Saima Shah February 27, 2009
#99 Posted by Majid81 on August 27, 2009 4:06:11 pm
have you ever came through Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan's "gorakh dhanda" a sufi stuff. It exactly says what you are saying and much more. Gorakh Dhanda in actual was written by Naz Khayalvi, a poet belong to Faisalabad, Pakistan, and sung by Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan.
I certainly recommend you to listen to "gorakh dhanda". you may find it on a lot of websites, e.g., youtube.
I certainly recommend you to listen to "gorakh dhanda". you may find it on a lot of websites, e.g., youtube.
#98 Posted by tahir on March 5, 2009 3:05:03 am
Re: # 92
Nem,
"You did not touch upon the points that you were capable of reacting though"
If I interact here, how will I write I-logs?
"They are meant to rub salt into the injury..."
Then by the same token, I must cry all the time at ChowQ about our minor setbacks!
"You chose a right sentence from my interact to give a wrong answer."
Enlighten me O wise one! How, which, where?
:)
Nem,
"You did not touch upon the points that you were capable of reacting though"
If I interact here, how will I write I-logs?
"They are meant to rub salt into the injury..."
Then by the same token, I must cry all the time at ChowQ about our minor setbacks!
"You chose a right sentence from my interact to give a wrong answer."
Enlighten me O wise one! How, which, where?
:)
#97 Posted by tahir on March 5, 2009 3:01:05 am
Re: # 94
"tahir thinks that killing of mushriques is good for them....because Islam is correct....."
Your thinking is all warped, Laddulius Caeser!
Lend me your Roman ear; I believe in what the Lord of the entire mankind (and more) has revealed. I'm sure you know the verses by heart now!
:)
"tahir thinks that killing of mushriques is good for them....because Islam is correct....."
Your thinking is all warped, Laddulius Caeser!
Lend me your Roman ear; I believe in what the Lord of the entire mankind (and more) has revealed. I'm sure you know the verses by heart now!
:)
#96 Posted by nemesis3 on March 4, 2009 7:07:18 am
#89 Posted by tahir
You chose a right sentence from my interact to give a wrong answer.
You chose a right sentence from my interact to give a wrong answer.
#95 Posted by laddu on March 4, 2009 6:17:20 am
"Muslims submit to God, the Prophets, and the revealed Books, but you follow your own vain desires."
Nonsense, they all follow their debased desires for that whore house called jannah.
Hindus reject the Jannah for bliss of Moksha in this life and forever.
There is no other path - and mullah's seductive stories about that whore house in after life is just a cheap ploy.
when would muslims see through this cheap trick!!
Nonsense, they all follow their debased desires for that whore house called jannah.
Hindus reject the Jannah for bliss of Moksha in this life and forever.
There is no other path - and mullah's seductive stories about that whore house in after life is just a cheap ploy.
when would muslims see through this cheap trick!!
#94 Posted by laddu on March 4, 2009 6:12:21 am
tahir thinks that killing of mushriques is good for them....because Islam is correct.....
no tahir ji??
no tahir ji??
#93 Posted by nemesis3 on March 4, 2009 5:51:40 am
#91 Posted by tahir
They are not based on religion-politics. They are meant to rub salt into the injury, forgetting that your ancestors also suffered humiliation in equal measure.
They are not based on religion-politics. They are meant to rub salt into the injury, forgetting that your ancestors also suffered humiliation in equal measure.
#92 Posted by nemesis3 on March 4, 2009 5:43:29 am
#89 Posted by tahir
You did not touch upon the points that you were capable of reacting though
You did not touch upon the points that you were capable of reacting though
#91 Posted by tahir on March 4, 2009 5:42:43 am
While Muslim missiles having religion-politics based names, the Indus-ian ones are rooted in Indu mythology; both methods are fine.
Would a missile launched in your direction soothe your nerves more if it were named Sabr (patience) or Shukr (thankfulness)?
:)
Would a missile launched in your direction soothe your nerves more if it were named Sabr (patience) or Shukr (thankfulness)?
:)
#90 Posted by tahir on March 4, 2009 5:39:06 am
Re: # 87
Nem,
"I think maulana ji has given a soothing answer in his ilog. I think this should convince you too."
He must honour the 'saugandh' he has taken to insult Muslims who killed ancestors he has no clue about.
COLDPLAY song: Stuck in reverse...
Nem,
"I think maulana ji has given a soothing answer in his ilog. I think this should convince you too."
He must honour the 'saugandh' he has taken to insult Muslims who killed ancestors he has no clue about.
COLDPLAY song: Stuck in reverse...
#89 Posted by tahir on March 4, 2009 5:36:18 am
Re: # 88
Nem,
"Is there any instance of any muslim condescending to say that Ghajanavi or Ghauri were wrong?
The missiles were created and named by the military, and the people didn't cast lots on what to name them.
Contact out GHQ please for further assistance.
Nem,
"Is there any instance of any muslim condescending to say that Ghajanavi or Ghauri were wrong?
The missiles were created and named by the military, and the people didn't cast lots on what to name them.
Contact out GHQ please for further assistance.
#88 Posted by nemesis3 on March 4, 2009 4:04:34 am
#87
Maulana ji,
Your consternation vis-s-vis arjun's action is perfectly understandable. You wanted everyone, irrespective of faith to condemn this incidence. Many supported you too. Speaking about babri masjid demolition, Congress publicly apologized for the event without even trying to listen to the proponents of the destruction.
Is there any instance of any muslim condescending to say that Ghajanavi or Ghauri were wrong?
Maulana ji,
Your consternation vis-s-vis arjun's action is perfectly understandable. You wanted everyone, irrespective of faith to condemn this incidence. Many supported you too. Speaking about babri masjid demolition, Congress publicly apologized for the event without even trying to listen to the proponents of the destruction.
Is there any instance of any muslim condescending to say that Ghajanavi or Ghauri were wrong?
#87 Posted by nemesis3 on March 4, 2009 3:53:04 am
#86 Posted by laddu
"But watch fitna and you would find prominent mullahs of present times saying something to the effect that Allah is happy whenever a mushrique is killed...."
I think maulana ji has given a soothing answer in his ilog as below:
"not many know Arabic (the language of the Qur'an). The preachers in their lectures (Friday sermons etc.) gloss over things. The result: certain ideas out-of-the-Book become fixed in the mind while others are not entertained at all. Individuals find little time to search or re-search on their own. "
I think this should convince you too.
#85 Posted by tahir
"Ask those who did that. Can I question you about what your future generations will indulge in, can you be answerable NOW?"
I know it is impossible to seek justification from the perpetrators. But what pinches is that over such a long period, no muslim has come out in the open to accept that those excesses were unislamic. Far from that, many prefer to quote those ugly events to brow-beat Indians and claiming superiority over them using cliches such as 1000 year slavery. Arsenals are named as Ghauri and Ghajanavi.
But one is utterly confused when, in the background of such happenings, one claims that Koran is against criticising and humiliating other religion. By this analogy, there is no man in your country who can call himself a muslim.
I am willing to be corrected.
"But watch fitna and you would find prominent mullahs of present times saying something to the effect that Allah is happy whenever a mushrique is killed...."
I think maulana ji has given a soothing answer in his ilog as below:
"not many know Arabic (the language of the Qur'an). The preachers in their lectures (Friday sermons etc.) gloss over things. The result: certain ideas out-of-the-Book become fixed in the mind while others are not entertained at all. Individuals find little time to search or re-search on their own. "
I think this should convince you too.
#85 Posted by tahir
"Ask those who did that. Can I question you about what your future generations will indulge in, can you be answerable NOW?"
I know it is impossible to seek justification from the perpetrators. But what pinches is that over such a long period, no muslim has come out in the open to accept that those excesses were unislamic. Far from that, many prefer to quote those ugly events to brow-beat Indians and claiming superiority over them using cliches such as 1000 year slavery. Arsenals are named as Ghauri and Ghajanavi.
But one is utterly confused when, in the background of such happenings, one claims that Koran is against criticising and humiliating other religion. By this analogy, there is no man in your country who can call himself a muslim.
I am willing to be corrected.
#86 Posted by laddu on March 3, 2009 5:16:29 pm
Re: # 85
you mean killing of mushriques like me today would not send modern times Islamists to Jannah.........but would be sent to Jahannum??
Now that is a news!!
But watch fitna and you would find prominent mullahs of present times saying something to the effect that Allah is happy whenever a mushrique is killed........
you mean killing of mushriques like me today would not send modern times Islamists to Jannah.........but would be sent to Jahannum??
Now that is a news!!
But watch fitna and you would find prominent mullahs of present times saying something to the effect that Allah is happy whenever a mushrique is killed........
#85 Posted by tahir on March 3, 2009 10:27:03 am
Re: # 83
"Please tell me the significance of killing mushriques and destroying their idols?"
Ask those who did that. Can I question you about what your future generations will indulge in, can you be answerable NOW? So why ask me, God will listen to your arguments I assure you, and punish the guilty.
Shanti.
PS: check out my i-log now.
"Please tell me the significance of killing mushriques and destroying their idols?"
Ask those who did that. Can I question you about what your future generations will indulge in, can you be answerable NOW? So why ask me, God will listen to your arguments I assure you, and punish the guilty.
Shanti.
PS: check out my i-log now.
#84 Posted by laddu on March 3, 2009 8:14:24 am
The Circle of Darkness
When Muslims say something about the Quran, by the time they finish they forget what they said in the beginning. Their argument goes in circles:
This is how they prove their claim that ‘the Quran is divine’: The Quran is divine because it is a perfect and error free book.
And this how they prove their claim that ‘the Quran contains no errors’: It is illogical to say the Quran contains errors, because it is divine and perfect.
This is what I call the Islamic circle of darkness.
When Muslims say something about the Quran, by the time they finish they forget what they said in the beginning. Their argument goes in circles:
This is how they prove their claim that ‘the Quran is divine’: The Quran is divine because it is a perfect and error free book.
And this how they prove their claim that ‘the Quran contains no errors’: It is illogical to say the Quran contains errors, because it is divine and perfect.
This is what I call the Islamic circle of darkness.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- Diesel: punjabi mole hi ex... NRO Is Just a
- HisExcellency: re: Agha Amin wrote: "NRO... NRO Is Just a
- Mr.India: Breaking News: Vajpayee,... The Jehadi Frankenstein
- Mr.India: Vajpayee, Advani pseudo-moderates, Liberhan... The Jehadi Frankenstein
- Diesel: so mulla omar was... Crowning of a Crony
- Diesel: the allegation by NAB... NRO Is Just a
- Diesel: the allegation by NAB... NRO Is Just a
- tahmed11: #6 jay thakeray is... Morality of Lawyers' Movement








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content