unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

People of Gilgit Baltistan Waiting to be Heard

Syed Ali April 20, 2008

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 1-16   1 2

#18 Posted by tahir on May 2, 2008 4:03:44 am
Simple-minded CHOWKIdars, please read post #3 again.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#17 Posted by tahir on May 2, 2008 4:01:49 am
Re: # 12
We'll keep the land, you embrace those whom YOU label kafirs!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#16 Posted by harish_hyd on May 1, 2008 11:28:09 pm
#14 by treetop

Shall i take your post as a vote for independent kashmir

Kashmir's accession to India was never in question. While we'd be willing to forego the whole of "Azad" Kashmir, not the least because the AJK Kashmiris are mentally more Paki than Pakis themselves and having them is a threat to India's security, the part that we have is absolutely non-negotiable.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#15 Posted by majumdar on May 1, 2008 11:08:03 pm
Treetop,

(Shall i take your post as a vote for independent kashmir? )

No. Merely that POK and Northern Areas shud be reunited with J&K as integral parts of India.

Regards
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#14 Posted by treetop on May 1, 2008 5:36:13 am
Re: # 13harish
Shall i take your post as a vote for independent kashmir?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#13 Posted by harish_hyd on May 1, 2008 4:22:34 am
Pakis cry rivers for the right to self-determination of Indian Kashmiris, but when it comes to the so-called Azad Kashmir and more specifically Gilgit-Baltistan, they do not have the slightest amount of sympathy. And this fool Tahir mian first is more concerned about whether they are Muslim or Ismaili and not whether they are human.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#12 Posted by ISlamIslam on May 1, 2008 3:53:16 am
Ref tahir #8

[Re: # 7
Maj sahib,
I'm not implying anything right now, let the Ismailis explain.]

If the Ismailis are NOT Muslims, shouldm't those kaffirs be handed over to India along with their land?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#11 Posted by treetop on May 1, 2008 1:47:37 am
Gigit and Baltistan should be a part of independent Kashmir
or a part of the union of greater Pakhtoonistan and kashmir.We need to get rid of dravidian injun and semi-dravidian pakis.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#10 Posted by peonoftheeast on May 1, 2008 1:18:46 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#9 Posted by pacifist on April 30, 2008 12:29:52 pm
I rquest my friends to dehyphenate the issue of Gilgit Batistan from its sectarian and strategic dimension and analyse the whole issue in the light of the sufferings of the residents of this area who are a perfect example of a nation without any legal identity. The question of ismailis being Muslims is totally irrelevent to a debate on our constitutional dilemma.

Syed Ali
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#8 Posted by tahir on April 30, 2008 9:08:30 am
Re: # 7
Maj sahib,
I'm not implying anything right now, let the Ismailis explain. And I don't like communicating with the peon-class.
Regards.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#7 Posted by majumdar on April 30, 2008 6:06:02 am
Tahir sahib,

Are you implying that Ismailis may not really be Muslims. In that case there wud be a peculiar situation (as Peon bhai points out) that the father of a Muslim nation is a non-Muslim.

Regards
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#6 Posted by peonofthewest on April 30, 2008 5:26:16 am
Re: # 4 and # 5

majamidar saab and Tahiri saab,

our nation's father Quaid-i-Azam Muhammed Ali Jinnah was Ismaili saab

they are Muslims saab

what do you think saab?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#5 Posted by tahir on April 30, 2008 5:15:33 am
Re: # 4
When they explain it themselves first, then I'll shed some light on the matter. But don't ignore what I said about Hunza.

:)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#4 Posted by majumdar on April 30, 2008 2:46:47 am
Tahir sahib,

Are Ismailis Muslims?

Regards
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#3 Posted by tahir on April 29, 2008 10:50:20 am
Re: # 2
It might be uselful to ask the Agha Khan first, these folks have steadily been converting the Gilgit-Hunza locals to the Ismaili faith since long.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 1-16   1 2

Interact Index

    #18 tahir
    #17 tahir
    #16 harish_hyd
    #15 majumdar
    #14 treetop
    #13 harish_hyd
    #12 ISlamIslam
    #11 treetop
    #10 peonoftheeast
    #9 pacifist
    #8 tahir
    #7 majumdar
    #6 peonofthewest
    #5 tahir
    #4 majumdar
    #3 tahir
    #2 Ras
    #1 harish_hyd

US Elections 2008 Primaries

  • Hillary Clinton a Better Presidential Candidate
  • Leaders, Heroes and Mountains
  • Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and New American Dreams
  • Pakistan Elections 2008 - An analysis
  • Political Issues Ahead of Pakistan Elections
more »
get rss feed Get Chowk RSS Feed

Get Chowk Newsletter

Latest Interacts

  • bubba: Re: # 29 {go back... US Commando Strike in
  • eyecontact: There is a heavy... Why Zardari Should Be
  • eyecontact: There is a heavy... Why Zardari Should Be
  • CreateAlpha: LOL @ system! Hahahah What... Why Zardari Should Be
  • adamkhan: If the Americans, with... US Commando Strike in
  • tahmed32: hamidm: i guess you... Why Zardari Should Be
  • hamidm2: victory for tahmed ISLAMABAD:... Why Zardari Should Be
  • hamidm2: Re: # 35 tahmed, .... you... Why Zardari Should Be

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Save Me From Charismatic Leaders!
  • Free to Breed
  • Why Zardari Should Be President!
  • There is no ‘honour’ in killing
  • US Commando Strike in Waziristan
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • The Highway of Death
  • When Colours Fade....
  • The New Education Policy -Two Suggestions
  • Matchmaker, Matchmaker, Make Me a Match
  • A Letter to the Prime Minister of Pakistan

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited