Gajendra Singh January 22, 2007
#5 Posted by eliXelx on February 2, 2007 7:34:09 am
usually, articles on CHOWK are graced with 150-200 replies and talkbacks! it says a great deal about the verborrhea (that`s the word made excrement!) in this article that it`s DIS-graced with 4--and I bet NOT ONE of these 4 misguided souls read the whole thing! I certainly didn`t, and I didn`t have to, to know that taking so much space to say nothing is probably the author`s raison d`etre!
#4 Posted by zeemax on January 23, 2007 2:18:36 am
Thank you for the very efficient condensation of recent developments.
#3 Posted by DrDr on January 22, 2007 3:36:38 pm
When wud iraqi army be ready 2 ``stand up``? When it has enuff muscle 2 kick out the occupation army.
#2 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on January 22, 2007 2:35:23 pm
{``Both Bush and Blair claim to be great admirers of Churchill, but never come round to read this chapter in Iraq`s history or Churchill`s naval debacle at Gallipoli. Now another naval misadventure is under planning. ``}
Singh Sahib,
Thank you for this detailed and scholarly analysis. Kurdistan may well be the final glue that binds Iran and Turkey into a mutually-beneficial policy in Iraq. As you indicated, the Turks would love to take over Northern Iraq along with the Turkmen-populated Kirkuk area. Iran could rule eastern Iraq through its proxy - the democratically elected Shia government. The Sunni Arabs would be left with a choice to be with Syria or invite the autocratic Soodis to take over. The days of Iraq as an independent country are over. The only monkey wrench in the scenario is the selfish vision of the Soodis, Kuwaitis, Israelis, and GCC Arabs. They are the ones pestering Dubya for action against Iran.
Singh Sahib,
Thank you for this detailed and scholarly analysis. Kurdistan may well be the final glue that binds Iran and Turkey into a mutually-beneficial policy in Iraq. As you indicated, the Turks would love to take over Northern Iraq along with the Turkmen-populated Kirkuk area. Iran could rule eastern Iraq through its proxy - the democratically elected Shia government. The Sunni Arabs would be left with a choice to be with Syria or invite the autocratic Soodis to take over. The days of Iraq as an independent country are over. The only monkey wrench in the scenario is the selfish vision of the Soodis, Kuwaitis, Israelis, and GCC Arabs. They are the ones pestering Dubya for action against Iran.
Interact Index
Also by Gajendra Singh
Similar Articles
- A Weak Pakistan is a Threat to Neighbours Beena Sarwar
- Historian Amaresh Misra on South Asia AliHasan Cemendtaur
- Into The Thick of the Battle Ather Naqvi
- We Have Met the Enemy and the Enemy is Us! Salim Chauhan
- The Marriott Bombing: ‘Pakistan’s 9/11’? Beena Sarwar
US Elections 2008 Primaries
Latest Interacts
- jayp: Loosing the battle..loosing the... Losing the Battle, Losing
- jayp: "A question we must... Losing the Battle, Losing
- nb: And how ridiculous to... Rape Survivor Families Struggle
- nb: Parthaab, you remind me... Rape Survivor Families Struggle
- jayp: Re: # 43 sharmeen, What are... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- jayp: Re: # 19 tahmed, Paki civil... Rape Survivor Families Struggle
- nb: I never knew until... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- _arjun30: heh... ‘Pakistan loses $1.5bn due... ‘Dustbin of history’ or








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content