Oh My God

89, U think Muhammed was actually 'selected' by that Jewish God to spread his religion to bedouins?

Tell me who's the real propa arab prophet other than Muhammed himself? Who're David, Solomon, Moses? Arabs?

Look @ the mythology of a winged angel meeting him all the time in a cave. Isn't that Judaic mythology? What abt circumcision? Isn't that Jewish custom? The valve of rational thinking is closed for all momins.

Christians & Muslims are Jewish Mirzais.

Shoaib Daniyal,

Don't worry about your ratings here; they don't matter.

I'm sure someone did recite the 'azaan' in your ear at birth; live up to your committment.

Re: # 82
VRV,

"Muhammed is another m.....ac who imported the Jewish God lock stock barrel to arabs and sold that God & religion to bedouins."

What a fool you are (one who is deficient in judgment, sense, or understanding).

With all the J-people and their learned Rabbis around, inventing or concocting was out of the question.

�क बार �क मूर�ख, हमेशा �क मूर�ख!

Re: # 85
Satan,

"Tahir Mian (for mian read katua)"

A slang used to describe Muslim male in north India. The word katua means, the one who is cut up (circumcised)in hindustani. A slang used to describe Muslim male in north India. The word katua means, the one who is cut up (circumcised)in hindustani.

Thanks for the compliment but I cannot comment further as you are a male interactor!

But hey, I pity you.

यदि आप खतना नहीं कर रहे हैं आप समस�याओं का होगा

Re: # 79

Sanatani,

See unfortunately all abic cults are actually inverted pyramids sooner or later they will collapse.

Then all you have to do is wait, mian. I suggest a holiday in Swat to pass the time.

Re:#86
dost_mittar,

Agree with para 2 and 3 of yours. M.F. Hussain is no ideal and maybe its futile to even expect him to be one.

Btw, I think, Daniyal and Daniel are from the same tradition. The firangs just anglicise it. Something like Isa and Jesus, I think.

Regards,
Shoaib

Nice article, shoab, as everyone else has said, too. You have also perfectly summed up my views about our politicians in your #20.

I also agree with the person who pointed to the cowardice of MF Hussain who "bravely" fights the hindutva thugs but caved in so easily in withdrawing his film Meenaxi when a few people objected to a rather innocent use of an adjective to describe a person which some people felt could only be used for the prophet.

But let me add a little caveat. I think that the people protesting against the article in the Statesman and those protesting the girls in skimpy clothes frequenting bars were also exercising their rights of free speech; however, they cross their limits when they beat up the girls whose actions they don't like or burn a bookstore because it carries a book that they don't approve of.

BTW, I was shopping for some bangles from a maniharan (muslim) in Jaipur last week and her son's name was the same as yours. I asked her if that name was a variation of the Christian Daniel; she said that no, it was from Dani, like Dani Karan. :)

Re: # 76

Tahir Mian (for mian read katua),

Kya Zamana a gaya hai ab keval gaaliyan he de sakte ho.

Sanatani

corr

..but making lives of ppl miserable in that name is dangerous.

If u had foregone ur foreskin u too'd have been taunting us the way these Pakistanis are doing. So keep sanity and leave India's security to the Army.

Islam is a fascist religion and I am aware of its dangers but making lives of ppl in that name is dangerous.

Sanatani,

Rama and Krishna are not Sanatanic gods. They're extrapolations of some smart, shrewd clergy. Even u can become a godman now and a god later. It's all in our superstitious minds (in India). The real God of vedic ppl is Indra the God of Gods. He's superceded by multitudes of Gods.

Jesus was a maniac who declared himself as the son of God. Muhammed is another maniac who imported the Jewish God lock stock barrel to arabs and sold that God & religion to bedouins.

The true Indic path is the follow truth. The post-modern world has created a mechanism i.e. scientific way of seeking truth. U can keep ur faiths to satisfy ur faint heart but rejecting science is rejecting all we are enjoying in this world. The standard of life that we enjoy is equal to employing 6000 slaves in ancient times. No thanks to gods but thanks to our own (collective) efforts.

No book represents the ultimate truth.

The '47 is long gone and dont make lives of future Indians unbearable with ur poisonous thinking.

No Regards,

V

Re: # 50

Wrong nb BTW is it a short form of nabi.

You see we are reviving the Hindu Mahasabha and importing the concept of wajib-ul-qatl, Dhimmi and Jaziya from Islam into the Sanatan Dharam, Hindu Samaj and Bharat Mata.

All 4M's to be wajib. All parsis, jews and bahais to live as dhimmis and pay Jaziya.

Maharishi Hanbal Zindabad
Maharishi Jaffar Zindabad

How does Vidhi-e-Jaffariya al Hanud sound

Re: # 49

VRV I would love to meet your parents. I wonder kya kha ke tujhe paida kiya.

Wow what a back handed compliment to me and a front handed slap to the muslai.

Thank You
Sanatani

BTW I and al of us like me do not just wish to take revenge for 47 it is for everything from 683 AD to 1947 and all that with interest

Re: # 42

Go and read Bharatvani and try and refute ANYTHING that is ANYTHING written there regarding all abrahamic cults.

Jews are bad, Christains Worst and muslai well they are like viruses nothing good can ever come from them but the problem is not the muslais it is Islam.

Also we are not talking of an empirical correlation but his own actions which are explicitly stated in the koran.

See unfortunately all abic cults are actually inverted pyramids sooner or later they will collapse.


Sanatani

Re: # 41

Bhagwan Shri Ram Chandra Ji was not a wife tormentor it was Lakshman??? How

Bhagwan Shri Krishna Ji was not a whore master but a divine lover.

And VRV even if we accept what you have said is true even then it does not make a difference.

The differnce between a true natural religion (and for that matter the only one despite its faults) and murderous political ideologies like marxism, mullahism, missionaryism and macaulayism is that the former is the search inwards to unite with the almighty the latter the glorification of narcisstic swine with a lot of external form and ABSOLUTELY NO substance.

You do not anger me or even provoke contempt. You are to be pitied.

But even pity is an emotion wasted towards you.

Regards
Sanatani

Is Vir Singhvi reading Chowk? Haha.


http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?sectionName=Ho mePage&id=630b8c69-4672-4e12-ac2a-a9073f5165d4&MatchID1=4932&TeamID1 =7&TeamID2=8&MatchType1=1&SeriesID1=1247&PrimaryID=4932&Head line=Stand+up+to+the+mullahs


Several points need to be made about the incident.

First: The article itself. There is not one line in Hari’s piece that I would disagree with. If religions deserve respect, then so does atheism. Followers of religions have every right to their views and practices. But so do atheists have the right to criticise religion. Nothing in this world is above criticism.

Two: The rioters said they were offended by a passage in the article where Hari referred to the Prophet’s marriage to a much younger woman and his directive to burn Jewish villages. (In all fairness, he was as critical of other religions and of the Israeli assault on the West Bank.)

The rioters say that nobody can criticise any aspect of the Prophet’s life.

Why?

There’s no shortage of books and articles criticising Jesus, suggesting that he might have been secretly married (as in The DaVinci Code), arguing that the resurrection was a hoax or that Mary was never a virgin.

Similarly, would mainstream Hindus be offended if somebody wrote that Hindu mythology features practices that we would find abhorrent today: one wife for five husbands as in the Mahabharat, the compulsive philandering of Krishna or the appalling mistreatment of Sita (the agni pariksha etc)?

Some Hindu extremists may protest but I doubt if they would get very far with their objections. The community, as a whole, would shrug its shoulders and many Hindus will agree with the critics.

-------

nemesis3,

We can discuss the finer points of our mythologies but there's always a view that Krishna was a conman.

Look at those who were named after a river, by the Persians, speak so highly of their colourful hand-handed un-godlike ancestors!

Perish in your rage for promoting anarchy.