unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
all are welcome to read, write and think
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

A Lot is Rotten in the State of Denmark

Karamatullah K Ghori February 23, 2006

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 48-64   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

#128 Posted by bjkumar on February 26, 2006 1:33:06 pm

#125 TAhmed

[hamidm: ``the fact remains that a significant majority of the ummah supports this kind of barbaric behavior and needs to be put on the spot``

And where did you collect this factoid?]

Sorry Tauheed saheb, I do not mean to come in-between two maha-rathis! (Just think of a particle of grain caught between two massive old wheels, running at full speed!)

However, can you explain how a humongous population of one billion lets such things happen in this day and age - and does NOTHING to address them - and denies, obfuscates, or merely turns around and tries to attack those very people who bring it to attention?!!

I think it goes a little beyond being passive spectators - don`t you think? I mean the culprits did not drop out of the sky, did they?

They appear more of the home-grown variety, won`t you say?


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#127 Posted by tahmed32 on February 26, 2006 1:03:09 pm
Zeena #121 Thanks. That picture shows just what kind of animals we share this planet with.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#126 Posted by bjkumar on February 26, 2006 1:00:27 pm

#115 (More Addenda)

I forgot to mention yet another important form of reaction - it is called obfuscation!

Thanks, #122 Noetherf, for reminding me.


#117, #120 Zeemax

Clearly, I have no special expertise in such matters - like YOU appear to claim!

The photograph appears in an article by a person named Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi - it says the picture was smuggled out of Iran. The same author has published articles in the National Review magazine - which does have a certain amount of reputation (perhaps significantly more than this web site does (at the present time (let us give the editor some more time though, who knows!))).

The intro states:

``Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi, a native of Iran, is an activist and writer. Elio Bonazzi is an Italian-born political scientist. Husband and wife, they are based in New York.``

I choose to believe that author. I believe such an author has more credibility than no-name interactors at this foolish web-site. Especially interactors who disclaim the photograph because the act it depicts does not appear to have been done ``by the Book``!

Simple as that!

Now, irrespective of the quality of this particular photograph, the real question is:

HAS ANYONE DENIED THAT SUCH STONINGS HAVE OCCURED IN THAT COUNTRY?

(Hint: Has any one denied that actual amputation of hands occurred during the Taliban regime in Afghanistan?)

The actual act won`t look very different from what is shown here - or would it? Or are you suggesting that they actually do it in more humane ways?



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#125 Posted by tahmed32 on February 26, 2006 1:00:06 pm
hamidm: ``the fact remains that a significant majority of the ummah supports this kind of barbaric behavior and needs to be put on the spot``

And where did you collect this factoid? wait, i forgot... you can read minds...not just your own but of 1.2 billion other people as well!! wow!!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#124 Posted by hamidm2 on February 26, 2006 12:53:55 pm
Re: # 123

zeemax,

........... i am surprised to see you defending the islamists who are throwing a hissy fit over some innocuous cartoons of a long-dead arab who claimed that he talked to god .......... who says that god and religion should not be mocked and put to the same test as other ideas and theories ?

........... and so what if the picture of the poor woman being prepped for ritual stoning is doctored ?.......... the fact remains that a significant majority of the ummah supports this kind of barbaric behavior and needs to be put on the spot so that they can see the idiocy of their faith .......... the danish cartoons and pictures like this one are an essential first step in reforming the mohammedans .............. let`s not back off and join the rank of apologists for this rabble ..........
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#123 Posted by zeemax on February 26, 2006 11:24:14 am
#122 by noetherf

Thanks noetherf ... very illuminating article. Hope it benefits some of these shitheads.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#122 Posted by noetherf on February 26, 2006 11:08:24 am
Please refer to this article also. I think this is important too. Think sensibly.

(DV) Leupp:Exposing Incitements - Those Danish Muhammad Cartoons
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#121 Posted by Zeena on February 26, 2006 10:43:26 am
#119 tahmed32
Very true.can`t agree more.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#120 Posted by zeemax on February 26, 2006 9:25:12 am
#118 by bjkumar

You clowns ... these poor bastards are probably filling up a ditch for some purpose... not planting a woman in it ... look closely ... the woman has been superimposed. Also, the stoning manual says you need to bury people neck deep ... not waist deep!

And BTW .. what`re they doing preparing to stone a woman in the middle of nowhere?? I thought it was supposed to be in the city square after the `Jima` prayers !!!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#119 Posted by tahmed32 on February 26, 2006 9:14:19 am
So chowk pulled of that picture of a woman being put half buried in the ground, in preparation for her being stoned to death by ``muslims``??

chowk staff is obviously not concerned with chowk interact guidelines - that picture represents something factual. Being factual (however bitter the truth may be) does not violate chowk guidelines it is the gratuitous, spiteful communal and nationalistic and personal insults that violate interact guidelines, and which chowk staff has never bothered to properly deal with.

