Dawood Mamoon February 26, 2007
#18 Posted by Diamond on April 28, 2007 2:04:09 pm
Saturday, April 28, 2007 3:02:58 PM
Theories are for dearest and practicalities are for
Pa’s cute gal’s lities they play with and spread out upon.
Just while passing by your thought provoking elongated material, about something that one can understand if one is a deep insider of “Digital Analogue Designing and Engineering” based person
Just because, you could not find the stuff in your “restricted” subject materials.
1. The theory of 0 (zero) and 1 (one) is based on an electronic three pin transistor, that is basically an electronic switch, meaning without mechanical needs. So according to writing, it is well understood that you are trying to have a peek in digital side of electronics while defying its actual basic theories.
Meaning it should be related to mechanics or mechanical aspects?
When a transistor is turned ON then it is supposed to be at a state of “1”
This can be true in both forms when a transistor is ON and some times when a transistor is OFF. As there are more than one combinations of small electronic components with different type of transistors, that eventually at the last output turn out to be with the same result, meaning either ONE or ZERO, one stands for being ON and ZERO stands for being OFF.
It is not possible to say we were not talking about electronics digital side, but talking about some heavenly force, thereby, making us believe there might be some inclusion of basic electronic theory into other (apparently) useless subjects to make them even somewhere near or Beyond GOD ALMIGHTY subject and profession
Electronic (Digital or Analogue)
But some how doctors as they too try this step, said human embryo when fertilized makes from
One to Two then Four then Eight then Sixteen and so on …. Towards an analogue (sort of) products called life in this case (the humans).
To make possible the fertilization of an embryo one also has to connect the One stem with the O ring if ever one could find intact in this world.
Digital or analogue and digital computers have disclosed the deep space human contact with the parallel side of life, using even a simple operating system called windows XP. Find out how.
Theories are for dearest and practicalities are for
Pa’s cute gal’s lities they play with and spread out upon.
Just while passing by your thought provoking elongated material, about something that one can understand if one is a deep insider of “Digital Analogue Designing and Engineering” based person
Just because, you could not find the stuff in your “restricted” subject materials.
1. The theory of 0 (zero) and 1 (one) is based on an electronic three pin transistor, that is basically an electronic switch, meaning without mechanical needs. So according to writing, it is well understood that you are trying to have a peek in digital side of electronics while defying its actual basic theories.
Meaning it should be related to mechanics or mechanical aspects?
When a transistor is turned ON then it is supposed to be at a state of “1”
This can be true in both forms when a transistor is ON and some times when a transistor is OFF. As there are more than one combinations of small electronic components with different type of transistors, that eventually at the last output turn out to be with the same result, meaning either ONE or ZERO, one stands for being ON and ZERO stands for being OFF.
It is not possible to say we were not talking about electronics digital side, but talking about some heavenly force, thereby, making us believe there might be some inclusion of basic electronic theory into other (apparently) useless subjects to make them even somewhere near or Beyond GOD ALMIGHTY subject and profession
Electronic (Digital or Analogue)
But some how doctors as they too try this step, said human embryo when fertilized makes from
One to Two then Four then Eight then Sixteen and so on …. Towards an analogue (sort of) products called life in this case (the humans).
To make possible the fertilization of an embryo one also has to connect the One stem with the O ring if ever one could find intact in this world.
Digital or analogue and digital computers have disclosed the deep space human contact with the parallel side of life, using even a simple operating system called windows XP. Find out how.
#17 Posted by Sanaullah on March 4, 2007 5:36:54 am
Well written Mamoon Sb:
having a scholarly interest in physics I love reading easy to understand concepts, I would disagree with your concept of imagination as receiving antena of future information. Artists and inventors both are imaginative and their imaginative power creates the future as we see it. Nonetheless it is one of the best pieces at chowk which deserve a second more serious read.
Would you like to explain the concept of 0 &1.
And best of luck for the ring theory
``LET NEWTON BE``
having a scholarly interest in physics I love reading easy to understand concepts, I would disagree with your concept of imagination as receiving antena of future information. Artists and inventors both are imaginative and their imaginative power creates the future as we see it. Nonetheless it is one of the best pieces at chowk which deserve a second more serious read.
Would you like to explain the concept of 0 &1.
And best of luck for the ring theory
``LET NEWTON BE``
#16 Posted by aquaris on March 4, 2007 3:10:37 am
Human `` MIND`` is the key.
What is human Mind......??
A physical container of forces, and possibilities ......!!
correct me if I am wrong, it is said, human has used only about 3-5% of the real capabilities of their MIND so Far.....!!
#15 Posted by mamoon on February 28, 2007 2:00:08 pm
thanx..i ll get back to u here after reading both concepts.
#14 Posted by Inquirer on February 28, 2007 12:00:06 pm
There is no connection between time travel ( used by H. G. Wells ) and time dilatation a concept in the special theory. You continuously conflate between the two.
You need to understand physics rather than view physics with the psychologist`s glasses and try to develop untenable statements. For example: ``In a universal sense, past may very well be anyone’s future and thus one may conclude that while traveling at a speed of light one may travel through both past and future. ``
You need to understand physics rather than view physics with the psychologist`s glasses and try to develop untenable statements. For example: ``In a universal sense, past may very well be anyone’s future and thus one may conclude that while traveling at a speed of light one may travel through both past and future. ``
#13 Posted by mamoon on February 28, 2007 10:04:26 am
Inquirer thts wht ur pitching line and intro suggests:
``M.Sc (Physics), Ph.D. (Nucl.Engg)
Intersested in developing a synthesis of the higher aspects of all religions. Fully recognize the tentative validity of all religious teachings. Would like to contribute to the rational foundation for human behaviour in all fields. ``
But your comment negate both your qualification as well as your proclaimed interest ..tsk`
Hope you read some psycology as well to have some self evaluation otherwise its no good and you might as well be just a paper clerk.
``M.Sc (Physics), Ph.D. (Nucl.Engg)
Intersested in developing a synthesis of the higher aspects of all religions. Fully recognize the tentative validity of all religious teachings. Would like to contribute to the rational foundation for human behaviour in all fields. ``
But your comment negate both your qualification as well as your proclaimed interest ..tsk`
Hope you read some psycology as well to have some self evaluation otherwise its no good and you might as well be just a paper clerk.
#12 Posted by mamoon on February 28, 2007 10:00:20 am
if you mean by fluff ímagination`definitely
and please dont get jealous....definitely i never claim to pertain any knowledge
and please dont get jealous....definitely i never claim to pertain any knowledge
#11 Posted by Inquirer on February 28, 2007 9:31:32 am
``Knowledge is limited but Imagination encircles the whole universe
--Albert Einstein ``
This article has little knowledge and all fluff.
--Albert Einstein ``
This article has little knowledge and all fluff.
#10 Posted by mamoon on February 28, 2007 6:52:42 am
Dear zeena,
This article has been written after reading Stephen Hawkings and utilising some of basic physics I read in school days. Many of the contents are an outcome of personal understanding , observatory analysis and some thinking on my part.
Universe is inifintely big, as what they suggest in theoretical physics meaning it lies in the category of countable infinity. It is but natural to assume that universe must have boundaries (though reaching infinitely). Thus one may only imagine a shape of the universe. The explaination given is quite sublte in nature that as we stand on earth, every other point looks the same. Once in outer space, we may see the shape of the earth. However, it would be physically impossible to lie out side the universe and then see through eyes the exact shape of it. Thus we can assume that it is so infinitely big that it would look the same from any point we may lie. And assume we we some how lie out side the universe at a decent distance, we may see the universe as a circular object much like a ball. However the problem is that to bring ourselve to any such situation we have to defy time also. Earth lie in three dimensions but universe lie in 4th dimension.
Also note that time is continous variable much like physical space.In physical space we may always return back to our point of origin and utilising quantum physics, it should also be possible to return back to original time of reference (say today). In such a scenerio the ball like shape explained by stephen hawkings to describe universe is not correct and his explaination of imaginary time on which the universe is hanging also doesnot give a lot of good information. Thus in the article, I argue that the shape of the universe is like a ring. Any one point it time universe has a circular shape, suggesting the infinitely wide size of of it, where has the over all ring, which has continous circular patterns is the time dimensions. Such a shape not only fits with different time horizons but it also fits with stephen Hawkings imaginary time dimension. Once we understand that, we would move on to analyze big bang theory. Recent tachnology to analyse change in light patterns in the galaxy has enabled the scientists to conclude that universe is expanding. But if it does, Stephen Hawkings bring another paradox which suggests that at some point in time it will also start contracting or in other words universe would be on reverse gear. All such observations have been made by analysing time as a measurement of continous change. Though it is quite simple to suggest that light patterns from infintite distances might contain a very complex form of information about changing patterns in galactic objects which are producing this light waves. Many of these images have been ancient as light follows certain time to reach us. Thus I mention optical allusion.
If in a universal sense time is only another variable, violated inside the universe by objects like black hole and even light itself, we can never say with confidence whether universe is following big bag. In this scenerio, the ring theory I propose seems more rational. The ring shape of the universe means that past and future may easily be violated.
It is good image of universe. We can bring parallel or multiple universes also in this ring. where these rings are over lapping each other. e.g. one ring is crossing another one like a chain, However a random pattern may suggest that it is not a perfect chain but simultaneously many universes may be overlapping with each other. I am writing the article in detail with figures.
p.s. This ring theory which I have come up with is result of my own thinking process. Now I am interested to know whether such theory exists in theoretical physics or quantum physics w.r.t to this topic or I am just reinventing some half baked theory. I have done a lot of internet search, but have been failed to find out any thing related to this.
There is ring theory in mathematics and some brief explainations in physics but nothing I could find which talks about shape of the universe as i suggest so. On building the super computer, i am also looking for any material substatiating my arguments. I have yet to find any source exactly explaining this idea. I have in detailed worked on this theory and the valid possibilty of it. Inter net search tells us that in 1976 NASA mate a telepathic experiments through apollo satellite. Now there is extensive research going on which suggests telepathy technology through artificial means has developed much advanced. Again minority report was not entirely a science fiction idea. I `ll write in detail if i find some ppl seriously interested in what i am suggesting.
This article has been written after reading Stephen Hawkings and utilising some of basic physics I read in school days. Many of the contents are an outcome of personal understanding , observatory analysis and some thinking on my part.
Universe is inifintely big, as what they suggest in theoretical physics meaning it lies in the category of countable infinity. It is but natural to assume that universe must have boundaries (though reaching infinitely). Thus one may only imagine a shape of the universe. The explaination given is quite sublte in nature that as we stand on earth, every other point looks the same. Once in outer space, we may see the shape of the earth. However, it would be physically impossible to lie out side the universe and then see through eyes the exact shape of it. Thus we can assume that it is so infinitely big that it would look the same from any point we may lie. And assume we we some how lie out side the universe at a decent distance, we may see the universe as a circular object much like a ball. However the problem is that to bring ourselve to any such situation we have to defy time also. Earth lie in three dimensions but universe lie in 4th dimension.
Also note that time is continous variable much like physical space.In physical space we may always return back to our point of origin and utilising quantum physics, it should also be possible to return back to original time of reference (say today). In such a scenerio the ball like shape explained by stephen hawkings to describe universe is not correct and his explaination of imaginary time on which the universe is hanging also doesnot give a lot of good information. Thus in the article, I argue that the shape of the universe is like a ring. Any one point it time universe has a circular shape, suggesting the infinitely wide size of of it, where has the over all ring, which has continous circular patterns is the time dimensions. Such a shape not only fits with different time horizons but it also fits with stephen Hawkings imaginary time dimension. Once we understand that, we would move on to analyze big bang theory. Recent tachnology to analyse change in light patterns in the galaxy has enabled the scientists to conclude that universe is expanding. But if it does, Stephen Hawkings bring another paradox which suggests that at some point in time it will also start contracting or in other words universe would be on reverse gear. All such observations have been made by analysing time as a measurement of continous change. Though it is quite simple to suggest that light patterns from infintite distances might contain a very complex form of information about changing patterns in galactic objects which are producing this light waves. Many of these images have been ancient as light follows certain time to reach us. Thus I mention optical allusion.
