Restoring the Civil Rights of Ahmadis

LOL! Sad to see Yasser reduced to such whimpering.

"Daiichi bought Ranbaxy so Daiichi is an Indian company now"

Lol. What logic indeed.

#67 by _arjun5

IBM bought daksh..so IBM is an Indian company

Yep and Daiichi bought Ranbaxy so Daiichi is an Indian company now...LOL!

Re: # 67

Ofcourse I called Mobilink a Pakistani company... not Orascom. We were talking about the fifteen percent shares of Mobilink going for 540 Million if you recall. So how was I talking about Orascom?

Do you have reading comprehension issues?

Re: # 61

Chowk is full of freaks... you, Zeemax, Kharish mian ...

So whats new?

#65 Posted by MantoLives on June 17, 2008 4:57:14 am


IBM bought daksh..so IBM is an Indian company...

Re: # 62

"part of me really feels sorry for you because you have to defend a criminal who caused a holocaust on the subcontinent."

I protest. I have NEVER defended Gandhi the abovementioned criminal.

Re: # 59


Mobilink i.e. Pakistan Mobile Communications Limited is a Pakistani company incorporated in 1992 by the Saif group... it was completely taken over by Orascom only recently ...

And I did call Rutgers "Public Ivy" ... which it is.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Ivy

Now where does that leave you ? Oh yes you are a liar.

#60 Posted by MantoLives on June 17, 2008 4:51:26 am


Meanwhile we have Gandhians running amok


yeah..I heard US forces dropped a few 500 pounders on a bunch of gandhians..


... do you know that in 1953 the Majlis-e-Amal... consisting of Ahrar... called its Anti-Ahmaddiya movement "Satyagraha"?


So what pakistan is only practicing satyagraha when it declares ahmadis non-muslims? and india is anti-satyagraha because ahmadis are regarded as muslims....?

#59 by _arjun5

seriously manto...people who quote nominal GDP numbers, call rutgers an ivy league school and call orascom a paki company should look back into their own self-deluded past..

Yaar Arjun, cut Yasser some slack. He's the brightest Pakistan has got and you had to spoil his party.

#57 by MantoLives

I have whooped your ass so many times on this discussion that it is not worth it anymore. Marginal utility of whooping your ass has been on a nose dive.

Yasser mian, we all know that when it comes to abuse, none of us can measure up to you. Perhaps that comes from the upbringing. But will you please argue with proofs or once again just declare victory and run away (with tail in between legs)?

PS: I just don't know what whether to sympathize with you or go mad at you with anger. A part of me really feels sorry for you because you have to defend a criminal who caused a holocaust on the subcontinent.

you would find most Pakistani Non-Ahmadi Muslims in favor of Ahmadis' rights


Really...why don't you as your "payee" zeemax what he thinks of ahmadis...

Re: # 55

Jinnah's ideals were shared by B R Ambedkar. B R Ambedkar drafted India's constitution. So your statement does make sense.

Meanwhile we have Gandhians running amok ... do you know that in 1953 the Majlis-e-Amal... consisting of Ahrar... called its Anti-Ahmaddiya movement "Satyagraha"?

#57 Posted by MantoLives on June 17, 2008 4:48:41 am


I have whooped your ass


seriously manto...people who quote nominal GDP numbers, call rutgers an ivy league school and call orascom a paki company should look back into their own self-deluded past..

#53 Posted by MantoLives on June 17, 2008 4:46:21 am


we have discussed this issue to death but Pakistan was not a country founded in the name of religion


That doesn't change the FACT that today's pakistan - in your own words - is a theocracy...

and maybach's aside, an ahmadi still can't call himself muslim..

Harish mian,

I have whooped your ass so many times on this discussion that it is not worth it anymore. Marginal utility of whooping your ass has been on a nose dive.