Lets have that picture put back - on the front page!! Truth, however bitter, is not unIslamic.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#118 Posted by bjkumar on February 26, 2006 9:13:43 am

#115 (Addendum)

I forgot to mention another important form of reaction - it is called denial!

Thanks, #117 Zeemax for reminding me.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#117 Posted by zeemax on February 26, 2006 9:07:08 am
#109 by hamidm2 Re: # 107

.............. well done ! ............

What`s wrong with you? The second picture is obviously doctored. Look at the aspect ratio which is all haywire.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#116 Posted by PunjabiZulu on February 26, 2006 9:06:51 am
bjkumar

Yes you are right - Hindoos have the same defensiveness reflex that blinds them to the cannibals and monsters amongst them. But there was a poll saying that 40% of British Muslims want sharia law to be introduced in British cities where they form a majority - so I think there is something else mixed in there with it.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#115 Posted by bjkumar on February 26, 2006 8:58:46 am

#110 PunjabiZulu
[...probably because a substantial number of Muslims agree tacitly with that kind of punishment being meted out to women...]

I must disagree with that. Half the population is women (or perhaps that does not mean much - after all, we see in that very revealing picture that it is a WOMAN who is helping pile on the soil!) and in any case, most people are peaceful in their day-to-day lives.

There is no evidence that I am aware of which indicates that the majority of the population supports sharia laws (if that be the case, Manto mian should seriously consider packing his bags - for less ``greener`` pastures!)

I believe the real reason for not speaking out against the people who are carrying out such barbaric acts are because such villains are considered ``fellow`` Muslims - so there is a certain degree of solidarity with them - somewhat similar to the different reaction to the barbaric acts of Saddam versus the leberating acts of the USA that we see from the vast majority of the chowk crowds (and perhaps the editors) here - there is a level of misplaced ``identification`` with individuals who wear the same ``religion`` label, but not the acts that those same individuals carry out. People become defensive about their own ``linkage`` to the perpetrators - and they would rather not look at the problem. Couple that with the fact that people are too intimidated to begin with - many of the people have to live under the rule of such perpetrators. And sometimes, it is much easier to blame the victims, and sometimes it is easier to lash out by accusing others of having their own deficiencies.

Weaknesses - all of them, and reactions that are fully designed to cover such weaknesses - and invariably fail to!

Such defensive reflexes are probably not unique to Muslims - however. In my opinion, many Hindus reacted in similar ways to the post-Godhra riots - the post-Indira-assassination riots, and perhaps other events prior to those.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#114 Posted by nasah on February 26, 2006 6:57:58 am
for mellow Hindus (except the one who imitate the Jihadis) their religion is personal --

for genetically exhibitionist Muslims their religion needs a soap box.....

Hindus will integrate in Europe like a charm -- if they don`t go to their homeland every weekend -- but the Muslims path will be full of thorns -- unless they burst away that self-created bubble of self-aggrandizement -- over their heads -- looking likw some alien beings from another planet --

if not -- Europe WILL BURST that bubble for them.....the cartoons are the beginnings of that process......
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#113 Posted by nasah on February 26, 2006 6:45:10 am
for mellow Hindus (except the one who immitate the Jihadis) their religion is personal --

for genetically exhibtionist Musliims their religion needs a soap box.....

Hindus will integrate in Europe like a charm -- if they don`t go to their homeland every weekend -- but the Muslims path will be full of thorns -- unless they burst away that self-created bubble of self-aggarandizement -- over their heads -- looking likw some alien beings from another planet --

if not -- Europe WILL BURST that bubble for them.....the cartoons are the beginnings of that process......
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 48-64   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Interact Index

