M A Shah October 18, 2006
#36 Posted by Akberm on February 15, 2007 8:11:04 am
Marriage is a Social Contract .... not an islamic contract ...
#35 Posted by munirnayar on January 26, 2007 7:48:41 am
The Author of this Article is an Illiterate person, he does know even the I of islam and going to raise objection on it. Islam is a Wisdom, and if the Author of this Article is a JAHAL then what we can do.In USA every 2nd women have illegle relationship from the age of 12.
#34 Posted by teshah on October 24, 2006 7:36:18 pm
Re: # 4
Marriage is in fact a function of culture not of religion, especially of a religion like Islam, with its `hallal` and `harram` applied even in case of human relations. Btw, are we not all the progeny of `kafirs` born out of their `harram` kafirana marriages?
Islam allows sex out of wedlock and legitimizes even the offspring from sex-slave but today muslims are the most sex-starved people on earth. Why? It is due to the paedophile mulla who uses Islam only to beat people with; interested in imposing Hadood Laws but not caring for any human rights, especially the sex-rights of the people. Even the so called moderates are also interested only in empowering the women without realising that this would make the marriage all the more costly and unattractive, leading perforce to extramarital sex relation not at all in the interest of the women.
Marriage is in fact a function of culture not of religion, especially of a religion like Islam, with its `hallal` and `harram` applied even in case of human relations. Btw, are we not all the progeny of `kafirs` born out of their `harram` kafirana marriages?
Islam allows sex out of wedlock and legitimizes even the offspring from sex-slave but today muslims are the most sex-starved people on earth. Why? It is due to the paedophile mulla who uses Islam only to beat people with; interested in imposing Hadood Laws but not caring for any human rights, especially the sex-rights of the people. Even the so called moderates are also interested only in empowering the women without realising that this would make the marriage all the more costly and unattractive, leading perforce to extramarital sex relation not at all in the interest of the women.
#33 Posted by smartsyco on October 21, 2006 9:13:40 am
Re: # 22
Actually i just wanted to clear that ........ the person wrote in article ....... so many gays are in islamic countries ...... but i just want to make him realize ...... that he is wrong ...... if he takes the closer look on USA ..... just only on USA ....... he will be surprized to see the result ......... that USA is the onliest biggest place for the criminal ...... regarding anything ...... either its about gays ..... lesbian ........ or rape ........ whatever ........
and beside it if you talk about islamic countries ..........
in which the person said ........ it`s difficult for the girl to marry according to her choice or may be difficult for a boy to marry according to his choice ......
then i am 100% sure that he is short of knowledge .........
in other words ...... i got ...... that the author was trying to say ..... islam is by sword .... i may be wrong ..... but this is my point of view
i would like to say about this article ........ that`s is only romour base ........ article and nothing more than it .........
hope you understand now ....
Actually i just wanted to clear that ........ the person wrote in article ....... so many gays are in islamic countries ...... but i just want to make him realize ...... that he is wrong ...... if he takes the closer look on USA ..... just only on USA ....... he will be surprized to see the result ......... that USA is the onliest biggest place for the criminal ...... regarding anything ...... either its about gays ..... lesbian ........ or rape ........ whatever ........
and beside it if you talk about islamic countries ..........
in which the person said ........ it`s difficult for the girl to marry according to her choice or may be difficult for a boy to marry according to his choice ......
then i am 100% sure that he is short of knowledge .........
in other words ...... i got ...... that the author was trying to say ..... islam is by sword .... i may be wrong ..... but this is my point of view
i would like to say about this article ........ that`s is only romour base ........ article and nothing more than it .........
hope you understand now ....
#32 Posted by jay on October 20, 2006 11:12:18 pm
Yet another pathetic article, refusing to look at the source of the issues identified by the author. If a muslim converts to another religion, it is death in pakistan and in all islamic countries. Women have no status other than objects in pakistan, and that is why a man can marry any women, convert her to islam, and it is another proud avheivement by the muslim and islam.
Well if a woman marries another man of other religion, well it is an asset loss to islam.
Read the book, the poor souls of pakistan, and do not indulge in these pretenses of modern topic discussions by pakistanis. You have no clue of what you are talking.
Well if a woman marries another man of other religion, well it is an asset loss to islam.
Read the book, the poor souls of pakistan, and do not indulge in these pretenses of modern topic discussions by pakistanis. You have no clue of what you are talking.
#31 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on October 20, 2006 9:47:41 am
M. Ali Shah {``Today, in Muslim countries - there are more sex crimes then anywhere else in the world. There is a whole gay community in every city and prostitution is at its peak. It is no secret how easily prostitutes are available in these countries. We are even shocked to find girls from very good homes working as prostitutes and no one knows about it. ``}
Dear Author,
Surely you exaggerate - neither are sex crimes very numerous in Muslim countries nor is prostitution at its peak there. There may be gay communities but they are certainly NOT what they are in the west.
I appreciate your well-written article for the topic and the various issues that you have highlighted. I do not agree with your viewpoint that somehow sex is a necessary evil and that we MUST get boys and girls married so that they can engage in procreation without fear of fornication. Whenever sex and religion are combined in one breath or one thought, religion comes out on top, slightly polluted, but sex becomes non-existent. We should separate religion from sex, and sex from everything else. While the right to copulate is a God-given force of nature, we should respect those who don`t want to take part in it or those who have found alternatives.
Sex, like other forms of human interaction, is a personal choice AND NOT AN OBLIGATION, DUTY, and OR SIN. In different cultures, people interact by shaking hands, talking, hugging, kissing, dancing, and even freely copulating. Other cultures, such as the ones wrongly labeled as ``Islamic,`` frown on shaking hands between the sexes. Other cultures, such as the Eskimo one and even traditional Japanese one, treat sex very much like food - something you would provide even to you enemy or someone condemned to die. So, let`s not pontificate about the ``evils`` of sex - I think the problem lies more with the ``evils`` of unrestricted, unabashed, and unprotected religious extremism.
Dear Author,
Surely you exaggerate - neither are sex crimes very numerous in Muslim countries nor is prostitution at its peak there. There may be gay communities but they are certainly NOT what they are in the west.
I appreciate your well-written article for the topic and the various issues that you have highlighted. I do not agree with your viewpoint that somehow sex is a necessary evil and that we MUST get boys and girls married so that they can engage in procreation without fear of fornication. Whenever sex and religion are combined in one breath or one thought, religion comes out on top, slightly polluted, but sex becomes non-existent. We should separate religion from sex, and sex from everything else. While the right to copulate is a God-given force of nature, we should respect those who don`t want to take part in it or those who have found alternatives.
Sex, like other forms of human interaction, is a personal choice AND NOT AN OBLIGATION, DUTY, and OR SIN. In different cultures, people interact by shaking hands, talking, hugging, kissing, dancing, and even freely copulating. Other cultures, such as the ones wrongly labeled as ``Islamic,`` frown on shaking hands between the sexes. Other cultures, such as the Eskimo one and even traditional Japanese one, treat sex very much like food - something you would provide even to you enemy or someone condemned to die. So, let`s not pontificate about the ``evils`` of sex - I think the problem lies more with the ``evils`` of unrestricted, unabashed, and unprotected religious extremism.
#30 Posted by JayJay on October 20, 2006 3:52:12 am
A ludicrous attempt to question the lack of freedom for sexes to intermingle and have liberty to choose partners in Islamic societies, without attempting to explore why only “Muslim” women are finding themselves in this unique situation. While plain obvious where the problem lies, the writer has done utmost to sidestep any criticism of the ‘best’ religion of the world. The writer shows no attempt to liberate the oppressed of the oppressed, the Muslim woman, from the clutches of an ideology which only perpetuates her misery. One law for a male of the species another for the female.
Grow up. Think for yourself without relying on narrow dictates of dark ages.
Grow up. Think for yourself without relying on narrow dictates of dark ages.
#29 Posted by zarrar2 on October 19, 2006 10:08:14 pm
Dear Sir,
You seem to toot the horn of religion pretty well. Although Islam is not the most tolerent religion of all time like you so put it. And by the way, Homosexuality is a common characteristic shown by almost all species on this planet. Islam is definately not tolerant of it as we both know. I don`t know if it would constitute as a sex crime. I`m sure we all know at least one homosexual. They are in fact humans too.
When people get married, sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn`t. When it doesn`t you break up and find someone else. Marriage is a sacred transaction but let`s face it... it doesn`t work all the time.
You seem to toot the horn of religion pretty well. Although Islam is not the most tolerent religion of all time like you so put it. And by the way, Homosexuality is a common characteristic shown by almost all species on this planet. Islam is definately not tolerant of it as we both know. I don`t know if it would constitute as a sex crime. I`m sure we all know at least one homosexual. They are in fact humans too.
When people get married, sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn`t. When it doesn`t you break up and find someone else. Marriage is a sacred transaction but let`s face it... it doesn`t work all the time.
#28 Posted by drakolos on October 19, 2006 10:06:47 pm
Re: # 10
Injun, I would not comment on that - but common sense dictates : If someone BELIEVES in one thing, and their partner BELIEVES in something else, then they would probably not be compatible. Our beleif controls us - our perception, attitude and the whole personality. If belief does not match, people don`t match.
If you feel that your belief and the belief of your partner is exactly the same.. well.. cool.
Real love is walking in the same direction.
