unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

Don’t I Have the Right to Know?

Veeresh Malik April 24, 2006

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 1-16   1 2

#23 Posted by harimau on April 30, 2006 8:54:16 pm
Ref Salim_Chauhan #22

[Thanks, but when one does it around a pillar, it`s got to have ``khamba`` in it - thus circumkhambambulate. :) ]

I am totally discombobulated ;)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#22 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on April 30, 2006 4:23:25 pm
#20, Harimau {``You mean circumambulate, maybe?``}
Harry,
Thanks, but when one does it around a pillar, it`s got to have ``khamba`` in it - thus circumkhambambulate. :)

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#21 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on April 30, 2006 4:23:10 pm
#20, Harimau {``You mean circumambulate, maybe?``}
Harry,
Thanks, but when one does it around a pillar, it`s got to have ``khamba`` in it - thus circumkhambambulate. :)

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#20 Posted by harimau on April 29, 2006 8:26:54 pm
Ref Salim_Chauhan #18

[#16, Never mind correctng me. I just realized that the correct word is circumkhambambulate. :) ]

You mean circumambulate, maybe?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#19 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on April 29, 2006 12:18:38 pm
#16, Never mind correctng me. I just realized that the correct word is circumkhambambulate. :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#18 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on April 29, 2006 12:18:24 pm
#16, Never mind correctng me. I just realized that the correct word is circumkhambambulate. :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#17 Posted by jang on April 29, 2006 12:15:03 pm
long live democracy.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#16 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on April 28, 2006 9:50:24 am
#15, Veeresh {``IMHO, the Hajj Committee of India is by definition a Public Authority. It can not under any Law of India stop me from applying, that`s a simple fact of life I enjoy by virtue of being an Indian citizen. But over the years, this became accepted as a sort of given.
I put this query up to some friends of mine who are Muslim scholars, and they agree too, that I can not be stopped from applying to the Hajj Committee of India. ``}

Veeresh,
Please do apply. It will be interesting to see the results. Now, if by some miracle, the Saudis give you a visa, are you going to go ahead and circumcize the cube? :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#15 Posted by veeresh on April 27, 2006 9:10:30 pm
nb/14: ```` . . . that only Muslims may be allowed by the Saudis to enter Mecca, but that maybe the Indian government should not participate in anything so exclusionary, and should be open to all comers-then the Saudis can throw out non-Muslims, because that is what would happen . . . ````

Exactly.

IMHO, the Hajj Committee of India is by definition a Public Authority. It can not under any Law of India stop me from applying, that`s a simple fact of life I enjoy by virtue of being an Indian citizen. But over the years, this became accepted as a sort of given.

I put this query up to some friends of mine who are Muslim scholars, and they agree too, that I can not be stopped from applying to the Hajj Committee of India.

Shall keep all of you posted on what sort of a response I get. Interim, I`ve also placed one with the Office of the President of India, requesting them to clarify if he is a ``Citizen of India`` or as per the MEA`s response, if he is a ``Muslim Citizen of India``.

Salim Chauhan/13 That`s a valid point, is the Indian government following the Pakistani Government`s definition of ``Muslim``?

The rest - no, I am not ``attacking`` Muslims or anybody else.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#14 Posted by nb on April 27, 2006 6:54:51 pm
Re: # 12
no, my brand new computer was playing up-would appreicate it if editors could take off two of those!
I have since thought about it, and I see his point-that only Muslims may be allowed by the Saudis to enter Mecca, but that maybe the Indian government should not participate in anything so exclusionary, and should be open to all comers-then the Saudis can throw out non-Muslims, because that is what would happen.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#13 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on April 27, 2006 12:06:23 pm
Veeresh Malik, {``Persons who are crippled, handicapped, lunatic or otherwise physically incapacitated or suffering from amputation of legs.``}

Veeresh,
LOL - I am laughing at the above exclusion. I object to ``lunatics`` being exclused. In fact, you got to be nuts to attempt to do what some of these yaatris do. :)

Good job,
I applaud your proactive manner in which you have demanded a definition of ``Muslim`` citizen of India. As we all know, only the Government of Pakistan is divinely-ordained to decide who is a Muslim and who is not - in addition to deciding who is a Paki and who is not. Thank you for your diligence. Don`t forget to come to Karachi and write about our great city.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#12 Posted by Dash_Dot on April 27, 2006 2:11:41 am
#9,#10, #11 three times you repeat. I guess Malik baaboo doesnot know the meaning of ``no``
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#11 Posted by nb on April 26, 2006 6:19:48 pm
Veeresh, what are you trying to do?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#10 Posted by nb on April 26, 2006 6:19:43 pm
Veeresh, what are you trying to do?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#9 Posted by nb on April 26, 2006 6:19:38 pm
Veeresh, what are you trying to do?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#8 Posted by bjkumar on April 25, 2006 10:17:59 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#7 Posted by bjkumar on April 25, 2006 9:58:17 am

Veeresh,

I think you are wasting your time. Everybody knows who a Muslim is - those who practice that faith or think they do. Everybody knows who an Indian is, too.

