Chowk Staff July 11, 2006
#586 Posted by zeemax on July 19, 2006 12:53:58 am
#585 by harish_hyd
They did exactly this in 1973 when US was scared it could be riding camels while the Aye-Rabs would be riding cadillacs. So they picked off all the leaders one by one!
But the battle is a bigger one now ... not restricted to camels & cadillacs ...
They did exactly this in 1973 when US was scared it could be riding camels while the Aye-Rabs would be riding cadillacs. So they picked off all the leaders one by one!
But the battle is a bigger one now ... not restricted to camels & cadillacs ...
#585 Posted by harish_hyd on July 18, 2006 11:37:44 pm
#584 by zeemax
In fact we are grateful to US for McDonald, KFC, Pizza Hut and Brittney Spears!
The feeling is mutual. Sitting as they are upon the oil wells, a smarter race (the Jews for instance, or even the lowly banias) could make life difficult for everyone if they choose (and had the brains) to do so.
In fact we are grateful to US for McDonald, KFC, Pizza Hut and Brittney Spears!
The feeling is mutual. Sitting as they are upon the oil wells, a smarter race (the Jews for instance, or even the lowly banias) could make life difficult for everyone if they choose (and had the brains) to do so.
#584 Posted by zeemax on July 18, 2006 11:25:00 pm
#581 by harish_hyd
Not at all. In fact we are grateful to US for McDonald, KFC, Pizza Hut and Brittney Spears!
Not at all. In fact we are grateful to US for McDonald, KFC, Pizza Hut and Brittney Spears!
#583 Posted by zeemax on July 18, 2006 11:21:56 pm
#572/#574 by Urstruly
So the conclusion is that as the Islamic resistance movements adopted to the targeted assassinations strategy by forming a cellular structure, the objective is now to turn those cellular leaderships against each other.
Excellent analysis. I agree. That explains a lot of imponderables.
The following excerpt from one of my posts re Iraq on the other board is relevant:
........on several previous occasions, attacks on Shia/Sunni shrines and funeral processions etc had elicited statements of solidarity from both communities` leaders who went to great lengths to dispel any notions of a civil war. Even the attack on the Imam Mehdi Golden shrine did not provoke a civil war when americans were constantly talking about one in the media, which prompted Moqtada al-Sadr to remark ``My friends, whether we`re having a civil war or not, kindly stay out of it.``
The truth is US cannot exit Iraq unless and until there`s a civil war there. Otherwise they`ll just be replacing Saddam with a coalition of hardline Islamists, both Shia and Sunni.
So the conclusion is that as the Islamic resistance movements adopted to the targeted assassinations strategy by forming a cellular structure, the objective is now to turn those cellular leaderships against each other.
Excellent analysis. I agree. That explains a lot of imponderables.
The following excerpt from one of my posts re Iraq on the other board is relevant:
........on several previous occasions, attacks on Shia/Sunni shrines and funeral processions etc had elicited statements of solidarity from both communities` leaders who went to great lengths to dispel any notions of a civil war. Even the attack on the Imam Mehdi Golden shrine did not provoke a civil war when americans were constantly talking about one in the media, which prompted Moqtada al-Sadr to remark ``My friends, whether we`re having a civil war or not, kindly stay out of it.``
The truth is US cannot exit Iraq unless and until there`s a civil war there. Otherwise they`ll just be replacing Saddam with a coalition of hardline Islamists, both Shia and Sunni.
#582 Posted by AlephNull on July 18, 2006 10:58:24 pm
Harish:
I looked at the gentleman’s website in addition to his interactor pages. To clarify – I’ve every reason to believe that he’s a very nice old gentleman, completely well-meaning, utterly benign. He may not be of a particularly skeptical bent of mind, however – that is the only sense in which I hoped he was not typical of educated Muslims.
I looked at the gentleman’s website in addition to his interactor pages. To clarify – I’ve every reason to believe that he’s a very nice old gentleman, completely well-meaning, utterly benign. He may not be of a particularly skeptical bent of mind, however – that is the only sense in which I hoped he was not typical of educated Muslims.
