Muhammad Ilyas December 20, 2006
#1 Posted by Charlie on December 20, 2006 7:28:12 am
Good article...
However, I must add a few bits here...
If research is done for the sake of research, it is a luxury. Rich countries can afford it. Poor countries like Pakistan should be a bit more selective in choosing their research focus. And the research done by Pakistan should be objective enough. It should be done on the topics which are important according to our needs. For example, too much theoratical research which doesn`t give short term material benefits is useless for Pakistan. The papers which are cited the most in a domain lie on the theoratical end. And it takes several years for that work to be translated to something being applied in industry. So may be, in Pakistan status symbol for researchers shouldn`t be number of citations only. It should also include the effect of their research on Pakistani society.
Let`s take another example. Researcher ``A`` worked well on a subject that will come to life after 20 years. And his paper was cited 100 times. Resarcher ``B`` worked on a topic and ended up starting a new hitech company based in Lahore. Although topic of researcher ``B`` didn`t get any citations, it brought money, jobs and a culture of entrepreneurship. For me, ``A`` and ``B`` are simply not comparable. I have a lot of respect for both of them.
I hope I was clear in my point.
However, I must add a few bits here...
If research is done for the sake of research, it is a luxury. Rich countries can afford it. Poor countries like Pakistan should be a bit more selective in choosing their research focus. And the research done by Pakistan should be objective enough. It should be done on the topics which are important according to our needs. For example, too much theoratical research which doesn`t give short term material benefits is useless for Pakistan. The papers which are cited the most in a domain lie on the theoratical end. And it takes several years for that work to be translated to something being applied in industry. So may be, in Pakistan status symbol for researchers shouldn`t be number of citations only. It should also include the effect of their research on Pakistani society.
Let`s take another example. Researcher ``A`` worked well on a subject that will come to life after 20 years. And his paper was cited 100 times. Resarcher ``B`` worked on a topic and ended up starting a new hitech company based in Lahore. Although topic of researcher ``B`` didn`t get any citations, it brought money, jobs and a culture of entrepreneurship. For me, ``A`` and ``B`` are simply not comparable. I have a lot of respect for both of them.
I hope I was clear in my point.
Interact Index
Similar Articles
- Pakistan's Universities - Problems and Solutions Pervez Hoodbhoy
- Foreign Factor in our Higher Education Muhammad FarooqiAzam
- The Quality Of Pakistani Research Muhammad Ilyas
- Religious Conservatism and Science Mohammad Gill
- Promoting Research in Pakistan: A Few Ideas Omer Cheema
US Elections 2008 Primaries
Latest Interacts
- MeiraJ08: #9 great exchanges, lol,... Faith and Religion
- masadi: tahmed writes "you were... How real is your
- masadi: Tahmed writes "you were... How real is your
- jang: how about increasing driving... Alcohol and Teenagers: A
- MeiraJ08: laddu is back, with... Educational Practices in Private
- Regards: #21 Pinku, I've no... Faith and Religion
- tahmed32: mr. masadi: Greetings to... How real is your
- masadi: Tahmed writes "#161 it... How real is your








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content