Pak Armed Forces vs. Pakistan

Ref#192

Another Sikh joke

While on pilgrimage to Nankana Sahib, Banta goes to local market to by some essentials. He pays money to the shop keeper for the stuff he bought and receives the coins as balance.

By accident Banta dropped an athani ( 50 paisa coin) in to open gandi naali.

As he was short of funds and every penny counted so he put his hand in the naali to recover his athani and started praying
`Ya Mohammad meri madad kar. Ya Mohammad meri madad kar.`

Passing Tehmat herad this. In his Mulla mind he saw the oppurtunity to convert a Kaffir sikh to Islam, but to be hundred percent sure Tehmat asked Banta `Bhappay tusi Vahe guru nu kyon nahi bulanday`.

Banta lost his temper and said `Oye Ja Ja apna rasta pakad. Behn chod ik athani vastay Vahe Guru nu gandi naali vich mein nahi vaadan vala.`

Looking at pakis right now - it reminds me of ``Last temptation of Christ``.... Jesus is crucified and is in extreme pain and exhaustion - he starts hallucinating about having sex, making babies and having a good time....

Which is kind of what happens to pakis - anytime somebody posts that `71 surrender picture :).... they relive that national pain, they feel that pain all over again - and collectively start hallucinating about all sorts of things: kashmir banega pakistan..... sikh banega pakistan.... blah blah.....

Not that it takes much for a paki to hallucinate.... their entire lives are spent on chasing one wet-dream after another, one delusion after another..... :))

correction to dullabhatti #191 in the second para where I wrote ``I do think think...`` , it was a typo and should read ``I do not think...``

dullabhatti: I believe I have always addressed you, dost-mittar, or delhiwala or any other other indian who has come to chowk for a friendly chat in a respectful and friendly manner. However, I dont think you or anyone of us has the right to deny anyone else the right to be respectful to a third poster on chowk.

Second: If even one of my posts has seemed ``venemous`` to you, I do think think you have any right to complain. I say this because I have not seen you use the same word for your ``fellow Indians`` on chowk who come here specifically to ridicule pakistanis and/or islam (since that, by any reasonable standard, is indeed ``venemous``). However, if you are offended by anything I have written, I will be glad to review that and apologize for it if I think I was out of line.

As for the sikh jokes, I have always understood that sikhs themselves are able to laugh at themselves, but perhaps I was mistaken. If you as a sikh are offended by them, then please say so and you will have my apologies and promise not to say a sikh joke again on chowk.

Is that fair?

#183 by Urstruly, #184 by tahmed32

``Muhammed is not a god...`` ``....preserved for purely educational purpose but after seeing what some Muslims do to graves and dead pirs...`` ``hostorical purposes...``

Can you explain why Muslim people have this urge to get into idolatry? This, although they know that it is forbidden. How do you explain their tilt towards ``worshipping`` such places or people. Don`t you think that even if the building or image is not physically there, it may exist in their minds? The urge is obviously so strong that authorities have to destroy the place rather than just tell everyone that they are not supposed to do it.
In india, I have not seen any middle class Muslim house without the photo of Kaaba promonently displayed. Their assocaition with it is very similar to the photo of Laxmi or Ganesha in a Hindu house. What is wrong with someone having ``reverence`` for something or someone to a level you can call it ``devotion``? IMHO, muslims really worship Mohammad ..this devotion is so strong among a great majority of muslims .... while a great majority of Hindus have not that much respect/devotion for God himself.

to dispell any doubts that Pakistan will ever get up from under Pak army boots, one have to only read how politely the venomous, firebrand Tahmed addresses a ch**tiya like kaptain as...``Kaptain sahib``, kaptain sahib, good job, kaptain sahib tusi great...

guy supports army rule
guy supports 20 other things that Tahmed has openly condemened on chowk as a moderate Quran only mullah.
but since kaptain shares Tahmed`s hatred of the hinuds..Tahmed is all over Kaptain Sahib..
wah tahmed sahib wah

notably not single sikh(chowk declared) has yet posted against kaptain..it is all hinuds fighting him over the Sikh jokes. heartening indeed. Tahmed, your policy is really working...soon india will be in pieces. you guys are the worst enemies of your own wet dreams.

par dulleya, sanu ki......

fauj vi tuadi, te khaan wale vi tuhade
bhen vi tuadi te yaan wale vi tuhade.

Re: # 187 closet mullah32

What? you ain`t satisfied with the ``clever response`` I gave you?.....

#186 Mohar Moron: so your stupidity defense having failed, you thought for a few hours and now come back trying to be cute by acting like a faggot. ha! ha!

What will the not-so-clever bania think of next??

Re: # 169 closet mullah 32
[...come back with a clever response...]

Sure sweetie - if that`s what you want, that`s what you will get... hold on to your bu!tt - here comes the ``clever repsonse``..... :)))

urstruly #183: jesus christ!! you and i in #184 are on the same page on this particular religious issue. mama mia!! jai ho bhagwaan ki!!

aquaris: Muhammed is not a god. So what is claimed to be ``his house`` has no more significance than the ``prophet`s blanket`` (made in korea) that Mullah Omar wrapped himself in. or the ``hazratbal`` on kashmir that had significance only to the superstitious ``muslims``. If this really was the prophet`s house, the only reason to keep it would be for its historical interest.

That is what Islam is all about. It is not about human gods and their abodes and superstitous chanting of verses from the Quran to ward off evil.

Islam is about concepts and values.

Re: # 179

I do not know why your post is directed to me but my position is that the house of Holy Prophet (pbuh) has no religious value whatsoever. It is just another house. However, in the name of history I would rather Saudis have it preserved for purely educational purpose but after seeing what some Muslims do to graves and dead pirs, I realize that the cost does not justify the benefit. The risk of it being used for idolatory rather than as a historical monument is/was overwhelming.

Re: # 165 kap

here is another paki hallucinating under the pain of the kick that arjun mian administered .... what`s up with pakis and their interminable hallucinations?.... it`s never-ending, one after another... 1 paki = 10 hinuds, 72 houris and 65 gilmans, kashmir banega pakistan..... and now sikh banega pakistan.....
:)))

urstruly #178 writes `` Pakistan is not oppressed by military alone, as a matter of fact it is a whole social class of lawless and corrupt elite in the society for whom military provides muscle. It is a marriage of convenience. THis corrupt class has all kind of people in it: military, mullah, feudal lords, drug smuglers, police, bureaucracy, gun runners, and politicians who have no conscience. ``

Hear! Hear! I must admit to being surprised you include the mullah b!stards along with the rest of the scumbags.

shishapa sahib barkhoodaar nay farmayaa Kya ab aap logo ne Urdu ka bhi theka leke rakhakha hai?

bila shak!! :-)

I dont know how to break this to you gently, but he letter ``zay`` in urdu is pronounced ``z``, not ``j``. And the letter ``jeem`` is pronounced as ``j``, not ``z``.

At least that is how Mirja Ghalib would jpeak it.

Re: # 178

Some times back....

I read an article , on how Saudi`s were demolishing what could contain the house of the prophet, there were some mute concerns, but like always..... the Muslim world remained silence.

here is the whole article..

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/A72A6C88-0492-4803-90AD-FC69482A6D56.htm


and an update to it was available from Saudi`s own website.... which confirmed the
that work on this project is in full swing..

http://www.saudiembassy.net/2004News/News/...asp?cIndex=4593