9/11: DOB of Islamophobia

Re: # 180
[..they are pretty lucky. ...]

You think so?... well, in this life you bedouins run after your goats [a goat-**** is the a ``right of passage`` for you guys is what I heard]... and in after life - you run after the gilmans... so where is the luck for the average fatima?... Between the goat and gilman - she is pretty much out of luck... :)

Re: # 178
No actually they are pretty lucky. there is no ugly guy telling her that she has to kill herself for her husband. there are no cows pissing in the same water that those people are drinking and taking a bath in. There are no people repeating ``thousand apologies`` to every gora skin they see and oh everyone is actually clean and does not have a smell that reminds everyone else of ``HEENG`` - lol

Re: # 177
[...It is all there in Al-Baqra...]

Yep - it`s all there is the Baqra book... jihad, it`s meaning, ways to wage jihad, the rewards for martyrs... everything you want to know about jihad is written by the Baqra guy... :)

Re: # 176
[hi zeemax...what is Jihad? ...]

jihad happens when zeemax and wife strap suicide belts and blow up a restarurant... then they go to heaven where zeemax gets 72 virgins, 65 young boys....... no one really knows what mrs. zeemax is going to get for the good act... :))...

methinks the 65 young boys were originally intended for women martyrs but over the time, the men martyrs have appropriated that from the women... looks like, even in heaven muslims women are out of luck...

#176 by haider5

Jihad is exactly what Quran says. Let`s not go into this new and lengthy subject. It is all there in Al-Baqra.

Jihad is `Fi Sabil Illah`. Period. Do clear your confusions.

hi zeemax

as per your verdict i am badly confused would you please help me in clearing my confusions. hope you will

lets start with Jihad

what is Jihad?

please give me the answer then we will preceed on.

thanks
haider

Re: # 162

# 162 Amended as:

Re: # 125

Mishra,

Agree to most of it.

The medieval bandits of Afghanistan - thanks to the efforts of the US and ISI - now behead people as if it`s an Islamic ritual. The deeds of Zarqawi for the last 2 years had inspired these worthless animals to imitate those Arabs.

You cant reason with them or an Arab state but you can howl aloud abt America and Europe on the other hand. Let them establish an equivalent of American society in the Muslim world first and howl abt discrimination in non-Muslim lands coz, they combine all issues of Muslims and have their hearts bleeding abt problems but asked abt responsibilities they flinch. They cant even say a word in support of the points we raised. Hypocrisy??

Though a non-Muslim I was searched twice or thrice in all (LA, SFO, LV, SJ, WDC Reagan, JFK, DFW) US airports in 2000 (pre-9/11). We have to follow the rules of the land. What’s the big deal?

aw! Now please go to GOD, she is not that bad, God will forgive and is all forgiving. Ask her for her blessings and she will give it you plenty.

Dont be ANGRY she is good!

Red Hot .... Quick ... cross your legs .... you may get burnt ....

Queenie ... surprise ... I don`t have a beard ... neither am I a Quran thumper as you say ... But ... I`m an Islamist. You have a problem with that ? Now I`m getting ANGRY!

#170 Salim, GOD has to be willing to accept a hirsute bearded quran thumper like Zeemax for that to happen!

Who knows she might send him for some remedial language and logic 101 classes

#169 QC&P {``Perhaps, at the risk of my friendship with Salim jang Veer bahadur chauhan Pasha-e-Pahsmina-Chawl, I will recommend that you sit at the feet of the lady ``}

Queenie,
I would recommend a much higher location. :)

zeemax mian - you need to learn a few things. Perhaps, at the risk of my friendship with Salim jang Veer bahadur chauhan Pasha-e-Pahsmina-Chawl, I will recommend that you sit at the feet of the lady you and your cohorts abused, the GOD of Chowk UP andlearn the art of developing a cherent logical argument.


The construction of the statements are crucial since they carry and convey a meaning. In this case you seem to be making the case for the world to prosecute the muslims and the islamic

#139 by nasah


[yes Krishna ji -- I have the `moral integrity` to answer your question in your own way:

Let`s suppose I caught George Bush in Iraq red-handed - right in the act, that is, and arrested him.

Let us also suppose that I knew that Dubya was planning to detonate a nuclear device that would kill millions of innocents, and the disaster could be averted by extracting that information through torture, from the ``invader``, WOULD I DO IT? Or would I read the Geneva conventions?.......

NO I WONT DO IT.

I will take George by his ear -- to his mother -- and ask Barbara to spank her barbarian son`s crappy butt -- red and blue.....for his genocidal gang activity -- I will tell her mother to brush her son`s full of cavities mouth with soap for being so stinky foul mouthed on a subject like TORTURE -- and I will advise the elder Bush to hire a tutor for his dyslexic dimwit Junior to teach him how to read and INTERPRET the Geneva convention every morning before he gets to eat his breakfast.....

NO -- I WILL NEVER TORTURE THAT SYNTAX TORTURED MAN in a million years.....period. ]


I am not smart enough to understand what your George Bush/Barbara Bush story is supposed to mean.

BUt I gather from your post that you are saying that you WOULD NOT torture a man who is INTENTIONALLY KILLING Iraqi civilians, to save the lives of millions of innocents.

Well, this is where you and I differ. I would. And I think every rational person should, too.



[btw -- Krishn Kanhaya ji -- don`t lose your `moral integrity` -- by forgetting your own ``insurgents`` like Shaheed Bhagat Singh -- and Udham Singh for avenging the third degree that General Dyre gave your ancestors in India -- in Jaliyanwala Bagh ......not too long ago.....please. ]

I would urge you not to compare your very low class barbarians with someone like Bhagat Singh. After all, there has to be a difference between followers of a pedophile, and an Idealistic man like Bhagat Singh.

Ever notice why you Islamists ALWAYS SEEM NOT TO NOTICE THE VERY CRUCIAL DIFFERENCE? EH?

BHAGAT SINGH NEVER TARGETED INNOCENT CIVILIANS! HE EXCLUSIVELY TARGETED BRITISH POLICE AND SOLDIERS. UNLIKE YOUR LOW CLASS ``INSURGENTS`` THAT ARE KILLING THEIR OWN COUNTRYMEN BY THE THOUSANDS.

IN FACT, KHUDIRAM, THE FIRST PERSON WHO EVER THREW A BOMB AT THE BRITISH, THREW A BOMB ON A CARRIAGE WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO CARRY A BRITISH OFFICIAL BACK FROM HIS RESIDENCE TO HIS OFFICE. UNFORTUNATELY, THAT DAY, IT WAS HIS WIFE IN THAT CARRIAGE - WHO DIED. OUT OF REMORSE, KHUDIRAM SURRENDERED, KNOWING FULL WELL THE TORTURE HE WOULD BE FACING.

SEE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN YOUR ISLAMIC ANIMALS AND IDEALISTIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS IN INDIA?

NO?

WELL THEN THAT`S BECAUSE OF YOUR ISLAMIC HERITAGE.

#166 by bjkumar

Just for this statement:

There is that “Muslimness” and its unique ability to crowd out any independent judgment ability.

25% for that. Back to 25% macaca score but no more. You should have known it is only because of everyone pushing them into a corner.

Yaar Zee,

Take a good look at my #124 (replacing Romair`s name with your own), then get back to me promptly on my current score!

Hurry, before I soften up!