When the Quran was revealed, religion and belief was the essence of life. In this day and age, like I have tried to show in the article, it is not. What value does religion have today to the Hindu, Christian or Muslim? We all know there is a God.. but do we BELIEVE He is for real and active around us, and do we trust Him? Think about it. A single trauma is enough to make us lose our minds - is that belief? I will , with much shame , also admit that the Muslims that impressed Hindus to the extent that Hindus built temples for them, do not exist anymore. Those hindus learnt and practiced the wisdom while the muslims were too busy playing chess and observing mujras... The Brahmin can teach you a lot about your own belief!
Caliph Ali said: Two people are a problem for any society, the educated that do not believe in God and the ignorant who are too religious.
So, you must grow to a higher level of being to be able to debate on religion differences. For now, do you see any difference between people, regardless of religion? I can sit with a Jew, Christian and Hindu and we would all talk about the SAME things. We will not teach eachother the wisdom of God, but the strategy of making money, acquiring technology and combatting terrorism...lol.
This verse talks about why its better for people of similer beliefs to marry eachother. The likelihood of dispute would be minimal. Figure it out.
Injun, I would not comment on that - but common sense dictates : If someone BELIEVES in one thing, and their partner BELIEVES in something else, then they would probably not be compatible. Our beleif controls us - our perception, attitude and the whole personality. If belief does not match, people don`t match.
If you feel that your belief and the belief of your partner is exactly the same.. well.. cool.
Real love is walking in the same direction.
When the Quran was revealed, religion and belief was the essence of life. In this day and age, like I have tried to show in the article, it is not. What value does religion have today to the Hindu, Christian or Muslim? We all know there is a God.. but do we BELIEVE He is for real and active around us, and do we trust Him? Think about it. A single trauma is enough to make us lose our minds - is that belief? I will , with much shame , also admit that the Muslims that impressed Hindus to the extent that Hindus built temples for them, do not exist anymore. Those hindus learnt and practiced the wisdom while the muslims were too busy playing chess and observing mujras... The Brahmin can teach you a lot about your own belief!
Caliph Ali said: Two people are a problem for any society, the educated that do not believe in God and the ignorant who are too religious.
So, you must grow to a higher level of being to be able to debate on religion differences. For now, do you see any difference between people, regardless of religion? I can sit with a Jew, Christian and Hindu and we would all talk about the SAME things. We will not teach eachother the wisdom of God, but the strategy of making money, acquiring technology and combatting terrorism...lol.
This verse talks about why its better for people of similer beliefs to marry eachother. The likelihood of dispute would be minimal. Figure it out.
#27 Posted by ZahraJ on October 19, 2006 6:41:19 pm
I find this article weird for its name and the theme. There were some good points as well, but the fact that someone will have to stoop to the level of ``marriage in hiding`` is simply awkward, idiotic and stupid. Marriage is a bond, committment or relationship between two people. Why the hell should they care for the rest of the world? If one is a teen-ager with no worldy exposure, that`s a different story. But adults should be able to exercise their born rights. Otherwise, I feel real bad for the man or the woman who has to lead such a hypocritical life.
Ironically, in the west, some of the ``tradtional`` muslim women who are focused on finding a ``muslim`` guy end up going back to their native countries to marry men who neither complement them educationally nor financially. Yes, they are muslims. I do not know if it means anything. You are not marrying anyone for his/her religion. That`s nonsense. I can understand that if one is in love, then one may ignore quite a few things (that itself is a difficult undertaking). But how can anyone fall in love meeting someone for the 1st time in completely different surroundings (not close to home) is beyond my comprehension. Still, it`s a very distasteful concept. I know of a few women who have taken the step by being involved in long distance relationships and taking the plunge. Some have hardly met their spouses once or twice. That`s simply sick. I guess to each his or her own.
Ironically, in the west, some of the ``tradtional`` muslim women who are focused on finding a ``muslim`` guy end up going back to their native countries to marry men who neither complement them educationally nor financially. Yes, they are muslims. I do not know if it means anything. You are not marrying anyone for his/her religion. That`s nonsense. I can understand that if one is in love, then one may ignore quite a few things (that itself is a difficult undertaking). But how can anyone fall in love meeting someone for the 1st time in completely different surroundings (not close to home) is beyond my comprehension. Still, it`s a very distasteful concept. I know of a few women who have taken the step by being involved in long distance relationships and taking the plunge. Some have hardly met their spouses once or twice. That`s simply sick. I guess to each his or her own.
#26 Posted by harimau on October 19, 2006 6:03:13 pm
I think Muslimas who are finding it difficult to get good Muslim husbands should advertise in the Taliban`s on-line dating service:
http://www.putrid.com/images/singles.jpg
On the other hand, THAT might be their actual problem!
http://www.putrid.com/images/singles.jpg
On the other hand, THAT might be their actual problem!
