unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
all are welcome to read, write and think
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

The Voice-over-IP dilemma

Irfan HAMID October 16, 2003

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all

#1 Posted by arjun_m on October 16, 2003 9:16:53 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#2 Posted by irfanhamid on October 16, 2003 10:16:51 am
arjun_m:

It`s part of the ``protocol``, but has not become part of the infrastructure. The reason is that your ISP will not honor your QoS word and prioritize it. Ofcourse, in a ``virtual circuit``, or a VPN you actually pay everyone in the path a little extra to give you ``guaranteed bandwidth``. That`s what I`m trying to say, your network card could go blue in the face demanding QoS but if your ISP-or for that matter any internet core route upto and including your callee`s ISP-does not honor that QoS request you won`t get QoS because a chain`s strength is determined by it`s weakest link.

Think about it, your analog telephone gives you voice at only 3.4kbps, yet your dialup modem cannot give it to you even at 56kbps. The reason is simple, with a telephone call, you have end-to-end connectivity. With an internet connection, the connectivity is not end-to-end, bandwidth is not reserved for you, paths are not reserved for your data, they are routed on an availability basis. For IP telephony to work, everyone has to implement QoS or it won`t work.

Don`t know about baby bells or Vonage because I don`t live in the US.

Regards,
Irfan Hamid.


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#3 Posted by arjun_m on October 16, 2003 11:42:02 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#4 Posted by anil on October 16, 2003 2:36:19 pm
Interesting discussion. I have just funded and started a VoIP infrastructure company (www.diyatel.com) to provide VoIP infrstructure and service between North America and South Asia. VoIP is a disruptive technology for this decade, just as PC`s were in early 80`s. The computation power in those days were about $1M, just as legacy TDM switches are $1M, alternative gateways and routers are about $50K for comparable infrastructure.
VoIP will allow companies to attack ``per minute`` based revenue model for phone calls to provide flat fee based phone calling.


ANIL KAPURIA
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#5 Posted by lunatic on October 17, 2003 10:26:13 am
For the sake of records, a little correction to the trivia byte: The first commercially available VoIP chip IN PAKISTAN was designed by Enabling Technologies.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#6 Posted by bmk on October 18, 2003 10:37:03 pm
attended a seminar on the same subject, last year where they said that LOCAL calls from ISP may become FREE after deregulation of PTCL, similar to that of AUSTRALIA and few more countries, they mentioned as an example. There won`t be any prob to dial a local number from the ISP, something like that ...

By the way, I don`t think, net-to-phone or Voice chat is a good idea, other than for fun-sake unless we compromise with the `TIME-DELAY` in data transfering, which is really unwise in Voice communications. !?!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content

Interact Index

    #6 bmk
    #5 lunatic
    #4 anil
    #3 arjun_m
    #2 irfanhamid
    #1 arjun_m

Also by Irfan HAMID

  • Pandora’s Box
  • The French Engineering Education System
  • Spam, Popup Blockers and Britney Spears
more »

Similar Articles

  • Let’s not Barter Away Our Food Security for GM Crops Kamal Siddiqi
  • What Ails the BPO Industry in Pakistan? Noman Faisal
  • Electric Illusion Fozan Zahoor
  • Computer Literated: Writing Preliterated? Junaid Sadiq
  • An Interview with Avnish Bajaj Rakesh Mani
more »

US Elections 2008 Primaries

  • Hillary Clinton a Better Presidential Candidate
  • Leaders, Heroes and Mountains
  • Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and New American Dreams
  • Pakistan Elections 2008 - An analysis
  • Political Issues Ahead of Pakistan Elections
more »
get rss feed Get Chowk RSS Feed

Get Chowk Newsletter

Latest Interacts

  • nb: Tahmed, I just read... The Correct Turn
  • ahmedmadani: Re: # 120 Arjun's... The Correct Turn
  • nb: Tahmed, I'm surprised you... The Correct Turn
  • BJ2: Kulharee, good points! The... Hop Aboard the Interfaith
  • ahmedmadani: Re: # 120 I... The Correct Turn
  • tahmed32: #119 excellent post, madani... The Correct Turn
  • ahmedmadani: Re: # 115 Arjun why... The Correct Turn
  • drlokraj: he can surely bowl... Cricket: Afridi is Our

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • The Correct Turn
  • G-8: RIP?
  • Urdu News Columnists and Anchors -- should we always believe them?
  • Politics of PPP and Asif Zardari
  • The Indian Obama!
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Evolution 101
  • Beyond ’Fictional Economic Man’
  • Auntie
  • The Ring
  • A Letter to the Prime Minister of Pakistan

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited