unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

Taj a Mirage

Zahid Hussain April 20, 2006

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 1-16   1 2

#22 Posted by Raja_Hyderabadi on May 17, 2006 9:44:06 pm
My Dear Author of the Article...
``........ who put Shahjehan’s bed in one of the balconies of the Red Fort with a window facing the Taj on other side of the river``

Who ever your guide was he passed on wrong information to you.... You cannot see the TAJ from Red Fort.. the fort in Agra is called Agra Fort....

If you were to educate people in your circles about the atrocities of the Indian Muslims in India, this is proof enough of your in-VALIDITY....

Cheers....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#21 Posted by harimau on April 26, 2006 9:29:38 pm
Ref HP #12

[Hindu and Jain ruins every where....
Some history being taught in India...
you guys are truely unbelievable!]

One really does have to wonder about the history taught in Indian schools with textbooks by JNU professors who whitewash the crimes of Islamic sultans.

You perhaps can come up with a theory as to why there are no ancient temples of magnificence in North India whereas you can find them in Orissa (Konarak), Madhya Pradesh (Khajuraho), Rajasthan (Mount Abu), and all over South India. You will definitely earn a PhD in Islamic Archaeology and Architecture from some Pakistani university.

I notice you have no answer to the question why the pillars in the mosque at the Qutb have celstial nymphs and musicians portrayed on them. Can you give me one such mosque anywhere else in the world?

You can start off in Saudi Arabia and cruise through Turkey, Bulgaria (where the invading Muslims introduced buggery), Bosnia, Kosovo, Moorish Spain, Morocco, Algeria, Libya, Egypt, Sudan, Pakistan, Malaysia, Brunei, etc. You can also compare the Jumma Masjids in Lahore, Delhi, Agra, etc., and tell me where you find statues carved on pillars, friezes carved on walls, etc.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#20 Posted by mannyd on April 26, 2006 5:39:24 am
Janji #1: ``I could not get to Wasim or Moin or PCB. I did not even try, but I did pray to God next day for their sake for Pakistan victory in the next match against India. And it did win with a comprehensive margin.``

You should have at least tried to talk to Moin or PCB. This apathy is the root cause of Muslim brothers suffering in India. I was going to say `Shame on you` but it seems you do have a special pull with God.

Doees God always listen to you or do you forget to pray sometimes before the match? It will be extremely boring if the outcome of any match was already decreed by you.

ANyhow I agree the editing was heavy handed censorship and thought control. There was absolutely no need for it.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#19 Posted by janji on April 24, 2006 8:29:46 am
bigot i m not, ballu and nasah both of you are wrong, absolutely wrong...and i won`t call you name...
the problem with guys like you is that if it comes from the other side of the border they become very very defensive. don`t feel lonely you have lot of company in many pakistanis like you. and i m not one of them...
what i wrote was what i observed, it was in agra not anywhere in pakstan... yes, in pakistan samething is happening and it is worse, because there are killing ``supposedly of their own kind``...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#18 Posted by nasah on April 24, 2006 7:11:12 am
`` plight of muslims in India of which i caught just a glimps in one day trip to agra``....

no you did not --

you caught a glimpse of your own bigoted mind -- and you got a glimpse of Muslim plight that is thousand times worse in Pakistan than anywhere in India --

AT LEAST the Indian ones are doing something useful -- doing their trade -- not loafing around blowing up their masjids in the Pakistani War of Masjids -- and massacring their own stupid little Ummas while bent in Namaz........

Bullukhan is right......you do have a communal mindset.....all that travel to broaden your horizon is practically useless for you.....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#17 Posted by ballukhan on April 24, 2006 6:22:03 am
`` They looked timid and frightened, their head bent down trying to concentrate on their work, but at the same time wanting to communicate with the onlookers. ``

``They were dying to know who I was and how I ended up there. ``

``I saw a shine in their eyes and a smile on their faces. I knew they were expecting this answer. but wanted to hear it from me.``

Wow !! A typical fantasy of every bigoted Pakistani- fancying themselves as saviours of the muslims as if every IM is looking up to them to liberate them from the oppression of the non-muslims...................I wonder if these typical communal Pakistanis can ever get out of this `Saviours of the Ummah` mindset....................get back to the real world and stop looking at every thing from a communal mindset!!!





reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#16 Posted by janji on April 23, 2006 8:32:19 am
Re: # 13
HP:
you ar really carried away with your assertions on who bulit it and how long it took it to build... If you go back to the article it says: It took more than twenty years, 30,000 laborers, artisans and engineers to finish this magnificent work of art.

And of course there were thousands of hindus who must have participated in construction of the Taj... Unfortunately, the history is taught in Bharat and Pakistan is quite different from one another, who knows what is true. You cannot trust the orientalists...they are full of bs. I buy echoboom`s explanation about the origin of the name, sounds reasonable. Do not try to rewrite or distart the history with some of your hypothesis, and coincidences and chances may seem to be real...

And by the way, who is talking about the Red Fort was built by Shahjahan, I never claimed that, sincerely i do not even know, so stay focussed on Taj and plight of muslims in India of which i caught just a glimps in one day trip to agra... those should be the two main objects of the discssions...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#15 Posted by avkrishna on April 23, 2006 7:36:23 am
Re: # 12

Don`t divert the topic by bringing in random conspiracy theories on various monuments.

The issue is whether Qutub Minar is built on the ruins of Hindu/Jain temples. And it is, as certified by ASI and evident to anyone who`s been there except the Jaundiced eye.

This denial by Muslims about genuine cases of destruction does not help anyone.

If Muslims can`t and won`t accept that the Islamic Invaders have destroyed innumerable temples in India, then they will face the reactionary theories (like you mentioned below) and incidents like Babri Masjid,

Thanks,
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#14 Posted by echoboom on April 23, 2006 3:44:39 am
HP:

Mumtaz Mahal was her title. Arjumand Bano , the name.

All begumat of the palace had titles: Look up all the princely states & some surviving begums even to this day. Mahal was the title reserved for thr queen only.

Zeenat Mahal, Hazrat Mahal etc etc.

Simply manufactured neo-myths these are.


P.s: If at all, I would be more interested to know if their is a hindu-deity buried under Akbar`s samadhi.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#13 Posted by HP on April 23, 2006 12:33:37 am

Taj Mahal or “the Tejo Mahalaya”?

#8 by echoboom
”The folks of Agra ( non-scholars, but the `commoners`--a.k.a the truly knowledgeable ones) still call it :``Taj bibi ka rauza.``

Well! I can understand that some would call/ pronounce mumtaz as mumtaj and over time it was also shortened to TAJ.

However, the Taj Mahal was named during the construction so it must mean the “crown palace” but then why would a mausoleum be named the crown palace?

I think the evidence is quite overwhelming and in view of the Hindu and Jain ruins everywhere and the process of conversion that went on in India and started with converting buildings first-(later transferred to human-Hindu converted to Muslims) the Taj Mahal actually was a Hindu worship place named:

“the Tejo Mahalaya”

Shahjehen turned that name around and called the building The “Taj Mahal”

There is some evidence of Hindu and Jain ruins in Taj Mahal too.

“One can perambulate through these rooms around the central octagonal sanctorum, now occupied by Mumtaz`s fake grave. The aperture, seen through of the central door, enabled perambulating devotees to keep their eyes fixed on the Shiva Linga in the central chamber. Hindu Shiva Lingas are consecrated in two chambers, one above the other. Therefore, Shahjahan had to raise two graves in the name of Mumtaz--one in the marble basement and the other on the ground floor to desecrate and hide both the Shiva emblems from public view. [The famous Shiva temple in Ujjain also has an underground chamber for one of its Shiva-lingams.]”

It is shiva linga that is buried in there and not Mumtaz Mahal. Who died some six hundred miles away (Burhanpura) and her body was transferred to Agra six months later.

What I don’t understand is that she died in 1630 and the construction of the Taj Mahal started in 1631. That to me does not make sense. For a building of this size, it would take more than one year to just have the designs ready, hire the craftsmen/artisans and other handymen. Since some of them came from the faraway lands, it might have taken them over one year to just make their journey to Agra. I hope you see my point.

One year is just too short a time to take up, design, and start a project of this size.
We do know that there were some structures already there but what we don’t know is how much of that was changed to design the Taj.

So, in a way, the claim that the Taj mahal was originally the “Tejo Mahalaya”
has some validity…



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#12 Posted by HP on April 22, 2006 10:31:40 pm

#11

Like any half a brain can tell after looking at these images that the red fort was actually build by some Hindu Raja (Raja Anangoal 1060 A.D.) ….Where do we get people with half a brain?…bred only in India…

Hindu and Jain ruins everywhere...

“It is entirely false that the Red Fort of Delhi was built by Shahjahan in 1639-48 A.D. Muslims were the destroyers of statues. Then why should they have constructed statues? But there are statues of Hindu Mahavants riding the elephants of the doors of each interior room of ``Khas Mahal`` in the Red Fort. On the main gate of the Fort named ``Delhi Darwaja,`` there are huge statues of elephants. The curtain of building statues of elephants on forts and palace gates can be well judged by examining the palaces at Gwalior, Udaipur and Kota. Decorating homes, forts, palaces and temples with elephants is a hoary Hindu tradition. To the Hindu an elephant symbolizes might, power, glory and wealth. The Red Fort in Delhi has life-size elephants at its gate and elephants with riders atop its door knobs in the Khas Mahal pavilion. Had Shahjahan built the fort, such Hindu motifs should not have been there.”

The resplendent Hindu midday sun (from whom Hindu rulers claim descent) in the arch above flanked by the sacred Hindu letter OM. This proves the hollowness of the claim that Shahjahan commissioned the Red Fort.



These life size elephants flanking the Delhi Gate of Delhi`s Red Fort are an unmistakable sign of the fort`s Hindu origin. This is one of the proofs that the Red Fort was commissioned by Raja Anangoal (1060 A.D.) and not the Mogul emperor Shahjahan (1639-48) as is erroneously believed. [The fort predates Shahjahan by 600 years, similar to the Taj Mahal.]



A close up of the elephant and rider door knob in the Khas Mahal of the Red Fort in Delhi. This is a typically Hindu motif. Other big life-size stone elephants decorating the Naqqar Khana (Music House) gate were slaughtered by Islamic invaders. The chopped up pieces may still be seen stored in the Khas Mahal basements. The public must insist on these being joined and displayed.




Hindu and Jain ruins every where....
Some history being taught in India...
you guys are truely unbelievable!

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#11 Posted by avkrishna on April 22, 2006 9:06:29 pm
Re: # 5

Any one with half a brain can observe the Hindu and Jain ruins around the Minar.


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#10 Posted by jila on April 22, 2006 4:53:55 pm
When I read the title of this article I could feel that there must be something more behind the story than just the Taj Mahal. As I read on I started to forget that the Taj Mahal was in the story and my attention shifted towards the workers. I love the picture you painted about your experience because I could imagine the whole scenario while I was reading. It is such a shame that Muslim people till this day have to live in fear in a country they chose to stay in even after the partition. It is so sad to know that Muslim people are living in neighborhoods where people throw bombs to celebrate victory because this only promotes aggressive behavior. If everyone took the high way and remained civilized there wouldn`t be so much hostility between India and Pakistan today. I love how you express your emotions and how you could relate to these workers. Isn`t it amazing that you can feel a connection with people you never knew and still understand how they feel? This a very good article. I think you should write more about your experiences. You would be surprised where your words can take you.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#9 Posted by yawarhussain on April 22, 2006 2:21:41 pm
well janji it is a very good article n i also forward those to my friends.but mostlly i like about this article is that u pay great attention to those poor artists trying to earn money from the skill they got.and most of all the funny part that ``the death of Muntaz Mahal may be due to giving birth too many children``but really at that time she won`t be the only wife of the King.
but janji many people in india like Pakistani team not only Muslims but it may be those people who want to make a good impression on u so they said such things so u can buy something from them.but Sub continent is always like that the people use to live together suddenlly aparted.Cricket will always be like a war janji n u can see those things during the matches on the faces of the players.
it was a nice n very good n funny article
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#8 Posted by echoboom on April 22, 2006 10:00:12 am
HP: 5

The folks of Agra ( non-scholars, but the `commoners`--a.k.a the truly knowledgeable ones) still call it :``Taj bibi ka rauza.``

Taj is a corruption of Mumtaz, nothing to do with the word crown. The general populace of india have phonetic problem with a ``Z`` sound.

The Principal wife ( ShahJehan did have more than one offficial wife) of the Harem, the queen, was always titled as --Mahal. Remember Zeenat Mahal, Bahadur Shah`s queen and so many other `mahals` (queens) throughout the nawab states.



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#7 Posted by janji on April 22, 2006 7:46:43 am
Re: # 5
HP:
i was on a business trip and had only one free day to do all this, so I picked Taj and Lal qilla...the story about shahjahan and mumtaz i heard from our guide... i do not beleive either that he had only one wife, legally he could have four wives and being a king can even have 100`s of concubines, he could afford that, he can have as many as he wanted, who would dare to give fatwa against him... history is full of this kind of bs... who is wrting the history...first the king himself and then his hired in his court.

The group of artisans i mentioned were employees of a well established factory a few miles away from the Taj Mahal. The guide brought us to this factroy, as you know they get tips when customers would buy stuff. That is how I ended up there. nasah said he went there recently and saw artisans repairing the western wall of the monument, so when you went there you did not visit the factory which was miles away from the Taj and repair work might not have started or done by the time you went there.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 1-16   1 2

Interact Index

    #22 Raja_Hyderabadi
    #21 harimau
    #20 mannyd
    #19 janji
    #18 nasah
    #17 ballukhan
    #16 janji
    #15 avkrishna
    #14 echoboom
    #13 HP
    #12 HP
    #11 avkrishna
    #10 jila
    #9 yawarhussain
    #8 echoboom
    #7 janji
    #6 harimau
    #5 HP
    #4 janji
    #3 nasah
    #2 HP
    #1 janji

Similar Articles

  • Taj a Mirage Zahid Hussain
more »

US Elections 2008 Primaries

  • Hillary Clinton a Better Presidential Candidate
  • Leaders, Heroes and Mountains
  • Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and New American Dreams
  • Pakistan Elections 2008 - An analysis
  • Political Issues Ahead of Pakistan Elections
more »
get rss feed Get Chowk RSS Feed

Get Chowk Newsletter

Latest Interacts

  • muqaddam: The recent blockade by... US Commando Strike in
  • rf786: Re: # 91 ahmedmadani sahib {Can... US Commando Strike in
  • HP: Asadi, My use of the... There is no ‘honour’
  • iron_mask: There is no honor... There is no ‘honour’
  • masadi: I gotta go now,... There is no ‘honour’
  • masadi: HP writes "Asadi sahib,... There is no ‘honour’
  • HP: "Sounds like you're repeating... There is no ‘honour’
  • HP: " how aggressive capitalism... There is no ‘honour’

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Why Zardari Should Be President!
  • US Commando Strike in Waziristan
  • Save Me From Charismatic Leaders!
  • Free to Breed
  • There is no ‘honour’ in killing
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • The Pakistani Connection: An Opinion
  • Love Means Never Having to Say You Are An Infidel!
  • A Day in the Year 2030
  • Swinging Cradles
  • A Candid Interview With Saeed Anwar

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited