Get over the Victim Syndrome

tahmed writes <<< You are only kidding yourself when you try to promote the Divine Right of Kings under the guise of the Theory of the Social Contract. >>>

A typical hypocrites hypocritical response. What kind of social contract theory is it when you support colonization and dictatorship by the Western elite? What kind of ``guise`` is it when a whole country is brutally attacked, its people butchered and a puppet regime that partakes in revenge killings installed under the ``guise`` of democracy. The mother and father of all scum on Chowk is none other than you, tahmed. Be ashamed of your damn self.

further to #186, i see you had already confirmed in #182 what I wrote in #186. unable to resolve an obviously self-contradictory position, you chose to simply back away. i dont get paid either for pointing out your self-contradictory set of views - so you can hang on to them forever. .

urstruly #180 like hell you are ``forfeiting``. :-) you are merely taking refuge in sarcasm. facts and common sense run in terror before your blinding faith in mullahism.

The following is a special delivery exclusively for mian Hamidm2 (everyone else, please look elsewhere!).

Re: # 179

joshi mian,

.... that`s why i never rush to the bar ...

Darn :)

Re: # 181

Don`t be so upbeat yet, it was all plain old sarcasm. However, something has had changed. It is the awareness that I have an agenda and time is money.

A rare sight on Chowk, again! Seriously, congrats Urstruly (and tahmed32) :)

Since it`s so unusual, we should understand what has changed. Ustruly bhai, what did you believe earlier and what has changed now?

Re: # 176

This is an incredibly forceful argument, leaving me no choice but to forfiet.

Re: # 143 Hamid mian

History isn`t all that useless. You can always find some good lessons. For example, reading about Humayun, you may learn to be careful while walking on stairs. :)

Re: # 174

shahji:

you didn`t answer my question. do you believe in mo simply because a hindu believes in bhagwan joe?
or you really think that 7th century code of regulations would serve humanity to eternity.

... the ill wind is blowing

pretty soon sharia will be the law of the land in india, iit`s will be converted to madrassas, and instead of wagging their heads sideways and memorizing microsoft manuals, the head-waggers will be wagging their noggins back and forth while memorizing useless passages from the koran ...........

........maybe thackerey has a point and this evil needs to be nipped in the bud ..... arjun and bj have my full support if they want to don khaki knickers and go on a rampage in keralaland ...............

http://dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007 01 30 story_30-1-2007_pg7_1

#175 urstruly: you had written ``A social contract takes place between an authority and individual ``, and the quote you now provide to support that says ``A concept used in philosophy, political science and sociology to denote an implicit agreement within a state regarding the rights and responsibilities of the state and its citizens; ``

The significance becomes all the more obvious when you look at the origins of the term - The term Social Contract was used by Rousseau, Hobbes and Locke to challenge the theory of the Divine Right of Kings that prevailed at the time in europe. And which the Khalifa-wannabe`s (the mullah omars and fazloos), mard-e-momins and other scum of the muslim world would like to use to become absolute rulers beholden not to the electorate but to God. You are only kidding yourself when you try to promote the Divine Right of Kings under the guise of the Theory of the Social Contract.

So - like I said, you twist english terms just as easily as you twist the message of Islam to suit your preferences.

Re: # 168

Look my definition of ``Social Contract`` is consistent with that of White people, then how could it be wrong:

Social Contract: A concept used in philosophy, political science and sociology to denote an implicit agreement within a state regarding the rights and responsibilities of the state and its citizens;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Contract_%28disambiguation%29

[yes Rousseou has defined the term a little different but practiclly all around the world the term is defined as above now]

#67..netzenji..i did never say that you believe in mo...in fact quran explecitly says`` to you your belief to me mine``....
the problem however
muslims all over have commonality of quran but whether you worship sarsvati durga ganesh or some vishnu its not clear to me.i appreciate philosophy of some geeta and veda but i plead ignorence so should you about areas you do not know

THE INDIAN CHRISTIAN MARRIAGE ACT, 1872