If in a universal sense time is only another variable, violated inside the universe by objects like black hole and even light itself, we can never say with confidence whether universe is following big bag. In this scenerio, the ring theory I propose seems more rational. The ring shape of the universe means that past and future may easily be violated.
It is good image of universe. We can bring parallel or multiple universes also in this ring. where these rings are over lapping each other. e.g. one ring is crossing another one like a chain, However a random pattern may suggest that it is not a perfect chain but simultaneously many universes may be overlapping with each other. I am writing the article in detail with figures.
p.s. This ring theory which I have come up with is result of my own thinking process. Now I am interested to know whether such theory exists in theoretical physics or quantum physics w.r.t to this topic or I am just reinventing some half baked theory. I have done a lot of internet search, but have been failed to find out any thing related to this.
There is ring theory in mathematics and some brief explainations in physics but nothing I could find which talks about shape of the universe as i suggest so. On building the super computer, i am also looking for any material substatiating my arguments. I have yet to find any source exactly explaining this idea. I have in detailed worked on this theory and the valid possibilty of it. Inter net search tells us that in 1976 NASA mate a telepathic experiments through apollo satellite. Now there is extensive research going on which suggests telepathy technology through artificial means has developed much advanced. Again minority report was not entirely a science fiction idea. I `ll write in detail if i find some ppl seriously interested in what i am suggesting.
#9 Posted by Zeena on February 28, 2007 1:02:18 am
mamoon sahib
You`re wellcome. Here is another piece for your interest. I hope you`ll like it.
The Genius of Einstein:
Where did it Originate?
VENTURI-TUBE DIAGRAM
Einstein`s perspective from his spiritual home on the inner planes offers a clearer view of the cosmos and the laws of the Infinite

``One thing I have learned in a long life: that all our science, measured against reality, is primitive and childlike--and yet it is the most precious thing we have.``
- Albert Einstein
In April 1955, Einstein changed worlds or left the physical plane in so-called death and ascended to one of the higher celestial dimensions. He now resides on the spiritual plane of Eros, a nonatomic planet devoted to the expression of science. After his transition to his spiritual home, Einstein began the process of tearing down or unlearning some of the concepts and precepts of his material life on Earth, replacing them with more of the higher and infinite concepts, which are clearer when one arrives in these inner and higher dimensions, formerly known as Shamballa.
Einstein thought of himself as much as a philosopher as a scientist. Here we are able to identify a strong scientific continuity from his previous life as Archimedes and a strong influence from his previous life as Jacobi, a German philosopher. Einstein`s life reflects an advanced scientific, investigative genius as well as a philosopher`s deep concern for the progress of humankind, though his study of humanity`s flaws and the possibility of world peace.
As a scientist, Albert Einstein made great contributions in physics that have enriched our view of the universe. Many of his theories and postulates were received through his clairvoyance and thus advanced our scientific world to the threshold of a fourth-dimensional or an interdimensional physics. The concept of mass being nonexistent and an illusion, and that, in reality, an expression of pure energy; and the concept that the velocity of light was not a static, constant expression of energy but was relative to the plane of expression upon which the viewer exists are two examples that will be understood as precursors in our twenty-first century science.
As a philosopher and humanist, Einstein was a freethinker. In his approach to solving problems, he tried to assume nothing and questioned everything. He caste aside the dogmas of religion as easily as he brushed aside the dogmas of Newtonian physics, which had dominated the minds of scientists for two centuries. Later he warned the quantum physicists against creating new dogmas. Einstein was a humble person, and in spite of his intellect and achievements he was known to be a compassionate and kind man.
