Muslims in America

Somebody has written Islamic Scientist...Nice oxymoron...

masadi, it seems you have lost the argument and chickened out!

Tooth writes "hey masadi,

why dont you answer those questions in #277?"

Once in a while I throw bones to dogs, that does not mean I take their barking seriously....

masadi, we have gone thru this before. we defined bigot and by the definition you were proven to be the real bigot.

hey masadi,

why dont you answer those questions in #277?

thanks

Manto writes "Yaar truth you are doing such a commendable job presenting the facts..."

Manto kissing the a$$ of a certified Hindu bigot who knows next to nothing about "facts" because the empty vessel has been stumped once again. Like I said exorcise the MAJ ghost from yourself or you'll babble in tongues that only Hindu bigots can understand...

Manto writes "The problem is that you are arguing with a halfwit...Now if only the dimwit knew what rhazes and avicenna actually thought of Islam quran etc he would not be taking pride in their purported achievements..."

A retard calling another a halfwit is not plausible evidence. I do not care about the personal beliefs of the scientists but the fact that they were the product of a social order deeply interwined with Islam that produced this openmindedness. I would like this fool to point out to me where these two scientists (out of the dozens of quite famous Muslim scientists) denounce Islam in categorical terms. Regarding Khaldun, the fool doesn't realize that "science" is a way of knowing or learning and doing research, it is not confined to the "physical" sciences, and Khaldun was the first historiographer/ sociologist of the scientific kind. His moqadama, a introduction book of scientific research regarding society and history has extensive quotations from the Quran

Yaar truth you are doing such a commendable job presenting the facts... Why stoop to masadi's level?

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts

Re: # 276 masadi,

look around where is arab world today? india suffered because of Jain and Buddhism neglected the "arm". tat is why you brutes could enter in India. the time coming that you will self distruct.

Hear not here

Truth

The problem is that you are arguing with a halfwit

He is probably going to say ramswamiramanu who?

On the other hand ibne khuldun is famous for his work in history not science.

Now if only the dimwit knew what rhazes and avicenna actually thought of Islam quran etc he would not be taking pride in their purported achievements.

Now here him speak of his superior wit... I must bow out now.

masadi aka mulla mandar multankar,

did you change yur biz card, dear?

dear red hot lipstick with pink maskara, would you please look around? u were almost given free ride in US & Canada in 80s and early 90s, what did muslims from arab and pakistanis did? how many really completed their education and what kind of education? You guys got that free ride in US because those poor abduls foolishly became cannon fodder in afghanistan.

You lost your key to progress in dark Islamic Kothi, but you mad-sad man insists to search it under the lampost of economy outside the kothi because there seems to be light of shampooed data supplied by your masters and his lounda Shortcut Aziz.

You have not responded to this:
Mulla Mandar Multankar,

Why do you write these long sentences and very very long paras? Your evey third sentence is same as the first one.

Answer these questions?

1. Why is it hard to practice democracy where majority is Musim?

2. Is Islam demands spreading it?

3. In the case of Islam does the spreading happens mainly by physical force?

4. Does that mean Islam has to excessively depend on the armed forces?

============

Above questions were Islam applied laterally, ie, spreading across the land. Similar questions are there for Islam acting vertically.

1. Does the Islam demand the state, nation country to be Islamic wherever Muslims are in majority?

2. Does that mean politics in Islamic state means proving who is more Islamic?

3. Does that mean people have to be constantly be judged and classified according to their purity?

4. What happens to the people who are little less pure such as Ahmedi and Shias?

5. To keep the society pure does Islam demands the state to be a police state?

6. Since the police are not so well armed and well organized or disciplined, does policing work also done by army in Islamic society?

.
.
.
=========

You see Mullaji with red lipstick and pink maskara, Islamic society is not police state but army state. The people when subjugated to such atrocious ideology and its modus-operndi for long time then they internalize it. People start asking for army rule.

Baki tumhari badbad is only hot air and pile of paper shit.

Manto writes "The contribution of the
Hindu civilization has been much more substantial than the Arab world in terms of science etc and this is a fact no one can deny."

BS.

Oye BJ yaar, tu Chowk sey kuch maheeney ka furlough kyon nahi ley leta? U seem to be the one person uniting Indians and Pakistanis these days..Saala Atif 2 sey ley key Chaltahai gives you gaalis. Take a break, dude.

Manto writes "Are you upset that all these TV stations keep calling me for interviews but a distinguised scholar like you gets ignored?..."

Mian tv channels are very interested in mass murderes and rapists too, does that say much about them? They throng around around that F'ck Musharraf as well. If they haven't called me thus far for my views, it is because I keep a low profile rather than seek cheap publicity like you. Regarding my work, our posts and my quite superior wit shows quite clearly for all to see...