Tariq Ali December 30, 2001
#1 Posted by AAmir on January 1, 2001 12:50:32 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#2 Posted by Fatimah on January 1, 2001 12:50:32 pm
Dec-31-01 21:7:37 EST Reply #: 7
jay.
````You have no idea about islam, first join some madrassa and learn.
A muslim woman seeing a non-muslim is a honourkilling crime. Imagine the muslim girl converting to another religion. ``]]
Its not Tariq who needs to learn but ninicoompoop like you.This btw is AnNys favourite vocabulary ,& she as a muslim women can teach you few things herself
Hindu Women VS Muslim Women
The Brahmins make a big campaign that Islam restricts the freedom of
women. Let us compare the positions of the Hindu woman and the Muslim
woman. See the following facts for comparison and then try to bring
these Brahmins to their senses.
The Hindu Woman:
1. The Hindu Woman has no right to divorce her husband.
2. She has no property or inheritance rights.
3. Choice of partner is limited because she can only marry within her
own caste; moreover her horoscope must match that of the intending
bridegroom/family.
4. The family of the girl has to offer an enormous dowry to the
bridegroom/family.
5. If her husband dies she should commit Sati (being cremated with her
dead husband). Since today`s law forbids Sati, society mainly punishes
her in other ``holy`` ways (see below).
6. She cannot remarry.
7. The widow is considered to be a curse and must not be seen in public.
She cannot wear jewelry or colourful clothes. (She should not even take
part in her children`s marriage!)
8. Child and infant marriage is encouraged.
The Muslim Woman:
1.The Muslim woman has the same right as the Muslim man in all matters
including divorce.
2. She enjoys property and inheritance rights. (Which other religion
grants women these rights?). She can also conduct her own separate
business.
3. She can marry any Muslim of her choice. If her parents choose a
partner for her, her consent must be taken.
4. The dowry in Islam is a gift from a husband to his wife (not the
other way around as is practiced by some ignorant Muslims).
5. A Muslim widow is encouraged to remarry, and her remarriage is the
responsibility of the Muslim society.
6.Mixed marriage is encouraged and is a means to prevent racism creeping
in society.
7. A Muslim mother is given the highest form of respect.
What right do the Hindus have to criticize the Muslims? Have you ever
heard of a Muslim burning his wife? In India women die daily of dowry
deaths, Hindu women being burnt by the husband or in-laws. It is a fact
that upper caste Hindus ill-treat their women. The Brahmins are trying
to claim that Muslims do not give freedom to their women. I ask you
again. ``Do the Hindus respect their women?``
You be the judge.
jay.
````You have no idea about islam, first join some madrassa and learn.
A muslim woman seeing a non-muslim is a honourkilling crime. Imagine the muslim girl converting to another religion. ``]]
Its not Tariq who needs to learn but ninicoompoop like you.This btw is AnNys favourite vocabulary ,& she as a muslim women can teach you few things herself
Hindu Women VS Muslim Women
The Brahmins make a big campaign that Islam restricts the freedom of
women. Let us compare the positions of the Hindu woman and the Muslim
woman. See the following facts for comparison and then try to bring
these Brahmins to their senses.
The Hindu Woman:
1. The Hindu Woman has no right to divorce her husband.
2. She has no property or inheritance rights.
3. Choice of partner is limited because she can only marry within her
own caste; moreover her horoscope must match that of the intending
bridegroom/family.
4. The family of the girl has to offer an enormous dowry to the
bridegroom/family.
5. If her husband dies she should commit Sati (being cremated with her
dead husband). Since today`s law forbids Sati, society mainly punishes
her in other ``holy`` ways (see below).
6. She cannot remarry.
7. The widow is considered to be a curse and must not be seen in public.
She cannot wear jewelry or colourful clothes. (She should not even take
part in her children`s marriage!)
8. Child and infant marriage is encouraged.
The Muslim Woman:
1.The Muslim woman has the same right as the Muslim man in all matters
including divorce.
2. She enjoys property and inheritance rights. (Which other religion
grants women these rights?). She can also conduct her own separate
business.
3. She can marry any Muslim of her choice. If her parents choose a
partner for her, her consent must be taken.
