Rozaiba June 26, 2004
#97 Posted by nikki7777 on June 28, 2004 11:19:49 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#98 Posted by kaurasach on June 28, 2004 11:19:49 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#99 Posted by nikki7777 on June 28, 2004 11:19:50 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#100 Posted by MantoLives on June 28, 2004 1:27:43 pm
Malik99,
You are either really naive or one major drama...
The reason why Mullahs don`t drive jaguars is because `GRAND CRUISERS` and `LAND CRUISERS` suit them better.... Each major Mullah leader has multiple grand cruisers and Land cruisers...Where did these Mullahs get all this money?? How does MMA a party of the religious clerics own such amazing party head quarters and WHY the hell is Fazlurrahman so fat?
And you have a problem with the family sedan I drive that I have on HIRE PURCHASE ?? or the house I am going to buy through a bank loan? I don`t drive Jaguars or Mercedes either... but if I ever will own one it will be from my own blood and sweat... And as far as Foreign education goes... my parents toiled hard for my education... but did Qazi Hussain Ahmed have to toil for his Son`s American education? Where did he get all the money for his houses in America and Pakistan? To my knowledge he is not a famous business man or a professional of any repute
Mullahs are hypocrites...
God save Pakistan and Islam from the Mullah B@stards...
You are either really naive or one major drama...
The reason why Mullahs don`t drive jaguars is because `GRAND CRUISERS` and `LAND CRUISERS` suit them better.... Each major Mullah leader has multiple grand cruisers and Land cruisers...Where did these Mullahs get all this money?? How does MMA a party of the religious clerics own such amazing party head quarters and WHY the hell is Fazlurrahman so fat?
And you have a problem with the family sedan I drive that I have on HIRE PURCHASE ?? or the house I am going to buy through a bank loan? I don`t drive Jaguars or Mercedes either... but if I ever will own one it will be from my own blood and sweat... And as far as Foreign education goes... my parents toiled hard for my education... but did Qazi Hussain Ahmed have to toil for his Son`s American education? Where did he get all the money for his houses in America and Pakistan? To my knowledge he is not a famous business man or a professional of any repute
Mullahs are hypocrites...
God save Pakistan and Islam from the Mullah B@stards...
#101 Posted by malik99 on June 28, 2004 2:54:29 pm
mantolives # 100 - you wrote ``And you have a problem with the family sedan I drive that I have on HIRE PURCHASE ?? or the house I am going to buy through a bank loan? I don`t drive Jaguars or Mercedes either... but if I ever will own one it will be from my own blood and sweat... ``
So there ARE people like you who ACTUALLY work hard!!! How wrong of me to have painted you with the rest with one broad brush !!
Now only if you would drop your own broad brush and stop blaming every single issue on Mullahs. Its no different than Mullahs blaming everything on RAW and Mossad.
So there ARE people like you who ACTUALLY work hard!!! How wrong of me to have painted you with the rest with one broad brush !!
Now only if you would drop your own broad brush and stop blaming every single issue on Mullahs. Its no different than Mullahs blaming everything on RAW and Mossad.
#102 Posted by malik99 on June 28, 2004 3:07:01 pm
BTW - its NOT that i am pro-mullah. Its just that blaming all economic, cultural, defense, environmental, conjugal, health, technological issues and erectile dysfunctions on mullahs stales the debate and does not help move forward with finding the solution.
So yeah, there ARE some mullahs who drive Pajero and may have some land and have send their children to US schools. But here is where you seem to get narrow-visioned - there is an OVERWHELMINGLY large number of elites, who ACTUALLY have run the whole country, have run it to ground, own the whole towns and villages, suppress their people, hinder progress - YET you do not see them!
How incredible !!
So yeah, there ARE some mullahs who drive Pajero and may have some land and have send their children to US schools. But here is where you seem to get narrow-visioned - there is an OVERWHELMINGLY large number of elites, who ACTUALLY have run the whole country, have run it to ground, own the whole towns and villages, suppress their people, hinder progress - YET you do not see them!
How incredible !!
#103 Posted by nooralain on June 28, 2004 4:32:07 pm
the `blame the mullahs` for ALL the ills in pakistani society is just as interesting as blaming it ALL on the faujis or the `occupying army`. i say let`s blame it primarily on `the nexus` and then move from there. kya khyal hai? ; ) (hate doing the wink, but can`t help it. if you can`t beat `em, join `em?)
#104 Posted by nikki7777 on June 28, 2004 4:43:36 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#105 Posted by asadm on June 28, 2004 5:52:30 pm
Another shining example of Musharaf`s democratic Pakistan. Get set to be ruled by a man who`s urdu is harder to understand then Benazir`s and who`s take is slightly Asif Zaradari`s infamous 10%. And then in 45 days after the Jat from Gujrat has had his name written in the history books as Prime Minister of Pakistan we will then be handed over to the banker from Manhattan. The Prime Ministership has a sort of used car ring to it. Musharaf sure was right when he said this government will complete its five years the bugger forgot to mention he will give every member of the National Assembly a chance to be ``Chief Executive``. The cricket board is run by a chief executive the army is run by a chief executive and the nation is run by a chief executive. Atleast the SOB introduced the masses of Pakistan to the term ``CEO``. Oh and by the way to the person who says our economy is going in the right direction- Pakistan`s exports fell in the first quarter this year compared to the same time last year, our foreign exchange reserves are dependant on workers who now are forced to send their remittances via banks because the hawala system has been outlawed, we have 30 % or so unemployment, inflation is climbing and climbing need i say more. Anyways enough facts and pessimisim lets take a deep breath and think of the coming Musharaf`s Pakistani utopia.
#106 Posted by stuka on June 28, 2004 8:00:34 pm
HP:
``I know in my student days, and a very short lived political life in Pakistan, People constantly considered me and people like me anti-Pakistan. We were often told to go to India.``
I can understand u being called anti--akistan but not pro-India. In fact it seems like you are more the son of the soil type Sindhi nationalist.
``I know in my student days, and a very short lived political life in Pakistan, People constantly considered me and people like me anti-Pakistan. We were often told to go to India.``
I can understand u being called anti--akistan but not pro-India. In fact it seems like you are more the son of the soil type Sindhi nationalist.
#107 Posted by MantoLives on June 28, 2004 9:49:16 pm
Malik99...
The truth is that even those people who do drive the big cars and live in luxury... we know where their money comes from.... they are either professionals, feudals, industrialists or extremely corrupt... Question that you fail to ask... is how these MULLAHS have the money to buy cars that until recently cost more than a 1 crore rupees in Pakistan... they are not feudals, professionals, industrialists or in positions where they can be extremely corrupt... most of them own really shabby madrassahs.. then how the hell are they so rich?
Mullahs are B@stards... they are the real enemies of this country... people like you put a cover on them... and protect them. Pick up any problem in Pakistan and you will find a mullah behind it. There is no analogy with blame on RAW or Mossad... RAW or Mossad act in their own national interest.... Mullahs act in the interest of others...
Shame on you... and shame on you for writing that disgusting post ...
-YLH
The truth is that even those people who do drive the big cars and live in luxury... we know where their money comes from.... they are either professionals, feudals, industrialists or extremely corrupt... Question that you fail to ask... is how these MULLAHS have the money to buy cars that until recently cost more than a 1 crore rupees in Pakistan... they are not feudals, professionals, industrialists or in positions where they can be extremely corrupt... most of them own really shabby madrassahs.. then how the hell are they so rich?
Mullahs are B@stards... they are the real enemies of this country... people like you put a cover on them... and protect them. Pick up any problem in Pakistan and you will find a mullah behind it. There is no analogy with blame on RAW or Mossad... RAW or Mossad act in their own national interest.... Mullahs act in the interest of others...
Shame on you... and shame on you for writing that disgusting post ...
-YLH
#108 Posted by malik99 on June 28, 2004 9:49:17 pm
nooralain # 103 - you wrote ``the `blame the mullahs` for ALL the ills in pakistani society is just as interesting as blaming it ALL on the faujis or the `occupying army`.``
I agree that at times I have gotten carried away in blaming the Field Marshal. But I do acknowledge the fact that not ALL ills in Pakistan are due to dictator. In fact many of these ills have been there even before the dictator`s family immigrated to Pakistan.
However, I am sure you would agree that there is a huge distinction between the so-called mullahs (who may or may not influence any policy just like any other folks in the country) and a dictator who single handedly determines the course of a nation of 140 million. A mullah may get hold of a few protestors, march to parliament building and then get diperssed by tear gas. Contrast that to a dictator who commands army to surround a region in his own country, attack that region with gunship helicopters killing women and children, and lets foreign secret agencies roam free in his country.
So I am sure you would agree that the buck stops with the dictator more so than it does it with mullahs or any other people in Pakistan. Especially so since armed dictators have ruled Pakistan for more than half of its existance.
I agree that at times I have gotten carried away in blaming the Field Marshal. But I do acknowledge the fact that not ALL ills in Pakistan are due to dictator. In fact many of these ills have been there even before the dictator`s family immigrated to Pakistan.
However, I am sure you would agree that there is a huge distinction between the so-called mullahs (who may or may not influence any policy just like any other folks in the country) and a dictator who single handedly determines the course of a nation of 140 million. A mullah may get hold of a few protestors, march to parliament building and then get diperssed by tear gas. Contrast that to a dictator who commands army to surround a region in his own country, attack that region with gunship helicopters killing women and children, and lets foreign secret agencies roam free in his country.
So I am sure you would agree that the buck stops with the dictator more so than it does it with mullahs or any other people in Pakistan. Especially so since armed dictators have ruled Pakistan for more than half of its existance.
#109 Posted by huma_mir on June 28, 2004 9:49:17 pm
I hate to be the one defending mullahs, but Malik99`s argument seems to carry a perfect logic. If mantolives is going to make broad statements like ``mullahs are rich``, ``mullahs are bastards``, or ``mullahs drive land cruisers``, then unfortunately he exposes himself to broad statements from others as well. A non-pajero owning mullah would be just as infuriated if he were to read mantolives statements :) So in that way, Malik99`s statement simply seems to show the other side of the picture, i think.
Having lived in US for many years, I too have developed an intense hatered towards these broad general statements which casts an entire group of people in the same net. An example of which Mantolives would find if he were to visit US is that americans these days are making broad statements as well. They are saying ``muslims are terrorists``. Pure and simple!! No distinctions and no qualifications. Even within Pakistan I have seen people making broad statements like calling christians ``jamadaars`` or ``choorah`` - even though a vast majority of them are not associated with that profession. But the intent is to not cause our brains much work in taking individuals at their own merit and simply cast them all in one lump.
Having lived in US for many years, I too have developed an intense hatered towards these broad general statements which casts an entire group of people in the same net. An example of which Mantolives would find if he were to visit US is that americans these days are making broad statements as well. They are saying ``muslims are terrorists``. Pure and simple!! No distinctions and no qualifications. Even within Pakistan I have seen people making broad statements like calling christians ``jamadaars`` or ``choorah`` - even though a vast majority of them are not associated with that profession. But the intent is to not cause our brains much work in taking individuals at their own merit and simply cast them all in one lump.
#110 Posted by SameerJB on June 28, 2004 9:49:17 pm
While some chowkies cheer for his every act, Pakistan Bar Council has other ideas.
From ``The Times``
PBC approves Musharraf’s ‘trial’ for treason
By Mohammad Kamran
ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Bar Council will conduct a ‘shadow trial’ of President Pervez Musharraf under Article 6 for ‘subverting’ the Constitution of 1973 and for the military coup of October 12, 1999.
The chief justice of Pakistan and a veteran constitutional expert will also be tried, the PBC decided at its 147th meeting on Monday. All the representative members of the bar attended the PBC meeting and the decision was endorsed unanimously.
“General Pervez Musharraf, Irshad Hasan Khan and Syed Sharifuddin Pirzada will be tried under Article 6 of the Constitution of 1973 in a high-treason case for abrogating the Constitution by abusing their authority and expertise,” a source who attended the meeting told Daily Times. The trial committee has been asked to finalise the modalities for the trial within a month, sources said.
“The purpose of this exercise is to set a precedent to warn all prospective dictators,” a meeting participant said. The trial will likely be in early August, said the sources. They added that the panel of jurists, prosecutor general and attorneys were being finalised.
#111 Posted by rozaiba on June 28, 2004 9:49:17 pm
feroz:
Yes, we do disagree.
my last post to you was written to show 1) your contradiction when you say you support the buiding of institutions. and 2) to ask why and how the presidential system would be any better. In your last post addressed to me, you did not refute 1) nor did you provide an answer to 2).
Anyhow, we all know how screwed up Pakistan is. it has all the classic attributes of a banana republic.
Yes, politicians have screwed institutions. But their role has been far less negative. If NS`s gundas stormed the Supreme Court, the Faujiz have stormed the entire country and ripped up the Constitution at will. They`ve done ten times worse.
My whole argument (as these are mere arguments for ideas) is based on dissing those policies and entities that crush institutional development. And no one does more so than Faujiz.
Regardless, one should not give up hope, as the more the faujiz tinker the sooner the fauji-created edifice will come crumbling down.
Yes, we do disagree.
my last post to you was written to show 1) your contradiction when you say you support the buiding of institutions. and 2) to ask why and how the presidential system would be any better. In your last post addressed to me, you did not refute 1) nor did you provide an answer to 2).
Anyhow, we all know how screwed up Pakistan is. it has all the classic attributes of a banana republic.
Yes, politicians have screwed institutions. But their role has been far less negative. If NS`s gundas stormed the Supreme Court, the Faujiz have stormed the entire country and ripped up the Constitution at will. They`ve done ten times worse.
My whole argument (as these are mere arguments for ideas) is based on dissing those policies and entities that crush institutional development. And no one does more so than Faujiz.
Regardless, one should not give up hope, as the more the faujiz tinker the sooner the fauji-created edifice will come crumbling down.
#112 Posted by sattar2 on June 28, 2004 9:49:17 pm
#78 by Urstruly on June 27, 2004 8:37pm PT
”Salzar
My neighbor swears that begum sehba musharaf is a quadiani. She was his neighbor at Hyderabad and was a schoolteacher when Mushsraf proposed.”
Sheer foolishness of our deluded mullah knows no bounds. Here the country is going to hell … and our resident imam is losing sleep over which way the dictator’s wife faces when praying. And they want to be in charge of running the country. WTF???
... And these are the same village idiots who are seen arguing at the JFK with the PIA crew … insisting that a lotta should not count as a carry-on item ……… and yes … your airhostess … that “nau jawan larki, huma …” does not give a flip about your brother-in-law working in UAE …… nor how often you visit him ... and how many times you performed ummrah while you were there … so shut the $%^# up …
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- dost_mittar: HP#165: "It is clearly that... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- nb: sorry for the double... The Future of Indo
- nb: Mr Amin, I haven't... The Future of Indo
- nb: Mr Amin, I haven't... The Future of Indo
- borivili_express: is this dost mittar... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- dost_mittar: "When he returned home... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- stuka: Well, Zardari spoke and... The Future of Indo
- dost_mittar: tahmed32: "As for your question... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content