#581 Posted by harish_hyd on July 18, 2006 10:47:00 pm
#563 by zeemax
I know US is trying to bring peace to us and we are trying to bring peace to the US. It`s only who can deliver MORE peace. :-)
All we hear is whining and more whining from the Muslim world about American injustices. Just a look at Paki newspapers and not a day passes by without the US being blamed for some misery that Muslims are facing.
I know US is trying to bring peace to us and we are trying to bring peace to the US. It`s only who can deliver MORE peace. :-)
All we hear is whining and more whining from the Muslim world about American injustices. Just a look at Paki newspapers and not a day passes by without the US being blamed for some misery that Muslims are facing.
#580 Posted by harish_hyd on July 18, 2006 10:43:10 pm
#575 by AlephNull
At any rate, please take a good look at his interactor page and in particular at his long series of ilog entries on ‘Islam and Arithmetic’. Highly instructive.
Indeed!
At any rate, please take a good look at his interactor page and in particular at his long series of ilog entries on ‘Islam and Arithmetic’. Highly instructive.
Indeed!
#579 Posted by harish_hyd on July 18, 2006 10:41:44 pm
#570 by number
I am stating the facts. If you do not like them, it is too bad. Truth does not need defence.
What is truth for you may not be the same for someone else. You say ``those who disregard Allah`s message will be punished on the day of judgment``. I say ``Allah who?`` I hope you get the drift.
I am stating the facts. If you do not like them, it is too bad. Truth does not need defence.
What is truth for you may not be the same for someone else. You say ``those who disregard Allah`s message will be punished on the day of judgment``. I say ``Allah who?`` I hope you get the drift.
#578 Posted by harish_hyd on July 18, 2006 10:41:18 pm
#570 by number
I am stating the facts. If you do not like them, it is too bad. Truth does not need defence.
What is truth for you may not be the same for someone else. You say ``those who disregard Allah`s message will be punished on the day of judgment``. I say ``Allah who?`` I hope you get the drift.
I am stating the facts. If you do not like them, it is too bad. Truth does not need defence.
What is truth for you may not be the same for someone else. You say ``those who disregard Allah`s message will be punished on the day of judgment``. I say ``Allah who?`` I hope you get the drift.
#577 Posted by harish_hyd on July 18, 2006 10:40:12 pm
#571 by number
Is it a crime to tell you who I am?
Uncle Jee, I didn`t say telling about yourselves is a crime, do so by all means. All I`m saying is that I`m not interested in talking about what I am and what I do on a forum that I come to pass time, that`s all.
What are we afraid of? Come on. Let us tell each other who we are.
There is absolutely nothing to be afraid of. Just that there is no point.
Is it a crime to tell you who I am?
Uncle Jee, I didn`t say telling about yourselves is a crime, do so by all means. All I`m saying is that I`m not interested in talking about what I am and what I do on a forum that I come to pass time, that`s all.
What are we afraid of? Come on. Let us tell each other who we are.
There is absolutely nothing to be afraid of. Just that there is no point.
#576 Posted by arjun_m on July 18, 2006 9:57:35 pm
muslim terrorists kill bombaywallahs...where`s the islamist terrorist sympathizer FV now?
#575 Posted by AlephNull on July 18, 2006 9:47:50 pm
harish_hyd #554
Harish:
I don’t know if the gentleman should be categorised as typical of educated Muslims; I hope not. At any rate, please take a good look at his interactor page and in particular at his long series of ilog entries on ‘Islam and Arithmetic’. Highly instructive.
Harish:
I don’t know if the gentleman should be categorised as typical of educated Muslims; I hope not. At any rate, please take a good look at his interactor page and in particular at his long series of ilog entries on ‘Islam and Arithmetic’. Highly instructive.
#574 Posted by Urstruly on July 18, 2006 3:08:11 pm
Cont`d from # 572
The following did not print at the bottom of my last post. Anyway....