4. The dowry in Islam is a gift from a husband to his wife (not the
other way around as is practiced by some ignorant Muslims).
5. A Muslim widow is encouraged to remarry, and her remarriage is the
responsibility of the Muslim society.
6.Mixed marriage is encouraged and is a means to prevent racism creeping
in society.
7. A Muslim mother is given the highest form of respect.
What right do the Hindus have to criticize the Muslims? Have you ever
heard of a Muslim burning his wife? In India women die daily of dowry
deaths, Hindu women being burnt by the husband or in-laws. It is a fact
that upper caste Hindus ill-treat their women. The Brahmins are trying
to claim that Muslims do not give freedom to their women. I ask you
again. ``Do the Hindus respect their women?``
You be the judge.
#3 Posted by anNy on January 1, 2001 12:50:32 pm
unkal jay:
``There was no need for you to state that you are not the famous tariq ali, your article says it all, you are a ninicompoomp``
really unkal jay..if u must copy the terms i use at least use them properly..its not ninicompoop..its nincompoop
``There was no need for you to state that you are not the famous tariq ali, your article says it all, you are a ninicompoomp``
really unkal jay..if u must copy the terms i use at least use them properly..its not ninicompoop..its nincompoop
#4 Posted by Rage on January 1, 2001 12:50:32 pm
Harimau, Jay,
Reconverting to Hinduism after one has become a Muslim is akin to a human devolving to hanuman.
Reconverting to Hinduism after one has become a Muslim is akin to a human devolving to hanuman.
#5 Posted by saminashah on January 1, 2001 12:50:32 pm
Mr. Ali,
Thanks for the article, it was quite interesting. Any class,or regional indicators in these cases? Additionally, since these forced marriages seem to affect young women the most, there is an unmistakable gender control dynamic to this phenomena. Are there any women focused grassroots orgs. (in the US we have Sakhi, Mannavi, Upna Ghar) involved in these cases that might have additional analyses?
Happy New Years Everybody!
Thanks for the article, it was quite interesting. Any class,or regional indicators in these cases? Additionally, since these forced marriages seem to affect young women the most, there is an unmistakable gender control dynamic to this phenomena. Are there any women focused grassroots orgs. (in the US we have Sakhi, Mannavi, Upna Ghar) involved in these cases that might have additional analyses?
Happy New Years Everybody!
#6 Posted by saminashah on January 1, 2001 12:50:32 pm
Again Mr. Afaqui, your ability (which incidentally, you share with an unfortunately addled interactor, who is so well known, it shall go unnamed) to completely miss the point is breathtaking... M`ashallah! Here`s hoping the New Year brings clarity to you...
#7 Posted by rsaxena on January 1, 2001 12:50:32 pm
re: AAmir
{about how muslims could NOT have been coverted without force ,but facts dont favour your theory.}
would a sword up your behind convert you into a human being first?
{about how muslims could NOT have been coverted without force ,but facts dont favour your theory.}
would a sword up your behind convert you into a human being first?
#8 Posted by solitude on January 1, 2001 12:52:42 pm
This problem of forced marriages has been epidemic in Muslim households since the prophet forced his adopted son to give up his wife so that he (the prophet Mohammad) could marry her (his son`s wife)- a tradition of forced sexual control has since then been practiced by every civilization infected with Islamic ideaology.
I know of relatives to whom this happened and I myself was kidnapped and imprisoned in my own house in karachi (by my parents) who tried to convert me back to Islam using physical abuse and mental torture (including drugs). Ofcourse I converted back to Islam and I am so happy now :)
:)
I know of relatives to whom this happened and I myself was kidnapped and imprisoned in my own house in karachi (by my parents) who tried to convert me back to Islam using physical abuse and mental torture (including drugs). Ofcourse I converted back to Islam and I am so happy now :)
:)
#9 Posted by Banjaara on January 1, 2001 3:46:30 pm
Jay #7
``, follow the path of jinnah and Imran khan, both benefitted from the wealth of their wives.``
Dear Jay,
That`s below the belt.FYI the only one benefitting
from their wives wealth are the Hindus(lucky you).
The Muslas have to pay the ``Mehr`` to the girls:(
Happy New Year.
``, follow the path of jinnah and Imran khan, both benefitted from the wealth of their wives.``
Dear Jay,
That`s below the belt.FYI the only one benefitting
from their wives wealth are the Hindus(lucky you).
The Muslas have to pay the ``Mehr`` to the girls:(
Happy New Year.
#10 Posted by Kiran- on January 2, 2001 2:49:55 pm
Mr. Ali, you highlighted an issue that needs to be resolved as soon as possible. Nobody should be forced into marriage -- it is simply inhuman, there`s no other word for it. I`m glad Narina and her sisters took the stand for their rights.
Your report, however, was extremely brief and needed more details. Maybe if no other fact was at your disposal, then just a couple of more quotes would have done.
Regards,
Kiran
Your report, however, was extremely brief and needed more details. Maybe if no other fact was at your disposal, then just a couple of more quotes would have done.
Regards,
Kiran
#11 Posted by saminashah on January 2, 2001 2:49:55 pm
This email joke has been circulating among friends; thought it was a well deserved giggle....
Subject: THE COMPANY`S CHRISTMAS PARTY
December 1st
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
I`m happy to inform you that the company Christmas Party will take place on
December 23rd at Luigi`s Open Pit Barbecue. There will be lots of spiked
eggnog and a small band playing traditional carols ... feel free to sing
along. And don`t be surprised if our CEO shows up dressed as Santa Claus to
light the Christmas tree! Exchange of gifts among employees can be done at
that time; however, no gift should be over $10. Merry Christmas to you and
your family.
Patty Lewis Human Resources Director
December 2nd
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
In no way was yesterday`s memo intended to exclude our Jewish employees. We
recognize that Hanukkah is an important holiday that often coincides with
Christmas (though unfortunately not this year). However, from now on we`re
calling it our ``Holiday Party.`` The same policy applies to employees who
are celebrating Kwanzaa at this time. There will be no Christmas tree and
no Christmas carols sung. Happy Holidays to you and your family.
Patty Lewis Human Resources Director
December 3rd
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
Regarding the anonymous note I received from a member of Alcoholics
Anonymous requesting a non-drinking table, I`m happy to accommodate this
request, but, don`t forget, if I put a sign on the table that reads, ``AA
Only,`` you won`t be anonymous anymore. In addition, forget about the gifts
exchange-no gifts will be allowed since the union members feel that $10 is
too much money.
Patty Lewis Human Researchers Director
December 7th
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
I`ve arranged for members of Overeaters Anonymous tosit farthest from the
dessert buffet and pregnant women closest to the restrooms. Gays are
allowed to sit with each other. Lesbians do not have to sit with the gay
men; each will have their table. Yes, there will be a flower arrangement
for the gay men`s table. Happy now?
Patty Lewis Human Racehorses Director
December 9th
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
People, people-nothing sinister was intended by wanting our CEO to play
Santa Claus! Even if the anagram of ``Santa`` does happen to be ``Satan,``
there is no evil connotation to our own ``little man in a red suit.``
Patty Lewis Human Ratraces
December 10th
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
Vegetarians-I`ve had it with you people!! We`re going to hold this party at
Luigi`s Open Pit whether you like it or not, you can just sit at the table
farthest from the ``grill of death,`` as you put it, and you`ll get salad bar
only, including hydroponic tomatoes. But, you know, tomatoes have feelings,
too. They scream when you slice them. I`ve heard them scream. I`m hearing
them right now... Ha! I hope you all have a rotten holiday! Drive drunk and
die, you hear me?
The B * * * from H * * *
December 14th
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
I`m sure I speak for all of us in wishing Patty Lewis a speedy recovery
from her stress-related illness. I`ll continue to forward your cards to her
at the sanitarium. In the meantime, management has decided to cancel our
Holiday Party and give everyone the afternoon of the 23rd off with full pay.
Terri Bishop Acting Human Resources Director
Subject: THE COMPANY`S CHRISTMAS PARTY
December 1st
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
I`m happy to inform you that the company Christmas Party will take place on
December 23rd at Luigi`s Open Pit Barbecue. There will be lots of spiked
eggnog and a small band playing traditional carols ... feel free to sing
along. And don`t be surprised if our CEO shows up dressed as Santa Claus to
light the Christmas tree! Exchange of gifts among employees can be done at
that time; however, no gift should be over $10. Merry Christmas to you and
your family.
Patty Lewis Human Resources Director
December 2nd
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
In no way was yesterday`s memo intended to exclude our Jewish employees. We
recognize that Hanukkah is an important holiday that often coincides with
Christmas (though unfortunately not this year). However, from now on we`re
calling it our ``Holiday Party.`` The same policy applies to employees who
are celebrating Kwanzaa at this time. There will be no Christmas tree and
no Christmas carols sung. Happy Holidays to you and your family.
Patty Lewis Human Resources Director
December 3rd
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
Regarding the anonymous note I received from a member of Alcoholics
Anonymous requesting a non-drinking table, I`m happy to accommodate this
request, but, don`t forget, if I put a sign on the table that reads, ``AA
Only,`` you won`t be anonymous anymore. In addition, forget about the gifts
exchange-no gifts will be allowed since the union members feel that $10 is
too much money.
Patty Lewis Human Researchers Director
December 7th
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
I`ve arranged for members of Overeaters Anonymous tosit farthest from the
dessert buffet and pregnant women closest to the restrooms. Gays are
allowed to sit with each other. Lesbians do not have to sit with the gay
men; each will have their table. Yes, there will be a flower arrangement
for the gay men`s table. Happy now?
Patty Lewis Human Racehorses Director
December 9th
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
People, people-nothing sinister was intended by wanting our CEO to play
Santa Claus! Even if the anagram of ``Santa`` does happen to be ``Satan,``
there is no evil connotation to our own ``little man in a red suit.``
Patty Lewis Human Ratraces
December 10th
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
Vegetarians-I`ve had it with you people!! We`re going to hold this party at
Luigi`s Open Pit whether you like it or not, you can just sit at the table
farthest from the ``grill of death,`` as you put it, and you`ll get salad bar
only, including hydroponic tomatoes. But, you know, tomatoes have feelings,
too. They scream when you slice them. I`ve heard them scream. I`m hearing
them right now... Ha! I hope you all have a rotten holiday! Drive drunk and
die, you hear me?
The B * * * from H * * *
December 14th
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
I`m sure I speak for all of us in wishing Patty Lewis a speedy recovery
from her stress-related illness. I`ll continue to forward your cards to her
at the sanitarium. In the meantime, management has decided to cancel our
Holiday Party and give everyone the afternoon of the 23rd off with full pay.
Terri Bishop Acting Human Resources Director
#12 Posted by hobbyty on January 2, 2001 2:49:55 pm
Tariq Ali
Ignorance, politics of sexual power and sexual shame deserve greater attention in Pakistan and among Muslims in general.
What is needed to effect a change in the thinking, are the creation of awareness, particularly of the elements of sexual power and sexual shame, changes in the way men and especially women make a living and time.
I have not met anybody who was forced to marry another person, but among friends in the UK (Kashmiri) I did become aware of the norm (with the very strong ``encouragement`` of their family elders) of girls marrying men, usually related, from the ancestoral village in Pakistan. The problem is obvious, girls used to living in a relatively free, ``liberated`` society, earning and supporting their families, accepting marriage with men, ususally quite a bit older, with a very different (village background, outlook, experience) perception of what life will be like, and they end up traumatized by the constricted experience of life after marriage.
It`s sad that such cultural, paraochial practices are being encouraged and legitimated by assigning label ``Islamic`` to these practices. Certainly parents think their daughters marrying within the faith is a necessity (for all sorts of reasons) but at no time do they actively encourage their daughters to be exposed to a larger number of eligible Muslim or Pakistani men within the communities they actually live in.
For instance, Masajid have failed to accept a role as a center for the building faith for both genders and have also failed to see their responsibility to act as a community center, within which Muslims can become aware of the resources available to them. Social functions may not have been a priority for leaders of the Masajid, but it must become one, if coersion is to disassociated with experience of significant numbers of Muslim girls, not just in the UK.
Masajid can serve as a resource as well as center for creating an awareness of the problem, of ways to deal with the problem and also to create an awareness that marrying off what by all criteria are ``little girls`` (their age is what I have in mind) they do a great disservice to their daughters who must be fully equipped educationally (technically and morally) to be able to accept the challenge of living in societies driven primarily by technological change, and values of materialism and secular humanism. No amount of coersion can prevent exposure to these forces and only education, technical and moral, can serve persons to make choices.
Jay
You certainly know a great deal of Islam - which Madressah did you go to?
#13 Posted by Prem on January 2, 2001 2:49:55 pm
Pyar kiye jaa,
I see that you haven`t improved one bit. And you call yourself a Hindu.
Do yourself a favor in this new year. First, try to be a human being. Then, find out what the essence of Hinduism is. May be your mind will expand a little, and the hatred in your heart will shrink just a tiny bit. Otherwise, for God`s sake, don`t call yourself a Hindu.
Best regards.
I see that you haven`t improved one bit. And you call yourself a Hindu.
Do yourself a favor in this new year. First, try to be a human being. Then, find out what the essence of Hinduism is. May be your mind will expand a little, and the hatred in your heart will shrink just a tiny bit. Otherwise, for God`s sake, don`t call yourself a Hindu.
Best regards.
#14 Posted by Kiran- on January 2, 2001 2:49:55 pm
Mr. Ali, you highlighted an issue that needs to be resolved as soon as possible. Nobody should be forced into marriage -- it is simply inhuman, there`s no other word for it. I`m glad Narina and her sisters took the stand for their rights.
Your report, however, was extremely brief and needed more details. Maybe if no other fact was at your disposal, then just a couple of more quotes would have done.
Regards,
Kiran
Your report, however, was extremely brief and needed more details. Maybe if no other fact was at your disposal, then just a couple of more quotes would have done.
Regards,
Kiran
#15 Posted by scout on January 3, 2001 1:19:44 am
harimau #2, ``Forced conversions is wrong. Well, that would mean about 950 million Muslims will return to the religions of their forefathers. All Pakistanis will become Hindus.``
What makes you so sure all Pakistani Muslims were converted from Hinduism? Did the stay in Buffalo freeze your few brain cells or are you one of those Hindu supremacist types..... there are enough supremacists in the world, so please step down from the podium and take your seat with us normal people.
What makes you so sure all Pakistani Muslims were converted from Hinduism? Did the stay in Buffalo freeze your few brain cells or are you one of those Hindu supremacist types..... there are enough supremacists in the world, so please step down from the podium and take your seat with us normal people.
#16 Posted by harimau on January 3, 2001 2:01:35 pm
Ref scout #: 23
[What makes you so sure all Pakistani Muslims were converted from Hinduism?]
When the first sultans arrived in India and called the country Hindustan, they only ruled over Punjab. Clearly, Punjab was therefore the land of the Hindus!
[Did the stay in Buffalo freeze your few brain cells]
Cold is a preservative, as you well know.
Happy New Year!
[What makes you so sure all Pakistani Muslims were converted from Hinduism?]
When the first sultans arrived in India and called the country Hindustan, they only ruled over Punjab. Clearly, Punjab was therefore the land of the Hindus!
[Did the stay in Buffalo freeze your few brain cells]
Cold is a preservative, as you well know.
Happy New Year!
Interact Index
Similar Articles
- Ridiculing Religion or Religion of Ridicule Mutaal Mooquin
- Are the Converted Tribals Really Hindu? Murad A Baig
- Reforming Religious Fundamentalists Khalid Sohail
- Boot Point Nadeem F Paracha
- The God Delusion Mutaal Mooquin
US Elections 2008 Primaries
Latest Interacts
- laddu: Re: # 218 Mian, Aap hi... The Correct Turn
- tahmed32: kaalchakra #210 tradition, old... The Correct Turn
- tahmed32: laddu mian: your understanding... The Correct Turn
- chaltahai: What good is giving... The Correct Turn
- chaltahai: Damn kaal...not much difference... The Correct Turn
- laddu: Re: # 214 Umm......that Hadith... The Correct Turn
- laddu: Re: # 204 "the rest... The Correct Turn
- chaltahai: Cool story tahmed. The... The Correct Turn








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content