#25 Posted by harimau on October 19, 2006 5:00:34 pm
Ref injun #17
[An interesting article about Hindu-Muslim marriages is this.]
What is the problem? The article says educated middle-class Muslimas can`t find husbands. Why not? I am sure slots such as Bibi #2 thru Bibi #4 are still available though Bibi #1 might be taken.
[An interesting article about Hindu-Muslim marriages is this.]
What is the problem? The article says educated middle-class Muslimas can`t find husbands. Why not? I am sure slots such as Bibi #2 thru Bibi #4 are still available though Bibi #1 might be taken.
#24 Posted by Ranjit on October 19, 2006 8:56:01 am
[...If we look at the number of single women in our societies, it is alarming. These women are unable to marry because their parents will not allow them to marry....]
Does this mean that Hamidm`s daughters might end up marrying horrible hindoos?
Its either that or Zeemax/Urstruly types. Ouch!! :-)
#23 Posted by Ally on October 19, 2006 8:43:50 am
when was marraige ever `blissfull` just look at our parents generation, most of them made do, cause they had to, not cause they wanted to, and if they wanted to get out they could not... so both resigned themselves to their kismet...
things are changing now, people marry becuase they are in love with each other, more and more people are marrying out of cast etc, because they want to, my Bhabhi is from a diff cast, but my bro is happy and she is a very cool person and respects our parents... so things are beginning to change and so are people... its not all gloom and doom...
i think if anything many marraiges are becoming `blissful` becasue people actually want them, rather than just doing it for the sake of it...
And what does Islam or the author say about two of my friends who are Muslim women and have married Hindu men? (neither of the couples are religious, but both women have more sway about religion and stuff) The kids if anything will be brought up more Muslim than Hindu!
Does this not defeat the purpose of why Muslim women shouldn`t marry diff religions?
things are changing now, people marry becuase they are in love with each other, more and more people are marrying out of cast etc, because they want to, my Bhabhi is from a diff cast, but my bro is happy and she is a very cool person and respects our parents... so things are beginning to change and so are people... its not all gloom and doom...
i think if anything many marraiges are becoming `blissful` becasue people actually want them, rather than just doing it for the sake of it...
And what does Islam or the author say about two of my friends who are Muslim women and have married Hindu men? (neither of the couples are religious, but both women have more sway about religion and stuff) The kids if anything will be brought up more Muslim than Hindu!
Does this not defeat the purpose of why Muslim women shouldn`t marry diff religions?
#22 Posted by KaalChakra on October 19, 2006 8:12:48 am
smartsyco
Kuchh samajh mein nahi aayaa aapne kya farmaya.
Kuchh samajh mein nahi aayaa aapne kya farmaya.
#21 Posted by joieya on October 19, 2006 7:02:23 am
Good articale and makes a lot of sense. The thing is these ME societies are undergoing a BIG change. The generation gap is perhaps at peak here. First of all , they underwent to a process that made them rich without any hardwork or planning. They sarted pampering their people ( I am talking about oil based monacrhist eceonmies ) or otherwise its slow poisionning. What I have observed is that people are getting richer materially but becoming poorer of the poorest spiritualy and mentally. I do know a single Arab colleague or acquintance who is not leading a double standard as it is mentioned by the writer. Extra marital affairs are there and these leads to hypocracy. They do not want to loose their honur while sitting with family and diwaniays and at the same time have their private clubs and apartmets meant for the other activities. Mostly they have women from less rich Arab countries, poor girls who are jobians and are being grined in the process. So when men are out with other women, this is but natural for their women to lead a double standard lives. Now the younger generation with their eyes dazzled by the most fercious attack of Western culture doubled by the wealth and being ignored by the parents are heading nowhere. Socitiey is becoming suolless.
Interact Index
Similar Articles
- Of medical students, passports and religious tolerance furkan ali
- An Ode Called Amritsar ammara ahmad
- Banana Republic Faysal Malik
- The Non-Existent Tourist’s Guide To Pakistan Nadeem F Paracha
- Edward De Bono's Point C: Situtation in Pakistan Faysal Malik
US Elections 2008 Primaries
Latest Interacts
- guru: Senna, You are history! The... An Ode Called Amritsar
- Senna: "Come back when you... An Ode Called Amritsar
- Senna: Re: # 118 O.K.Talking about... An Ode Called Amritsar
- guru: hamidm, you will make sense... Pakistan’s Prevailing Political And
- guru: "Nazrul Islam Nawab of... An Ode Called Amritsar
- hamidm2: Re: # 26 guru, .... when... Pakistan’s Prevailing Political And
- Senna: Re: # 116 O.K. imy... An Ode Called Amritsar
- guru: " As swami veveka nanda... An Ode Called Amritsar








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content