In the recent months there is a new element that has been introduced in the targeted assasissinations of ulemmas. This element is the assassinations through suicide attacks or at least give an impression that the attacks are being done by suicides. This policy has worked quite well in Iraq in pitting shias against sunnis. It works well if it is done by those who are actually charged with investigation and declaring it a suicide attack as well. In Pakistan the Nishtar Park was the first botched operation that has exposed conclusively as to what is going on. That is the reason every testicle of this corrupt ruling class went out of the way to repeat ad nauseum that attack was suicide attack as if they had witnessed it themselves. The objective of this strategy, as it must have been evident by now, is to turn those cellular leaderships against each other as mentioned earlier. My estimate is that the policy would fail.
The following did not print at the bottom of my last post. Anyway....
In the recent months there is a new element that has been introduced in the targeted assasissinations of ulemmas. This element is the assassinations through suicide attacks or at least give an impression that the attacks are being done by suicides. This policy has worked quite well in Iraq in pitting shias against sunnis. It works well if it is done by those who are actually charged with investigation and declaring it a suicide attack as well. In Pakistan the Nishtar Park was the first botched operation that has exposed conclusively as to what is going on. That is the reason every testicle of this corrupt ruling class went out of the way to repeat ad nauseum that attack was suicide attack as if they had witnessed it themselves. The objective of this strategy, as it must have been evident by now, is to turn those cellular leaderships against each other as mentioned earlier. My estimate is that the policy would fail.
#573 Posted by echoboom on July 18, 2006 2:31:33 pm
Urstruly:
& zeemax 568
i am a vicarious beneficiary of your keen insight of the state of affairs in our Pakistan. Please do not feel bad if I count myself also as one who is awed by your profuse & profound
interacts.
CHOWK has really come a long way from the days when the bhoora/bhoree-farangis/farangans, hogged these spaces. How long the 2-number maal, the totaa-mainaa-bunder, could last?
As I`ve always maintained : If you do not go to the madressa, the madressa will come to you.
& zeemax 568
i am a vicarious beneficiary of your keen insight of the state of affairs in our Pakistan. Please do not feel bad if I count myself also as one who is awed by your profuse & profound
interacts.
CHOWK has really come a long way from the days when the bhoora/bhoree-farangis/farangans, hogged these spaces. How long the 2-number maal, the totaa-mainaa-bunder, could last?
As I`ve always maintained : If you do not go to the madressa, the madressa will come to you.
#572 Posted by Urstruly on July 18, 2006 2:14:00 pm
Re: # 568
Thank you for the kind adulation.
I classify religious violence in Pakistan in two categories. The first category is the shia-sunni violence that started right after the Islamic revolution in Iran. The initiators of this violence were the CIA funded organizations like sipah-e-sahaba and couple others. There is an unsubstantiated rumor that Saudis may have also funded these organizations, acting as a conduit, but it seems unlikely; since this funding could have very well be done through zia regime. Anyway, this worked very well and shias are caught in a revenge cycle from which they cannot get out. The idea was to prevent shias from delivering their revolutionary message to sunni masses. It is absolutely possible to stop tyhis cycle of violence if sunni ullema put a united front and mobilize masses in support of shias but they wont. The reason is that, those moulvis who vield the street power belong to the oppressive ruling class. They have their vested interests to keep the status quo in support of dictatorship and neo-colonial agenda in this country. They are doing a pretty good job of it.
The second category of religious violence is that which started after 9/11. It is a targeted and concerted effort to assassinate those ulema who have nothing to do with shi-sunni violence. Instead some of them were greatest proponents of the shia sunni unity. A couple of biggest names are Moulana Yusuf Ludhianvi Shaheed and Mufti Nizamuddin Shamzai shaheed. Together there are about 55 to 60 ulema (excuding Nishtar Park Shaheeds) that have fallen martyr in this category. These were the ulema who did not hold any political power and never sought one. Their crime however, was that they were guiding people towards the righteous path in the hindsight of the neo-colonial invasion of this country. They were the real threat to the military dicatorship and to the corrupt ruling class and neocolonial aggression. The new direction from the neo-colonial masters to their minions is to ``de-Islamize`` the country. The idea is that if a country can be ``Islamized`` and recruited to fight a war (against USSR) then it can also be de-Islamized to become the cogs in the big wheel of global colonialism. As if the Iman of a nation can be turned off or on with a switch at will.
The theory of targeted assassination is new and still undergoing testing. The theory was put in practice by Israelies in the last three or four years when they started a campaign of targeted assasination of Palestinian leadership. Pakistani dicatatorship adopted the startegy round about the same time. In Palestine at least it seems to have failed since Hamas won big time despite the elimination of the big names from its top echelon.
In my opinion this theory is based on old paradigm - the paradigm of ``headless chicken``. This theory would have worked quite well in colonial era Muslim lands but decades and centuries of colonial oppression and installation of proxy governments in Muslim lands in post colonial era have forced people to evolve and improvise and the novety that has emerged is termed by west is ``cellular leadership``. A cell constitutes of small group of people and various groups work independently towrads one ideology and one goal. So the elimination of one leader through assassination and corruption has limited or no effect on the greater movement.
Thank you for the kind adulation.
I classify religious violence in Pakistan in two categories. The first category is the shia-sunni violence that started right after the Islamic revolution in Iran. The initiators of this violence were the CIA funded organizations like sipah-e-sahaba and couple others. There is an unsubstantiated rumor that Saudis may have also funded these organizations, acting as a conduit, but it seems unlikely; since this funding could have very well be done through zia regime. Anyway, this worked very well and shias are caught in a revenge cycle from which they cannot get out. The idea was to prevent shias from delivering their revolutionary message to sunni masses. It is absolutely possible to stop tyhis cycle of violence if sunni ullema put a united front and mobilize masses in support of shias but they wont. The reason is that, those moulvis who vield the street power belong to the oppressive ruling class. They have their vested interests to keep the status quo in support of dictatorship and neo-colonial agenda in this country. They are doing a pretty good job of it.
The second category of religious violence is that which started after 9/11. It is a targeted and concerted effort to assassinate those ulema who have nothing to do with shi-sunni violence. Instead some of them were greatest proponents of the shia sunni unity. A couple of biggest names are Moulana Yusuf Ludhianvi Shaheed and Mufti Nizamuddin Shamzai shaheed. Together there are about 55 to 60 ulema (excuding Nishtar Park Shaheeds) that have fallen martyr in this category. These were the ulema who did not hold any political power and never sought one. Their crime however, was that they were guiding people towards the righteous path in the hindsight of the neo-colonial invasion of this country. They were the real threat to the military dicatorship and to the corrupt ruling class and neocolonial aggression. The new direction from the neo-colonial masters to their minions is to ``de-Islamize`` the country. The idea is that if a country can be ``Islamized`` and recruited to fight a war (against USSR) then it can also be de-Islamized to become the cogs in the big wheel of global colonialism. As if the Iman of a nation can be turned off or on with a switch at will.
The theory of targeted assassination is new and still undergoing testing. The theory was put in practice by Israelies in the last three or four years when they started a campaign of targeted assasination of Palestinian leadership. Pakistani dicatatorship adopted the startegy round about the same time. In Palestine at least it seems to have failed since Hamas won big time despite the elimination of the big names from its top echelon.
In my opinion this theory is based on old paradigm - the paradigm of ``headless chicken``. This theory would have worked quite well in colonial era Muslim lands but decades and centuries of colonial oppression and installation of proxy governments in Muslim lands in post colonial era have forced people to evolve and improvise and the novety that has emerged is termed by west is ``cellular leadership``. A cell constitutes of small group of people and various groups work independently towrads one ideology and one goal. So the elimination of one leader through assassination and corruption has limited or no effect on the greater movement.
#571 Posted by number on July 18, 2006 1:00:10 pm
Re: # 556 by harish_hyd
Is it a crime to tell you who I am? What is the reason for this forum to be anonymous?
What are we afraid of? Come on. Let us tell each other who we are.
Is it a crime to tell you who I am? What is the reason for this forum to be anonymous?
What are we afraid of? Come on. Let us tell each other who we are.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- pinku: The basic question is... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- pinku: Re #302 Posted by... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- pinku: #301 Posted by tahmed32... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- tahmed32: Dinaric #298: I am... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- tahmed32: pinku: i really dont... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- tahmed32: ajeya: thanks for your... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- ajeya: #296 Posted by tahmed32... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- Dinaric: Re: # 295 I agree... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content