Exchange Siachen Madness for Mountain Peace

#82 by bhangi_lauroo

....paki control means it was paki territory...

Haha .. sure ... thanks for giving me AJK for good ... haha

Abey ... now can you please tell me who was it in the makeshift hammock stretcher?

Haha ...

#80 by zeemax on February 20, 2007 5:39am PT


p.s. you didn`t answer my question...does your wife now get 72 male virgins or is it girl on paki retard action?

#80 by zeemax on February 20, 2007 5:39am PT

paki control means it was paki territory...and india got paki territory...that`s unlike the paki army that miserably failed to get kargil and withdrew abandoning the bodies of it`s soldiers...now that wouldn`t be a problem without global warming but with global warming, i`m sure the rising temparetures mean the bodies are rotting...no 72 virgins for them...

``Tahmed32 is right. Hindooland didn`t gain an inch ... but just managed to get back what was captured by Pak in 1947 ... ``.

The poster at #80 has unwittingly admitted that it was Pak Army which was involved in the `47 Agression of Kashmir, a fact which has been all along denied by Pakistan saying it was a local uprising.

#77 by rabid_ITBillionaire aka bhangilauru

Haha ... mirchi....

Abey, why didn`t you reproduce the fiollowing from that wiki link eh? Why did you only reproduce the latter part of the same paragraph? Typical dishonest lower middle-class trailer park economic miigrant ...

``There were pitched battles fought around Kargil which saw the entire area initially coming under Pakistan control before most of it being reclaimed by Indian troops and remained with India after the ceasefire ...... The area shot into the spotlight in spring of 1999, ... armed infiltrators from Pakistan, aided by the Pakistani army, occupied vacant high posts belonging to India in the Kargil and Drass regions. The result was a limited scale conflict (Kargil War) between both nuclear equipped nations that ended with India regaining the Kargil region .... ``

Tahmed32 is right. Hindooland didn`t gain an inch ... but just managed to get back what was captured by Pak in 1947 ... haha ... idiot.

so this explains the bombing, probing and kidnapping of paki citizens on paki soil....

Pentagon for attack on camps in N. Waziristan: NYT

By Our Correspondent

WASHINGTON, Feb 19: The Pentagon has advocated direct US strikes against alleged Al Qaeda training camps inside North Waziristan where the terrorist group appears to have made new inroads, the New York Times reported on Monday.

The concern about a resurgent Al Qaeda has been the subject of intensive discussion at high levels of the Bush administration, the report said, and has reignited debate about how to address Pakistan`s role as a haven for militants without undermining the government of President Pervez Musharraf.

The Pentagon, the report said, wanted direct US strikes against the camps, but others warned that any raids could result in civilian casualties.

“State Department officials say that increased American pressure could undermine President Musharraf`s military-led government,” the report added.

Last week, President Bush`s senior counterterrorism adviser, Frances Fragos Townsend, went to Afghanistan to consult security officials about rising US concerns on Al Qaeda`s resurgence in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Quoting unnamed intelligence sources, the newspaper reported that Al Qaeda, the terrorist network led by Osama bin Laden, had established a new operating organization after being ousted more than five years ago from its safe haven in formerly Taliban-run Afghanistan.

now that prophet tahmed(pbuhsrr)`s claim about India not having gained an inch of land has been shown to be true only ins his alternate universe, the prophet will run away from the point he made...

#76 by zeemax on February 20, 2007 1:11am PT

your wife already died a suicide bomber...your son is probably headed to gitmo as we speak.....your inbred retard bottom of the social barrel brit-paki brothers are being rounded up by the british cops....

so i can understand your frustration...

... hey ... does anyone know who was the wounded guy in the hammock ???

#48 by Pardesi

Indian sycophancy and opportunitism also derive its roots from Hindu culture. Rajiv and Indira exploited it to hilt just like British and Muslim invaders.

While I am with you on the second one, I fail to understand why you feel Hindu culture is to blame.

How many Hindus took out mass protests against Rajiv after the 1984 massacres? How many Hindus died to protect those innocent Sikhs?

Is dying alone a proof of intentions? I know of many Hindus who at great risk to their lives sheltered Sikhs from the marauding mobs. Under the circumstances, many did what they could to help them. I (a Madrassi) was then a kid staying with an uncle and I saw the whole apartment full of scared Sikhs. My uncle and aunt themselves took in a dozen of them, cooked food for them and tried their best to make them feel at home. I didn`t understand the magnitude of the tragedy then, but looking back today, I`m proud of those who did whatever little they could, considering the threats that were being hurled their way.

And yaar tell me how many Indian Sikhs protested against the atrocity? Has there been a sustained movement on the part of influential Sikhs (and there are quite a lot of them) to bring justice to the victims? I hate to talk in terms of Hindus this and Muslims that, but why should Hindus alone be blamed when Sikhs themselves haven`t done too much? Many Sikhs continue to be proud Congressmen, when a simple boycott of the party could have sent a message that they haven`t forgiven it for its complicity.

It’s pathetic and shows how much more the culture has to evolve.

I agree that we as Indians are still a long way away from the values of truth and justice but hopefully someday, we`ll get there.

Re:tahmed#70

[..India been winning all the wars as you assure me, and yet does not have one inch more turf than it did in 1947....]

Tahmed, I know Pakistanis have this secret fantasy of Indian forces rolling into Pakistan some day and taking them back into the fold of mother India. When people protest so loudly about something NOT happening, they secretly wish it actually did happen!! Its kind of like how hindus come on chowk and insist stubbornly about cutting off all links to Pakistan. :-)

However, you are out of luck. We do not want your land. We would rather visit Lahore as tourists for Basant and enjoy your hospitality than show up with tanks and suffer suicide blasts. Just protect the northwest and keep away the X-e-Y type riff-raffs from Kashmir, and we will be all set.

arjun: i write a post to you and to another to ranjit. And you ignore the post addressed to you and start responding to the post to the other individual. I think your dyslexia is getting worse..... :-(

#71 first tell me - did you finally take your pills today?

#70 by tahmed32 on February 19, 2007 7:31pm PT



ranjit #65 Isnt it amazing - India been winning all the wars as you assure me, and yet does not have one inch more turf than it did in 1947.


maybe not in your fictional pakiworld..in the real world...

Kargil

However in the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 the entire Kargil region including key posts was captured for good by Indian troops.[1] In order to straighten out the line of control in the area, the Indian Army launched night attacks when the ground temperatures sank to below -17º and about 15 enemy posts located at height of 16,000 feet and more were captured. [2] After Pakistan forces lost the war and agreed to the Shimla Agreement, Kargil and other strategic areas nearby remained with India.[

ranjit #65 Isnt it amazing - India been winning all the wars as you assure me, and yet does not have one inch more turf than it did in 1947. And as a result of all these amazing victories, India has managed to brilliantly exchange change the military equation from one of superiority in conventional arms to one of a nuclear stalemate. But then, what are ``elder brothers`` for if not to do these small favors. :-)

arjun #66: I know it is frustrating to be reminded to take your pills. But remember: it is for your own good. These pills will make your dyslexius macacus better. Soon you will be able to start reading my posts, rather than reading hallucinations as you were doing below!! :-)