    #176 tahmed32
    #175 discoverer
    #174 tahmed32
    #173 SR
    #172 tahmed32
    #171 zeemax
    #170 zeemax
    #169 zeemax
    #168 tahmed32
    #167 zeemax
    #166 tahmed32
    #165 zeemax
    #164 tahmed32
    #163 zeemax
    #162 tahmed32
    #161 zeemax
    #160 tahmed32
    #159 zeemax
    #158 tahmed32
    #157 zeemax
    #156 zeemax
    #155 teshah
    #154 bjkumar
    #153 tahmed32
    #152 hamidm2
    #151 tahmed32
    #150 tahmed32
    #149 zeemax
    #148 rsridhar
    #147 PewResearch
    #146 hamidm2
    #145 tahmed32
    #144 tahmed32
    #143 arjun_m
    #142 zeemax
    #141 rf786
    #140 bbabu
    #139 zeemax
    #138 bbabu
    #137 bjkumar
    #136 rsridhar
    #135 rsridhar
    #134 bjkumar
    #133 rsridhar
    #132 Salim_Chauhan
    #131 arjun_m
    #130 Ramanujan
    #129 hamidm2
    #128 bjkumar
    #127 tahmed32
    #126 bjkumar
    #125 tahmed32
    #124 hamidm2
    #123 zeemax
    #122 noetherf
    #121 Zeena
    #120 zeemax
    #119 tahmed32
    #118 bjkumar
    #117 zeemax
    #116 PunjabiZulu
    #115 bjkumar
    #114 nasah
    #113 nasah
    #112 PunjabiZulu
    #111 PunjabiZulu
    #110 PunjabiZulu
    #109 hamidm2
    #108 PunjabiZulu
    #107 bjkumar
    #106 bjkumar
    #105 rsridhar
    #104 rsridhar
    #103 rsridhar
    #102 rsridhar
    #101 rsridhar
    #100 rsridhar
    #99 arjun_m
    #98 arjun_m
    #97 arjun_m
    #96 Ahmadzai
    #95 arjun_m
    #94 hamidm2
    #93 harimau
    #92 sri
    #91 sri
    #90 bbabu
    #89 ahmedmadani
    #88 nasah
    #87 ahmedmadani
    #86 Zeena
    #85 harimau
    #84 rsridhar
    #83 rsridhar
    #82 rsridhar
    #81 mohar11
    #80 rsridhar
    #79 rsridhar
    #78 ahmedmadani
    #77 rsridhar
    #76 Zeena
    #75 arjun_m
    #74 Raw_Dust
    #73 arjun_m
    #72 arjun_m
    #71 Kulharee
    #70 stuka
    #69 stuka
    #68 Ahmadzai
    #67 upman7626
    #66 Ahmadzai
    #65 pmishra2
    #64 kalihawa
    #63 swarrier
    #62 HP
    #61 pmishra2
    #60 Kulharee
    #59 swarrier
    #58 swarrier
    #57 mohar11
    #56 Saminasha
    #55 aslam644
    #54 KaalChakra
    #53 bjkumar
    #52 burpinder
    #51 ziahmed
    #50 kalihawa
    #49 MantoLives
    #48 Zeena
    #47 Zeena
    #46 ahmedmadani
    #45 stuka
    #44 Sanatani
    #43 mukulfaiz
    #42 rsridhar
    #41 rsridhar
    #40 warpster
    #39 teshah
    #38 harimau
    #37 harimau
    #36 harimau
    #35 arjun_m
    #34 harimau
    #33 harimau
    #32 tahmed32
    #31 harimau
    #30 harimau
    #29 pokershark
    #28 pokershark
    #27 stuka
    #26 stuka
    #25 stuka
    #24 pmishra2
    #23 parthaab
    #22 jang
    #21 colonel
    #20 sri
    #19 Urstruly
    #18 mohar11
    #17 Jamesmaxwell
    #16 colonel
    #15 stuka
    #14 Jamesmaxwell
    #13 Kulharee
    #12 arjun_m
    #11 ziahmed
    #10 stuka
    #9 chaltahai
    #8 Urstruly
    #7 HaroonEllahi
    #6 kaurasach
    #5 pmishra2
    #4 arjun_m
    #3 stuka
    #2 Kulharee
    #1 kaurasach

Latest Interacts

  • Shah2: Re: # 639 #637 What were... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
  • Goldfinger: Re: # 654 "Yeh,... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
  • Shah2: UMGRATEFULL This was your... An Indian Muslim
  • Shah2: We gave you one... An Indian Muslim
  • nkg: Re: # 202 Parde... If some... An Indian Muslim
  • nkg: Re: # 178 zeena(h)... "Both India... An Indian Muslim
  • Eklavya: Pardesi and salimbro Ms Dawa... An Indian Muslim
  • nkg: live as nuicense creator... An Indian Muslim

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
  • An Indian Muslim
  • Sexless and Loveless Marriages
  • Terror in Mumbai.....and also in 'Bannu or somewhere'
  • A Big, Decadent Pakistani Wedding
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • A Tree of Water
  • This Should Do It
  • Report on Economic Development Conference at MIT
  • Scaly
  • A Horse’s Head On Your Bed

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited