Rozaiba June 26, 2004
#36 Posted by nazarhayatkhan on June 26, 2004 10:17:35 pm
Humpty-Dumpty Jamali was doing OK - just sailing along - at least a peg in the system as per the Constitution.
Why unceremoniously get him out - Choudhry`s are a bigger calamity - why not let the system run by the book - why no patience.
Jamali was talking about Musarraf taking off his uniform a bit too often in Media - and Musharraf is working out some long term strategy to hang on - but he is mistaken.
The Chaudhries are too foxy - and could take him along when they go.
Not good at all.
Presently, the only two political entities in Parliament that can not be bought, ignored or brushed aside by the Army are the MQM & MMA.
#35 Posted by mog on June 26, 2004 10:03:13 pm
Bring back Benazir Bhutto, deposed queen in distress, in my earnest and humble opinion.
At least she used to look good.
More than that, she can then proceed to find an economist or banker or IMF or World bank type and place him/her in power, while controlling the strings from behind.
Turban will help.
At least she used to look good.
More than that, she can then proceed to find an economist or banker or IMF or World bank type and place him/her in power, while controlling the strings from behind.
Turban will help.
#34 Posted by ijaz_gul on June 26, 2004 10:03:13 pm
Romair, impulsiveness is not always correct. All of a sudden you have a heartache for Ata and Hoodbouy. Being actually involved in professional education, I have a true measure of the contributions of both.
Being that death an inevitable end will come when it comes. The issue that Jamali is no more is not important. The issue is experimentation with demcracy and dispensibility of institutions. I feel the next victim will be the wise man who suggested that the army should do such hobnobbing with the politicians. He must be quite uncomfortable in Lahore.
Why reinvent a wheel when one comes up with weird things like everything but a wheel.
This is reminding me of the musical chairs that were played in the late 50s.
We are an engine in full throttle with the gears in neutral.
Shaukat would perform better in select areas. Take my word, Pakistan`s dependency would increase. Note the date and time. 27 june 9:26 AM
A very sad person
Being that death an inevitable end will come when it comes. The issue that Jamali is no more is not important. The issue is experimentation with demcracy and dispensibility of institutions. I feel the next victim will be the wise man who suggested that the army should do such hobnobbing with the politicians. He must be quite uncomfortable in Lahore.
Why reinvent a wheel when one comes up with weird things like everything but a wheel.
This is reminding me of the musical chairs that were played in the late 50s.
We are an engine in full throttle with the gears in neutral.
Shaukat would perform better in select areas. Take my word, Pakistan`s dependency would increase. Note the date and time. 27 june 9:26 AM
A very sad person
#33 Posted by nazarhayatkhan on June 26, 2004 10:00:06 pm
Romair # 31
(Awais Leghari recently graduated from college,.... is now the head of the whole Science and Tech. of Pakistan. He seriously couldn`t get a job as an intern in any IT company in North America (or in Pakistan for that matter)
Nothing to do with Awais. But a Minister has to be a politician - not MCSE, Diploma or degrees holder in his field. Lots of technocrats are under him to do that bit. He is elected & young. I find that rather encouraging.
Could Laloo Prashad get an internship in a railway Company?
NHK
#32 Posted by stuka on June 26, 2004 8:22:30 pm
HP:
``Congress is certainly showing much needed maturity in dealing with Pakistan. ``
Can I infer from your comment that Congress is showing MORE maturity then BJP in dealing with Pakistan? If so, why? Also, what is your opinion about the initial missteps by Natwar Singh?
``Congress is certainly showing much needed maturity in dealing with Pakistan. ``
Can I infer from your comment that Congress is showing MORE maturity then BJP in dealing with Pakistan? If so, why? Also, what is your opinion about the initial missteps by Natwar Singh?
#31 Posted by Romair on June 26, 2004 6:53:00 pm
Forgot one thing....
I hope the first step Shaukut Aziz takes is to get rid of Awais Leghari as the Minster of S&T. Another scion of another famous feudal clan in Pakistan.
Awais Leghari recently graduated from college, with a degree in political science (or in basketweaving or something very scientific like that). He ran some unknown IT compnay briefly. And is now the head of the whole Science and Tech. of Pakistan. He seriously couldn`t get a job as an intern in any IT company in North America (or in Pakistan for that matter). I wouldn`t hire anyone with his qualifications. Yet he heads the ministry, in a field which is driving the whole world. My friends in the Pakistani IT industry thought it was an April fool`s type joke, when they heard he had been appointed to head this ministry.
I am sure he is a decent person, like Jamali. And, of course, he is, ``democratically`` elected (kind of hard for someone else to get elected from an area, which is owned by his dad). But what the hell does he know about S&T. About as much as his predecessor S&T miniseter, Abida Hussain (another stud-farm owning feudal). did. She had a high school diploma in interior decorating(?) and was heading Pakistan`s S&T ministry. She just recently cleared her BA exams. But she was, ``democratically`` elected also. Perhaps because her dad owned half of Jhang. This time she was defeated by her nephew.
Then people ask, why Pakistan lags so far behind the rest of the world in IT and S&T.
Bring back Ata-ur-Rahman, or appoint Hoodbhoy or anyone else. At least someone, who has attended a few science courses. Any of the Chowk associates are more qualitifed than Leghari.
Put technocrats, with international credibility, in positions of power, and then see how quickly Pakistan progresses..............
I hope the first step Shaukut Aziz takes is to get rid of Awais Leghari as the Minster of S&T. Another scion of another famous feudal clan in Pakistan.
Awais Leghari recently graduated from college, with a degree in political science (or in basketweaving or something very scientific like that). He ran some unknown IT compnay briefly. And is now the head of the whole Science and Tech. of Pakistan. He seriously couldn`t get a job as an intern in any IT company in North America (or in Pakistan for that matter). I wouldn`t hire anyone with his qualifications. Yet he heads the ministry, in a field which is driving the whole world. My friends in the Pakistani IT industry thought it was an April fool`s type joke, when they heard he had been appointed to head this ministry.
I am sure he is a decent person, like Jamali. And, of course, he is, ``democratically`` elected (kind of hard for someone else to get elected from an area, which is owned by his dad). But what the hell does he know about S&T. About as much as his predecessor S&T miniseter, Abida Hussain (another stud-farm owning feudal). did. She had a high school diploma in interior decorating(?) and was heading Pakistan`s S&T ministry. She just recently cleared her BA exams. But she was, ``democratically`` elected also. Perhaps because her dad owned half of Jhang. This time she was defeated by her nephew.
Then people ask, why Pakistan lags so far behind the rest of the world in IT and S&T.
Bring back Ata-ur-Rahman, or appoint Hoodbhoy or anyone else. At least someone, who has attended a few science courses. Any of the Chowk associates are more qualitifed than Leghari.
Put technocrats, with international credibility, in positions of power, and then see how quickly Pakistan progresses..............
#30 Posted by hamzan on June 26, 2004 6:48:20 pm
Chowk Staff
Thanks a lot for the clarification.
Now back to the subject
Normally, I submit my reply after Romair, this time I am doing it pre-emptively - just for the sake of change.
WARNING
Soon Field Marshall Romair will be here with his very non-expert opinion that will include following comments:
1. Salaries of military officers are too low as compared to their civilian counterparts
2. Genius military officers have no option but to leave and head for the Silicon Valley
3. Money makes the mare go. People [like him] will renounce their citizenship, voting right for a better future. Better = more money in absolute terms.
4. He has now more money than all of his ex-colleagues
5. Chowk is a place for rich and intelligent. Because he is one of the frequent contributor on different threads.
And same ghisi-pitti babble will go on and on …
In likelihood the solution and remedy he will offer would look like
Home-take salary of the PM must be increased before he leaves everything and move back to his village for fishing
To his detractors he would say
According to the surveys he has read [and saved on his PC] Musharraf is liked by 50.9945% of Pakistanis. Anyone criticizing Musharraf must first come up with a survey that shows that people are fed up with the military.
Mera khial hai main abb bas karta hoon …
over to FM
#29 Posted by SameerJB on June 26, 2004 6:48:20 pm
Once you agree to play the role of a pawn, you are dispensible. Jamali`s exit and Shujaat entry did not excite me because they were as good as nothing. Musharraf and his coaterie in GHQ have been taking all the major decisions during celebrations after awarding themselves new plots of land for their services to the nation by drying up the national resources and capturing Islamabad without any sacrifice. They are getting everything they want and people have started giving them what they deserve. So they are advised to not wear uniform in the public and possibly dont get soldier haircut too. jamali? who?
#28 Posted by Romair on June 26, 2004 6:29:33 pm
There are two aspects of Jamali losing his power.
The bad aspect is that he shouldn`t have been appointed in the first place. So the blame goes to the people who appointed such a dimwit to this position.
The good part is that it is about time that waderas and feudals and tribals stopped becoming Prime Ministers. They have nothing to do with democracy. The only reason they get elected is because they own their whole constituencies. They have no track record of any accomplishment, at any level, in their lives. The Amin Fahims and Jamalis etc. wouldn`t get elected dogcatcher in a decent democracy. Most people on Chowk are more professionaly qualified than these guys.....
I had suggested in my replies, when Jamali was being apointed PM, that Shaukut Aziz should be appointed PM, and not Jamali, nor any other landowner. Better late than never. Shaukut Aziz is the perfect person for the position. A middle to uppermiddle -class urbanite, who has made it to the top of the international levels, on his own merit. He has delivered at the finance ministry also. This should help with respect to the maulvi threat and hadood laws etc., also. Feudals and tribals live for hadood laws and karo-karis, and suppression of women.
Pakistan must be led by progressive, educated, self-made urbanites. These are the kinds of people who will bring Pakistan in line with the internatinonal community. They will initiate the end of feudal-supporting honor kilings etc. They are not ashamed to let their wives walk shoulder to shoulder with them. Unlike the Jamalis and Amin Fahims, whose wives are locked up in warehouses.
Now PPP is the only party left that has an out and out feudal leadership. If it can get rid of its Makhdooms and Bhuttos, and let its Aitezaz Ahsans come to the top, it will win landslides. I have no doubt about that.
An urbanite President with an urbanite Prime Minister, neither living in the 15th century is a good combination. Those of us, who think Pakistan has been a dictatorship, whether elections are held or not held, will be happy with it. Now the only hitch is that Musharraf should take off his uniform. Which hopefully he will in six months.
Those who have no issues with political parties having lifetime feudal heads, nor with Shariah Bill appointed amir-ul-momineens, will cry for the loss of another feudal leader.
It will good for peace with India also. India has a finance minister as a PM. And so will Pakistan. Neither has a constituency in the country. Neither is bound to strong political careers as their profession. They both view economy as the main driving force for peace and prosperity.
Dair aaye darust aayyee. I feel sorry for Jamali, and the process of he has gone through. But he shouldn`t have taken the job, he was unqualified to begin with. Shaukut Aziz will make a very good PM.
The economy is finally getting center-stage in South Asia. Is this the first step towards the end of feudal Prime Ministers in Pakistan. I really hope so.............
The bad aspect is that he shouldn`t have been appointed in the first place. So the blame goes to the people who appointed such a dimwit to this position.
The good part is that it is about time that waderas and feudals and tribals stopped becoming Prime Ministers. They have nothing to do with democracy. The only reason they get elected is because they own their whole constituencies. They have no track record of any accomplishment, at any level, in their lives. The Amin Fahims and Jamalis etc. wouldn`t get elected dogcatcher in a decent democracy. Most people on Chowk are more professionaly qualified than these guys.....
I had suggested in my replies, when Jamali was being apointed PM, that Shaukut Aziz should be appointed PM, and not Jamali, nor any other landowner. Better late than never. Shaukut Aziz is the perfect person for the position. A middle to uppermiddle -class urbanite, who has made it to the top of the international levels, on his own merit. He has delivered at the finance ministry also. This should help with respect to the maulvi threat and hadood laws etc., also. Feudals and tribals live for hadood laws and karo-karis, and suppression of women.
Pakistan must be led by progressive, educated, self-made urbanites. These are the kinds of people who will bring Pakistan in line with the internatinonal community. They will initiate the end of feudal-supporting honor kilings etc. They are not ashamed to let their wives walk shoulder to shoulder with them. Unlike the Jamalis and Amin Fahims, whose wives are locked up in warehouses.
Now PPP is the only party left that has an out and out feudal leadership. If it can get rid of its Makhdooms and Bhuttos, and let its Aitezaz Ahsans come to the top, it will win landslides. I have no doubt about that.
An urbanite President with an urbanite Prime Minister, neither living in the 15th century is a good combination. Those of us, who think Pakistan has been a dictatorship, whether elections are held or not held, will be happy with it. Now the only hitch is that Musharraf should take off his uniform. Which hopefully he will in six months.
Those who have no issues with political parties having lifetime feudal heads, nor with Shariah Bill appointed amir-ul-momineens, will cry for the loss of another feudal leader.
It will good for peace with India also. India has a finance minister as a PM. And so will Pakistan. Neither has a constituency in the country. Neither is bound to strong political careers as their profession. They both view economy as the main driving force for peace and prosperity.
Dair aaye darust aayyee. I feel sorry for Jamali, and the process of he has gone through. But he shouldn`t have taken the job, he was unqualified to begin with. Shaukut Aziz will make a very good PM.
The economy is finally getting center-stage in South Asia. Is this the first step towards the end of feudal Prime Ministers in Pakistan. I really hope so.............
#27 Posted by nooralain on June 26, 2004 6:14:40 pm
chowk staff. . .
that is your reasoning?
and even if he did use the name che guevarra. . we can split hairs here but he does differ from the original che, in that he spells his name with two r`s. . .the cuban revolutionary was che guevara.
and why was this not noticed before? i think you would spare the author the embarrassment and yourselves the ridicule (i`m being kind here) of posting the article with that moniker in the first place? but since you have apologized for the inconvenience, perhaps you might pay closer attention in future? it is so inconvenient to be so inconvenient afterall.
that is your reasoning?
and even if he did use the name che guevarra. . we can split hairs here but he does differ from the original che, in that he spells his name with two r`s. . .the cuban revolutionary was che guevara.
and why was this not noticed before? i think you would spare the author the embarrassment and yourselves the ridicule (i`m being kind here) of posting the article with that moniker in the first place? but since you have apologized for the inconvenience, perhaps you might pay closer attention in future? it is so inconvenient to be so inconvenient afterall.
#26 Posted by HP on June 26, 2004 5:37:16 pm
Back to the subject.
I am not much of an army watcher, as I think they can never do any thing right.
Off late, there have been some developments that need second look.
Mushy needs to lower his profile and needs to have a PM who can take lead in internal Pakistani affairs. Jamali was worthless in that area. Jamali was also a slight problem because of his political connections. That would have become a problem after Mushy puts on civvies. Now Mushy will have a safe PM plus somebody who has some ability in working with the bureaucracy.
The interesting developments were at the nuke talks between India and Pakistan. It seems that both countries are looking to have some sort of joint stand in international forums on nuke issues. This kind of cooperation is a welcome change for the sub continent.
I also think that Kashmir is now probably clear of Pakistani infiltrators and Indians should clear out rest of the diehards in Kashmir and move towards negotiation.
Congress is certainly showing much needed maturity in dealing with Pakistan.
#25 Posted by chowkstaff on June 26, 2004 5:33:29 pm
Ref #24
Changing a moniker is acceptable. Choosing Che Guevarra as the moniker is the issue. This is like publishing an article under the name Mao Tse Tung - as you will agree that will cause a problem because there are millions of web references to those names.
Please note that you can also change your Chowk moniker to Arjun Ahmed Mohammed Kumar Banerjee Stein Smith (AAMKBSS) - it is fine and well within the policies. We hope that this will close this issue.
We appreciate your prompt criticism and subsequent kudos.
Changing a moniker is acceptable. Choosing Che Guevarra as the moniker is the issue. This is like publishing an article under the name Mao Tse Tung - as you will agree that will cause a problem because there are millions of web references to those names.
Please note that you can also change your Chowk moniker to Arjun Ahmed Mohammed Kumar Banerjee Stein Smith (AAMKBSS) - it is fine and well within the policies. We hope that this will close this issue.
We appreciate your prompt criticism and subsequent kudos.
#24 Posted by arjun_m on June 26, 2004 5:14:59 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#22 Posted by chowkstaff on June 26, 2004 4:59:43 pm
Ref #21, 20
Please read #19 for a clarification. The article is very much there and wil be reposted after verifying the identity of the writer.
Please read #19 for a clarification. The article is very much there and wil be reposted after verifying the identity of the writer.
#21 Posted by HP on June 26, 2004 4:57:32 pm
It should be a simple matter to find it. Look it up in your cache(temp internet files in user account) or just do a search in your computer. If your browser is NOT set to ``Empty temp internet files... on exit``, you should still have it in your cache. Unfortunately I empty my cache everyday.
Sehbai sahib, If you really wanna search some thing way back here is the URL.
www.waybackmachine.org
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- dost_mittar: nkg, mohar & others: We... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- borivili_express: hamidm u might be... Pleas For Sanity as
- drlokraj: Good analysis, but still... Pleas For Sanity as
- SR: Deepak Chopra on Mumbai... Pleas For Sanity as
- SR: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cIG80dlUHA&feature=related http://www.y outube.com/watch?v=WACjyXfBD_I&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/wat ch?v=nvf2GP2XzVY... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- shoaib_daniyal: Re: # 154 Beena, Yes, but... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- MaheshG: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/03/world/asia/03mumbai.html?hp U.S. and India See... Pleas For Sanity as
- majumdar: Cobes, They did indirectly and... The Future of Indo








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content