unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

Is Jehad Passe’?

Aqil Shah December 21, 2001

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 144-160   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

#2 Posted by sarwar on January 2, 2001 2:49:55 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#1 Posted by sattar2 on January 1, 2001 9:49:02 pm
Re Tahmed (#142):

You have picked a very convenient time to “agree to disagree” …right when I started to press you for some details of your vague and grand plans to revive Islam by human development, education, and rational thinking and when I questioned your unrealistic expectations of Islamic fanatics turning into caring and compassionate and rational beings. I also pointed out that similar vague and grand plans have been in place and have utterly failed for the past thousand or so years. It is at this juncture that you simply “agree to disagree”, while failing to provide any arguments to support your claims and expectations.

Similarly you have not commented as I have pointed out that your statements are clearly contradicted by Quran. This includes your comment that Mohammad`s personality is of almost no significance in the Quran and also that Quran is neither necessary nor sufficient for progress of Muslims.

This is a continuation of your lame approach when you contradicted my statement that there is no Quranic basis for finality of proophethood. You told me I was wrong, but failed to provide any arguments to support your claim. On the other hand I provided some arguments from Quran, but you did not discuss these either. You only stubbornly insisted that Sattar is wrong.

When you contradict claims made by others and make counter claims, you have the intellectual responsibility to support your position by providing arguments. Merely making counter claims generates noise and makes for a childish shouting match. It is a mark of arrogance and shows lack of courtesy.

Moving along …

You still not have understood my position, as indicated by your summary of the argument. My position of following the divine messages and deriving inspiration from the shinning examples of the prophets covers more than what you have understood so far. I have continuously argued that the divine scripture (i.e. Quran) provides the necessary framework within which true human progress can take place. First understanding this “framework” is important, which means accepting the presence of the divine in one’s life and making Him the focus of one’s devotion. Once this is done, humans need to exercise their faculties for development and progress … at individual level, at national level, as well as for the benefit of the entire mankind. This includes education, physical fitness, studying sciences, developing technology, maintaining law and order, and more.

This, I have argued, has happened numerous times in this history of the mankind and Allah’s prophets have been instrumental in its implementation. This is fully supported by Quran and is one of the reasons I believe in continuation of prophethood. As I pointed out earlier, continuation of prophethood is further confirmed by the study of Quran.

Now, if you’d like to counter my claim, do provide some supporting arguments, and counter the arguments that I raised earlier on this board. However if you merely choose once again to voice your opinion without any supporting arguments, I’ll consider this to be your preferred method of discourse, and desperately hope that this is not how you plan to reform the Muslims of the world.

Regards,

Asad



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 144-160   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Interact Index

    #145 tahmed321
    #144 sattar2
    #143 shammi
    #142 tahmed321
    #141 tahmed321
    #140 nasah
    #139 nasah
    #138 sattar2
    #137 Fatimah
    #136 sigalph235
    #135 tahmed321
    #134 soysauce
    #133 nasah
    #132 tahmed321
    #131 tahmed321
    #130 nasah
    #129 tahmed321
    #128 Layman
    #127 Deepika
    #126 Brad Cruise
    #125 M.A.Jinnah
    #124 DRUMZ
    #123 sarwar
    #122 anNy
    #121 sattar2
    #120 sattar2
    #119 mohajir
    #118 harimau
    #117 semipreciousme
    #116 arjuna
    #115 RanaRansher
    #114 RanaRansher
    #113 Fatimah
    #112 Fatimah
    #111 sigalph235
    #146 sifzal
    #110 DRUMZ
    #109 sigalph235
    #108 tahmed321
    #107 tahmed321
    #106 jay
    #105 OmarAkram
    #104 sattar2
    #103 shammi
    #102 shammi
    #101 narain
    #100 SameerJB
    #99 shammi
    #98 rsaxena
    #97 RanaRansher
    #96 RanaRansher
    #95 tahmed321
    #94 tahmed321
    #93 nasah
    #92 ali1
    #91 Fatimah
    #90 soysauce
    #89 Pardesi
    #88 jay
    #87 sattar2
    #86 sigalph235
    #85 sigalph235
    #84 Humsab
    #83 nasah
    #82 OmarAkram
    #81 sattar2
    #80 ali1
    #79 Pardesi
    #78 tahmed321
    #77 saminashah
    #76 saminashah
    #75 Humsab
    #74 AAmir
    #73 Trojan Horse
    #72 sigalph235
    #71 OmarAkram
    #70 jay
    #69 Ras Siddiqui
    #68 sigalph235
    #67 tahmed321
    #66 Banjaara
    #65 Humsab
    #64 Humsab
    #63 tahmed321
    #62 tahmed321
    #61 sigalph235
    #60 Bapu
    #59 SameerJB
    #58 OmarAkram
    #57 babu
    #56 Snoopy
    #55 shammi
    #54 Trojan Horse
    #53 rsaxena
    #52 jay
    #51 nasah
    #50 nasah
    #49 tahmed321
    #48 tahmed321
    #47 Lajwanti
    #46 sigalph235
    #45 sigalph235
    #44 soysauce
    #43 rsaxena
    #42 harimau
    #41 shammi
    #40 shammi
    #39 jay
    #38 ali1
    #37 ferozk
    #36 Mateen
    #35 semipreciousme
    #34 Assad_K
    #33 OmarAkram
    #32 hobbyty
    #31 jay
    #30 ahmedmadani
    #29 SameerJB
    #28 Pardesi
    #27 ahmedmadani
    #26 nasah
    #25 ahmedmadani
    #24 shammi
    #23 rsaxena
    #22 ferozk
    #21 narain
    #20 audio-video-rad
    #19 ahmedmadani
    #18 jay
    #17 jay
    #16 sarwar
    #15 Syed Ahmed
    #14 _digit
    #13 Romair
    #12 rozaiba
    #11 mohajir
    #10 mohajir
    #9 mohajir
    #8 Trojan Horse
    #7 Aq
    #6 sattar2
    #5 tahmed321
    #4 sattar2
    #3 tahmed321
    #2 sarwar
    #1 sattar2

Latest Interacts

  • nb: And back to NFP's... The Correct Turn
  • nb: I didn't know that,... The Correct Turn
  • akcheema: Re: # 182; nb thanks... The Correct Turn
  • nb: Cheema, hing is asafoetida... The Correct Turn
  • akcheema: Re: # 180 yaar nb... The Correct Turn
  • nb: HP, if it was... The Correct Turn
  • akcheema: dost_mittar and hamidm sahibaan,... The Correct Turn
  • ahmedmadani: When we who write... Politics of PPP and

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • The Correct Turn
  • G-8: RIP?
  • Urdu News Columnists and Anchors -- should we always believe them?
  • Politics of PPP and Asif Zardari
  • Hop Aboard the Interfaith Express
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • On Being an Ex-Expatriate
  • Incantation
  • Choona Aur Chooriyan
  • Phool Na Loon to Kiya Karoon?
  • A Candid Interview With Saeed Anwar

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited