unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
all are welcome to read, write and think
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

Boot Point

Nadeem F Paracha September 21, 2008

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 1-16   1 2

#27 Posted by sajjad_zaidi on September 24, 2008 3:35:25 am
Re: # 1
mr. meraj2008 you seem to be in the state of real meraj,if they were the, according to you , s** of *****,so who r u?actualy u are suffering from extreme myopia,the neo con muslim extrimists have actulay been deteriorating your country since its birth like islmic republic,muslim bomb,muslim army,selfmade idealogy and invincibilty deludions like things,you have mediocritic pakistani thinking.
think again!!!!!!!!1
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#26 Posted by Skeptical on September 24, 2008 12:41:16 am
Mr NFP, let me bring your attention to the following paragraph of your article

"This leads to a rather potent point: Many of the political and religious TV shows anchored by hosts who hold masqueraded sympathies for Islamists, and TV shows in which televangelists passionately give Western countries a convoluted verbal bashing, some even calling them "economic terrorists" … ever notice how each one of these shows are punctuated by a gazillion commercial breaks, all stuffed with commercials of brands made by western multinationals?

I mean, if, say, Hamid Mir or Zaid Hamid, are always so incensed by "western interference" and "influence" and so sympathetic towards those "fighting a war against the West", how can they allow their shows to be sponsored by western multinationals?"


Mr. paracha, if I remember correctly, you have bashed Junoon for selling out to corporate interests while writing jingles for corporates yourself..add to it your hypocritical claims of being a socialist...
What is more hypocritical? a religous person bashing west and allowing his show to be sponsored by western multinationals, or a socialist actually writing advertisements for western corporates....
You are a hollow person yourself...... and so are these religous fundos.....the only difference between them and you is that you lie at the other end of political spectrum....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#25 Posted by Naqshbandi on September 23, 2008 1:55:20 pm
i,e, can someone give evidence that links his statements to someone murder directly like did he say," Go and kill XYZ".
If not, you cannot hold him responsible for what another idiot does--and i speak as someone who is not a fan of his!

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#24 Posted by Naqshbandi on September 23, 2008 1:52:40 pm
i' m not a big fan of aamer liaquat --he overacts and is a drama queen on his show--but he is definitely not a funda wahabi by any stretch of the imagination.

his show promotes traditional sunni-sufi islam from a theological POV although there are internet rumours that he is actually a Rafidite.

Allah wa Rasuluhu Aalam.
I dont think he did incite anyone to murder anybody. if so, what is the proof?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#23 Posted by hamza_yusufzai on September 23, 2008 12:26:16 pm
other than zee no one is trying to exonerate an animal who would kill innocent civilians...i would be the last one
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#22 Posted by cliftonbridge on September 23, 2008 12:05:19 pm
hamz as much as i accept that one killer is just as guilty as the next regardless of ideology....fact is that the religious brand of bandits are certainly wreaking a degree of devastation that is unparalleled in pakistans history.

Sure we have always had criminals and antistate loons and terrorists (pretty apt term for some MQM workers) but the magnitude of the problem just isnt comparable.

Against that backdrop we have to prioritise our condemnation. Religious loons first ... everyone else including NFP after that.

Vaise i also think that most people are genuinely sad about the civilian casualities in the north and noone gets called a fundo for shedding tears for them.

But maybe as a society we need to learn to not confuse sympathy with the oppressed for justification for what is now clearly the OPPRESSOR.

Fundo to me is when someone uses any pretext - even a sympathetic one - to let criminals/terrorists/oppressors off the hook or justify their crimes against innocent people ...or even equate it to another problem of a much lesser magnitude.

All the points you have made for e.g are reasonable and so long as people dont mention them in a context that deliberately exonerrates the terrorists (current ones) im totally fine with that and im sure most people are.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#21 Posted by hamza_yusufzai on September 23, 2008 11:36:56 am
n its not something inherent in 'secular' that makes them less violent....i can list u examples from the history of pakistan as well as the world if u like...reactive violence can not be tied down to an ideology...its the pain n revenge that drives it. i am eye witness to some of the most horrific things done to human bodies by the enlightened n civilized rocket scientist of psf n apmso ...so althought islamist fundoo is a sexy term...it has very lil to do with isalm everything to do with the evil, revenge that is instinctive of ALL human beings..it just gets triggered when v r pushed to our breaking point
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#20 Posted by hamza_yusufzai on September 23, 2008 11:28:10 am
it was equatable in 90's u forget that mqm was considered just as bad as taleban from establishment's perspective. The thing with army establishment is that they need an enemy to fight..so they keep creating monsters n keep using them according to the climate and fashion of the season. ppl who r blowing up civilians must be dealt with no doubt...

but just because someone sheds a tear on 300,000 refugess or inncent women n children being blown away as collateral damage shouldnt become a fundo by default. if u think hamid mir is a fundoo than i m sorry u r just a close minded person..we can have difference of opinion without labeling each traitors. nfp is usally bitter n pissy against everyone who has a better career than him.

wat i do find funny is aamir liaquat is just as annoying as he was couple of years ago when he had mushy's balls in his mouth...n we were all saying this guy is a fake n wouldnt know islam if it smacked him in his face but all u enlightened were in an awe like he was a mujadid or somethin...ahh how quickly things change once there is a memo from 90
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#19 Posted by cliftonbridge on September 23, 2008 9:09:20 am
hamzoo im not going to disagree with those principles, but i will put them in order of priority.