If your objective is to attack the Haj involvement of the secular government that is a separate issue and should be approached directly rather than in a weasel-like manner.

I personally have no problem if the Government of India helps out some indigent Indians accomplish what for many of them is once in a lifetime cherished dream!

Make no mistake about it.

Barring nutcases here and there, mostly to be found shouting from minarets, Indians have the best Muslims in the world!

The best Sikhs AND the best Muslims!

And comparing with the overseas lot - perhaps even the best Hindus!

What a lucky country!


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#6 Posted by khamkhwa. on April 24, 2006 8:59:49 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#5 Posted by veeresh on April 24, 2006 8:17:52 pm
This is not about Hindus performing Hajj. This is about the relationship of Indians with a Public Authority called the Ministry of External Affairs.

This is about finding out, using the RTI Act-2005, which is open to any Indian citizen anywhere:-

a) The situation for Indian citizens to apply for a Hajj under the laws of the equal for all secular country of India.

b) Definition of ``Muslim Citizen of India``, for example, and inequalities therein if any.

c) This is not about the Laws of Saudi Arabia.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#4 Posted by harimau on April 24, 2006 5:55:44 pm
Ref khamkhwa. #1

[...what the hell is this?...are hindoos performing haj now...]

EX-Hindus...you know, folks like yourself.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#3 Posted by rakeshmani on April 24, 2006 12:47:22 pm
Wow..

Good job Mr Malik!

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#2 Posted by khamkhwa. on April 24, 2006 12:27:49 pm
=== Interact Removed ===
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#1 Posted by khamkhwa. on April 24, 2006 12:25:53 pm
...what the hell is this?...are hindoos performing haj now...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 1-16   1 2

Interact Index

    #23 harimau
    #22 Salim_Chauhan
    #21 Salim_Chauhan
    #20 harimau
    #19 Salim_Chauhan
    #18 Salim_Chauhan
    #17 jang
    #16 Salim_Chauhan
    #15 veeresh
    #14 nb
    #13 Salim_Chauhan
    #12 Dash_Dot
    #11 nb
    #10 nb
    #9 nb
    #8 bjkumar
    #7 bjkumar
    #6 khamkhwa.
    #5 veeresh
    #4 harimau
    #3 rakeshmani
    #2 khamkhwa.
    #1 khamkhwa.

Also by Veeresh Malik

  • Notes from the Sunderbans
  • Why Have This Train At All?
  • Risky Routes and Rootless People
more »

Similar Articles

  • They Will Seal The Case Sheets! Prashant Bhatt
  • Ahmed Faraz (1931-2008) – The Romantic Rebel Zaki Rahman
  • Muhammad Aslam Khan Khattak: A Man for All Seasons Zeejah
  • Terrorism Accused: Is Legal Aid Justified? Shridhar Naik
  • Losing the Battle, Losing the Faith Ehtisham Iqbal
more »

US Elections 2008 Primaries

  • Hillary Clinton a Better Presidential Candidate
  • Leaders, Heroes and Mountains
  • Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and New American Dreams
  • Pakistan Elections 2008 - An analysis
  • Political Issues Ahead of Pakistan Elections
more »
get rss feed Get Chowk RSS Feed

Get Chowk Newsletter

Latest Interacts

  • pinku: [[ Q. How is it... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • pinku: I am the embodiment... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • pinku: #228 Posted by tahmed32... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • tahmed32: and given your description... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • tahmed32: pinku #226 i have... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • pinku: So if people have... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • tahmed32: #225 pinku jee, welcome... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • ajeya: #221 Posted by rabiawsti [#218:... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Terrorism Accused: Is Legal Aid Justified?
  • Three Cups of Tea & Pennies for Peace
  • Muhammad Aslam Khan Khattak: A Man for All Seasons
  • Losing the Battle, Losing the Faith
  • Not to Forget the Devastation of October 8, 2005 Earthquake
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Human Rights Groups Slam Sharif
  • Aunty Vilayatpasand Thinking Aloud
  • A Passing Glance
  • Book: The Sparrow
  • Humpty-Dumpty rescrambled

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited