Biases of the American Press

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts

Re: Shankar and macgupta

Folks, the way the Bush administration is handling its international relations, one aspect of its tenor is becoming increasingly clear.

This administration, unlike past republican governments, is not isolationist, but unilaterist in approach to international affairs.

If you look at its intentions vis-a-vis the national missile defense; Kyoto climate treaty; irking China; and generally acting outside the gambit of international relations, it is risking its own isolation. Granted that the United States, as a sole super power will act on its own interests, but it has to deal in way that does not anger other countries. If European Union goes ahead with the ratification of Kyoto, Washington will find itself isolated in its own traditional sphere of influence: Europe.

Already, Russia is angered by the American dominated NATO drive to move towards the Russian border and if United States continues with its arms sales to Taiwan, it seriously risks seeing a Sino-Russian entente against it in Asia.

India may harbor ideas about playing China against America, but India has to tread carefully if it wants to avoid irritating Russian interests. Russian and Chinese interests will take predominance over Indian aspirations, because both Moscow and Beijing want to be the next bi-polar powers in Asia with the express intention of containing American influence in the area. Both China and Russia may disagree with each other, but they will agree to the fact that American influence is not a good thing for their policies in Asia.

India will have to do a clever diplomatic balancing act and given the ``wild card`` of Pakistan, India cannot afford to let Pakistan emerge as a Chinese protége in a regional sense. Iran is tilting towards Russia (in defense related matters and in gaining nuclear technology from Russia) and if India is not careful, it will be identified as a nation ``running with the foxes while hunting with the hounds``.

India will have to pick a side and stick with it. This may be a fine game plan, given a BJP rule, but if Congress returns to power, it may redirect India towards a non-aligned status and that would seriously annoy the Americans, who have every intention of playing India against China. Hence, India has more to close than gain in this new Asian ``great game`` of the 21st century.

Like I mentioned in my article, The Asian Waltz, there is a new game in Asia and its rules are just emerging. It will be really interesting to see how this game develops and how the nations of Asia team in the process!

Ciao!

Ref png #: 67

[I am sickened with snobbish attitude of indians who think they or their country are so better. They try to be in league with other nuclear powers when most of their own people are living in the same slumps as in Pakistan, Sri Lanka or Bangladesh (P/S/B). Their literacy rate is at par with P/S/B.]

You are wrong here. The literacy rate in Sri Lanka is in excess of 89% whereas in India it is around 54%. Get your facts right.

The fact that Sri Lanka has a higher literacy rate doesn`t prevent them from being stupid in their treatment of their 20% minority Tamils.

Don`t attempt to compare that to the plight of Kashmiris. The Kashmiris constitute less than 1% of India`s population and will be squelched like cockroaches.

Ferozk :

Non-alignment has far too often (seemed to me) to be geared towards Indian leaders` need to play to a gallery and primp their egos rather than a means to advance India`s interests.

India does have opportunities opening up; but you are right that each opportunity brings with it the possibility of loss.

-Arun

As an aside, check out the following news

``Talibanisation of Americas.``

April 3, 2001

Web posted at: 3:23 PM EDT (1923 GMT)

http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/04/03/hairless.fines/index.html

MACCLESFIELD, North Carolina (AP) -- Some clean-shaven guys could find themselves in a hairy situation in a couple of weeks. Beard-growing is now mandatory in Macclesfield, North Carolina. Any male without at least some stubble growing by April 15 will be subject to arrest and-or a 25 dollar fine.

Local officials enacted the beard ordinance to celebrate the town`s 100th birthday. Organizers say beard-growing is an old English tradition for special occasions.

But Gene Wallace says he`s ready to go to jail rather than risk his wife`s wrath. He says he grew a beard once, but she didn`t like it. Wallace notes that law or no-law, he still has to live with her.

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts

Dost-mittar #55 and Neptune #65

[I also discovered that Dhaka is named after a Hindu goddess, Dhakeshwri, to which an ancient temple is dedicated in Dhaka. But what I found even more interesting was that none of my muslim friends in Dhaka (of which I made many during my stay) knew about this origin of their city`s name.]

Well, no. It is actually the other way round. The name Dhakeshwari (literally - goddess of Dhaka) is derived from Dhaka



The name Dhaka is apprently derived from ``Dhaak`` trees which may have been in abundance at that time. There are many such names around:

eg.

Plassy: Palash

Champaran:Champa Aranya or Forest of Champa trees

Bakait

Harimau # 70

``The Kashmiris constitute less than 1% of India`s population and will be squelched like cockroaches.``

Are you for real?

``May the flies of a thousand camels reside in your armpits``

C. Klinger

Ferozk#69

``India will have to do a clever diplomatic balancing act and given the ``wild card`` of Pakistan, India cannot afford to let Pakistan emerge as a Chinese protége in a regional sense. Iran is tilting towards Russia (in defense related matters and in gaining nuclear technology from Russia) and if India is not careful, it will be identified as a nation ``running with the foxes while hunting with the hounds``.

``

Actually the situation is extremely complicated from Indian point of view. India does not want to go in the bad books of Russia as it is its main supplier of defence equipments. At the same time India, at this juncture can not afford to rile up Chinese. If Russia and China team up together to prevent US from making inroads into Asia, India would be in an unenviable situation. Given its economic and geopolitical interests, it would be inviting a big trouble if it antagonises Russia-China combine. China can cause India a lot of harm if they apply themselves to it, and in absence of Russia to fall back on in Asia, it would be a disaster inspite of American support. So India should keep itself away from this power game and at least not become a stooge of USA. India should strive to maximise her economic interests and lay low till it becomes an economic power to match Chinese(ie double its GDP from $480bn to a trillion(Chinese) ). But it requires some ingenuity to prosper without siding any party overtly. The useless rhetoric of non alignment will not work. India has everything to loose and little to gain in the kind of situation you hypothesize.

Ref binifer #: 78

[``The Kashmiris constitute less than 1% of India`s population and will be squelched like cockroaches.``

Are you for real?]

Yes, sweetheart, I am for real. I post in plain English home truths that Pakistanis, fervent believers in Islam, their fellow-travellers and hand-wringing Hindu apologists don`t like to hear.

[``May the flies of a thousand camels reside in your armpits``]

Would those flies have to be of Arab or Chinese origin or would sand flies of the Thar desert be acceptable to true-blue Pakistanis?

Re: arjun_m # 73

Just a point of clarification.

My reference to Bush`s revised cold war policies was meant in the sense that it seeks confrontation instead of consensus in forging international policies.

United States does not have to support Pakistan like it did during the cold war, because India has more strategic importance for it than Pakistan - in terms of trade.

I am against United States` support of Pakistan, because Pakistanis will blindly implement Washington`s bidding and when United States` interests change, Pakistanis will complain of being ignored by the United States. United States` alliance is the worst thing, which can happen to Pakistan and in my opinion, Pakistan will be far less worse off it tries to exist without United States` patronage.

An alliance with the United States is rational decision if that decision is taken within a realistic assesment of the prevailing geo-political situation. Pakistan has a very childish concept of foreign policy. It believes in giving absolute loyality and it accepts absolute loyality in return and that is a very flawed premise upon, which to decide foreign policy.

Therein lies the rub. Pakistan needs to come up with a rational foreign policy based on pragmatic realizations of its security considerations and not on emotionalism.

Pakistan is a very emotional nation prone knee jerk acts of myopia cursed with a unwillingness to admit to its past mistakes.

Hence, Pakistan continues to make make wrong decisions, because it never learns from its mistakes and simply compounds the problem endlessly.

Ciao!

RE: Haramiu # 70

[``The Kashmiris constitute less than 1% of India`s population and will be squelched like cockroaches.``]

Thats what your intolerant and bigoted religion teaches you... that humans are inherently unequal... made from brahma`s head, feet or arse... can be as high as the brahmins or can be sub-human cockroaches like muslims and shudras.

Like communism and stalinism, the civilised world must rid itself of this inhuman, unnatural religion; along with its bigoted followers if necessary.

re feorzk #69

My friend, the problem with your and Rockefeller`s brand of Republican foreign policy was that it was without principle and without power. Your liberal Republican foreign policy was based on nonsense do-gooderism that got America into the Cold War in the first place. You guys like Hatfield and Dan Coats were apologetic when Reagan asked the Commie s.o.b.s to get the h * * * out of Afghanistan, Poland and Nicaragua. You guys don`t believe it but the USSR or the Berlin Wall didn`t crumble from within. The Reagan Revolution brought them down. China and Russia today will have to be negotiated with principle not flaccidity. And if the pinlo French and the neo-Nazi Germans want to criticise the US, well what`s new? The only concern W ought to have is the national interest of the USA and the promotion of global freedom.

Feroz, I hate to break it to you, but the liberal Republicans lost in 1976 and the nazi Republicans in 1996; either you are an internationalist pro-business Republican or something from a different time.

Interesting article about India in Pakistani press :

http://www.newsline.com.pk/html/impressions.html

Sincerely,