To move on to a more succesful state we do have to weed out extremist fundos from the streets and airwaves first. Next step - civilize the vigilantes.

We can talk about secular vs religious extremists in theory but the truth is Pakistan doesnt have secular suiciders or truck bombers blowing up its infrastructure so they are not equatable.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#18 Posted by hamza_yusufzai on September 23, 2008 8:47:01 am
bibi ..keeping street clean from islamic or secular fundoo is the responsibility of the state..when private armies start to do the bidding, than whether its the sector incharges or the commander mehsood than eventually shit hits the fan...i respect the mandate of mqm although i dont agree with there politics of zero principles...but i dont support vigilante justice thru unit incharges ANYWHERE
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#17 Posted by cliftonbridge on September 23, 2008 8:43:25 am
hamzoo though you have a point the more imp. point is that someone has to stand upto fundos or people who look fundo or people who sound fundo.

Since karachi has repeatedly democratically elected a bunch of ghundas we have every right to expect these ghunda's to keep the streets clean of those other ghundas - who we NEVER VOTED for.

Now you being the proponent of democracy should know that :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#16 Posted by hamza_yusufzai on September 23, 2008 7:45:46 am
abbayy jaahilloon hamid mir never claimed to be a socialist, marxist, or a surqa. he disagrees with american foreign policy and so does 73% american citizens. NFP on the other hand is the self-proclaimed cheguavara, hugo chavez, stalin all rolled in one.....his hard-on for american estab. all of a sudden just because they r killing muslims however is quite rich.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#15 Posted by crazyghan on September 23, 2008 6:09:25 am
The media in Pakistan and in much of the neighborhood is a system of tools and propaganda much of it to appease the conventional wisdom and exploit the poor and often brainless, senseless 'naazirin e karaam'

Good job NFP
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#14 Posted by goonga on September 23, 2008 4:32:38 am
I partially enjoyed and agreed regarding state of media evangelist and media cooperations.
But I am bit disappointed, high expectations and no way this is improvement.
luck next time?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#13 Posted by Danishafsar on September 22, 2008 8:52:08 pm
It's always been great reading Paracha. No matter what, he never let's go. This is a highly timely article and accurately describes the state of the media in Pakistan and how with their jihadi anchors and blind preachers they are trying to create nothing but even more havoc.

And yes, I agree, how come if men like Hamid Mir and Ziad Hamid are so ticked off with the west, they let their shows be sponsored by western multinationals?
Kudos, NFP.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#12 Posted by farras on September 22, 2008 2:39:10 pm
This brings to my attention, that i watched a programme on a second rated tv channel (can't remeber the name, one of those AAJ type channels). There was an Adnan Sami look a like gorafied cum desi wannabe hosting the show along with a man who had some rather strange gestures when talking. Mr. Paracha was also one of the participant of this copied prgramme from the BBC. Mr. Paracha has been a big critic of pirated music and stolen ideas all his life. How come you managed to appear in such a pirated talk show. As you are being so critical of all these talk shows. How would you rate that show?

Guess all the maulvis are same. Whatever you do yourself is halal, any one else does it, then it becomes haram!
farras
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#11 Posted by farras on September 22, 2008 2:28:32 pm
For the first time in your life, your article seems to make some sense. Its note worthy that the overall feel of the article was much more mature and focused. The objectivity was quite clear and that seems to be a big improvement in your mental approach.

The typical hyper emotional instability was lacking, which indeed is a big positive. Keep it up!!

P.S Looks like nictonie patches are available in Pakistan now!
farras
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#10 Posted by quin on September 22, 2008 12:43:30 pm
"A society whirling helplessly inside a dangerous socio-political flux in which even the most sensible men and women are looking at everyone but themselves to put the blame on for whatever that has gone wrong in the spheres of economics, politics and religion in Pakistan."

Why an ordinary person who has not caused this mess will blame themselves ... do you and I have any control over it?

"...if there are no multinationals sponsoring their shows, there will be no show at all."
WELL SAID
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#9 Posted by saharanpuri on September 22, 2008 11:38:09 am
YLH sahib

Ab aap kya kahenege aalimonline ke ahmadiyon ke katleaam ki lalkar ke bad.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#8 Posted by usamamunir on September 22, 2008 10:58:53 am
its funny when one hypocrite and a showman blames the other of the same thing. i wonder how this works.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#7 Posted by foggy1 on September 22, 2008 10:19:07 am
no,no,no! we must have sensible men and women at all cost. let them blame, it is only a vent under cover. they themselves are threatened by others' s blame. we must keep our viewpoint sensible. it prevents mass hysteria.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#6 Posted by hamza_yusufzai on September 22, 2008 10:09:16 am
clifton u nailed it...he got booted for writing an article in jang for criticizing the queenie of england when she awarded rushdie with the title of sir. Quaid was going...amaan ham yahan unkay tukRROn par paRay hein orr tum hamray...or aankhein dikha rahay hoo mayi baap koo....it just didnt add up
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#5 Posted by rf786 on September 22, 2008 9:49:29 am
Kudos to MQM for dumping Amir Liaqat Hussein, other parties need to follow their example.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#4 Posted by cliftonbridge on September 22, 2008 8:32:19 am
There isnt much morality to this. MQM knows it simply cant afford to cede ground to the religious right because if they make ANY appeasement noises next thing you know karachi urdu speakers will start voting for IJI again.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#3 Posted by hassansiddiqi on September 22, 2008 2:02:17 am
Also, Aamir Liaquat is a perfect example of a hypocrite. He uses religion in a glamorous way in order to sugar coat some of the stupidest and extremist views that are aired on his program. He has bashed US several times but refuses to grill those "scholars" who come on his program because obviously they can never be wrong.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#2 Posted by hassansiddiqi on September 22, 2008 1:56:56 am
GA Muttahida - the most sane, informed and educated political party in Pakistan.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#1 Posted by MeiraJ08 on September 22, 2008 12:02:28 am
Party chief Altaf Hussain and
the MQM Rabita Committee cancelled Liaquat's membership after accusing him of "spreading religious hatred through his TV shows" and going against party policies.

MQM, mqm...where have I heard that name before, weren't these the terrorists, killers, maniacs and s**of****** that ruined my city, not too long ago?
I hate them. Religious Fanaticism, what is that anyway...poof the magic dragon, write on some other topic now. We're bored.

معرآج

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 1-16   1 2

Interact Index

    #27 sajjad_zaidi
    #26 Skeptical
    #25 Naqshbandi
    #24 Naqshbandi
    #23 hamza_yusufzai
    #22 cliftonbridge
    #21 hamza_yusufzai
    #20 hamza_yusufzai
    #19 cliftonbridge
    #18 hamza_yusufzai
    #17 cliftonbridge
    #16 hamza_yusufzai
    #15 crazyghan
    #14 goonga
    #13 Danishafsar
    #12 farras
    #11 farras
    #10 quin
    #9 saharanpuri
    #8 usamamunir
    #7 foggy1
    #6 hamza_yusufzai
    #5 rf786
    #4 cliftonbridge
    #3 hassansiddiqi
    #2 hassansiddiqi
    #1 MeiraJ08

Also by Nadeem F Paracha

  • Thereek-e-Televiban: A Short History
  • Mirror, Mirror
  • The Correct Turn
more »

Similar Articles

  • Am I a Skeptical Muslim? saeed qureshi
  • Science and Enlightenment: East and West Ali Hashmi
  • Seven Reasons to Kill Khalid Sohail
  • The Shrinking Boundaries of Sikhism Dost Mittar
  • Angels and Demons sufia ajaz
more »

Swat: Paradise Lost

  • Swat Calls For Civil Society to Act
  • In Search of Political Will: Fight Against Militants in Swat
  • In memory of the Swat valley
  • The Nightmare Must End
  • In Honor of the Heroes of Swat
more »
get rss feed Get Chowk RSS Feed

Get Chowk Newsletter

Latest Interacts

  • giani_240: Re: # 4 Especially if... Crowning of a Crony
  • kedarnathji: I am reminded of... Crowning of a Crony
  • KHYBER: Agha Amin...impressive article............. 99%... NRO Is Just a
  • RiazHaq: Re: # 3 Nawaz Sharif... NRO Is Just a
  • RiazHaq: The US has already... Crowning of a Crony
  • wiseguyin: Re #1. "... to dealing... Taking The Men Who
  • CheGuevara: I can see what... NRO Is Just a
  • giveabighand: Taking off shoes in... Taking The Men Who

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • The Strange Case of the Indian Channels That Did Not Air the 26/11 Documentary
  • I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
  • Why MQM Wants To Enter Punjab?
  • Uneven Democracy : The Cry from Chhattisgarh
  • The Jehadi Frankenstein
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Kargil: A view from Pakistan
  • An Inward Journey to Pakistan - Part 2
  • The Smart and the Ordinary
  • The News of a Kidnapping
  • Our Real and Imaginary Complexes are Not Complex

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2009 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited