 2006 6:53:24 am
Ras -- saw it in Washington -- never mind the eyebrow raising title of the movie -- the movie is quirkily funny -- in the understated tradition of Brooksian style.....deserves three stars..:)
Interact Index
Also by Ras Siddiqui
Similar Articles
- Demon Sahir Shah
- Better Times Muhammad Farhan
- Love at Shara Zawia Prashant Bhatt
- ‘Dustbin of history’ or ‘history of sorts’ Gowhar Geelani
- Cockroaches of Disruption kashkin dabruski
US Elections 2008 Primaries
Latest Interacts
- muqaddam: So the Biharis are... MQM - History and
- MantoLives: PS. Which brings me... Living Gandhi and King
- MantoLives: Adam is right when... Living Gandhi and King
- MantoLives: Gandhi did not merely... Living Gandhi and King
- nkg: Re: # 163 Manto... "The people... Living Gandhi and King
- MantoLives: Btw even Niazi was... Living Gandhi and King
- MantoLives: The people in Swat... Living Gandhi and King
- MantoLives: Adam khan, Sorry no can... Living Gandhi and King








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content