Truth Behind US-India Nuclear Deal

taikonaut #58

`` I see these so-called Indian nationalist like 1saurabh who are hell bent on inviting US and UK into their regional wars. ``

Pakistanis were the first to seek outside help whether it is USA or China.

`` Well what can you expect from these ghaddars. They did the same thing by inviting B-EIC (British East India Company) into the regional fights. And guess what! Before we knew it, BEIC was ruling the whole subcontinent. ``

British or some other European power was going to colonize India. India was too backward, disunited to resist the colonials.

taikonaut, there is no common belief that the US will seriously get deep into Pakistan to clear the place of terrorists (assuming there are any terrorists there).

#58 by taikonaut on December 16, 2006 8:37am PT


I see these so-called Indian nationalist like 1saurabh who are hell bent on inviting US and UK into their regional wars.


Funny how the pakis want the US/UK to intervene in Kashmir but now that America is dropping hellfires and killing pakis on paki soil, they`re outsiders who need to be shunned...

Re: # 58 taikonaut

[.......Now this aulad-e-ghaddars (decedents of traitors) is at it again.]

And what about your wonderful bleeding India through a thousand cuts strategy that didn`t work?

Re: # 54 taikonaut


[.......and now you think the whole USA will take your bait hook line and sinker. Man talk about wet dreams!]

Please look at what your compatriot Mr Ahmad Madani writes below in #41:


``Now kindly read how Indians are in words of president Nixan. Now he was very devious himself. And when he qualifies some body means its real hard case of Saitan.
Nixon write in his memories

“Pakistanis are straightforward and sometimes extremely stupid. Indians are more devious, sometimes so smart that we fall for their line, ..``

So it may not be wet dreams after all! :)

---

#56 by kaalchakra on December 16, 2006 7:50am PT
# 53

But seriously, expecting the US to do that would be too much. :)

---

I sincerely hope you meant this as a joke.

I see these so-called Indian nationalist like 1saurabh who are hell bent on inviting US and UK into their regional wars.

Well what can you expect from these ghaddars. They did the same thing by inviting B-EIC (British East India Company) into the regional fights. And guess what! Before we knew it, BEIC was ruling the whole subcontinent.

Now this aulad-e-ghaddars (decedents of traitors) is at it again.

---

#55 by 1saurabh on December 16, 2006 7:08am PT
Re: # 54

It is far wiser than sending JIHADIS into other country.

---

Wiser? Wiser my @r$e!

Banyas were finally liberated from commie yoke by the same Jihadis. Now Banyas give us lectures on peace and capitalism. Once a commie banya, always a commie.

# 53

But seriously, expecting the US to do that would be too much. :)

Re: # 54

``Banyas are always looking for someone else to do their bidding.``

It is far wiser than sending JIHADIS into other country.

---

#53 by 1saurabh on December 16, 2006 6:44am PT
Re: # 51

Next in the US firing line would be Pakistan. Us would rid Pakistan of all its WMDs including Nukes in the pretext of chasing terrorists. that will make the world a more safe place.

---

hahah! Banyas are always looking for someone else to do their bidding. First you guys got that bhuddu Mujib, and now you think the whole USA will take your bait hook line and sinker. Man talk about wet dreams!

Re: # 51

Next in the US firing line would be Pakistan. Us would rid Pakistan of all its WMDs including Nukes in the pretext of chasing terrorists. that will make the world a more safe place.

LOL #51

Soysauce, doesn`t this whole NPT business seem more show than substance? Neither China nor the US does or should treat friends and foes and everyone else the same.

#44 by soysauce on December 14, 2006 9:27pm PT


china may make an exception in the case of pakistan or north korea.


Yeah...there`s a real possibility of that happening in the FUTURE....</sarcasm>

nasah:

This is one of the reasons why you should support this deal. If this deal goes through, at least the civilian reactors -and the new ones are supposed to be civil- will come under the IAEA inspection standards which will ensure greater safety than those not subject to external, independent oversight.

``I am against this deal as its detrimental to Pakistan, china and America and for Indian people. Indian people will be subjected to radiation desease in big numers as they built shoddy buildings and recently they were building roof of atomic plant roof came down it was so bad. They are cheat and bad building will lead to leaking nuclear light ande killing in millions due to nuclear disease. ``(madani )

madani sahib -- you are one astute observer -- besides its sinkhole aspect of immoral militarization I am also afraid of another Chernobyl in India or Pakistan -- the Russians are sloppy and corrupt -- the Indians and the Pakistanis are sloppier and corrupter......

#46:

Yes, there was a small window of opportunity when the changes were announced a couple of weeks ago. There was impulse selling of some good income trusts, more than was justified by the changes, but the initial reaction has now been corrected.