In the Unarius library there are several transmissions from Einstein himself, from the inner spiritual worlds where he now resides, in which he speaks as a Brother of the Light from a higher perspective--a cosmic consciousness in-tune with the Infinite. He clarifies and corrects some of the scientific theories that were confounding him and other fellow scientists, while in his previous finite existence; he states that he is a student of the Infinite Concept of Cosmic Creation, a mere child of the Infinite.
Where did all this intense creative genius and inspiration come from? It was learned and properly integrated on the inner spiritual plane of Eros--one of the seven celestial teaching centers where Einstein, Archimedes, and other advanced intellects resided before they incarnated to the earth plane.
uranius.org
You`re wellcome. Here is another piece for your interest. I hope you`ll like it.
The Genius of Einstein:
Where did it Originate?
VENTURI-TUBE DIAGRAM
Einstein`s perspective from his spiritual home on the inner planes offers a clearer view of the cosmos and the laws of the Infinite

``One thing I have learned in a long life: that all our science, measured against reality, is primitive and childlike--and yet it is the most precious thing we have.``
- Albert Einstein
In April 1955, Einstein changed worlds or left the physical plane in so-called death and ascended to one of the higher celestial dimensions. He now resides on the spiritual plane of Eros, a nonatomic planet devoted to the expression of science. After his transition to his spiritual home, Einstein began the process of tearing down or unlearning some of the concepts and precepts of his material life on Earth, replacing them with more of the higher and infinite concepts, which are clearer when one arrives in these inner and higher dimensions, formerly known as Shamballa.
Einstein thought of himself as much as a philosopher as a scientist. Here we are able to identify a strong scientific continuity from his previous life as Archimedes and a strong influence from his previous life as Jacobi, a German philosopher. Einstein`s life reflects an advanced scientific, investigative genius as well as a philosopher`s deep concern for the progress of humankind, though his study of humanity`s flaws and the possibility of world peace.
As a scientist, Albert Einstein made great contributions in physics that have enriched our view of the universe. Many of his theories and postulates were received through his clairvoyance and thus advanced our scientific world to the threshold of a fourth-dimensional or an interdimensional physics. The concept of mass being nonexistent and an illusion, and that, in reality, an expression of pure energy; and the concept that the velocity of light was not a static, constant expression of energy but was relative to the plane of expression upon which the viewer exists are two examples that will be understood as precursors in our twenty-first century science.
As a philosopher and humanist, Einstein was a freethinker. In his approach to solving problems, he tried to assume nothing and questioned everything. He caste aside the dogmas of religion as easily as he brushed aside the dogmas of Newtonian physics, which had dominated the minds of scientists for two centuries. Later he warned the quantum physicists against creating new dogmas. Einstein was a humble person, and in spite of his intellect and achievements he was known to be a compassionate and kind man.
In the Unarius library there are several transmissions from Einstein himself, from the inner spiritual worlds where he now resides, in which he speaks as a Brother of the Light from a higher perspective--a cosmic consciousness in-tune with the Infinite. He clarifies and corrects some of the scientific theories that were confounding him and other fellow scientists, while in his previous finite existence; he states that he is a student of the Infinite Concept of Cosmic Creation, a mere child of the Infinite.
Where did all this intense creative genius and inspiration come from? It was learned and properly integrated on the inner spiritual plane of Eros--one of the seven celestial teaching centers where Einstein, Archimedes, and other advanced intellects resided before they incarnated to the earth plane.
uranius.org
#8 Posted by wasif2 on February 27, 2007 11:17:04 pm
Very very interesting.
I wonder:
i. whether there is any purpose in ``studying`` the human mind.... i.e whether what the human mind may experience is knowable (and ``teachable``) in physical terms ?
ii. we may be talking about ``mystics`` here too....right ? And mystics do teach their disciples. But not in physical terms I suspect. Could the pinnacle of physics just might be its understanding of the nature of mysticism.
iii. while certain individuals may have (be born with...or possess the necessary ``physical and mental ``health`` for it) the capacity to transcend what constrains ``physics`` or ``mathematics`` .... do all people have the potential for acquiring that capacity ? Is mystic discipline the way ? While mystic discipline may be the way for an ``individual`` to transcend ``physical reality`` what about the society as a whole ? Can a whole society go on that path ? Why should this ability to know (know, transcend..whatever) be an elite club activity only ? What sort of social and economic system would a society need to have to enable all its members to go on that path ? One with no inter se conflicts I suppose.... so that all its members may have that certain ``mental health`` or ``mental condition`` for going on that journey toward ``knowing`` or ``transcending`` ..... so that its members can do just that.... only a society that guarantees freedom from internal (economic) strife inter se its members can provide that.
iv. fashionable ``pro-sufi`` people talk about ``oneness`` with God in a vein that suggests they think it is desirable. Oneness of an individual with universe...or God, that is. Strangely, these same people think ``individuality`` and ``differences`` (as opposed to ``oneness``) amongst humans are desirable (communist ideals were ridiculed for treating people as herds and not accomodating the ``individual`` enough). Why is the human race not included in the mystic ambition of ``oneness`` ? Why are most mystics an elite club of seeking or achieving oneness with God just by and for themselves (or some disciples willing to join the club) ?
#7 Posted by mamoon on February 27, 2007 6:25:34 pm
? to diamond
p.s. thanx zeena fr appreciation. and i would like to carry out some discussion with a serious student of theoretical physics if any
p.s. thanx zeena fr appreciation. and i would like to carry out some discussion with a serious student of theoretical physics if any
#6 Posted by Diamond on February 27, 2007 2:53:23 pm
for that we`ll have to wait untill the god almighty`s othersides guys can produce parabolas for inter universe communications, however, if you would like to have a communication sittings with the parallel side of life or solar system you may do so by first talking within yourself and then it starts to pick onwards to the direct links with others and the otherside extra, however a properly configured computer shall be a real plus to communicate with the parallel side, just incase if you would want the other side of universe to stop communicating with you then all you`ll have to do would be to turn off the microsoft`s virtual machine including but not limited to the java software rouitne.
good luck ...
we`ll hit the other side right after we`ll die off.
good luck ...
we`ll hit the other side right after we`ll die off.
#5 Posted by nasah on February 27, 2007 5:51:30 am
The article should be titled: In Praise of Schizophrenia; How I came to Love God and Hate Thorazine......:)
#4 Posted by zeemax on February 27, 2007 2:24:39 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#3 Posted by Zeena on February 26, 2007 3:26:50 pm
Dear writer
Excellent piece!
I believe God created universe. Humans are part of God who created them to explore this universe to reach God(Al mighty). Human souls have unlimited powers beyond our imaginations.
I believe science has restricted itelf to limited human experience, but, this is what exploration is all about......................
Some old civilizations were way too, advanced than what we are today......true.
Excellent piece!
I believe God created universe. Humans are part of God who created them to explore this universe to reach God(Al mighty). Human souls have unlimited powers beyond our imaginations.
I believe science has restricted itelf to limited human experience, but, this is what exploration is all about......................
Some old civilizations were way too, advanced than what we are today......true.
listing 1-16
1 2
Interact Index
Also by Dawood Mamoon
Similar Articles
- Freud and Jung and Their Secret Affairs Khalid Sohail
- Judah Folkman Syed Shah
- Ultimate Fate of the Universe mubasher jamil
- Rote Learning Vis-Ã -vis Physical Comprehension Mohammad Gill
- Science and the Islamic world --- The quest for rapprochement Pervez Hoodbhoy
US Elections 2008 Primaries
Latest Interacts
- majumdar: Sadna, If YLH is correct,... Living Gandhi and King
- majumdar: Muthu, i can understand if... Living Gandhi and King
- MantoLives: No one is asking... Living Gandhi and King
- MantoLives: Ok nautanki champion answer... Living Gandhi and King
- MantoLives: Ok nautanki champion answer... Living Gandhi and King
- jayp: Re: # 200 You forgot... Living Gandhi and King
- MantoLives: Frankly I don't understand... Living Gandhi and King
- sadna: Mantolives Your calling something a... Living Gandhi and King








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content