unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

Pakistani Media to Face Wrath of the Government

Saeed Minhas June 5, 2007

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 1-16   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

#164 Posted by masadi on June 17, 2007 10:55:16 pm
Reproduced under is the article that the AH editors of CHOWK censored as they have censored many of my previous articles. These idiot editors on Chowk of which the major one is Mohammad Gill (the writer of pseudo-plagiarized BS), have mastered, like the US media, the art of drowning relevant discussion by either outright censorship or bombardment with BS. Read the article under and judge for yourselves whether it should have been published or not:

FACTIONALISM, SOCIAL MOVEMENT STRUCUTRE AND SOCIAL CHANGE by M. Asadi
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#163 Posted by subhashjoshi on June 11, 2007 8:06:35 am
Re: # 161 Salim

Shaayad bhang zyada pee lee hogi, is liye sunai diya. Hahaha.

Anyways, concentrate on my sincere advice in post#162.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#162 Posted by subhashjoshi on June 11, 2007 8:03:05 am
Re: # 160 Salim

Elementary my dear Watson. Always keep your kids away from the shadow of a pedarast, whether it`s an Indian or an Arab bedou, doesn`t matter. Bad influence. You are an example. Hahaha.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#161 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 10, 2007 1:13:38 pm
{``#150 by subhashjoshi on June 10, 2007 10:44am PT
A few months back, one of your posts said that now they don`t want to be repatriated (or one of their leaders said something like that). ``}

A few months ago, I read that you were banned for two days. How can I be sure that whatever merited your exit has been thoroughly rectified? N:)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#160 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 10, 2007 1:11:34 pm
{``#159 by subhashjoshi on June 10, 2007 10:44am PT
Re: # 76 Arjun`s Million dollar question!!!
if someone told you 10% of rattlesnakes were not poisonous, would you let your kids play around with rattlesnakes? ``}

If someone told me that 10% of Indian internet surfers were pedophiles, would I let my kids interact with people like you on Chowk?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#159 Posted by subhashjoshi on June 10, 2007 10:44:19 am
Re: # 76 Arjun`s Million dollar question!!!

if someone told you 10% of rattlesnakes were not poisonous, would you let your kids play around with rattlesnakes?

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#158 Posted by subhashjoshi on June 10, 2007 10:40:50 am
Re: # 76 arjun2

kya yaar, you hit the nail right in the centre of its head, 100% accurate!

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#157 Posted by subhashjoshi on June 10, 2007 10:31:15 am
Re: # 155 Zeena

It will be nice to watch how he first takes the first one ``down`` his own. That`s why I asked, is he out of his housearrest, but you skipped that part.

Or may be you don`t know that either, like ``mutarwa``?




reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#156 Posted by subhashjoshi on June 10, 2007 10:25:13 am
Re: # 105 arjun2

Yaar some people have fun thinking they are such nice guys, out to save the world. Why play spoilsport?

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#155 Posted by Zeena on June 10, 2007 10:23:16 am
#152 subashjoshi sahib
I wish I know the meaning of ,``mutarwa``.I have never used this term and I am not aware of such terms either. I am not very good in using any kinds of slangs. so, my knowledge about such words is zero.

#153

Actually, he is up to making another nuclear device to shove it up in to Pakistan`s enemies............just watch out........

just curious.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#154 Posted by subhashjoshi on June 10, 2007 10:21:49 am
Re: # 132 Khamy1

Khamy yaar what a defective nick you got!

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#153 Posted by subhashjoshi on June 10, 2007 10:13:28 am
Re: # 143 zeena

[he is our spiderman]

hahaha! So what the spidey is up to these days? Is he out of his housearrest now?

Just curious.



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#152 Posted by subhashjoshi on June 10, 2007 10:08:37 am
Re: # 144 Zeena

What`s ``mutarwa``?

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#151 Posted by subhashjoshi on June 10, 2007 10:06:55 am
Re: # 150 correction

I mean...``stranded Pakistani`` topic.


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#150 Posted by subhashjoshi on June 10, 2007 10:06:02 am
Re: # 149 Salim


You are still on this Mohajir topic! A few months back, one of your posts said that now they don`t want to be repatriated (or one of their leaders said something like that).


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#149 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 10, 2007 9:29:38 am
#143 Zeena {``#141 salim Mian
A.Q.Khan is the pride of all Pakistanis. He is our spiderman....super hero.....
He is an asset to pakistani history and Pakistani nation is oblighed to what he did for pakistan to save this country...

You can not divide him as MQM...... ``}

Zeena,
Exactly. A.Q. Khan belongs to ALL Pakistanis, just like the issue of ``stranded`` Pakistanis belongs to ALL Pakistanis. It is not just a Mohajir issue. The shame and injustice of keeping Pakistani citizens from returning to their own country belongs to ALL Pakistanis. The sooner we remove this cruelty, this injustice, this black mark against the name of Pakistan, the better off we will all be as a nation. Please convince racists and bigots like Chahca Chaar Sau Bees about this logic. Thanks,
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#148 Posted by CheGuevara on June 9, 2007 11:44:00 pm
Re: # 146
Hahaha islamofascists are so funny sometimes
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#147 Posted by arjun2 on June 9, 2007 8:57:16 pm
#136 by Zeena on June 9, 2007 7:45am PT

The MQM is only doing the paki army`s bidding...so the situation is that it`s the paki army backed and Indian army trained MQM against pbuh-dude`s followers
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#146 Posted by Urstruly on June 9, 2007 7:46:16 pm

My heartiest felicitations to whole Pakistani nation on our victory against dictators, foreign agents, and murderers. Dictator has been forced to swallow his own PEMRA ordinance.

For Lawyers, Jouranists, members of judiciary and political activists - There are no words to thank you for your fearless perseverance, your principled stand, and your selflessness - on behalf of a very grateful nation - SALUTE!!!!!

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#145 Posted by Urstruly on June 9, 2007 7:31:48 pm

The latest victim of MQM`s fascism and NaPak fouj`s crimes against nation

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#144 Posted by Zeena on June 9, 2007 2:20:27 pm
Salim Mian

Not all Urdu speaking Karachiits are MQM........and that`s the crystal clear difference that I wish some Urdu speaking chowkies should recognize as well......

Why to assimilate MQM(mafia) with all Urdu speaking people?

BTW, I also speak URDU with my family.....So, in that context I am also URDU speaking......(T)

I also chew paan right from my childhood....meetha pan with supari(bewafa sanam, taj mahal, shehzada salim, kaneez, shahi supari, tum rootho naa, payaar kaa musam, khushboo pyaar kii, aashaq, chambeeli, gulab kii khushboo, toota dil etc, etc, etc)........these are the specific names for all kinds of paans that i always chew when I am in Pakistan.........

I spent my early childhood in Karachi...So, I still have all my loving memories with Karachi....

I am also Mohajir mutarwa paan chewing kaali short mohajir...........

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#143 Posted by Zeena on June 9, 2007 2:10:19 pm
#141 salim Mian
A.Q.Khan is the pride of all Pakistanis. He is our spiderman....super hero.....
He is an asset to pakistani history and Pakistani nation is oblighed to what he did for pakistan to save this country...

