Bina Shah June 18, 2006
#1 Posted by PM on June 19, 2006 2:31:59 am
``Woldt noted that Americans must learn to respect Muslims but also Muslims must respect Americans. This struck me as particularly truthful, given that Muslims tend to see themselves as the victims of Western oppression, and often forget that respect and honor are a two-way street, both of which must be given generously in order to be earned, even in the case of those who we consider to be our adversaries. ``
Shabbash, Bina. Well said!
(Though I wonder about the premise. I mean, why are some ``considered to be our adversaries`` in the first place? I would have thought that true respect -- IF it is due, and borne of understanding -- should help us remove the adversarial attitudes. OTOH, if the other is truly and adversary, then should we afford them respect in any sense other than a prudent fear?)
Shabbash, Bina. Well said!
(Though I wonder about the premise. I mean, why are some ``considered to be our adversaries`` in the first place? I would have thought that true respect -- IF it is due, and borne of understanding -- should help us remove the adversarial attitudes. OTOH, if the other is truly and adversary, then should we afford them respect in any sense other than a prudent fear?)
#2 Posted by masadi on June 19, 2006 2:56:46 am
The author writes
<<< Muslims tend to see themselves as the victims of Western oppression, and often forget that respect and honor are a two-way street, >>>
Why does this remind me of whites in the US complaining of being a victims of race discrimination, or Christians in the US complaining of there being a war on `Christmas` or a war against Christianity in the US?
Muslims haven`t been dominating US society or labelling Americans as backward barbarians, if anything due to cultural hegemony of the US in our world, they hold a positive view of the US in general when controlling for effects of the bloody wars conducted in their neighbourhoods~ that is when thier perception changes. Islam is much more accomodative of Christians in respect, we have not seen as many Muslims attack Jesus or the Judaism as Christian attack the personality of the prophet and the Quran.
Read about the entire industry of Western orientalism to understand how this caricature of the `other` regarding Muslims was constructed and became fermented in Western psyche~ there was never a comparable endeavour by the Muslims. Regardless of a$$ kissing by the Muslims, and there are many on here who do that periodically, the West will still see you as the `other` and you will gain no equal respect, the solution is much wider than mere reciprocity.
<<< Muslims tend to see themselves as the victims of Western oppression, and often forget that respect and honor are a two-way street, >>>
Why does this remind me of whites in the US complaining of being a victims of race discrimination, or Christians in the US complaining of there being a war on `Christmas` or a war against Christianity in the US?
Muslims haven`t been dominating US society or labelling Americans as backward barbarians, if anything due to cultural hegemony of the US in our world, they hold a positive view of the US in general when controlling for effects of the bloody wars conducted in their neighbourhoods~ that is when thier perception changes. Islam is much more accomodative of Christians in respect, we have not seen as many Muslims attack Jesus or the Judaism as Christian attack the personality of the prophet and the Quran.
Read about the entire industry of Western orientalism to understand how this caricature of the `other` regarding Muslims was constructed and became fermented in Western psyche~ there was never a comparable endeavour by the Muslims. Regardless of a$$ kissing by the Muslims, and there are many on here who do that periodically, the West will still see you as the `other` and you will gain no equal respect, the solution is much wider than mere reciprocity.
#3 Posted by Bina_Shah on June 19, 2006 3:42:23 am
correction: Hadia Mubarak was not born in Syria, but was actually born in the United States. I have asked the editors to amend this but until they do I thought it would be good to add it here.
You can also go to www.belief.net and look up ``Dispatches from The Muslim World`` for more information and writing on this project by Dr. Ahmed and his team.
You can also go to www.belief.net and look up ``Dispatches from The Muslim World`` for more information and writing on this project by Dr. Ahmed and his team.
#4 Posted by bjk on June 19, 2006 4:47:06 am
So what the heck is the Prof. doing? Saving the big, bad, Western world from misunderstanding Islam yeah, thats all it is a big, massive misunderstanding easily handled through pushing Jinnah and some public relations and especially by making some US-born chicks wear salwar-kameez!
Easily addressed by getting cozy and being chummy-chummy with the Mushy?
Even though it is hard work and involves making serious sacrifices like showing up for a photo op!
Three appearances on Oprah! The Prof. probably deserves some kind of medal for endurance I can barely watch ONE!
So, has the Prof. uttered a WORD on Kashmir? Has he?
#5 Posted by chaltahai on June 19, 2006 6:10:27 am
People, Globalization is haram. Ain`t that right Masadi brother...
#6 Posted by nasah on June 19, 2006 6:46:14 am
btw -- Bina is this the same Professor Ahmed, the Pakistan High commissionor who was accused of embezzling lot of money making Jinnah movie...? Please correct me if I heard it wrong..
#7 Posted by Urstruly on June 19, 2006 7:24:11 am
FATHERS` DAY IN PAKISTAN
in the age of Globalization

in the age of Globalization

#8 Posted by hamidm2 on June 19, 2006 7:43:54 am
Re: # 4
bj,
........ even though i agree that the good professor is wasting his time as long as people like masadi continue to breathe, what does it have to do with jinnah and kashmir ? ......... lookey here, we pakis might not agree on much, but i am ready to spill at least half a glass of merlot and masadi`s blood to protect jinnah`s honor and liberate kashmir from the evil chungals of the unconverted and uncircumcised ......... so stop needing us if you are not prepared to discuss gandhi`s racism and sexual perversions with manto ..........
bj,
........ even though i agree that the good professor is wasting his time as long as people like masadi continue to breathe, what does it have to do with jinnah and kashmir ? ......... lookey here, we pakis might not agree on much, but i am ready to spill at least half a glass of merlot and masadi`s blood to protect jinnah`s honor and liberate kashmir from the evil chungals of the unconverted and uncircumcised ......... so stop needing us if you are not prepared to discuss gandhi`s racism and sexual perversions with manto ..........
#9 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 19, 2006 9:11:17 am
Bina, {``Martin offered analytical observations about how people in different countries had different role models Pakistan was the first country where Osama Bin Laden showed up as a major Muslim role model, rather than the Middle East``}
Bina,
Thank you for a positive article regarding Prof. Akbar Ahmed and his well-known attempts at interfaith understanding. I have met him and he comes across as a sincere and moderate person. He is very soft-spoken and does present a positive image of Islam. OTOH, being an educator at American University, a notoriously Jewish establishment, his attempts at bridging the diffeences among Abrahamic faiths is understandable. How come he doesn`t have similar feelings of brotherhood and common cause with Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Jains? Maybe it`s just an oversight on his part, or it`s possible that he recognizes which side of his toast is buttered and who applies the delicious ointment.
To be fair, Prof. Akbar Ahmed is certainly a welcome change from the usual Saudi-funded, Wahabi motivated, and thoroughly disgusting ISNA, ICNA, CAIR crowd. Thanks to these fools and their utterly stupid manner of digesting Wahabbi venom, the position of American Musliims has gone from neutral to negative, from welcome to hated, from ignored to hunted.
Considering Martin`s observation about the popularity of UBL among Pakis, one can understand why ordinary, moderate, and peace-loving Paki Musliims have to pay the price for the extremist, virulent, and despised few.
I wish the Professor good luck, but I am not holding my breath in anticipation of any success with this interfaith come to Jesus, kumbaya marsmellow roasting and hand-holding around a camp fire.
Bina,
Thank you for a positive article regarding Prof. Akbar Ahmed and his well-known attempts at interfaith understanding. I have met him and he comes across as a sincere and moderate person. He is very soft-spoken and does present a positive image of Islam. OTOH, being an educator at American University, a notoriously Jewish establishment, his attempts at bridging the diffeences among Abrahamic faiths is understandable. How come he doesn`t have similar feelings of brotherhood and common cause with Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Jains? Maybe it`s just an oversight on his part, or it`s possible that he recognizes which side of his toast is buttered and who applies the delicious ointment.
To be fair, Prof. Akbar Ahmed is certainly a welcome change from the usual Saudi-funded, Wahabi motivated, and thoroughly disgusting ISNA, ICNA, CAIR crowd. Thanks to these fools and their utterly stupid manner of digesting Wahabbi venom, the position of American Musliims has gone from neutral to negative, from welcome to hated, from ignored to hunted.
Considering Martin`s observation about the popularity of UBL among Pakis, one can understand why ordinary, moderate, and peace-loving Paki Musliims have to pay the price for the extremist, virulent, and despised few.
I wish the Professor good luck, but I am not holding my breath in anticipation of any success with this interfaith come to Jesus, kumbaya marsmellow roasting and hand-holding around a camp fire.
#10 Posted by Bina_Shah on June 19, 2006 10:43:48 am
All I`m going to say in response to comments like those in Interact #6 is that I`ve known Professor Ahmed half my life and I wouldn`t endorse anybody who I didn`t have the highest respect for. Professor Ahmed`s integrity and honesty are not issues up for debate by me in this board. Cheers.
#11 Posted by Kulharee on June 19, 2006 11:08:43 am
Any effort at any attempt to at least understand the other side should be commended.
More power to Professor, and as Bina ji says in her conclusion that more needs to be done from both sides to bridge this huge gap built on ignorance and lack of trust.
More power to Professor, and as Bina ji says in her conclusion that more needs to be done from both sides to bridge this huge gap built on ignorance and lack of trust.
#12 Posted by Raw_Dust on June 19, 2006 11:09:37 am
Professor Akbar s. Ahmed is a fake. That makes him a darling of `sophisticated` pakistanis by extension. He used to live in cambridge and used to appear in tv talkshows in pakistan posing as some sorta cambridge intellectual. a living breathing example of pakistanyat, i must say. oh and he had no qualms in representing the occupiers of pakistan in UK back in 1999.
#13 Posted by Raw_Dust on June 19, 2006 11:16:30 am
``If more young Americans like these, who are so open-minded and courageous, and more authorities from Islam such as Akbar Ahmed are able to step forward as voices of reason in a time of chaos and outright lunacy, then there truly is hope that the rift between our two worlds can be mended, and that a greater global understanding can come about as a result of the groundbreaking work in the area of multicultural dialogue.``
War on Militant Islam is not going to go away by wishing a better `understanding` of some punk-Islam brewing around Khayabaan-e-Shamsheer..
War on Militant Islam is not going to go away by wishing a better `understanding` of some punk-Islam brewing around Khayabaan-e-Shamsheer..
#14 Posted by pmishra2 on June 19, 2006 11:31:29 am
#9 salim_chauhan
I was wondering about the poor hindus and buddhists myself. But as you point out, Shri Ahmed`s sponsors would not want him to waste time on riff-raff of this low-type. Presumably, if christians and muslims can make peace, they can then jointly torture and finish off us poor animists and idol worshippers. Also, never mind that Akbar Ahmed is from pakistan, so he doesnt have any practical knowledge about middle-east problems. We all know geography is an ultra-weak area in US education system.
Anyway, he seems a decent sort. I have read his stuff and while sucking up to americans and brits is his main thing, he also seems pretty honest and interested in change. Good luck to him. Lets hope no fatwa descends upon him too soon.
I was wondering about the poor hindus and buddhists myself. But as you point out, Shri Ahmed`s sponsors would not want him to waste time on riff-raff of this low-type. Presumably, if christians and muslims can make peace, they can then jointly torture and finish off us poor animists and idol worshippers. Also, never mind that Akbar Ahmed is from pakistan, so he doesnt have any practical knowledge about middle-east problems. We all know geography is an ultra-weak area in US education system.
Anyway, he seems a decent sort. I have read his stuff and while sucking up to americans and brits is his main thing, he also seems pretty honest and interested in change. Good luck to him. Lets hope no fatwa descends upon him too soon.
#15 Posted by hamidm2 on June 19, 2006 11:39:50 am
Re: # 7
urstruly,
........... i don`t understand the relevance of your post on this board unless you are trying to suggest that the suicidal dead-enders are blowing themselves up because of their dire economic conditions .......... there might be a kernel of truth to that fallacious argument, but it still does not excuse the ummah from being a royal pain in the keister for rest of the world ........... just because they, and their leaders, cannot come to grips with the intricacies of modern economics, global trade, science and technology doesn`t mean that they have to go on a rampage ...........
urstruly,
........... i don`t understand the relevance of your post on this board unless you are trying to suggest that the suicidal dead-enders are blowing themselves up because of their dire economic conditions .......... there might be a kernel of truth to that fallacious argument, but it still does not excuse the ummah from being a royal pain in the keister for rest of the world ........... just because they, and their leaders, cannot come to grips with the intricacies of modern economics, global trade, science and technology doesn`t mean that they have to go on a rampage ...........
#16 Posted by wiseguyin on June 19, 2006 11:53:35 am
Re: # 15
so is that what turly wrote ? that msulims bomb everyone because they are poor....
hmm ... one more reason to contribute to Bush`s coffers ... This race needs to be diminished.
so is that what turly wrote ? that msulims bomb everyone because they are poor....
hmm ... one more reason to contribute to Bush`s coffers ... This race needs to be diminished.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- pinku: Re #302 Posted by... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- pinku: #301 Posted by tahmed32... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- tahmed32: Dinaric #298: I am... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- tahmed32: pinku: i really dont... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- tahmed32: ajeya: thanks for your... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- ajeya: #296 Posted by tahmed32... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- Dinaric: Re: # 295 I agree... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- pinku: #296 Posted by tahmed32... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content