Feroz Qutabshahi April 29, 2008
#746 Posted by GT on May 8, 2008 10:21:56 am
"is what you're doing fool....don't think that people cannot look beyond your dimwitted facade. You're a third rate bigot like nkg, just more polite with your dirty nose always in Pakistani affairs that you seldom understand....go F yourself"
Bravo! ....
Bravo! ....
#745 Posted by zeemax on May 8, 2008 10:16:33 am
#736 Posted by GT,
GT, what ashtray would have said was 'ghin' not 'ghrin' in "feel ghrin". It must have been a typo.
'Ghin' means 'a nauseous aversion' in good Urdu.
GT, what ashtray would have said was 'ghin' not 'ghrin' in "feel ghrin". It must have been a typo.
'Ghin' means 'a nauseous aversion' in good Urdu.
#743 Posted by masadi on May 8, 2008 10:07:50 am
Ghrin or no Ghrin- whatever the F that means, when you write "In India we discriminate on the basis of everything ...", while not even living in India, let alone the BS claim made therein to trivilize discrimination on the basis of caste and religion that is persistent in that society,...hiding behind BS and not any "logical discourse" is what you're doing fool....don't think that people cannot look beyond your dimwitted facade. You're a third rate bigot like nkg, just more polite with your dirty nose always in Pakistani affairs that you seldom understand....go F yourself
#742 Posted by GT on May 8, 2008 10:00:51 am
Example of "logical discourse" driven by "ghrin":
"A banal excuse for Indian apartheid against Muslims and lower caste Hindus and other minorities by an idiot who does not even live in India."
"A banal excuse for Indian apartheid against Muslims and lower caste Hindus and other minorities by an idiot who does not even live in India."
#741 Posted by masadi on May 8, 2008 9:59:18 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#740 Posted by CreateAlpha on May 8, 2008 9:53:13 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#739 Posted by masadi on May 8, 2008 9:50:01 am
GT writes "Hindus discriminate against Muslims (when they can) and vice versa because they "feel ghrin" for each other..."
The vice versa is absolute BS because both groups do not have equal power within the Indian social structure. No Muslim who "discriminates against Hindus" will ever reach a position of consequence in any facet of Indian society....Similar to his BS claim that discrimination against AAs in the US was an untestable hypothesis, which he would say is similar to black on white "discrimination"...
The vice versa is absolute BS because both groups do not have equal power within the Indian social structure. No Muslim who "discriminates against Hindus" will ever reach a position of consequence in any facet of Indian society....Similar to his BS claim that discrimination against AAs in the US was an untestable hypothesis, which he would say is similar to black on white "discrimination"...
#738 Posted by masadi on May 8, 2008 9:44:47 am
GT writes "In India we discriminate on the basis of everything .... it is so prevalent and accepted that we do not even notice. "
A banal excuse for Indian apartheid against Muslims and lower caste Hindus and other minorities by an idiot who does not even live in India.
GT writes to DM "What do you mean by "responsibility of India"? What is this India .... the govt., people? And why are Muslims "a responsibility of India" ... why not Sikhs or Arunachalis?
Muslims should expect nothing from the Indian polity (and frankly most of them do not). They should fight to get whatever they can (and they do) just like everybody else."
Don't act like a fool. DM's post made it very clear that the "responsibility" was viz a viz the (farcial) claims of MAJ and Co regarding the need for a seperate Muslim homeland. Compared to the other minorities you mention, the Muslims had the political clout with the colonials and feudals to break the nation and hence the "guarantee". Regarding discrimination, there was an extensive study done by an Indian on institutional discrimination regarding Indian Muslims (where no fight will prove useful until the resistant institution changes, dumbass), which I posted for nkg a while back- HRW has published reports on the Indian "apartheid", do your google search....and desist from posting Absolute Nonsense....
A banal excuse for Indian apartheid against Muslims and lower caste Hindus and other minorities by an idiot who does not even live in India.
GT writes to DM "What do you mean by "responsibility of India"? What is this India .... the govt., people? And why are Muslims "a responsibility of India" ... why not Sikhs or Arunachalis?
Muslims should expect nothing from the Indian polity (and frankly most of them do not). They should fight to get whatever they can (and they do) just like everybody else."
Don't act like a fool. DM's post made it very clear that the "responsibility" was viz a viz the (farcial) claims of MAJ and Co regarding the need for a seperate Muslim homeland. Compared to the other minorities you mention, the Muslims had the political clout with the colonials and feudals to break the nation and hence the "guarantee". Regarding discrimination, there was an extensive study done by an Indian on institutional discrimination regarding Indian Muslims (where no fight will prove useful until the resistant institution changes, dumbass), which I posted for nkg a while back- HRW has published reports on the Indian "apartheid", do your google search....and desist from posting Absolute Nonsense....
#737 Posted by CreateAlpha on May 8, 2008 9:31:06 am
Zee, the situation of muslims is very bad in India and a lot of other places where they are not in the majority. You should petition the gov't of pakistan to open up its arms and take them in. Imagine a pakistan double its muslimness, then take in bradfordites, others from outer paris aggrondisments, from sri lanks, from thailand.....pakistan would be the new mecca of muslims. I think you should get started right away....there is no time to lose. Why...on my last trip to mumbai, my muslim driver abdul had a ganesh sticker on his dash under the dangling kaaba door ornament or something. Its getting crazy out their and you have a religious duty to save them. Chop chop buddy!
#736 Posted by GT on May 8, 2008 9:27:28 am
#731 Posted by dost_mittar:
D_M,
OK, I understand where you are comming from. While you maybe right about this "loyalty" business, I do not think Muslims are discriminated because people think they are not loyal. Hindus discriminate against Muslims (when they can) and vice versa because they "feel ghrin" for each other (sorry could not come up with a better word). You can see it for yourself when you read interacts here in chowk. Actuall a nick called ashtray (I think) used this exact word in UP!
D_M,
OK, I understand where you are comming from. While you maybe right about this "loyalty" business, I do not think Muslims are discriminated because people think they are not loyal. Hindus discriminate against Muslims (when they can) and vice versa because they "feel ghrin" for each other (sorry could not come up with a better word). You can see it for yourself when you read interacts here in chowk. Actuall a nick called ashtray (I think) used this exact word in UP!
#735 Posted by zeemax on May 8, 2008 9:13:21 am
#734 Posted by dost_mittar,
I don't think Police registration is required at all in Pakistan for Indians. Did you need one when you visited?
And yes, I think visa-less travel will ultimately come about. It is essential for both countries.
At a time the residents of NWFP did not even need a Passport for travel to Afghanistan. Just something called a 'red pass'. But that was before the Afghan war.
I don't think Police registration is required at all in Pakistan for Indians. Did you need one when you visited?
And yes, I think visa-less travel will ultimately come about. It is essential for both countries.
At a time the residents of NWFP did not even need a Passport for travel to Afghanistan. Just something called a 'red pass'. But that was before the Afghan war.
#734 Posted by dost_mittar on May 8, 2008 9:04:10 am
zeemax:
There are the laws and then, there are the practices. The two are not necessarily the same in India.
BTW, I am surprised that the rule of police registration after a certain period does not apply to Indian visitors in Pakistan.
You know my position - I am for a visa-less travel between India and Pakistan - just like Canada and US although things are tightening between these two countries as well.
There are the laws and then, there are the practices. The two are not necessarily the same in India.
BTW, I am surprised that the rule of police registration after a certain period does not apply to Indian visitors in Pakistan.
You know my position - I am for a visa-less travel between India and Pakistan - just like Canada and US although things are tightening between these two countries as well.
#733 Posted by zeemax on May 8, 2008 8:54:27 am
#730 Posted by dost_mittar,
That's very strange because the penalty for overstaying visas for Pakistanis to India is extremely harsh. Immediate imprisonment when caught and torture. Indian visitors to Pakistan don't even require Police registration. That's a lousy law and should be removed.
That's very strange because the penalty for overstaying visas for Pakistanis to India is extremely harsh. Immediate imprisonment when caught and torture. Indian visitors to Pakistan don't even require Police registration. That's a lousy law and should be removed.
#732 Posted by zeemax on May 8, 2008 8:43:01 am
#729 Posted by GT,
There was only one instance when I was just out of Uni and a Daudi Bohra (I think) lady refused to let me the upper portion of her house because I couldn't accept her condition I will NEVER wear any sort of shoes within the house! They have to be left outside the door!
There was only one instance when I was just out of Uni and a Daudi Bohra (I think) lady refused to let me the upper portion of her house because I couldn't accept her condition I will NEVER wear any sort of shoes within the house! They have to be left outside the door!
#731 Posted by dost_mittar on May 8, 2008 8:32:11 am
GT:
I did not say that they are more a responsibility of India than any other group. But discrimination against Muslims, especially at a private level, is different from discrimination against any other group whose loyalty to the country is never in question.[but no other group -as a group - has this concept of ummah uber alles either!]
I did not say that they are more a responsibility of India than any other group. But discrimination against Muslims, especially at a private level, is different from discrimination against any other group whose loyalty to the country is never in question.[but no other group -as a group - has this concept of ummah uber alles either!]
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- ejazharoon: The forbidden fruit is... Alcohol and Teenagers: A
- tahmed32: And furthermore, Moaziz Masadi... How real is your
- ejazharoon: Murad: Thanks for a simple... Faith and Religion
- tahmed32: Mr. Masadi: so you... How real is your
- Kulharee: I am in DC... Alcohol and Teenagers: A
- Eklavya: Baig bhai, the ONLY... Faith and Religion
- HP: #158 Posted by masadi “Lately... How real is your
- MeiraJ08: #9 great exchanges, lol,... Faith and Religion








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content