You can not divide him as MQM......

Trust me not all Urdu speaking Karachiits are MQM....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#142 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 9, 2007 1:21:14 pm
From Zeemax on UP {``A word of advice for tha mohajirs ...
I don`t see how it is in the interest of Urdu speaking people to turn loyalty to a linguistic party, whom the entire rest of the country considers criminal, into a communal issue. ``}

Peemin,
What communal issue. Urdu-speaking Mohajirs in Karachi and Hyderabad are not a distinct race, nation, or even linguistic group. We are Dilliwallas, Lucknowis, Allahabadis, Rampuris, Rohillas, Bhopalis, Pathans, Rajputs, Biharis, Gujratis, Hyderabadis, Mysorewallas, Madrasis, Keralites, Bumbaiwallas, and even from Jabalpur, Nagpur, and Sholapur. MQM has forged many different ethnicities with roots in India into one group demanding equal rights with the Pisser-e-Zameen.


{``After all, they`re just forcing communalism on 92.5% of the country`s population (total Urdu-speaking population being just 7.5%) whom not only do not wish to become so, but also against the wishes and interests of those Urdu-Speaking people who do not support MQM. ``}

Abey Peemin,
You manipulate percentages and issues just like you masturbate with abandon. Punjus DO NOT constitute 92.5% of the Paki population. The truth is the other way around - 60% of present-day Pakis (If you count the oppressed Saraikis as Punjus), have alienated the other 40% after having forced the former majority of Pakistan (the 55% Bengalis of pre-71 Pakistan) to secede from the minority. The more you demean the MQM and Altaf Bhai, the more the fence-sitting Urdu-speaking Mohajirs will support them, because they despise you Punjus much more.


{``It was precisely to prevent a disadvantaged status and alienation of the urdu-speaking refugees, that the language of a few million was adopted as national language over and above the majority languages by far of that time of Bangla and Punjabi in Pakistan.``}

Make up your mind. Did you really make Urdu the national and official language to appease Mohajirs? Don`t lie. We prefer English as the national and official language, how about that? Please go ahead and form your own Punjuland and make Punjaibi the official and national and mandatory language. Just keep us out of this mess.

{``All the indigenous ethnicities accepted the foreigners` language without question except the Bengalis who maintained a grudge and never forgot the insult. West Pakistanis I suspect accepted it mainly due to long association and love for the Urdu language due to its treasures in literature, and not for any love for the refugees who were clannish from the very outset, and never made an effort in return to assimilate even in their host province, Sindh.``}

Peemin, you are not making any sense. First you say that you chose Urdu because you wanted to appease us, now you are saying that Urdu was selected due to the great ``love`` the illiterate people of Poonzab had for Urdu.

{``And still, these people go around with badges of ethnicity stuck on their chests, and want to stoke communal fires by insulting other much larger, stronger and culturally rich ethnicities. Do they want another Godhra in Pakistan? If they do, they`re sure to have one. 8-|8-|``}

What badge of ethnicity? B) If anything, we Urdu-speaking Mohajirs are the most diverse racially, linguistically, and physically than any other group in Pakistan. We represent every single province of India. If you are threatening us with Godhra, that is not new. Chacha Chaar Sau Bees has already issued a veiled threat to Urdu-speaking minorities in Lahore. 8-|
Just one piece of advice for you. The Mohajirs of Karachi and Hyderabad are not as helpless or as unarmed as the Muslims of Gujarat. ;) So the truth is out, Narinder Modi is the new hero, after the corrupt CJ Chodhry, of the Paki Punju Paindoo racists and bigots. :))
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#141 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 9, 2007 12:31:30 pm
#140 BJ {``You are losing it! :)
You just made the OPPOSITE case of what you intended to.
Without its nukes, Pakistan would not be the threat to world peace that it is today - and a Mohajir is responsible (as per you)! ``}

BJ,
Very good Indian perspective on your part. Unfortunately, you seem to forget that I am still a Paki - a detested one at that. :)
A. Q. Khan, a leading Muttarwa Mohajir and Urdu-speaker (of whom we are very proud), has contributed to peace in South Asia by leveling the playing field between the two hostile neighbors. Now, there can be no more ceremonies of Paki Punju ``Ghazis`` kissing Indian Hindu dhoti contents against their will. For this, the Paki Punjus hate the paan-chewing Urdu-speaking HindustaaNras. Maybe they became fond of the dhotis and all that they contained.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#140 Posted by bjkumar on June 9, 2007 9:31:52 am

#139 Salim

You are losing it! :)

You just made the OPPOSITE case of what you intended to.

Without its nukes, Pakistan would not be the threat to world peace that it is today - and a Mohajir is responsible (as per you)!

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#139 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 9, 2007 8:51:49 am
That dark-skinned, paan-chewing, short, Urdu-speaking, Bhopali HindustaaNra, Panahguzeer Muttarwa ...



Started by Salim_Chauhan on June 9, 2007 8:48am PT

Mohajir, A. Q. Khan, gave Pakistan its much-needed nuclear capability. If it were not for him, the Paki Punju Paindoos, like Chacha Chaar Sau Bees, Ass Lame, Madame Demi Flatulence, Kopek A Lie, Chuck the frog fuck, Peemin Shoomax, HijRali, Chutif, Kala Harry, and BhaiRya Faggot would all be breathing through the wide open yellow dhotis of the Indian Hindus - just like their Ghazi ``Tiger`` Niazi did 35 years ago.

So, at least one muttarwa saved the collective Paki Punju Paindoo dark face from being continuously pressed by the even darker hindu ass.

With this universal abuse and multi-ethnic slur, I have managed to satisfy Sadna`s thirst:

#8 by sadna on June 8, 2007 12:34pm PT
Noone has time to abuse hindoos these days, cos they are too busy going after each other hammer and tongs, so naturally I am puzzled



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#138 Posted by sam67 on June 9, 2007 8:34:30 am
zeena its better to have some balance when declaring some one as the ``right`` person. there is no two opinion about MQM but there is certainly a question mark put on Imran`s abilities to run and lead the affairs of the country. like many past politicians, both great abd gutter, he has got his own shell to live in and his own prism to look at things. what we are looking to make this country great is a debate which can go on for ever because everyone of us has different dreams about this. but like there is one right and one wrong and yes there are different ways of reaching the same right and the wrong, same is true for building a nation in a democratic set up. we need to draw up all the commonlaities of good things and then look for the best choice. perhaps it will be hard to find one consensus choice but before showering our praise or hatered for anyone we must keep in mind the totality of the issue in mind. having said that i think there is also a need to see how our institutions can be built, is the much trumpeted democractic way is the right way for us or is Atta Turk model offers something for us? do we really need to listen and look at the Islamic model, without looking or listening to the mullahs but looking at the Holy Book and the authentic material? these and many such questions need to be deal with before reaching a common goal and then searching for the right choice. for the time being Imran is doing a right thing of taking up a case against Altaf but what his views are on other issues, needs lots of debate and his views arises lots of questions as well. so lets make this a public domain where everyone should come and talk about the issue under review and thats of pemra and its usage and how rulers are doing this and what need to be done and in that context the freedom of media question that how much freedom and freedom for whom, for owners to mint money or freedom for masses who should be given first hand knwoeldge of whatever is happening. because this might prove the first step towards institution building and eventually towards nation building. Unless people are not involved in public domains and asked to debate on issues not on personalities we cannot think of a better future. =but zeena keep it up.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#137 Posted by Zeena on June 9, 2007 8:08:27 am
Imran Khan with all his honesty........in the making of a great leader..........Listen

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#136 Posted by Zeena on June 9, 2007 7:45:03 am
From the board of Pakistan tehreek-e-Insaf.com

[[[i came across an audio tape recorded on 1987, in which altaf of mqm says: ``mahajiro! aslah kharido aslah, tv vcr chhoro, aslah kharido``. mqm is first organization of its kind in pakistan, which started its activities on the basis of smuggled arms. thousands and thousands of pakistanis have been killed by the terrorists of this organization. mqm`s terrorists are trained in bharat by bharti army. the same bharti army once trained mukti bahini of east pakistan. i read a news story in an old news paper of 1987, in which a pashto speaking muslim was ziped with iron belts and then blown up alive by throwing petrol and then fire. innocent poor pashtoon was requesting: `` please kill me with gun, but please do not blow me up`` mqm`s terrorists were laghing and taunting at the cry of that pashtoon. just imagine the scene in your dreams. mqm has killed thousands and thousands of innocent muslims like that. this is just one single example. any pakistani who believes in quran and our innocent prophet (pbuh) will always hate this terrorist mqm. mqm has purchased millions of dollars of armory from afghan war lords in 1980s. but underground members of zia`s govt like aslam baig and pervaiz musharraf provided full support to this terrorist organization. they had organized fake fights between panjabis,sindhis,pashtoons and urdu speaking community just to strengthen terrorist mqm. whenever see a mqm member just remember these events. these members represent those terrorists,who have unromovable spots of blood on their faces. just always remember it. if you support mqm, it means you support killers, murderers, and remember our prophet (pbuh) never support murderers. please choose the prophet`s way(pbuh). thank you.]]]]
www.tehreek-e-insaaf.com
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#135 Posted by arjun2 on June 9, 2007 7:11:16 am
pakis..don`t get too uppity..

Ordeal of freed May 12 petitioner

KARACHI, June 8: Advocate and civil rights campaigner Syed Mohammad Iqbal Kazmi, who went missing on Wednesday afternoon, was released on Friday morning by his captors on condition that he leave Karachi within five days.

Mr Kazmi had recently filed petitions in the Sindh High Court on the May 12 violence and the new Pemra ordinance in which major political and government figures were named as respondents.

With tears welling up in his eyes, Mr Kazmi said that two men tortured him during this period and quizzed him about his association with Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaf chief Imran Khan and the reason for filing a petition against the Muttahida Qaumi Movement chief Altaf Hussain.

They also asked him to disclose the names of his supporters. He claimed his captors used to throw cold water on him to force him to stay awake.

“They burnt the sensitive parts of my body with cigarettes and pressed my fingers with stones,” he said.

Mr Kazmi said that his captors threatened him with death if he did not disclose the names of those who had asked him to file the petition. He said his cellphone containing photo clips of the May 12 incidents, Rs12,000 in cash, a telephone directory and other documents were taken from him.

He said that one of the men -- whom the others referred to as ‘sahib’ – talked to him in a much more civilised manner. He said the man grilled him and asked him to withdraw the petition. Mr Kazmi said he was given some plain white papers to sign and then asked to bathe.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#134 Posted by Zeena on June 8, 2007 8:38:12 pm
#110 by Salim_Chauhan
Salim mian
Thank you so, much.
I appreciate your sincere compliments.
And I do respect your devotion for MQM. But, sorry we both are not on the same plat form.May be in future...Who knows?

Take care
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#133 Posted by Zeena on June 8, 2007 8:17:07 pm
Re:#131 anil
[[[[The only leader showing courage is Musharaff...]]]]
anil sahib
Sorry, I don`t agree with you here. Musharaf is NOT our leader, he is a tyrant and d is a cruel dictator.....

And recent killings of innocent Pakistanis backed up by Musharaf At the hands of MQM and now banning of all the media....tells a lot.


Pakistan has bad and good both types of politicians..

Honestly, if, it comes to choose a bad or worst politcian Versus an army dictator....I will choose the worst politician.....just for democracy.

Like I stated before the worst democracy is much much better and healtheir than army dictatorship...And that`s the rule of thumb.......

Yes, if, Musharaf wishes to be the leader of pakistan..First he has to go to court for killing innocent Pakistanis and has to prove himself innocnet......and then if he is proven innocent, he has to resign from his army position and should run like a regular politician and if, majority people of Pakistan give him mandate to rule the country.............By all means he can be Pakistani leader................difference is clear............

Musharaf has to leave....he is NOT leader...but, a tyrant.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#132 Posted by khamy1 on June 8, 2007 7:32:57 pm
chowk guidelines are very specific about interacts being relevant to the topic...just a reminder...;)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#131 Posted by anil on June 8, 2007 5:00:50 pm
Re: # 118

Zeena:
#118
“..She is pro-Indian and I am rigid Pro- Pakistani. She is anti-Pakistan and I am NOT anti-India….”

This probably summarizes the differences between the two of you quite well, and your remaining points about Sadna show that you are open to listening to the viewpoints which do not coincide with yours. This is the basis of pluralism. To me creativity is synthesization of known ideas. A person is more likely to create something new from opposite ideas than with identical ideas.

“….arjun2 doesn`t have any agenda, he is a clear cut cyber harrasser, abuser and his only agenda is to spread hate and spread negativity on chowk 24/7........................”

It is unfortunate for him that he applies his intellect to find negative cut-and-paste, why make it angry for yourself? There indeed is a term that may be apt that the person always has another viewpoint. I wish he applies this talent to point problems in Bangalore and Delhi as well. I read his postings as just that.
Your agenda, at least on Chowk, of democracy, secularism and religion as personal matter is far above the agenda of the above persons. There is indeed an Indian saying that you can learn from enemy too. I suggestion is that you may want to keep this in mind when you think of other persons who are distracting you. I do not approve of anyone’s harassments, and his use of an animal and giving it a name of someone’s prophet is abhorring, and discussing it or similar things giving more importance. May be this is non-violent to the extreme, but that is what I think.


Zeena & Naqshbandi Sahib:
#117 & #116

In my student days, there were really two South Asian names (= heroes) to look up to, Tariq Ali and Imran Khan. I did follow his cricketing career, till I moved to the U.S. As I see the only institution that is strong and has withstood challenges in Pakistan is Military. The generals have come and gone through this institution. Any leader therefore, worth being called a leader in Pakistan is someone who has arisen from it.

The Acid test is would a leader be ready to give up his / her life?

I find Musharaff standing up to it. All civilian leaders – Benazir, Shariff, and Altaf Hussein in England. Even Imran Khan going to England to see justice against Altaf Hussein. Imran Khan, instead should be better off to lead the movement to extradite Altaf Hussein to Pakistan, if Altaf Hussein is guilty of what he claims. Instead of struggling to build the democratic institutions, he is off to summer time in London.

There is something seriously wrong, Zeena and Naqsh. It seems these Pakistani civilians are happy to make London as the civilian capital of Pakistan.

The only leader showing courage is Musharaff. One can easily think that he enjoys the U.S. support, but the heat that he must be taking from the west – have you considered that. He is fighting Islamic terror on one-side, obscurantism in the society one the other. He is daring to solve the issues like women’s rights, reforming education to be beyond Quran, reforming economy and facing internal dissent just to mention the few. He does not run away to London to file cases against Altaf Hussein. I agree that he has challenged Supreme Court’s independence. We will see how this gets resolved, the first historical moment.

Saudi Arabian clergy and the others who came were not just to lead prayers, but also to talk to Lal Masjid crazies. This only shows his clam and calculated approach, rather than add more fuel to the fire.

Frankly, I believe Pakistan needs more stability, Musharaff has provided it, and has ensured that until the war on terror is over, no one will touch Pakistan. If anything, Pakistan will get economic and other support from the world. His handling of Kashmir has been remarkable, yes there are people on Chowk who only out of disbelief say that his real intentions are different.

By any standard his score card has top grades among the top in South Asia.
If I were a Pakistani and had Pakistan in my mind, at this stage, I will support him and his plans for the nation building. Fighting him, is creating internal dissent to squander the war-and-peace capital and dividends that he has amassed for the nation.
That is the way I see it.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#130 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 8, 2007 12:15:02 pm
Peemin aka Zeemax, Karachi lasses aren`t that hard up ...

#29 zeemux :)) {``when the mosquito-bite Karachi lasses feel an uncontrollable urge for the Punjabi `hard willow` .. ``}

Peemin,
Karachi lasses aren`t that hard up that they would pull off a dozen Pathans off of a single Punju`s backside, then turnover the paindoo, to find out that the withered willow is all bark. :))
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#129 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 8, 2007 11:18:49 am
#128 Chacha Chaar Sau Bees Gholwalla,
Looks like you are doing a pretty filthy job of littering this FP article with racist and ethnic slurs like calling me chuha. It not only is a derogatory term used by Bezamir and Buwaseer Lulla BuRbuR, but is also a mutilation of my Hindu last name - of course, this gives you an opportunity to abuse BOTH - Urdu-speaking Mohajirs and Hindus. Your racist, bigoted, and one-sided self-righteousness is known to all - that is why you are the acknowledged and despised MAHA HYPOCRITE of Chowk. Not too long ago, a nice compassionate female was complaining about your miserable attitude. So save the sanctimonious crap for your fan club - I am not impressed.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#128 Posted by tahmed32 on June 8, 2007 8:58:31 am
#126 Khaali matkay: I am not going to litter the front page with your garbage. Go to unplugged and howl to your hearts content. So last post to you here.

I should note that in #126 you prove yet again that it is you who is the char-sau-bees when you try to hide behind the mohajir community by claiming that ``rat`` is a term applied to mohajirs. This is the first time I have heard of this, and I have made very clear why you I call you the rat man - it is because of your harrassing of female chowkies on unplugged with your lewd comments and ridicule. And you are a married man with a daughter, not merely a street thug harrassing females.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#127 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 8, 2007 8:03:00 am
Mahapunju Mahadoghla Gholkhor Kelb-e-Taussab Bint-e-Sharmut Chacha Chaar Sau Bees.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#126 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 8, 2007 7:52:53 am
#125 by tahmed32 on June 8, 2007 7:48am PT
#124 khaali matkay char-sau-bees-salim-ratman: Re-read #123 on why you are a khaali matka. I have already explained earlier to you why you are a rat (writes lewd posts to female chowkies on unplugged``}

Chacha Chaar Sau Bees,

chuha was a favorite derogatory term used by Bezamir to refer to Urdu-speaking Mohajirs. It was also used by Chacha Chaar Sau Bees` other hero, Bawaseer Lullah BuRbuR who was Bezamir`s Minister of Interior. I guess he really ministered the bitch`s interior.

So, being the exposed hypocrite who happens to be the #1 Urdu-speaking Mohajir hater on Chowk, Chacha has repeatedly called me a chooha. Coming from this hateful paindoo, I consider it an honor to be referred to as a chooha - the same thing that Bezamir called all Urdu-speaking Mohajirs.

So, go ahead taussub, nafrat, aur soobai prasti ke kuttay - bhonk bhonk bhonk. Aakhir men tu nanga hoga or tere chootaR par DanDay paReNge.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#125 Posted by tahmed32 on June 8, 2007 7:48:30 am
#124 khaali matkay char-sau-bees-salim-ratman: Re-read #123 on why you are a khaali matka. I have already explained earlier to you why you are a rat (writes lewd posts to female chowkies on unplugged).
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#124 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 8, 2007 7:44:40 am
#119 {``Let Pakistan Lawyers teach the military what wearing the uniform means - defending the rule of law in the nation. Not breaking it. ``}

Chacha Chaar Sau Bees,


When Musharraf arrived at the scene:
Pakistan was bankrupt
The economy was down the tubes
People were leaving Pakistan in swarms
The four ``democratic`` governments had looted the nation
The civilian ``democratically-elected`` PM was acting worse than a dictator
Real estate prices were at rock bottom
Pakistan was close to being a failed state

Why Paki Punju Paindoos want him to depart from the scene:
Pakistan`s foreign exchange cash reserves are at a high
The economy is booming
Real estate prices are at all-time highs
The military ``dictator`` has allowed more freedoms than ANY of the past 5 civilian ``democratically-elected`` governments of ZAB, BBI, NSI, BBII, and NS II, and ANY of the past 3 dictators - Zina Owl Hack, Yayha Khan, Ayub Khan. More TV channels, more free speech, more demonstrations and street ``democracy.``
Exiled leaders (BB, NS) are chomping at the bits to come back and loot some more. The maintenance fees on their palaces in Europe have skyrocketed and they need more funds.

Basically, when their bellies are full, the Paki Punju Paindoos think of ``democracy.``
Jab gidaR ki maut ati he to ...
Jab cheeti ke par nikal aatey hen to ...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#123 Posted by tahmed32 on June 8, 2007 7:41:17 am
salim-khaali-matkay: and when i say it is you who is the char-sau-bees, i can back that by countless posts you have written writing insults to ``panjoos`` while at the same time claiming to be the victim. when you call me a char-sau-bees, you have consistently failed even when challenged to produce anything I have said to back your claims.

Thus proving that you are a khaali-matka trying to be a char-sau-bees.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#122 Posted by tahmed32 on June 8, 2007 7:37:24 am
woman-abuser-salim-char-sau-bees: havent found a job yet, i see.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#121 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 8, 2007 7:16:54 am
#119 Chacha Char Sau Bees,
Paki Punjus could learn a lot about what being a Pakistani citizen means from Singh - helping fellow citizens rather than looting them, raping them, and killing them. (T)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#120 Posted by Urstruly on June 8, 2007 6:20:37 am

AYSHA SIDDIQUA of Military Inc. chased out of Pakistan by Military Mafia.

(some details in the news report by mafia apologists are eye-opening)

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#119 Posted by tahmed32 on June 8, 2007 5:10:45 am
Let Pakistan Traffic Warden Singh teach the military what wearing the uniform means - service to the nation. Not taking over the nation.


LAHORE - June 06: Sardar Ghulab Singh, a traffic warden, helps a rickshaw driver near the AG’s Office. — APP


Let Pakistan Lawyers teach the military what wearing the uniform means - defending the rule of law in the nation. Not breaking it.


LAHORE - June 07: Lawyers determined to hold rallies on every Thursday. —Dawn
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#118 Posted by Zeena on June 8, 2007 1:11:46 am
Re:#115 anil

Addition to #117.....[[[In their own commitments, Sadna and Arjun do the same, although to you their causes may be useless. ]]]

anil sahib
As for as sadna is , I respect and admire her uniqueness and intelligence right from the beginning. This Indian lady has earned her respect in my eyes. And you know why?

Here are the reasons:-
#1:-Although, sadna and I disagree 98% of the times. She is pro-Indian and I am rigid Pro- Pakistani. She is anti-Pakistan and I am NOT anti-India. But, she never ever uttered a single word of personal disrespect , cyber harrasement, personal attack and she never ever tried to dig out my personal info, she never tried to humiliate me for being pakistani.

#2:-sadna, always comes up with valid discussions totally related to the topic of the article and does not personally attack other readers.

Now, if, you compare me with sadna....

#1:- I am NOT anti India, infact I like Indians as our neighbors and as progressive and hard working nation.

#2:-I never try to cyber harrass, personally attack, or dig out personal info or abuse Indians based on their nationality.

#3:- My agenda is exclusively based on Pakistan`s progress and Pakistan`s better establishment and ultimately better life for all Pakistanis on equal basis.

#4:- I am interested in India only to the extent that India is our neighbor..Even though Indians see us as their enemies, I don`t view them as my enemies......honestly I don`t.....

Now come to arjun2`s agenda..................

Sorry, I totally disagree with you here....arjun2`s agenda is to cyber harrass me, to personally attack me, to abuse me, to humiliate me....................most of the times I do not read his threads on un plugged and here on front page just because this man is full of hatred for Pakistanis for NO reason at all.

arjun2 doesn`t have any agenda, he is a clear cut cyber harrasser, abuser and his only agenda is to spread hate and spread negativity on chowk 24/7........................

I am sorry,if, you call arjun2`s below the belt stuff and hateful personal attacks as agenda and as some useful source of energy, then I am surprised for an intellectual like yourself, who is unable to distinguish between personal abuse and agenda..............

If, you think arjun2 is serving good for Indians, then you`re totally wrong. This person is totally screwed up, he is clueless and he is actually harming reputation of the rest of the Indians.

Honestly, arjun2 is the reason I have started feeling hatred for Indians and I know I shouldn`t feel that, but, arjun2`s hate ful agenda ( based on personal attacks and abuse and belittling all chowkie Pakistanies) including me is not an agenda,but, an abuse of cyber space........Just think about it.

yes, I do admit that quite few times arjun2`s personal abuse for me provoked me to retaliate against him............Still I believe arjun2 is NOT a reflection of all Indians........

Indians have sadna(who is highly intellectual) and then arjun2 ( the cyber abuser)............

I hope you understand and see the crystal clear difference......
Regards
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#117 Posted by Zeena on June 7, 2007 10:20:25 pm
Re:#115
[[[. The support must be unwavering and more to the institutions that to the persons? Because if these institutions are built strong then people can come and go through them without destroying the institutions]]]]

Yes, I agree with you and that`s my exact point and stand. Pakistan needs strong institutions. And strong institutions are built by people, not by walls or empty rooms.

Who are the people? People are Pakistanis. Now to build strong institutions Pakistanis need strong and honest politicians(unfortunately all current politicians are fialures) who can gather thme on one platform and can lead their chaotic COUNTRY`S SYSTEM TO RUN IN A RIGHT AND firm direction...........means strong institutions.....and then once Pakistanis will achieve such strong institutional forces, they won`t need any savior or leader...They will automatically run in the right direction via ultrafiltration process(process of true democracy).......

Imrna Khan`s video is the true picture of an honest and firm politcian who has already proved himself multiple times....in all my fairness Imran Khan is the best candidate for PM ship for Pakistan and I am sure he put democracy in a right direction.......

And to tell you the truth...I never were a big fan of Imran Khan,but, after viewing all these videos and reading about him in detail....I am 100% convinced that he should be the next PM of Pakistan.................
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#116 Posted by Naqshbandi on June 7, 2007 4:30:18 pm
anil sahib,

i too watched the video of imran khan and he is, imho, a really honest man who would be GREAT for pakistan if he was allowed to implement his vision as stated by him. to be fair to him he didn`t say `hum parliament khaali karwa denge`` what he said was that if those two laws or articles 62 and 63 are applied to every MP then the whole parliament will become empty! in other words, if you think the MQM can remove me due to application of these laws then by the same set of laws the entire parliament would be disqualified. i am not sure but these articles must be something to do with the moral and ethical behaviour of an MP being in accordance with islamic principals. imran`s point is valid. everyone and his uncle knows what MPs of all colours get up to in their private lives with mistresses and god knows what else! imho that should be no one`s business but their own but imran`s point is valid still. his `problem` being that his escapades and dalliances with the fairer sex in the past have not exactly been subtle! but i think that has nothing to do with his present or his politics and the fascist Altaf Hussain and his MQM are just pissed at imran for threatening to take their leader altaf to court in the UK.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#115 Posted by anil on June 7, 2007 4:21:00 pm
Zeena:

You have stated yourself to be the ardent supporter of democracy, secularism and religion being personal matter. In addition, you have committed yourself to social work through your burn center. Remarkable commitment and its demonstration that it is not talk the walk, but really walk the walk. In their own commitments, Sadna and Arjun do the same, although to you their causes may be useless.

I watched Imran Khan video that you posted. He was a student in England when I was and therefore had followed his cricket career ever since.

Don`t you think, right now Pakistan needs institution builders, and pepole who remain committed to the three - democracy, secularism and religion in personal space, no matter what? This commitment must not change. The support must be unwavering and more to the institutions that to the persons? Because if these institutions are built strong then people can come and go through them without destroying the institutions. In this regard, I tend to support Gandhi and Nehru over Jinnah. Jinnah quit and even withdrew from political scene to practice in England for a while, now people can give their own interpretations to it. The fact remains he did withdrew, whereas the other two, and many others remained in jail. You cannot igonre this historical fact, although this fact like any other can be interpretted in many ways.

In this aspect, I have my serious doubts about Imran Khan, especially after watching the video you posted.

During the discussion, he talks about some constitutional article 62 / 63, and says if applied, ``Parliamnet Khaali Karwaa Denge``. This talk is no different than the talk of a dictator, who puts himself / herself ahead of the institutions.

He has failed to demonstrate the hinking which is better expressed spontaneously as saying ``Parliament mein log elect karenge jo articles 62 63 ko amend karne ke liye vote denge...``

Think about it, and probably continue your search for a true democractic force first, than accept a person first.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#114 Posted by arjun2 on June 7, 2007 12:09:08 pm
masadi..

perhaps I misunderstood..thanks for clarifying that...



the value of sociologists for THEIR OWN society`s economic well being by being informants due to their knowledge of the potential for internal conflict in Latin American countries


In any case, show me the money...show me where the sociologists were gainfully employed...economists are regularly employed by financial firms..writers write books that people buy...how do sociologists make money or contribute to the economy outside of being in a university on taxpayer dole?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#113 Posted by rf786 on June 7, 2007 11:33:25 am
Re: # 107

Urstruly,

Yaar, seriously was this supposed to go in a ugly photo contest?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#112 Posted by masadi on June 7, 2007 11:05:06 am
The sob in #111 was claiming that sociologists have no role in the economy and the well being of the people, and the field is useless. Regarding that bs assertion, I informed him of project camelot where the US elite saw the value of sociologists for THEIR OWN society`s economic well being by being informants due to their knowledge of the potential for internal conflict in Latin American countries and how that could be suppressed in order to keep non democratic governments in power, and I also informed him that sociologists being aware of the working of a society are in a much better position than economists to build consciousness among people for their betterment.

This answer he perverted, in his usual dishonest and immoral fashion to conclude that the only gainful employment for sociologists is being tools of imperial powers. Dishonest AHs like him need to ignored.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#111 Posted by arjun2 on June 7, 2007 10:23:48 am
#109 by masadi on June 7, 2007 10:01am PT


as regards the US elite


You`ve openly admitted that the only way you can find gainful employment for your skills is when some imperial power wants to supress democracies...that`s the only time anyone will hire you....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#110 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 7, 2007 10:15:35 am
Zeena #53 {``Salim mian on the other hand has proven himself a real gentleman on this board.......Salim Mian .I am so very proud of you.....We both are standing up for absolutely different causes,but, we both did not disrespect each other, rather we acknowledged eachother`s POVs......
Now, this is the kind of democracy that we need...
Salim Mian
You have set an excellent example of democracy.....Please, teach tahmed and others the same democratic attitude.Thanks ``}

Zeena Behen,
Thank you for respecting my point of view and for acknowledging that, while we may have differences in opinion, we need to allow everyone to speak and present their viewpoints. I have always found you to be polite, compassionate, intelligent, and caring. Your motives are usually right and you take a stand. While we may agree as in the case of the Jamia Hifsa ladies or disagree about laying the entire blame on MQM for the May 12 tragedy, we both manage to respect each other.

I have been trying to convince Mr. Tahmed against his deep-seated bigotry against Urdu-speaking Mohajirs and especially his vehement opposition to the repatriation of ``stranded`` Pakistanis in BD. Unfortunately, this person, who normally tries to come across as a liberal democrat and a patriotic person, is in reality a hypocrite. He abandons all values of freedom, fairplay, and democracy when it suits his bigotry and embraces the same values when it suits his ethnic agenda. I think that he is far worse than the genuinely abusive and annoying characters like Zeemax, Ali1, Atif2, Ally, Khamkhwa, and Ass Lame.

Thanks for your post.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#109 Posted by masadi on June 7, 2007 10:01:29 am
bjk writes <<< Sir, I have not read all the interacts but am surprised at your choice of using expletives! >>>

Sorry to have upset your sensibilities, sometimes frustration at knowing the obvious but being powerless to do anything about it results in expletive use, as regards the US elite and their supporters like tahmed who are killing our folk directly and indirectly, expletive use is quite mild, others by their posts deserve those expletives, where they are misplaced, I apologize...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#108 Posted by Zeena on June 7, 2007 8:40:21 am
Re:#85 mohar sahib

Yes, I agree with you.Unfortunately, BB, Nawaz and others are proven failed politicians.

But, still I believe that the worst kind of democracy is much much more better than the military govt..................and that`s the fact.

Pakistan has had been hijacked by Military rulers most of the years........and whenever army has to plunder and loot poor pakistanis, they hijack them and then start taking their own advantages, and that`s another cruel fact......

Yes, it`s the people who need to realise that and again it`s the people who should say,NO to army..................
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#107 Posted by Urstruly on June 7, 2007 7:53:59 am

ARIF JAAN - Victim of criminal aggresion of NaPak Fouj upon the people of Pakistan



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#106 Posted by Chennai on June 7, 2007 6:47:10 am
Re: # 102

Folio: I understand exactly what you say & mean, hell my heart says the same thing but lets look at ground realities.......<><>

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#105 Posted by arjun2 on June 7, 2007 6:45:05 am
#102 by Folio on June 7, 2007 6:41am PT


OK, Chennai and Arjun, I give up. I may be wrong


mission accomplished then...

I`m here to convince misguided Indians, not make friends with pakis...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#104 Posted by arjun2 on June 7, 2007 6:44:08 am
hey Folio..there are two sides in afghanistan...guess which side the pakis are on...yup..it`s this one
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#103 Posted by arjun2 on June 7, 2007 6:42:20 am
#100 by chennai on June 7, 2007 6:37am PT

yup..absolutely...pakis give muslims a bad name...even their ummah homies knew it..I posted a report about britain a few years ago. non-paki muslims look suspiciously at their fellow muslims who travel a lot to the land of the pure...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#102 Posted by Folio on June 7, 2007 6:41:21 am
OK, Chennai and Arjun, I give up. I may be wrong:-(
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#101 Posted by arjun2 on June 7, 2007 6:40:44 am
#99 by Folio on June 7, 2007 6:35am PT

I`m sure there`s 10% of pakis who probably-maybe don`t support terrorism...but the propensity of pakis to get busted for terrorism on a regular basis means regardless of what you say, they`re not just like us..

Take the case of the united kingdom...tons of indians, tons of pakis...guess who`re the fundemantalist nuts and who`re blowing up subways and planning to blow up discos and poison people?

I personally think pakis a whole different species...homo jihadis`r`us..
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#100 Posted by Chennai on June 7, 2007 6:37:52 am
Arjun, to give credit to our Muslims, none were ever involved in 9/11 and other shennigans and we have more muslims than Pure land..................
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#99 Posted by Folio on June 7, 2007 6:35:42 am
Arjun,

I dont agree with you.

Not ALL Pakistanis support terrorism. Pl read their newspapers. Unless the reporters are Hindus or Christians, the news reported must be wrong, if they really support terrorism.

I know a lot of middleclass British who support one or other kind of action form their men (terrorism?) but NOT ALL advocate such action.

There`s one Indian Muslim who once a jihadi wrote a book recently. He dissected the extremsim in British Muslim society. Does he support terrorism. Of course not!

On ourside we have a Chowkie by name sanatani. He enjoyed the murder of Samjhouta passengers. What wud Pakistanis say abt Indians then? All Indians are extremists?

We need to see the `big` picture.

We discuss politics on Chowk. We remove ppl from our thoughts. We talk abt the official policies of Pak. Unfortunately they had the most unreprsentative govt there. How then the official polcies be dubbed as the will of the ppl of Pakistan?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#98 Posted by Chennai on June 7, 2007 6:35:11 am
Re:#95 by Folio:

Folio, if they want economic betterment they need to do one hell of a lot of things before even dreaming of getting there.....

They could start with maybe acknowledging that they have zilch arab genes :))

Seriously, I know what you mean but I``m afraid it looks like a lost cause......

My take is , better the military than the mullah..........
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#97 Posted by arjun2 on June 7, 2007 6:30:34 am
tell me something folio

If the pakis are ``just like us``, why doesn`t a week go by news of some paki somewhere getting busted for terrorism...

India has 7 times as many people as pakiland and almost as many muslims...why were pakis required to register first after 9/11 and not Indians?

How come there are no Indians in gitmo but a bunch of pakis?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#96 Posted by arjun2 on June 7, 2007 6:10:31 am
#91 by Folio on June 7, 2007 4:48am PT



I know what u mean but most of the ppl are like us in India.


No they`re not...most of them support the use of islamic terrorism or what they call jihad...

If there are any pakis who genuinely don`t support terrorism, they`re like the unfortunate residents of dresden who didn`t really support nazism...

stop deluding yourself...you think pakis care about your average indian? heck no...paki rats like tahmed may fake concern for all humankind but when passenger trains are bombed in india, abdul paki thinks they deserved it because of kashmir...and this isn`t anecdotal..most pakis openly say it...the letters to the editors of their newspapers say the same thing..

get your head out of the sand...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#95 Posted by Folio on June 7, 2007 5:36:14 am
Channai,

I agree 2 what u said. What we look at is not what we see.

They too want good life i.e economic betterment. Look at their immigration figures and look at their (Pakistanis) deportation figures. They are so desparate to leave Pakistan. So were many in India. Lookat the Gujju effers. The rate to take u abroad was 8 lakhs in 2002. Look at our MPs who`re escorting ppl to Canada. The rate is 30 lakhs!

Plz dont force me talk like Tahmed abt Pakistan. I share ur concerns visavis India but aam ppl are different. They are the product of their society which is hightly feudal and of late highly communal. They want to be part of larger Muslim/Arab world but they wud remian in the wings 4ever coz arabs never give passports to non-arabs, even to cock-sucking Pakistanis like Zeemax.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#94 Posted by Chennai on June 7, 2007 5:23:33 am
Folio:

Most of the Pakis are absolutely different from Indians in that their mindset is only on religion and more religion........and exporting violent versions of it round the globe......

Look at this board for instance....there are radical pakis who want everyone to get Islamized, Punj Pakis slugging it out with Mohajirs, Sindhi Muslims eyeing both suspiciously, Balochi & pathans wistfully looking at the neibouring countries.....

India & pakistan.....chalk & cheese man!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#93 Posted by mohar11 on June 7, 2007 4:58:19 am
Re: # 91
[...most of the ppl are like us in India. ...]

Not really... that`s the fallacy that indians too often fall for... Like I said - making your country a terrorist pit takes certain mindsets... that`s very unique...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#92 Posted by Folio on June 7, 2007 4:55:39 am
Arjun,

>>I enjoy any meat...especially over the grill... <<

:-))

That`s zabardast.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#91 Posted by Folio on June 7, 2007 4:48:31 am
Mohar,

I know what u mean but most of the ppl are like us in India. I dont think all poor abduls are into these madrasas. As I see, most of the JH an JF are from rich bakgrounds. The poorer ones u say are from NWFP.

I think we need to know Pakistan fully. Pl keep watching Pak TV and interact with Pak ppl. Prolly that wud smoothen ur rough edges. Btw, I had mmmany Pak friends some are jigri friends.

Not all Pakis are Zeemaxes and Abu Safwans. There MinazJs, TE Shahs and lots of unnamed ppl on Chowk itself who rile their own country for its propensity for religous extremism.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#90 Posted by arjun2 on June 7, 2007 4:43:12 am
#86 by Folio on June 7, 2007 4:21am PT

I enjoy any meat...especially over the grill...

and isn`t it funny how pakis weren`t talking about poverty and the condition of the common man when they thought their islamic jihadi adventures were about to land them kashmir...hardly a dissenting voice against the use of islamic fundamentalism as a policy tool then...then, one day in sept 2001, things changed and pakis were falling all over themselves to distance themselves from the indigenous freedom fighters..it`s funny what mandatory registration , fingerprinting and deportation will do...

as far as I`m concerned, there are two types of pakis...those who openly say they support islamic terrorism and then there`s the other kind...liars..
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#89 Posted by mohar11 on June 7, 2007 4:37:53 am
Re: # 86
[...Most of the ppl who makeup for both India and Pakistan are the poor, poorer and the poorest...]

True... but then, what do you do when the poor abdul[sometimes, not so poor] gets trained in his madrassa and gets over here and blasts the sh!t out of you, literally...

See - it`s not a very easy moral situation here... if abdul is just poor, we have all symathies for him... but when he is violent and maniac fed with heady brew of islam and nonsense - it`s impossible to be symathetic to him, no matter what his economic situation is...

You can make a case that not all abduls are violent and you are right... but does that really make a difference to the victims of the wanton islamofascism-inspired violence?...

You tell me...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#88 Posted by arjun2 on June 7, 2007 4:35:22 am
#83 by bjkumar on June 6, 2007 9:40pm PT

who said it accomplishes anything? what does having 8 ids on chowk accomplish?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#87 Posted by mohar11 on June 7, 2007 4:27:13 am
BJ dude

Why are you so riled up?... what`s up with this holier-than-thou BS?...

I am sure pakis are ``good`` people individually, but collectively they have proved to be otherwise.... I mean, the country is a veritable terrorist breeding ground... that doesn`t happen in a vacuum, it needs wide support and sustainance... it needs a certain mindset and malice...

We all want pakiland to be ruled by the ``good Dr`` instead of the army... but what`s the chance of that happening? we all want india to be ruled by Narayan Murthy, but that won`t happen... so why are you being a drama queen on hypothetical propostions?...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#86 Posted by Folio on June 7, 2007 4:21:42 am
Arjun,

I have my own differences with Tahmed and his ilk here but I think u are going too low, kinda below belt on other board where u compared Muhammed with a pig i.e incarnation of Lord Vishnu? Dont think too reverential abt cow. On the scale of reverence pig shud be above cow becoz pig is one of the incarnations of Lord Vishnu. U love to eat spare-ribs but not the rump-steak?

I know u hate terrorism and its breeding ground (Pakistan) but I guess u dont hate their traditional Indian/subcontinental Islam which is not of extremist-type.

Like India they too had poorer ppl who dont know who`s the `king` in Islamabad. They dont understand the concept of a capital city, nor abt government. If u ask them who`s the president of Pakistan, they`d not know what that means. Most of the ppl who makeup for both India and Pakistan are the poor, poorer and the poorest.



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#85 Posted by mohar11 on June 7, 2007 4:13:26 am
zeena

Benazir and Nawaz haven`t done any worse than politicians/demagogues in India[ ``strong`` country, in your opinion] or any other country for that matter... I mean, we have laloos, mulayams, advanis, commies and host of other fools running around wrecking havoc... and even look at the demagogues running around in US these days...

Nawaz has failed alright... but then you pakis have failed too... when he was deposed, you danced in the streets... you didn`t realize that it`s not Nawaz that is being thrown out, it`s your right to make the decision that`s being thrown out... Bad as nawaz was, deposing him is a decision that only people should make, not the army...

That`s a failure worse than anything nawaz and bb may have done... that`s the main problem...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#84 Posted by tahmed32 on June 6, 2007 9:48:30 pm
arjun #82 I am not interested in changing your mind on anything since, as I said, your insults and putdowns of Pakistanis say nothing about Pakistanis, and speak volumes of your mental condition.

But just clarify what I think bjkumar meant: it doesnt matter who comes to power in Pakistan. Personalities are not the issue, so it is not important who comes to power. What is important is that the checks and balances to those in power are introduced in Pakistan. That is what the chief justice and the lawyers understand.

Whether or not this effort succeeds is not the issue. By any reasonable measure, even if the struggle fails this time, it will have sown the seed for the next time around. So, like I said - bad news for you. Pakistan will emerge stronger than ever.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#83 Posted by bjkumar on June 6, 2007 9:40:57 pm

#82

So tell me the ``ingenious`` truth! What does that ``ha, ha`` accomplish?

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#82 Posted by arjun2 on June 6, 2007 9:34:17 pm
#81 by bjkumar on June 6, 2007 9:27pm PT

The question is irrelevant...in terms of logical fallacies, it would come close to the false dilemma..

the ``good dr``, to use your words, has a ZERO chance of leading pakiland...even prophet tahmed(peace be unto his self-righteous rear) will tell you that if he decides to tell the truth...

a non-disingenuous reading of the OP would tell you that the ``haha`` was for pakiland`s current situation, not the doctor`s fate(for which I couldn`t care less)....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#81 Posted by bjkumar on June 6, 2007 9:27:35 pm

#80

You weaseled out of answering my question. Which of the three should the Indians be supporting?

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#80 Posted by arjun2 on June 6, 2007 9:23:27 pm
#79 by bjkumar on June 6, 2007 9:17pm PT


Who will be better for India in terms of running Pakistan - the khakis, the greens, or the good Dr.?


The ``good dr`` has a zero % chance of running jihadis`r`us....ZERO...you are familiar with the concept of zero, aren`t you? your ancestors invented it and we haven`t heard the end of it...

the paki army and the jihadis are peas in a pod...rattlesnakes with differing number of rattles...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#79 Posted by bjkumar on June 6, 2007 9:17:59 pm

#76 Arjun2

Comparing a whole population to ``rattlesnakes`` is one of the most foolish things you have ever said (the reality is that most people are simply people and those living closest to the ``rattlesnakes`` are the most in danger and probably most scared, too). But telling all that may be futile to you, so let me deal with it another way.

Do you care about India?

Who will be better for India in terms of running Pakistan - the khakis, the greens, or the good Dr.?

So, if she is forced to leave - it is not ``ha, ha`` time!

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#78 Posted by tahmed32 on June 6, 2007 9:14:52 pm
bjkumar #74 You can see that was a good attempt on your part - but as I was saying earlier you are better of teach math to a dead squirrel than trying to explain the basics to geniuses like arjun.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#77 Posted by tahmed32 on June 6, 2007 9:11:46 pm
arjun #76 of course Pakistan`s future depends on what IT billionaire arjun thinks of Pakistanis.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#76 Posted by arjun2 on June 6, 2007 9:06:41 pm
#74 by bjkumar on June 6, 2007 8:53pm PT


I don`t give a f@#k for dr siddiqa or any other paki...with very very few exceptions - so few that they hardly matter - all pakis are the same to me..

if someone told you 10% of rattlesnakes were not poisonous, would you let your kids play around with rattlesnakes?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#75 Posted by tahmed32 on June 6, 2007 8:59:15 pm
bjkumar #74 and Amen to that.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#74 Posted by bjkumar on June 6, 2007 8:53:54 pm

#Arjun

My dear, you miss the point!

She could have stayed back and either paid millions of rupees in arbitrarily imposed fines or gone to jail or worse - she could have cowed down and played along with the khaki`s deluded dance on its last legs!

What many Indians - including you - do not realize is that people like Dr. Siddiqa are the true pillars of a future Pakistan - and also these are the folks who will provide the foundations of a lasting friendship because they have the necessary education and broadness of outlook for the same. People like her do not leave their motherland in search of greener pasteurs like many of us do - they do so when there is no choice and when they can be more effective from outside.

We, the Indians, do such individuals no favors when we ridicule what is a land that they truly love - as they demonstrate. We need to encourage such individuals. They are even more indispensable from the Indian point of view than from the rest of the world.


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#73 Posted by tahmed32 on June 6, 2007 8:51:34 pm
#71 sure - rushdie wrote from the safety of UK. Ayesha Siddiqa wrote the book on the Pakistani military while living in military-ruled Pakistan. duh!

And her leaving Pakistan at a time hundreds are being arrested in an effort to curb freedom of speech does not make her a coward either. double duh!!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#72 Posted by tahmed32 on June 6, 2007 8:47:09 pm
#67 and dont write meaningless cliches again either.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#71 Posted by arjun2 on June 6, 2007 8:46:23 pm
#69 by tahmed32 on June 6, 2007 8:44pm PT

going by that logic, I`m sure rushdie proves something too...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#70 Posted by tahmed32 on June 6, 2007 8:45:57 pm
#67 if your wishes were horses, you would have a real job.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#69 Posted by tahmed32 on June 6, 2007 8:44:20 pm
#68 arjun: she proves that by writing the book.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#68 Posted by arjun2 on June 6, 2007 8:42:51 pm
#65 by tahmed32 on June 6, 2007 8:28pm PT


Ayesha Siddiqa is yet another Pakistani who proves that Pakistanis will not be cowed


prophet tahmed(pbuhsrr)...she proves that by leaving pakiland?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#67 Posted by arjun2 on June 6, 2007 8:42:00 pm
#66 by tahmed32 on June 6, 2007 8:32pm PT

if wishes were horses, pakis would be riding seabiscuit....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#66 Posted by tahmed32 on June 6, 2007 8:32:11 pm
#64 pandit hate arjun: more bad news for you. Pakistan will come out of this stronger than before.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#65 Posted by tahmed32 on June 6, 2007 8:28:58 pm
bjkumar #63 Couldnt agree more with you. Those killed while asserting their right to peaceful assembly on May 12 are the true martyrs of Pakistan. Those struggling for the rule of law and respect for basic human rights in Pakistan are the true patriots of Pakistan, and friends of freedom loving people everywhere. Ayesha Siddiqa is yet another Pakistani who proves that Pakistanis will not be cowed in their just struggle by guns and ghoondas. The sooner musharraf understands this, the better it will be for everyone.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#64 Posted by arjun2 on June 6, 2007 8:27:48 pm