Mohammad Gill April 22, 2007
#381 Posted by Zeena on May 3, 2007 8:32:02 pm
echoboom jii
Yes, I read your link...and I am surprised why Mr.Mirza Ahmed claimed to be messiah?
or some prophet....the man must be completely out of his mind......
This guy wished to change the whole concept of Quran with wrong interpretations rather convoluted and still had the nerves to call himself Muslim....
My objection for Mr. Mirza is only one....
I do not care, if, he got this delusion of being messiah or prophet or whatever......I do not care whatever his disciples practice.......that is non of my business...
But, I have serious concerns when they call themselves Muslims.............
Why they persistently wish to be called Muslim Mirzaii? Why are they so desperate to be called Muslim Mirzaii while they have made themselves very clear that they do not accept Quran and the teachings of our LAST PROPHET(pbuh) AND THEY HAVE CHANGED THE WHOLE CONCEPT.......
This is so stupid and hypocrite......
They should struggle to get their recognition separatley, as a separate cult or group of some followers of their peophet, MR.Mirza...separate than Islam....They shouldn`t be using Islamic crutches for their own delusions.......
Either you are Muslim or not.........there is no third way......
They will be accepted more open heartedly as Non Muslims............
Yes, I read your link...and I am surprised why Mr.Mirza Ahmed claimed to be messiah?
or some prophet....the man must be completely out of his mind......
This guy wished to change the whole concept of Quran with wrong interpretations rather convoluted and still had the nerves to call himself Muslim....
My objection for Mr. Mirza is only one....
I do not care, if, he got this delusion of being messiah or prophet or whatever......I do not care whatever his disciples practice.......that is non of my business...
But, I have serious concerns when they call themselves Muslims.............
Why they persistently wish to be called Muslim Mirzaii? Why are they so desperate to be called Muslim Mirzaii while they have made themselves very clear that they do not accept Quran and the teachings of our LAST PROPHET(pbuh) AND THEY HAVE CHANGED THE WHOLE CONCEPT.......
This is so stupid and hypocrite......
They should struggle to get their recognition separatley, as a separate cult or group of some followers of their peophet, MR.Mirza...separate than Islam....They shouldn`t be using Islamic crutches for their own delusions.......
Either you are Muslim or not.........there is no third way......
They will be accepted more open heartedly as Non Muslims............
#380 Posted by teshah on May 3, 2007 8:27:44 pm
Re: # 377
Sattar
I have a question about the concept of Khatam-un-Nabiyeen.
An advocate in Attock city, Aein Faatimi, claimed to be a `Rasool` (messenger) which appointment he considered to be superior than `Nabi` (prophet) and also technically quite valid as, according to him, no ban existed against it in the form of `Khatmul Mursalleen` like the one imposed on the `Nabuwwat` by the Khatmi Mullah . He was later murdered by some unknown assailants, probably for his said claim.
Btw, why not Ahmadies advance the same argument in their debate on the technical question of whether God has stopped sending any one for guidance of human beings?
I think it is because perhaps He got totally disappointed with them. But who can tell us this now, all communication with God having been broken by the Mullah who has come to occupy His place as demigods?
In fact despite this khatmiism lot of people have been claiming to be sent by God as prophets, etc., and there are some followers of them also. How should we treat them when there is no mention of them in any constitution, etc., except Ahmadies. Surprisingly, `Fatwa` against them (Ahmadies) stands even when the Constitution of Pakistan remains suspended or abrogated.
Sattar
I have a question about the concept of Khatam-un-Nabiyeen.
An advocate in Attock city, Aein Faatimi, claimed to be a `Rasool` (messenger) which appointment he considered to be superior than `Nabi` (prophet) and also technically quite valid as, according to him, no ban existed against it in the form of `Khatmul Mursalleen` like the one imposed on the `Nabuwwat` by the Khatmi Mullah . He was later murdered by some unknown assailants, probably for his said claim.
Btw, why not Ahmadies advance the same argument in their debate on the technical question of whether God has stopped sending any one for guidance of human beings?
I think it is because perhaps He got totally disappointed with them. But who can tell us this now, all communication with God having been broken by the Mullah who has come to occupy His place as demigods?
In fact despite this khatmiism lot of people have been claiming to be sent by God as prophets, etc., and there are some followers of them also. How should we treat them when there is no mention of them in any constitution, etc., except Ahmadies. Surprisingly, `Fatwa` against them (Ahmadies) stands even when the Constitution of Pakistan remains suspended or abrogated.
#379 Posted by sattar2 on May 3, 2007 4:07:50 pm
echo,
You give Ahmadis too much credit.
Paranoia is just one more service we offer (grin) …
#378 Posted by echoboom on May 3, 2007 3:42:00 pm
THE BAATIL SECT
by Dr Rashid (UAE)
Ahmadiyya Movement is following in the footsteps of Christian Missionaries and is engaged in actively misguiding ignorant unsuspecting Muslims into their fold by pretending to be Sunni Muslims and Champions of Islam.
Their tactics include setting up centres, clinics, schools, publishing weekly/monthly literature in upto 120 languages, publishing distorted translations of Holy Quran in various languages. They have 24 hour TV broadcasts by the name of MTA via Global Beam, costing around U$75000 per day. In addition they have daily Radio broadcasts in several languages from various bands.
Question is who is paying for such enormous propaganda campaign? Qadianis/Ahmadis would have us believe that it is their donations, but one would be very naive to believe that. However this issue can be easily understood when one looks at this movement in historical
perspective.
In 19th Century, British usurped the power from the Muslims when they landed in India.As a result they faced repeated Movements of Jihad from the Muslim quarters. In 1868 a Parliamentary Commission of Enquiry came to India, consisting of MPs, Journalists and Church Officials, to find a solution of this spirit of Jihad. They submitted their report in 1870 to the British Parliament, entitled `THE ARRIVAL OF BRITISH EMPIRE IN INDIA`. In this report they recommended that the mentality of Muslims is such that if they accept someone as their religious leader then they follow him blindly. If someone can be found who claim to be an apostolic prophet then the target can be achieved, since Muslims are waiting for the coming of a Messiah and Mahdi. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani was chosen for the task for his ancestral links with the British Raj.
Mirza Ghulam launched himself as a Rejuvenator of Islam and a servant of Holy Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam). Soon some followers gathered around him, consisting some of the Government employees who wanted to please the Raj. However some of these followers sincerely believed in Mirza`s claims of being a servant of Islam. He formed Ahmadiyya Movement in 1890. Soon Mirza claimed to be Messiah, Imam Mahdi and a prophet in his own right. Servant became the Master! In this capacity he abrogated Jihad.
Despite protests from Muslims, Mirza and his movement flourished under the benevolent of the British Raj. Muslims could do little to contain this heretical doctrine that was being grafted into the body of Islam. Mirza died in 1908 while Ahmadiyya Movement continue to enjoy support from the Colonial Masters, who utilised their services as Spies in various Muslim countries during the 1st and 2nd World Wars.
With the Independence of Pakistan, Ahmadiyya Movement regained new life under the patronage of Sir Zafarullah Khan, the 1st Foreign Minister of this newly founded country.
Taking advantage of the chaotic situations, he filled the Civil, Foreign, Judicial and
Military Services with Qadiani followers. Every Pakistan Foreign Post in various parts of
the world effectively served as a Qadiani base and at the expense of Government of
Pakistan, missionary centres were established in different countries. Rapid promotions
were given to those who converted to Qadianism or were Qadiani sympathisers. This resulted
in serious uprising by the Muslims in early 1950s which was brutally crushed by the police
and army, imposing Martial Law in parts of Punjab.Government wanted to remove Sir
Zafarullah Khan but USA threatened to stopped the supply of grain to this new Islamic
Republic in its infancy!
However the first serious blow came to this Movement when Islamic Scholars of 124 countries met under the auspices of Rabita Alam Islam (Muslim World League) in Makkah and declared Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his followers as apostates and out of the fold of Islam.
Soon Pakistani Parliament by a unanimous vote passed a Constitutional Amendment declaring Qadianis as a non-Muslim minority. Thus the fate of this Jama`at was sealed for ever.
However by that time they were well entrenched in various parts of Africa and West. In the
name of Persecution on religious grounds, they started getting immigration/asylum in
various countries.
With the fall of Communism and break down of Russia, West suddenly realised that the threat of Islamic revival in much more dangerous than communism ever was. Reports that Islam is the fastest growing religion in the Western Hemisphere are disturbing indeed for them. Various strategies are being adopted to contain this threat of Islam and supporting Ahmadiyya Movement is one such strategy. Making a person Qadiani, is one Muslim less. West knows that and Ahmadiyya Movement Hierarchy knows that too but just as they played the
role of spies in the WW, they are willing to play the role of fifth columnists among the
Muslims, trapping them with their pious fraud in the name of Islam.
Now one can understand the following report: ``BIG SUM TO SPREAD QADIANISM IN
AFRICA`` Some of the Christian Missionaries working in Ethiopia fixed a sum of U$35
million to spread the evil faith of Qadianism. Moreover, these Christian missionaries
printed new versions of the books of Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, the Apostate and started
distributing it in the Republic of Ghana, in addition to other publications of the same
faith which have already invaded book shops of the Ghanaian Capital ``Accra.``
(Al-Khaleej Arabic Newspaper date 22-12-1989)
Well protected & cared-for by the Zionists in Israel!
Jama`at Ahmadiyya has special links with the Zionist state. Ahmadiyya Headquarter play
host to the Jewish Dignitaries from Israel. (Khatme Nabuwat Magazine Vol. 9. No. 5, P.8)
Kababeer is town of strategic importance, located on Mount Karmel, overlooking the
Athleeth Harbour and it Naval Base and Ordinance factory on one side and the Haifa Harbour
on the other. 99% population of this town is Palestinian Arab belonging to Qadiani
community. Zionists have known to displace/eliminate Palestinians from areas of much less
importance. The village of Dier Yassin was wiped from the face of earth, killing all its
inhabitants. And yet the same Zionists continue to tolerate Qadianis residence at such an
important place for obvious reasons. Jama`at Ahmadiyya publishes its Arabic propaganda
literature by the name of Al Bushra, from this place for distribution among the Arab
World.
#377 Posted by sattar2 on May 3, 2007 1:52:48 pm
Khuram (#359),
I am aware of these things. You should minimize ill-thought out assessments; they reflect poorly on you. Here’s a summary, with some details …
Ahmadi-Muslim beliefs
Ahmadi-Muslims believe in Allah Almighty, Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), and Quran as completion of divine law. They offer salat, pay zakat, fast during ramzaan, and perform Hajj. Hence they claim to be Muslims. Moving on to the crux of the issue …
Reappearance of Issa
Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) foretold appearance of Issa among Muslims in latter days. Ahmadi-Muslim view is that this prophecy is a metaphor, which suggests appearance of a prophet among Muslims. This prophet will bear spiritual resemblance to Issa-ibne-Marriam.
Resemblance between Issa-ibne-Marriam and this future prophet of Islam
This future prophet would resemble Issa-ibne-Marriam in several ways:
Issa-ibne-Marriam did not bring new law. Rather, his mission was to bring people back to the existing divine Law, that of Moses (that is, Torah). He appeared approx. 1400 years after Moses, among Jews who were occupied by an outside nation, the Romans. At the time of his appearance, Jews, led by their scholars, had become corrupt and strayed away from teachings of Torah.
Similarly, when Issa reappears, his mission will be to bring people back to the existing divine Law, that of Muhammad (that is, Quran). He will appear approx. 1400 years after Muhammad, among Muslims who will be occupied by an outside nation, the British. At the time of his appearance, Muslims, led by their ullema, would have become corrupt and strayed away from teachings of Quran.
There may be more, but this should suffice for now.
Similar metaphor in Bible … and in our daily conversations
Symbolic reference to a future prophet is not new.
In Old Testament we find similar account … where reference is made to future reappearance of Prophet Elijah. Much later Jesus explained that this prophecy was fulfilled in appearance of John The Baptist (Prophet Yahya for Muslims), who had appeared in spirit of Prophet Elijah.
Use of such metaphors is common in our daily language as well. An intelligent person is sometimes called Einstein. Intention is to highlight an attribute that he shares with Albert Einstein, the Relativity dude.
Issa and Imam Mahdi
So Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) foretold appearance of a prophet, who will revive teachings of Quran. He referred to this prophet as Issa-ibne-Marriam.
In some ahadith Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) also referred to appearance of Imam Mahdi (the Guided One).
Note that a prophet is also a Mahdi, since he is guided by Allah. Two different titles (Issa-ibne-Marriam and Imam Mahdi) does not necessarily suggest two different persons. They may very well be references to the same person.
A hadith (from Ibne-Maja, I think) sheds some light on this issue. Here Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) suggests that Issa and Mahdi are indeed the same person.
Khatam-un-Nabiyeen
You are conrrect in that Ahmadi-Muslim belief in continuation of prophethood is not entirely new. They believe that divine law has been perfected and completed in Quran, but Allah may raise prophets to guide people as they go astray from teachings of Quran.
Similar views have been expressed by several well-known scholars throughout history of Islam. But I’ll digress for now.
I recently commented briefly on meaning of khatam-un-nabiyeen. Following link should suffice for now. 2nd half of the post gets into it …
Click [Khatam-un-Nabiyeen … Understanding Death Fatwa on Taslima Nasreen … post #364]
Lastly, and perhaps most importantly …
Here I am not claiming that Ahamdis are right, that Mirza Sahib is a prophet, etc. While responding to inquiries, I have made the case that Ahmadi-Muslim views are well-founded and not without merit.
It is inherently unfair for a person to use one yardstick to judge his faith, and another to judge someone else’s faith. Consistency in such standards is worth striving for. Double-standards are likely to lead to delusion, bewilderment, and hypocrisy.
#376 Posted by Folio on May 3, 2007 12:15:29 pm
Haha mircha laga......PUBHic followers ko.
The true colours of PUBHic philanderer are all over the net. Racism, sex & violence that sums of this bloodthirsty beast. Stupidy is the hallmark. Intolerence is the spirit.
The true colours of PUBHic philanderer are all over the net. Racism, sex & violence that sums of this bloodthirsty beast. Stupidy is the hallmark. Intolerence is the spirit.
#375 Posted by Zeena on May 3, 2007 11:52:41 am
#373 zeemax
[[The average Chowk Shamimists` dream ...]]]
LOL....you are hilarious as always........I agree...
[[The average Chowk Shamimists` dream ...]]]
LOL....you are hilarious as always........I agree...
#374 Posted by Zeena on May 3, 2007 11:47:24 am
#359 khuram
Thanks for this post.....I read the post and I will come up with own analysis....
#360 echoboom ji
I will read the whole link about all this confused sect, called mirzaiiism...and then will comment. Thanks for your response. I appreciate that...
Thanks for this post.....I read the post and I will come up with own analysis....
#360 echoboom ji
I will read the whole link about all this confused sect, called mirzaiiism...and then will comment. Thanks for your response. I appreciate that...
#373 Posted by zeemax on May 3, 2007 11:45:55 am
#371 by Zeena,
Some clowns are always needed to keep things interesting ... like the almost entire chowk.com.
BTW have you noticed the desperation? Gillster is working extra time, so is hamidm, so are all the shamimists, so are all the hindoos, mirzais etc ... because they see the writing on the wall and are trying to keep their maum batti from flickering off .. :)
Some clowns are always needed to keep things interesting ... like the almost entire chowk.com.
BTW have you noticed the desperation? Gillster is working extra time, so is hamidm, so are all the shamimists, so are all the hindoos, mirzais etc ... because they see the writing on the wall and are trying to keep their maum batti from flickering off .. :)
#372 Posted by Folio on May 3, 2007 11:35:01 am
If chroniled the life of Muhammed wud stink if not more than that of Mirza Ghulan Ahmed. Religion is abt belief but not for propriety as per 21st century. If done now Muhammed wud have been in jail for this peadophilia.
(these quotes are from religious texts)
Tabari IX:128 ``When the Prophet married Aisha, she was very young and not yet ready for consummation.``
This is how it happened:
Tabari IX:131 ``My mother came to me while I was being swung on a swing between two branches and got me down. My nurse took over and wiped my face with some water and started leading me. When I was at the door she stopped so I could catch my breath. I was brought in while Muhammad was sitting on a bed in our house. My mother made me sit on his lap. The other men and women got up and left.
The Prophet consummated his marriage with me in my house when I was nine years old.``
Muhammad struggled to justify his behavior.
Bukhari:V9B86N98
``The Prophet said, `A virgin should not be married till she is asked for her consent.` `O Apostle! How will the virgin express her consent.` He said, `By remaining silent.```
Bukhari:V9B87N139-40 ``Allah’s Apostle told Aisha, `You were shown to me twice in my dreams [a.k.a. sexual fantasies]. I beheld a man or angel carrying you in a silken cloth. He said to me, ``She is yours, so uncover her.`` And behold, it was you.
I would then say to myself, ``If this is from Allah, then it must happen.`````
IF MUHAMMED HAD SEXUAL FANTASIES ABT A CHILD WHY NON MIRZA FOR A BEGUM?
(these quotes are from religious texts)
Tabari IX:128 ``When the Prophet married Aisha, she was very young and not yet ready for consummation.``
This is how it happened:
Tabari IX:131 ``My mother came to me while I was being swung on a swing between two branches and got me down. My nurse took over and wiped my face with some water and started leading me. When I was at the door she stopped so I could catch my breath. I was brought in while Muhammad was sitting on a bed in our house. My mother made me sit on his lap. The other men and women got up and left.
The Prophet consummated his marriage with me in my house when I was nine years old.``
Muhammad struggled to justify his behavior.
Bukhari:V9B86N98
``The Prophet said, `A virgin should not be married till she is asked for her consent.` `O Apostle! How will the virgin express her consent.` He said, `By remaining silent.```
Bukhari:V9B87N139-40 ``Allah’s Apostle told Aisha, `You were shown to me twice in my dreams [a.k.a. sexual fantasies]. I beheld a man or angel carrying you in a silken cloth. He said to me, ``She is yours, so uncover her.`` And behold, it was you.
I would then say to myself, ``If this is from Allah, then it must happen.`````
IF MUHAMMED HAD SEXUAL FANTASIES ABT A CHILD WHY NON MIRZA FOR A BEGUM?
#371 Posted by Zeena on May 3, 2007 11:34:45 am
#365 zeemax
What the hell ........:@
Why all these crazy people start claiming something new?
They must be out of their mind.
What the hell ........:@
Why all these crazy people start claiming something new?
They must be out of their mind.
#370 Posted by zeemax on May 3, 2007 10:09:26 am
#368 by khuram,
There`s a chowkie named `number`. Look in his profile.
There`s a chowkie named `number`. Look in his profile.
#369 Posted by sattar2 on May 3, 2007 9:59:53 am
Khuram,
Here’s some more on harassment issue:
Quran mentions twice the punishment for Prophet’s wives for their dishonorable conduct. It then mentions twice the reward for them if they are obedient to Allah and His Prophet (Chapter 33, verses 30-31).
Does this amount to harassment as well?
Be consistent in your assessment.
#368 Posted by khuram on May 3, 2007 9:26:20 am
Re: # 366
I have not understood your point. Anyways, name of that ``popular`` Imam Mehdi was Syed Muhammad Junpoori.
I have not understood your point. Anyways, name of that ``popular`` Imam Mehdi was Syed Muhammad Junpoori.
#367 Posted by sattar2 on May 3, 2007 8:50:07 am
Khuram (#353):
The ”uneducated and less educated Muslims” you refer to … comprises super majority of ullema of this day and age. Sir Syed is reviled by these ullema; people like Gill Sahib are no exception. What does this say about current Muslim leadership? Can we agree that they are indeed uneducated, or less educated, to say the least? Maudoodi is one example that comes to mind. BTW, these are the same ullema who are issuing calls for jihad and suicide bombings.
As for harassment, start with Quran … which harasses non-believers and hypocrites with warnings of great calamities. Do you see the parallel? Why is it OK when Quran says such things, but no OK with an Ahmadi says the same things?
Same applies to plague issue of Punjab. Along similar lines, Quran issued dire warnings: to people of Noah, to people of Lot, to those who opposed Muhammad (pbu them all) and more.
Let’s use the same yardstick, let’s not use double-standards. I hope you see your error here.
More later ...
#366 Posted by zeemax on May 3, 2007 8:42:16 am
#359 by khuram,
For example a ``popular`` Imam Mehdi emerged in Muslim India in the 14th century AD. He launched a ``fundamentalist`` type movement which is known as ``Mehdawi Movement``.
Yeah. This guy `number` is one. But at-least all he does is post some stupid numerical trivia in iLogs and doesn`t try to argue.
For example a ``popular`` Imam Mehdi emerged in Muslim India in the 14th century AD. He launched a ``fundamentalist`` type movement which is known as ``Mehdawi Movement``.
Yeah. This guy `number` is one. But at-least all he does is post some stupid numerical trivia in iLogs and doesn`t try to argue.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- Mr.India: Breaking News: Vajpayee,... The Jehadi Frankenstein
- Mr.India: Vajpayee, Advani pseudo-moderates, Liberhan... The Jehadi Frankenstein
- Diesel: so mulla omar was... Crowning of a Crony
- Diesel: the allegation by NAB... NRO Is Just a
- Diesel: the allegation by NAB... NRO Is Just a
- tahmed11: #6 jay thakeray is... Morality of Lawyers' Movement
- guru: Given this fact about... The Jehadi Frankenstein
- guru: MJ Akbar, a sekularist... The Jehadi Frankenstein








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content